Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dawn 25 July, 2020 by M.Usman and Rabia K PDF
Dawn 25 July, 2020 by M.Usman and Rabia K PDF
Dawn 25 July, 2020 by M.Usman and Rabia K PDF
Our Policy
We provide you with best quality analysis of Dawn newspaper on daily basis. The reason
behind this endeavor is clear as our policy is to educate you. Knowing the current issues of
Pakistan_ domestic and external is imperative for Civil service aspirants. Unlike India, in
Pakistan no such digital platform or academic work is available for aspirants' ease of
preparation. So, follow these instructions: Read these editorials and Opinions carefully and
keenly. These are important for widening your knowledge base, improving language skills,
understanding key issues, etc. This section(Editorial/ Opinions) is very useful for English
Essay, Current Affairs, Pakistan Affairs – and sometimes Islamiat – papers as they emphasize
more on analysis than facts. (Icep Analyst)
💬 To The Point
▪ Competitive Exams
▪ Essay Writing
▪ Current Affairs
▪ Pakistan Affairs
▪ Global Issues
▪ Geopolitics
▪ International Relations
▪ Foreign Policy
✍️Presented By:
M.Usman & Rabia K
COLOURS Used:
THE federal government’s decision to set up the Real Estate Regulatory Authority is
expected to deliver effective and fair regulations in the country’s fragmented, undocumented
real estate market.
Key Points:
Prime Minister Imran Khan’s directive for the creation of the proposed authority has
reinforced hopes that his government is serious about regulating the informal real estate
market in order to realise its true potential and boost economic growth. The development of
a robust (strong) regulatory framework is crucial to creating an enabling environment for a
vibrant, secure and reliable real estate market, and the proposed regulator is vital to its
smooth implementation.
▪ The success of the government’s fiscal and monetary incentives for the construction
industry largely hinges on (depends on) the early implementation of a transparent
regulatory framework. The growth of a healthy mortgage industry is also linked to
the enforcement of a clear regulatory framework to mitigate risks to creditors.
Pakistan’s real estate market largely operates in the informal economy and is
plagued(troubled) with numerous issues owing to the absence of an effective regulatory
framework that could protect the interests of all stakeholders — buyers, sellers, developers,
builders, tenants, etc. The lack of regulations often draws the stakeholders into long court
battles over property frauds and ownership/tenancy disputes, repels potential investors
because of unclear land titles and undermines public confidence in real estate. More
important, tax revenue collected from this sector remains far below its true potential because
over the past few decades real estate/property has become a haven for tax evaders to park
huge amounts of illegal money. In recent years, the government has taken several measures
to regulate the real estate market in order to document it and increase tax revenues.
However, these steps have met with limited to no success owing to the absence of a
coordinated effort, and a non-existent regulatory and policy framework to streamline the
market
Conclusion:__So far the scope and coverage of the proposed authority remains unclear.
Nevertheless, it is expected to introduce the country’s real estate market to international best
practices so that it can realise its untapped( unutilized) potential. In addition to
streamlining, harmonising and modernising tedious processes and laws related to land and
property development, it will be required to enrol builders, developers and real estate agents
to properly document them so that it can swiftly find a remedy to their problems, as well as
to protect the rights of consumers and tenants. The new body will be expected to work
closely with all stakeholders and act as a bridge between the government and private sector
in order to formulate policies and develop strategies to bolster (strengthen) the real estate
market by removing impediments. Once the government has delivered a transparent
investment ecosystem and a real estate market regulated by an efficient body, it will not be
difficult for it to attract much-needed foreign investors to this sector.
Q: What Decision has the federal Government taken about real estate market?
Ans: THE federal government has taken decision to set up the Real Estate Regulatory
Authority.
Ans: Currently, the country’s fragmented, undocumented real estate market is full of
problems. So,the development of a robust regulatory framework is crucial to creating an
enabling environment for a vibrant, secure and reliable real estate market, and the proposed
regulator is vital to its smooth implementation.
