Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Paper For A - 3
Paper For A - 3
Paper For A - 3
ORIGINAL PAPER
Received: 27 February 1998 / Received revision: 21 August 1998 / Accepted: 3 September 1998
Abstract Previous investigations have reported that laboratory conditions (Mattoni et al. 1971; Mesland
bacterial suspension cultures grow to higher stationary 1987; Mennigmann and Lange 1988; Klaus et al. 1994,
concentrations in space ¯ight than on Earth; however, 1997). Mennigmann and Lange (1988) found that
none of these investigations included extensive ground B. subtilis suspension cultures grown in space had an
controls under varied inertial conditions. This study increase in growth rate and total biomass yield. Also,
includes extensive controls and cell-growth data taken at Klaus et al. (1997) found that E. coli, cultivated in space,
several times during lag phase, log phase, and stationary had a cell population that was an average of 88% higher
phase of Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis. The than controls. Several of these studies were performed in
Marquardt-Levenberg, least-squares ®tting algorithm the same ¯ight hardware as used in the experiments
was used to calculate kinetic growth parameters from described below, and the E. coli strain was identical.
the logistic bacterial growth equations for space-¯ight However, Bouloc and D'Ari (1991) reported no dier-
and control growth curves. Space-¯ight cultures grew to ences in ¯ight and ground E. coli bacterial cell biomass
higher stationary-phase concentrations and had shorter concentrations.
lag-phase durations. Also, evidence was found for in- Most of these earlier investigations did not include
creased exponential growth rate in space. extensive ground-control cultures modeling various ¯uid
and inertial conditions nor were data collected several
times throughout the growth cycle of the bacterial cul-
Introduction tures. Therefore, the current study includes both exten-
sive control culture conditions and cell-growth data
Microgravity research oers an opportunity to investi- taken several times throughout the growth cycle of B.
gate the relative roles of diusion and metabolic rate in subtilis and E. coli. The space-¯ight and control data
biomass synthesis in the absence of any convective were analyzed on the basis of the logistic bacterial
forces, such as agitation which is normally provided to growth equation (Bailey and Ollis 1986). This analysis
keep cells suspended and sedimentation that moves cells technique, along with high-precision, baseline laborato-
through fresh medium but ultimately crowds them at the ry data, aids the determination of the kinetic parameters
bottom of the vessel. Therefore, the objective of this for both B. subtilis and E. coli when grown in space, even
research was to develop a complete set of experimental with limited data. According to this analysis, cultures in
growth curves for Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis space ¯ight grew to higher ®nal cell concentrations (cs)
under varying inertial conditions including microgravity. with apparently increased growth rates (l) during com-
Investigations of the growth of bacteria in space ¯ight parable exponential growth periods (te), and had ap-
have generally reported higher ®nal cell concentrations parently shorter lag periods (tl).
in space ¯ight than under normal unit-gravity (1 g)
1994). The latter could be less aected by inertial forces because At the appropriate intervals (approximately every 4±8 h during
swimming produces more movement than sedimentation alone. lag and stationary phases and about every 2 h during log phase),
the absorbance was measured in triplicate at 660 nm. Each culture
was used for only one measurement because the tubes had to be
Culture media completely mixed (by manual shaking and vortexing) to obtain
accurate absorbance readings. Absorbance was transformed into
All bacterial samples were cultured in Vogel-Bonner synthetic cell concentration using calibration curves. These calibration
medium E growth medium (Vogel and Bonner 1956). Prior to curves were obtained from previous experiments in which the ab-
initiation of the space-¯ight experiments, the bacterial inocula were sorbance had been measured, and then a total cell count was per-
held in minimal medium E (carbon source omitted) to minimize formed on the same culture.
metabolic activity. Then, at initiation, the bacteria in the minimal
medium E were mixed into complete medium E that contained
5 g l)1 glucose so that the ®nal concentration of glucose was ap- Experimental cultures for space ¯ight
proximately 4.3 g l)1.
The experiments were performed in the ¯uid processing apparatus
(FPA), space-¯ight quali®ed hardware that allows test-tube ex-
Baseline cultures and cell counting periments to be initiated and terminated in space (Luttges 1992).
