Professional Documents
Culture Documents
By C. V. Girija Vallabhan, Fellow, ASCE, and Y. C. Das, Member, ASCE
By C. V. Girija Vallabhan, Fellow, ASCE, and Y. C. Das, Member, ASCE
ABSTRACT: The analysis of axisymmetric circular tank foundations has been made
in the past using the classical Winkler model, where the properties of the elastic
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by DAPS LIBRARY on 06/16/13. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
INTRODUCTION
789
GOVERNING EQUATIONS
-J f q{
.2ir
. dw
r)wrdrdd <Mt M — rde. (1)
Jo dr
Jo Jo
AXIS OF
q' ^^SYMMETRY
Q Q
q(r)
u A
V ^Ttm> ).y
£ J. "• / i,
E,v \H
w
'
• .•-•:.•.•.•;.•.••.:•:.•:.•;•.•:•••.•.•.•!:•;.• >:•;:-.
^ * \ Rigid Boundary
790
du/dr
u/r
(2)
dw/dz
Su/dz + dw/dr
where E and v are the values of Young's modulus of elasticity and Poisson's
ratio of the elastic foundation.
Vlasov assumptions are as follows:
1. The vertical displacement w(r,z) = w(r) • c|>(z) such that <j>(0) = 1 and <$>(H)
= 0.
2. The horizontal displacement u(r,z) is assumed to be zero everywhere in
the elastic foundation.
(6)
(1 + v)(l - 2v) J0 W
791
It = | <p2dz (7)
2(1 + v) Jo
Field Equation for Elastic Foundation
For 0 < z < H
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by DAPS LIBRARY on 06/16/13. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
m d\
~^ ~ "<P = 0 (8)
dz2
with boundary conditions m(d$/dz) • 8<|> = 0 at z = 0, H. Here
m= BLU2 w2rdr (9)
(1 + v)(l - 2v) Jo
and
dw\
— rdr (10)
o \dr)
Here m and n are the additional parameters that describe the behavior of the
elastic foundations. Those derivations for m and n are due to Jones and
Xenophontos (1977). The introduction of a new parameter 7 gives
dw\
. . — I rdr
7\ n 1 - 2 v Jo \dr/
- =- = = (11)
HJ m 2(1-v) f"
w rdr
It is to be noted that 7 is a dimensionless parameter, and substituting Eq.
11 in Eq. 8 and solving the differential equation with appropriate boundary
conditions, we get
z
sinh 7 ( 1
<p(z) = 7T (12)
sinh 7
The variations of <^>(z) for different values of 7 have been shown by many
authors (Vlasov and Leont'ev 1966; Vallabhan and Das 1988) and, hence,
they are not repeated here. Substituting <|)(z) in Eqs. 6 and 7 we get
= £(1
1 — v)i 1 7 /sinh !7 cosh
^ 7 + 1y\
k (13)
(1 + v)(l - 2v) H \ 2 sinh27 /
and
E H /sinh 7 cosh 7 — y\
l
It = ~ (14)
2
2(1 + v) 7 V 2 sinh 7 /
Field Equation for Elastic Foundation at z = 0 for R < r < 00
The field equation outside the plate at z = 0 is
-2tV2w + kw = 0 (15)
792
K0(ar)
w(r) = wR (17)
K0(aR)'
where wR = the lateral displacement of the plate at r = R and K0 is the
modified Bessel function of zero order and a = y/k/2t. The corresponding
shear force along r = R of the foundation on to the plate is given by
dw
N It — = \p2kt wR (18)
dr K0(aR)_
where Xi(a/?) is the modified Bessel function of order one. By using Eq.
18, the boundary condition given by Eq. 5 can be modified as
*i(«R)"
D - (vy> 2t(—) - V2kt K (aR)J wR + Q = 0
0
(19)
dr
In a nutshell, the problem of a circular plate on an elastic foundation is given
by the field equation in Eq. 3, with boundary conditions given in Eqs. 4
and 19.
DETERMINATION OF y PARAMETER
The classical finite difference method is employed to solve the field equa-
tion given in Eq. 3. Since this equation is a quasi-linear fourth-order dif-
ferential equation, the finite difference equations can be expressed by a qui-
diagonal matrix equation with the five coefficients using the central difference
formula in the following form
a,wt-2 + bjwt-i + cjWi + di\vi+1 + eiWi+2 = ft (21)
where
h
1 - - (22a)
r,-
793
dl
r, rf 2rj D \ 2r,
h
e,= 1 + - (22c)
n
h4
fi = 9i- (22/)
Using the finite difference techniques, the boundary conditions are also ex-
pressed and incorporated into the field equations. Special numerical tech-
niques were used to evaluate the modified Bessel functions K0 and Ki ("Sci-
entific Subroutine" 1966). At r = 0, Eq. 21 becomes singular, and, hence,
the boundary conditions, are to be modified slightly. It can be shown that
the boundary conditions at r = 0 are
dw
— =0 (23a)
dr
dAw d2w
—T-2t— + kw = q (23b)
dr dr
NUMERICAL EXAMPLES
E = 3x103psl
v = 0.2
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by DAPS LIBRARY on 06/16/13. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
H = 10ft
Three cases of loadings were used in the analysis, where all other data
regarding geometry and material properties were kept the same.
FURTHER CAPABILITIES
where Et and E2 are the elastic constants of the soil at the top and bottom
of the layer. By replacing Eqs. 13 and 14 with Eqs. 24 and 25, respectively,
we can analyze circular tanks on elastic foundations with linearly varying
795
-2.0
-1.0
0.0
II 2.0
Y = 2.94
k = 731827 p/ln?
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0 FEM
796
CONCLUSIONS
1. The vertical displacement patterns for the case of uniformly distributed load
are almost parallel. The Vlasov model gave lower displacements than the finite
element model, naturally. Since the displacements are parallel, the bending mo-
ments and shear forces in the plate from both models will compare well.
2. The differences between the two solutions for the vertical displacements
increased for the case of concentrated load and the edge moment.
3. The values of k, 2t, and -y for the system depend on the material properties
and geometry of the plate and the soil and the loading.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was performed as a part of the research project on the analysis
of laminated plates sponsored by the National Science Foundation under grant
number CES-8803146. The support of Eleonora Sabadell is gratefully ac-
knowledged. Also, the writers wish to extend their thanks to Richard Dil-
lingham, for his assistance in editorial work, and Rebecca Foster, for typing
the manuscript.
APPENDIX. REFERENCES
797