1. Informal cnomy:
The informal economy is the diversified set of economic activities, enterprises, jobs, and
workers that are not regulated or protected by the state. Similarly, Pakistan’s real estate
market largely operates in the informal economy, thus the industry hasn’t yet reached to its
full potential.
Pakistan's real estate market lacks an effective regulatory framework that could protect the
interests of all stakeholders — buyers, sellers, developers, builders, tenants, etc.
The lack of regulations often draws the stakeholders into long court battles over property
frauds and ownership/tenancy disputes, repels potential investors because of unclear land
titles and undermines public confidence in real estate.
Tax revenue collection from this sector remains far below its true potential because over the
past few decades real estate/property has become a haven for tax evaders to park huge
amounts of illegal money.
Ans: It is expected to introduce the country’s real estate market to international best
practices so that it can realise its untapped potential.
In addition to streamlining, harmonising and modernising tedious processes and laws related
to land and property development, it will be required to enrol builders, developers and real
estate agents to properly document them so that it can swiftly find a remedy to their
problems, as well as to protect the rights of consumers and tenants. The new body will be
expected to work closely with all stakeholders and act as a bridge between the government
and private sector in order to formulate policies and develop strategies to bolster the real
estate market by removing impediments.
THE season of moral policing and censorship is yet again upon us. In a fresh move to
clamp down(restrict) on digital platforms, the PTA has banned video-streaming app Bigo
and issued a final notice to short video app TikTok for allegedly encouraging “immoral,
obscene and vulgar content”. (A ban on the online game PUBG has just been lifted by the
court.)
The regulator has said that despite communicating its reservations to both companies, it was
not satisfied with their responses. Therefore, it said, PTA had decided to immediately block
Bigo and issue a final warning to TikTok “to control obscenity, vulgarity and immorality”
on its app.
Worryingly, the Supreme Court has separately taken notice of ‘objectionable’ content on
YouTube. The court regretted that people using the social media platform “incite people
against the judiciary, the armed forces and the government” adding that “we are showing
restraint but this has to come to an end”. The objections appear to have sparked fears that
YouTube may be blocked in the country — as in 2012 when the platform was banned for
four years.
Critical Analysis:
PTA’s message that content on these platforms is “vulgar and obscene” is ambiguous. While
there is no doubt that online content which falls under the category of death threats, hate
speech and sexual violence must be reported and taken up with these platforms, the
regulator’s reasoning that these channels feature material that “have a negative effect on
society” is vague and reeks(be suggestive) of moral policing.
What are the regulator’s specific concerns? If they are about child pornography and explicit
videos of minors, it must communicate this to the company.
TikTok maintains that it has deleted 3.7m videos from Pakistan for violating its community
guidelines in a crackdown against content featuring nudity or sexual activity. If the company
appears to be open to taking action against content which is deemed criminal, the
government must engage with these platforms so that concerns can be communicated
effectively.
Conclusion:
As the Digital Rights Foundation put it, the justification of such bans to ‘protect’ children
is akin (similar) to banning highways to prevent road accidents. Similarly, any move to
ban a platform like YouTube, too, would be counterproductive; the earlier ban severely
hurt content creators who later flourished by monetising their content. The state must not
dictate morality to the people, especially when these apps are avenues for learning, income
generation and creative expression by young people who are devoid of entertainment and
opportunities.
"The repression of my rights and coercion of your ethical norms to forcefully align my
behavior and suit it to your criteria of 'acceptable conduct', through violent or illegal
means."
On the flip side, one may also define moral policing as:
Which of the above two definitions is right? If you have been on the receiving end,
you would propagate the first definition; if you are driven by a desire to help society
by implementation of small, but stringent rules, you would firmly stand by the latter.
Mr. Y: Trying to curb carnal desires through regulating public displays of affection is
moral policing.
The amusing thing is that both parties feel that they are right; and that 'THEIR
TRUTH' is 'THE TRUTH'.
Why can't both be right? Why can't both be wrong? Since it is easier to live on with
our prejudices and biases, illusions and perceptions rather than understand our
opposition's perspective, conflicts are created and continued everywhere, including
Moral Policing.