Figure 1 illustrates the operation of the FPA and indicates how the
In separate, baseline experiments, samples were cultured in 9-ml samples were loaded. Chamber A of the FPA contained 3.5 ml
test-tubes completely ®lled with log-phase B. subtilis or E. coli cell complete medium E. To be consistent throughout the experiments,
cultures (i.e. no headspace). The baseline experiments were used as 0.5 ml minimal medium E, initially containing 5 ´ 105 cells ml)1
high-precision controls for which the Marquardt-Levenberg algo- (on the basis of hemacytometer counts as just described) of either
rithm was tested to ®t the data precisely to the growth kinetic E. coli or B. subtilis, were loaded into chamber B of the FPA.
equations discussed below. Finally, 1.5 ml absolute ethanol was placed into chamber C. All
Hemacytometer counts of high-density, log-phase stock cul- chambers were completely ®lled with liquid without headspace and
tures were determined, and the appropriate quantity of cells was were completely sealed from other oxygen sources. Therefore, all
diluted into complete medium E to give a starting concentration of oxygen received by the cells was that which was initially dissolved
5 ´ 105 cells ml)1. In Table 1 columns 2 and 3 show the various within the medium. After about 24 h the dissolved oxygen was
inertial conditions and temperatures under which E. coli and depleted (data not shown). This depletion, in the ground experi-
B. subtilis were grown in these studies. The inertial conditions in- ments (performed at 23 °C), coincided with the end portion of the
cluded static 1 g cultures in the vertical and horizontal positions at lag-phase period after which cells continued to multiply in log
both 23 °C and 37 °C, and vertical cultures that were grown on a phase and then reached saturation. Therefore, all subsequent
shaker bath (model 50, Precision Scienti®c Company, Chicago) growth was anaerobic. This information aids the interpretation of
operating at 100 oscillations min)1 and 23 °C. our growth data, since our growth rate is below that generally
Table 1 Growth parameters of Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis l exponential growth rate, tl lag-phase duration, ts stationary-phase
baseline cultures grown at 23 °C or 37 °C in 9-ml test-tubes under entry, te exponential growth period. Cell concentrations were
agitation and sedimentation (above line). Growth kinetic para- measured experimentally. l, tl, ts and te were calculated by applying
meters of E. coli and B. subtilis ¯ight and ground control (static the Marquardt-Levenberg algorithm to the experimental data. C
sedimentation or 1 g) cultures grown at 23 °C or 37 °C in a ¯uid control, used to compare two dierent types of cultures. Quantities
processing apparatus (below line). cs saturation cell concentration, in parentheses indicate the percentage dierence from the control
Scienti®c, Calif.). Inputs to the algorithm were time (t), the cor-
responding average cell density (ct), and the standard deviation of
the corresponding cell density, the inverse square of which was
used as the weighting function for each data point. Equations 1±4,
as previously published (Kacena and Todd 1997), were ®tted to
obtain the following parameters: co, the extrapolated cell density at
t 0; cs, the saturated(stationary)-phase cell density; ci, the lag-
phase cell density; and l, the exponential growth rate. After these
best-®t values had been obtained, the following three time pa-
rameters were established: tl, the lag-phase duration; ts, the sta-
tionary-phase entry time; and te, the duration of the exponential
growth phase. Errors were calculated by the propagation of the
measured errors, and signi®cance was determined by a Student's
t-test with P < 0.05.