THE issue of security of nuclear facilities is a very sensitive one, and countries need to
constantly upgrade their protocols to ensure fool-proof measures are in place to protect sites.
There is reassuring news where Pakistan’s atomic facilities are concerned, as a recent
American study has rated this country’s protocols favourably.
Key points:
▪ According to the Nuclear Threat Initiative, which conducted the study, Pakistan
has improved the most in nuclear security and in fact overall, this country is
ahead of India in the rankings. The study says that Pakistan “improved its overall
score by adopting new on-site protection and cybersecurity regulations, improving
insider threat protection measures and more”.
Detailed Analysis:
This analysis from an independent concern should put to rest any irresponsible conjecture
that questions the safety protocols of Pakistan’s nuclear programme. Moreover, on a visit
to Karachi in 2018, then IAEA head Yukiya Amano had said that the metropolis’s
nuclear plants were “heavily protected” and that Pakistan was “committed to nuclear
safety”.
▪ While the US body has praised Pakistan’s progress on nuclear security, it has also
sounded the alarm regarding the “decline in the rate of improvement to national
regulatory structures and the global nuclear security architecture”.
Basically, the institute is worried that geopolitical friction and the fallout of the Covid-19
pandemic was weakening global cooperation in the realm of nuclear security. Perhaps
this should serve as a moment to ponder the future of atomic power, both for energy and
weapons, for the global community. The risks associated with nuclear energy are far too
great, compared to its advantages, and the world should think about shifting to safer, more
environment-friendly alternatives.
Japan’s Fukushima disaster of 2011 serves as a reminder of what can go wrong at even
the best protected sites should a natural disaster strike. Moreover, when some states insist on
being exclusive members of the nuclear club, this causes others — with legitimate security
concerns — to proliferate to protect themselves.
Suggestion:
Perhaps in the best interest of mankind, it would be better to rethink nuclear power.
In addition to,
Furthermore,
On the other hand,
Moreover,
In contrast,
However,
Likewise,
Personally speaking?
Morally speaking,
Legally speaking,
Ethically speaking,
Strictly speaking,
Softly speaking,
On a serious note,
Thesis Statement:
The Treaty of Sèvres, imposed by the Allies on the Ottoman Empire after World War I, had
virtually destroyed Turkey as a national state. The treaty was not recognised by the nationalist
government under Mustafa Kemal Pasha (later known as Ataturk). After the nationalist victory
over the Greeks and the overthrow of the Sultan during the War of Independence, Ataturk’s
government was in a position to request a new peace treaty. Accordingly, the signatories of the
Treaty of Sevres and delegates of the USSR (excluded from the previous treaty) met at Lausanne,
Switzerland. After lengthy negotiations, a peace treaty was signed in 1923.
A peace treaty officially The modern Turkish Republic was A treaty, part of the Versailles
concluding World War I in Peace Settlement, signed
founded according to this Treaty between the Allies and
the Middle East, signed
between Turkey, heir to the of Lausanne 1923. Britain has Turkey, effectively marking
defunct Ottoman Empire, and developed several unfair and the end of the Ottoman
the Allied Powers, including painful conditions to the rights of empire. Adrianople and most
Britain, France, Italy and of the hinterland to
the Ottoman Empire, such as the Constantinople (now Istanbul)
Japan. The treaty was signed
in Lausanne, Switzerland on
abolition of the caliphate, and the passed to Greece; the
24 July 1923. It replaced the exile of the caliph and his family Bosporus was
1920 Treaty of Sèvres, one of outside of Turkey, and the internationalized and
the treaties signed in the wake demilitarized; a short-lived
confiscation of all his assets and independent Armenia was
of the Paris Peace Conference, the declaration of a secular state, created; Syria became a
that gave the Allies effective
control over large parts of
and to prevent Turkey from oil French mandate; and Britain
exploration and to consider the accepted the mandate for Iraq,
Turkey, following the Turkish
Palestine, and Transjordan.