Results
Baseline experiments
gravity at 37 °C had a ®nal cell population that averaged ¯ight than on the ground. However, B. subtilis samples
325% above that of static 1 g controls. These data at 37 °C experienced essentially identical lag phases ac-
suggest either that, in space, bacteria have more favor- cording to the logistic curve ®ts; the lag phase was
able access to nutrients and better dissemination of shorter in ¯ight, but by only about 5%, which is not
waste products, owing to lack of sedimentation to the statistically signi®cant. The non-signi®cant dierence in
bottom of the culture container (indirect gravity eect), lag-phase duration for B. subtilis cultured at 37 °C, may
or that low gravity causes more ecient metabolism of possibly be explained by the motility of B. subtilis cells
nutrients, and cells can multiply more often before the (compared to less motile E. coli cells grown at 37 °C) in
nutrients are exhausted (direct gravity eect). This dis- combination with the higher temperature (compared to
tinction was tested in other experiments. the B. subtilis cells grown at 23 °C). The exact duration
Studies using the same bacterial strains, grown in the of the lag phase for all cases, associated errors, and
same hardware modi®ed for agar cultures, and ¯own on percentage dierence from the control (Table 1) may
the same Space Shuttle missions showed that cultures on demonstrate a shortened lag phase in E. coli (37 °C) and
solid agar substrates grew to statistically identical ®nal B. subtilis (23 °C) where the dierences are shown to be
cell concentrations in space and on Earth (Kacena et al. signi®cant. Klaus et al. (1994, 1997) also noted a de-
1997). Therefore, it would appear that space-¯own crease in lag-phase duration for E. coli grown in space
bacteria do not have more ecient metabolic capabili- with absorbance monitoring; however, this decrease was
ties in view of a lack of enhanced growth on agar. not reported to be signi®cant. In a separate study by
The closest analogy in biotechnology practice to TheÂvenet and associates (1996), the E. coli cultures
quiescent suspension, such as occurs in microgravity, is grown in space also appeared to have a reduced lag
fed-batch fermentation. At very high glucose levels, too period. In any case, there is no evidence supporting a
much acetate and/or lactate is produced, and biomass prolonged lag period in low gravity.
synthesis is attenuated (Crabtree eect). When the glu-
cose concentration is held low by batch feeding, more
biomass is synthesized (Frude et al. 1994; Todd and Growth rate
Klaus 1995). Similarly, in low gravity without agitation,
the cell depletes its immediate unstirred surroundings of Growth rate determinations were very dicult in space-
glucose thereby dropping the glucose concentration to ¯ight experiments, in which data intervals exceeded 1/l.
an eventual steady-state value based on the material Nevertheless, it can be inferred, not only from the values
balance between the transport (diusion) rate to the cell of l in the logistic curve ®ts, but also from straight lines
and the rate of substrate consumption. Indeed, when connecting ci to cs on the 37 °C growth curves for E. coli
glucose is fed to bacterial suspension cultures at a lower and B. subtilis, that both cell types grew more rapidly in
concentration than is used in single-batch fermentations, the space cultures. B. subtilis cultures at 23 °C exhibited
higher cell densities are achieved. In the absence of a signi®cantly higher growth rate, on the basis of a data
mixing, cells are expected to deplete glucose in their set with more log-phase measurements, but the dier-
immediate environment and should therefore also be ence was not as large (23%). These data suggest that
expected to grow to higher cell densities. In the presence space-¯own, bacterial cultures grow more rapidly than
of gravity this does not occur, because cells sediment, simultaneous controls.
become overcrowded, and rapidly deplete precursor In another study, Gasset et al. (1994) examined the
pools. This appears to be con®rmed by the baseline growth of E. coli by taking absorbance measurements on
studies. Static 1 g E. coli cultures had a ®nal cell con- samples that had been terminated (by decreasing the
centration that was signi®cantly lower (13%) than temperature) at 6 assay times. They calculated the
simultaneous 1 g shaker-bath samples. It is possible that doubling time to be 46 min in ¯ight and 59 min on
the shaker samples have better access to nutrients while Earth. Also, they found that the ¯ight cultures entered
the cells are falling to the bottom of the culture vessel stationary phase 9 h earlier than did the ground sam-
(zig-zag pattern) and, once sedimented, the shaking ac- ples. They believed this was due to either a more rapid
tion allows more cell layers than just the top layers to be growth rate or a shorter lag period; but, because the
exposed to the nutrients. There was no signi®cant dif- dierences were not considered signi®cant, they con-
ference between baseline 1 g and shaker B. subtilis cluded that space ¯ight had ``no eect on the growth rate
studies, probably because of the motility of B. subtilis of exponentially growing E. coli cells''. Mennigmann