War of Independence. The Bosphorus Strait which links The treaty was rejected by
treaty contained a recognition between the Black Sea and the Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, who
of Turkish sovereignty in its Marmara Sea, and then to the secured a redefinition of
current borders by the Allies, Turkey's borders by the Treaty
in exchange to an official Mediterranean as an international
of Lausanne (see Versailles
waiver of Turkish claims to corridor which it is not entitled to Peace Settlement).
the rest of the former Ottoman Turkey to obtain fees/tax from
Empire ships passing through it.
The Turks have never forgotten the Treaty of Lausanne, which caused the reduction of the
geography of the modern Turkish state and forced it to give up large territories that were
belonging to it.
We can understand some aspects of the ongoing differences between Turkey and the West.
Western countries fear that if the treaty were to not exist, Turkey would find the justification
for its intervention in Mosul, which has belonged to Turkey over four centuries until it lost it
in the First World War.
All Muslim Countries need to take a collective action against West propagandas:
Turkey has to call for fraternity beyond favourable relations among Muslims by suggesting
that Muslim countries should mobilise to cooperate in technical, trade, cultural, and social
affairs. All Muslim countries have to stand for “International Solidarity Day against
Islamophobia” and raise their voice against growing anti-Muslim sentiment. All Muslim
countries have to establish a joint media and communications center against anti-Muslim
racism. Anti-Muslim hatred has significantly risen in Europe in recent years. Far-right
extremism and xenophobia have fueled anti-Muslim hatred in Western countries, where
terror attacks by Daesh and Al-Qaida are used as an excuse to legitimise those views.
Touching upon the Palestine issue, all Muslim countries should also take a determined
stance against Israel’s injustice. By not respecting the Palestinian people’s right to live and
work in peace, Israel is jeopardizing (puts in danger) the future of the world and the
region.
Conclusion:
Thee only condition to overcome the crisis in the Islamic world is unity, solidarity, and
alliance. We can resolve every problem as long as we are united. If we (as Muslims) act
together, we will end the loneliness of Palestine which has continued for nearly one century.
It is possible to end the bloodshed in Iraq and the deaths of Syrian and Kashmiri children if
we unite under the leadership of Turkey.
Asfan Tariq
The writer is a civil servant at the Punjab Civil Secretariat. He can be reached
asfantariq@gmail.com and tweets @asfantariq.
Thesis Statement
The USA is reeling as a result of the economic downturn and global isolation
triggered by the coronavirus. Beijing senses US vulnerability, feels capable of
confronting the USA, and is finding a time to forge a strategic agreement with
Iran. The Comprehensive Strategic Partnership between the Islamic Republic of
Iran and the People’s Republic of China, consisting of 20 articles and Chinese
investment in Iran of $400 billion over 25 years, with $280 billion for the
development of Iran’s petrochemical sectors and another $120 billion for the
country’s transportation and manufacturing infrastructure, covers banking,
commerce and services, transportation and railway, ports, energy, industry, and
dozens of other projects.
To benefit from Chinese investment and infrastructure projects and confront US domination
in the world, Iran has rightly capitalized on China’s growing influence across;
Iran, which has a vision of non-alignment with the slogan of neither East nor West since the
1979 revolution toppling its pro-US monarch, is steadily turning towards Asia as part of its
Look East strategy. As in 2019, Iran, China, and Russia conducted a joint military
exercise in the Gulf of Oman.
Moreover, Iran requires both China and Russia, with veto power in the UN Security
Council, to neutralize US hegemony, and to prevent any kind of sanctions by the United
Nations backed by the USA. Furthermore, an insatiable oil demand and military and civilian
technology pushes Iran toward alliance with the rising superpower.
The Sino-Iranian deal, if enforced as planned, would more effectively end Iran’s non-
alignment and incorporate Iran into the framework of Eurasia. This strategic shift and
incorporation into the Eurasia region indicates Iran has the capacity to find economic
partners and energy consumers among major economies of the continent to quench its thirst
for economic progress.
Iran welcomed US and European companies into the country, including many energy
companies, after the nuclear deal was signed in 2015, which offered to buy oil and gas.
However, the response to Iranian offers by Western states under pressure from the USA was
inhospitable. Washington was not interested in improving relations, but instead wanted
regime change in Tehran. The Iranian leadership soon smelled a rat.(idiom:be doubtful)
The infusion of a significant amount of cash into its economy, especially its energy
sector ($280 billion) and manufacturing and transport infrastructure ($120 billion) would be
a boost for Iran’s ailing economy and ease its economic burden. No doubt it will create more
jobs in Islamic Republic of Iran and more industrial growth. Iran’s deal with China is
expected to relieve domestic opposition too. Economic and political progress would boost
the regional status of Iran and perhaps allow opponents to reduce tensions with Tehran. Arab
states might rush to make their own special deals with China.
Iran, which has much of the world’s oil reserves and is one of the top five producers of
natural gas, had to face an economic shrinkage of around 10 percent, largely due to the
reintroduction of US sanctions. Because of the covid-19 outbreak, Iran ‘s economy was hit
hard by the lowering of oil and gas roduction. Oil output and revenues have plummeted—
falling from nearly 4 million bpd in 2018 to just 2 million bpd nowadays, as reported by The
New York Times.
Similarly, the Sino-Iranian deal will help provide Iran with a bargaining lever with
Europe and the USA over easing sanctions as the West will divert its attention towards
this holistic agreement. China’s greater interest in Iran should alert the USA to review its
past approach towards Tehran. It would also serve as a balancing factor in the normalization
of relations between the West and Beijing, which due to the coronavirus and their trade war
is at the lowest ebb.
14 ICEP Dawn Analysis
Beijing, on the other hand, is a big winner and plays a longer game. At Iranian ports, it
could enjoy preferential treatment and develop free-trade zones around the country. It will
also include discounts for Iranian oil. Iran is to provide regular and discounted supply of oil
to China for 25 years. China would also develop free-trade zones in Maku, in northwestern
Iran; in Abadan, where the Shatt al-Arab river flows into the Persian Gulf, and on the gulf
island Qeshm.
This agreement promises to greatly enhance China’s position not only in the Middle
East, but also in Central Asia, the Black Sea, the Caspian and the Mediterranean.
Through this route, Beijing would have a land route to Europe.Probably, China will have a
large security footprint at two new ports expected to be established adjacent to the Strait of
Hormuz, through which 30-40 percent of the oil trade passes. Oil supply to its market would
be assured.
The very reason why the US geopolitical supremacy over the world is preserved is the
control of the world’s maritime routes. Among nine key maritime channels, the Gulf of
Hormuz significantly controls the major global outflow of fossil fuels. The Chinese presence
would give it a stranglehold on these waters through which much of the world’s oil transits.
The US assistance to ASEAN countries to limit Beijing’s scope and legitimacy on the
South China Sea would be of no benefit but to give China more options to use.
Similarly, it would be no use for the USA to condemn it over Hong Kong. Providing
military and economic assistance to the South-Eastern partners to contain China and
labelling it violation of the navigation freedom provided under UNCLOS (UN Convention
on the Law of the Sea) would not weaken China ‘s efforts over its territorial claims. China
will certainly consider alternatives.The deal has a provision of China building infrastructure
for 5G telecommunications network in Iran. It would provide an opportunity to Chinese
telecommunications giant Huawei, a company that is facing US sanctions, to enter the
Iranian market.
It would also bolster China’s new digital currency, the e-RMB, as a way to bypass US
financial systems, and reduce the power of the dollar. It would benefit China, the world’s
largest energy consumer. Furthermore, Iran could find a mechanism to sell its oil while
evading US sanctions.Iran having million barrels of oil and gas now a burden on Iran’s
economy to finance oil storage, would ultimately benefit from this deal. If the Iran-China
agreement were implemented, it would revive Iran’s economy and consequently stabilise its
politics. On the other hand, over the decades, China would have continual energy supply to
materialize its vision of connecting the Eurasian region and challenging the world’s US
unipolarity.
Conclusion:
Yet in global affairs, nothing is everlasting. The US returning to the Iran nuclear deal
and lifting sanctions against Iran, and allowing European and US companies to deal with
Tehran, may avert Iran’s strategic partnership with China.