cells. and Lange (1988) studied B. subtilis cultures in space
(via absorbance measurements) and found them to have
a higher growth rate and ®nal biomass yield than con-
Lag-phase duration trols. Overall, evidence has been found that is consistent
with a higher growth rate in E. coli and B. subtilis sus-
B. subtilis cultures at 23 °C had much shorter lag phases pension cultures in low gravity.
in ¯ight than on the ground, as re¯ected by a succession
of data prior to growth (Fig. 3C). At 37 °C, E. coli Acknowledgements This work was supported by NASA grant
cultures also appeared to have shorter lag phases in NAGW-1197, Achievement Rewards for College Scientists, and the
234
Zonta International Foundation. We would like to thank Pat Klaus D, Simske S, Todd P, Stodieck L (1997) Investigation of
Leonard, John Doyle, Dave Hanna, Doug Kacena, Sue Ellis, and space ¯ight eects on E. coli and a proposed model of under-
Emily Wilson for their help over a 2-year period and Mike Pecaut lying physical mechanisms. Microbiology 143: 449±455
and Elizabeth Stephenson for taking readings over the weekend Luttges MW (1992) Recognizing and optimizing ¯ight opportuni-
after Thanksgiving Day. ties with hardware and life sciences limitations. Trans Kansas
Acad Sci 95: 76±86
Marquardt DW (1963) An algorithm for least squares estimation of
non-linear parameters. J Soc Ind Appl Math 11: 431±441
References Mattoni RH, Ebersold WT, Eiserling FA, Keller ED, Roming WR
(1971) Induction of lysogenic bacteria in the space environment.
Bailey JE, Ollis DF (1986) Biochemical engineering fundamentals, In: Saunders JW (ed) The experiments of biosatellite II. NASA
2nd edn. McGraw Hill, New York, NY SP-104. pp 304±324
Bouloc P, D'Ari R (1991) Escherichia coli metabolism in space. Mennigmann HD, Lange M (1988) Growth and dierentiation of
J Gen Microbiol 137: 2839±2843 Bacillus subtilis under microgravity conditions. In: Longdon
Frude MJ, Read A, Kennedy LD (1994) Scale-up production of a N, David V (eds) Biorack on Spacelab D1: an overview of the
recombinant Mycobacterium leprae antigen. Ann NY Acad Sci ®rst ¯ight of Biorack, an ESA Facility for Life Sciences Re-
72: 100±104 search in Microgravity, ESA SP-1091. Noordwijk, Nether-
Gasset G, Tixador R, Eche B, Lapchine L, Moatti N, Toorop P, lands, pp 37±44
Woldringh C (1994) Growth and division of Escherichia coli Mesland DAM (1987) Biorack experiments in Spacelab D-1 and
under microgravity conditions. Res Microbiol 145: 111±120 IML-1: further developments in gravitational biology. In:
Holt JG, Krieg NR, Sneath PHA, Staley JT, Williams ST (1994) Proceedings of the 3rd European Symposium on Life Sciences
Facultatively anaerobic gram negative rods. In: Hensyl WR Research in Space. pp 307±312
(ed) Bergey's manual of determinative bacteriology, 9th edn. TheÂvenet D, D'Ari R, Bouloc P (1996) The SIGNAL experiment in
Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, Md, p 179 Biorack: Escherichia coli in microgravity. J Biotechnol 47:
Kacena M, Todd P (1997) Growth characteristics of E. coli and B. 89±97
subtilis cultured on an agar substrate in microgravity. Micro- Todd P, Klaus DM (1995) Theories and models on the biology of
gravity Sci Technol 10: 58±62 cells in space. Adv Space Res 17: 3±10
Kacena MA, Leonard PE, Todd P, Luttges MW (1997) Low Turnbull P, Kramer J, Melling J (1990) Bacillus. In: Parker MT,
gravity and inertial eects on the growth of E. coli and B. Duerden BI (eds) Topley & Wilson's principles of bacteriology,
subtilis in semi-solid media. Aviat Space Environ Med 68: 1104± virology and immunity, 8th edn. Decker, Philadelphia, Pa,
1108 p 189
Klaus DM, Luttges MW, Stodieck LS (1994) Investigation of space Vogel HJ, Bonner DM (1956) Acetylornithinase of Escherichia coli:
¯ight eects on Escherichia coli growth. SAE Technical Paper partial puri®cation and some properties. J Biol Chem 218: 97±
Series, SAE 941260 106