Thesis Statement:
Absolute poverty is a state of severe deprivation and denial of basic human rights.
Hunger and dispossession affect the entire life cycle, keeping people away from actively
and meaningfully participating in the social, economic and political sphere of life and
bringing immense suffering, pain and psychological effects.
Introduction:
Poverty alleviation must be the first and foremost development policy goal of any
democratic government, with clear time-bound targets and milestones to measure and report
progress.
Unfortunately, poverty alleviation has not attained the level of political priority in Pakistan
given its importance and urgency. Whether media or legislative discussions, one will hardly
find dedicated discourse to make it a part of essential political debate – except some nice but
unattainable documents in dusty official racks.
There have been two major global commitments – the Millennium Development Goals
implemented from 2000 to 2015 and now the Sustainable Development Goals from 2016
to 2030. Poverty alleviation has been the very first goal in both frameworks.
In contrast, the debate in Pakistan has always focused on fabricating and fudging(falsify)
figures to show a reduced number of poor people for political gains rather than a real
decrease in the actual number of poor people. For a long time after adopting the MDGs(see
above) is the debate remained around determining the national poverty line and measuring
it.
▪ Later, the World Bank revised the global poverty line to $1.90. Simultaneously,
the Oxford Poverty & Human Development Initiative started measuring
multidimensional poverty – departing from traditional measures based on food calorie
intake. MPI included fifteen indicators of three broader dimensions of schooling,
health and standard of living to measure wellbeing.
▪ almost one quarter of Pakistan’s population lived below the poverty line and over 38.8
percent population was multidimensionally poor.
▪ In March 2018, the Planning Commission prepared a summary with SDGs
framework, with the baseline poverty figure of 29.50 percent of the population and
aimed to reduce it to 9 percent in the year 2030.
▪ UNU-Wider estimates that the Covid-19 crisis could add 80-400 million new
poor, living under $1.90 per day. These numbers may reverse the gains made over the
last two decades in the fight against poverty. The estimates illustrate a resurgence of
poverty in Bangladesh, India, Indonesia and Pakistan.
What this means is that people were just one shock away from poverty and may easily
be prey to the current Covid crisis. This also means that one out of three children born in
the year 2000, the year of MDGs, will still be living in poverty in 2030, the terminal year of
the SDGs, if serious and targeted efforts are not made. We are not talking about shared
prosperity and wellbeing, just about people having enough to eat for survival.
Given the slower pace of economic recovery this year, the only powerful policy instrument
available with the government is augmenting(increasing) the existing social protection
programme. Pakistan’s SDGs target was to reach 70 percent of people living below the
poverty line through social protection by 2030; this must be brought forward.
This poses a great challenge but also an opportunity. Challenge in the sense to have
registration of all the people who need to be brought under a comprehensive social
protection programme. But taking this challenge will be very instrumental for future targeted
assistance programmes, once there is valid registration and list of people with a unique ID.
Other Measures:
The other important policy measure could be to control the leakage, corruption and
cartelization of essential commodities to neutralize the effect of market manipulation
and artificial price hikes – especially in food items. Timely public-sector interventions in
these areas along with quality assessment and research on the effect of macroeconomic
policies on household level poverty can lead to evidence-based policymaking. Apolitical and
objective analysis can show how exchange rate, policy rate, subsidies, trade, taxation, energy
and fuel prices, and agriculture policy can help or cancel out social protection benefits.
Social protection benefits may help in poverty reduction if not supported with favourable
macroeconomic policy measures – policies such as increase in indirect taxation, food
If children born in the year 2000 remain poor in 2030 as adults and transmit poverty to the
next generation, that demonstrates a collective failure and will inflict a moral wound on our
conscience. Therefore, delaying poverty alleviation is not an option, despite the challenges
posed by the Covid-19 pandemic. We need to fight back with right policies, attaching high
political priority, capitalizing on collective wisdom and forging partnership. A poverty-free
Pakistan is achievable.
Introduction
ON June 29, 2020, at 10.02 am, four terrorists of the Majeed Brigade, a faction of the
Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA), attacked the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX) in Karachi
with weapons and grenades. They had with them dried ration packs, indicating they intended to
take over the place and hold people hostage before killing them. But by 10.12 am, within 10
minutes, before they could enter the premises all four were killed by three well-trained police
commandos.
Two pointers here. One, the civilian police exhibited the capability to neutralise desperate,
well-armed terrorists, on their own, efficiently and effectively.
Foremost Trend
The most noticeable trend is that there has been a consistent, significant reduction in the number
of terrorist attacks by Baloch sub-nationalist groups (BSNGs) since 2015. According to one
estimate, terrorist attacks by BSNGs between 2015 and 2019, came down from 194 in 2015 to
51 in 2019. This is a reduction of 74 per cent in terms of terrorist attacks in the last five years.
This is no mean achievement and, to an extent, speaks volumes for the effectiveness of the
government’s CT measures.(counter terrorism) But one would hasten to add that there is
much criticism of the heavy-handed tactics adopted to achieve the reduction in terrorism, eg the
policy of enforced disappearances and ‘kill-and-dump-the-militants’ approach.
Changes in the nature of Baloch militancy call for a review of our CT strategy.
This brings us to the second new trend in Baloch militancy ie a fundamental change in modus
operandi(method) in terrorist attacks. Earlier, BSNGs used to plant IEDs on railway
tracks/roadsides or carry out kill-and-run tactics. Suicide bombing, the most common tactic
of religiously inspired militants, was never adopted by Baloch militants. This has changed as
Baloch militants have not only resorted to suicide bombings but also conducted more
sophisticated attacks aimed at holding hostages, as in the attacks on the Chinese consulate
(Karachi, 2018), PC Gwadar (2019) and PSX (2020).
It started in 2011 when the Majeed Brigade declared itself a fidayeen group, carrying out
only suicide attacks. The first suicide attack they claimed was in 2011 against Naseer Mengal,
killing 13 persons. Such attacks may not have caused much damage till now but are likely to
continue, and though less in number, attract a lot of media attention here and abroad. Some say
the adoption of suicide bombing by Baloch militants is the direct outcome of the alleged
policy of enforced disappearances and killing militants and then dumping their bodies by
LEAs, besides reliance on excessive force. That is not to deny that this fault line is exploited
by India, Afghanistan and Iran who provide support to these militants.
▪ To counter this, besides neutralising the external factor, we must have a phased
programme of Balochistan’s civilianising internal security by going
for capacity building of police, ultimately replacing the Frontier Kinetic measures
Corps. included mean
▪ Also, there’s a need for a shift in our security paradigm so that non- concentric force,
kinetic measures form the main thrust(strike) of our approach to peak concentric
dealing with Baloch alienation, and kinetic measures are scaled force, and peak
back over time. power.
The third significant recent trend involves the effective leadership of BSNGs shifting from
tribal sardars to the educated middle-class youth. We see this happening in the two most
dangerous Baloch organisations, ie BLA and the Baloch Republican Army. While the former
is formally being headed by London-based Harbiyar Marri, the latter is led by Brahmdagh
Bugti based in Switzerland. The de facto(in practice) leadership of these organisations, which
is leading the fight from Afghanistan, are two militants, Bashir Zeb and Gulzar Imam. Both
are former leaders of the Baloch Students Organisation and belong to the middle class.
The third important Baloch militant organization is the Balochistan Liberation Front (BLF)
headed by Dr Allah Nazar Baloch, a middle-class doctor (MBBS). The main fallout of this
‘non-sardarisation’ of Baloch militant organisations has been seen, for the first time in the
militants’ history, in the form of an alliance between four major groups of militants ie BLA,
These changes in Baloch militancy are fundamental in nature and call for a review of our CT
strategy. The status quo (existing state of affairs) may lead to a reduction in terrorist attacks in
the short run but would also add to the alienation of Baloch youth, driving them, in the long
term, into the fold of those advocating lethal tactics. The sooner we realise this simple fact, the
better.
The writer is a former police officer and Nacta’s first national coordinator.