Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Comparison Between Codes
Comparison Between Codes
CHECKED BY
-عند تصميم العمود يتم حساب اقصى حمل يتحمله العمود و منه يتم حساب مقاومه الضغط
الخرسانى للعمود و مقاومه الضغط الناتج من تسليح العمود كما هو موضح بالمعادله
التالية :
-
-
)Egyptian code (2007
Pu = 0.35*Fcu*Ac+0.67*Asc*Fy
ACI CODE
-و فى الكود االمريكى يتم حساب الحمل الذي يتحمله العمود ومنه يتم عمل تصميم للعمود
-
- COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
Point of comparison ECP ACI BSI
Smin
70mm 25mm 30mm
- COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
Point of comparison ECP ACI BSI
Classification of structure Braced & Unbraced Sway & non- Sway Braced &
according to buckling design. Un Braced
Maximum slenderness ratio. Rec. Circular not braced against side sway Slenderness Limits For
𝐾 𝐿𝑢 Columns 𝐿0 < 60𝑏
Braced 30 25 ≤ 22 Slenderness of
𝑟
Unbraced 23 18 unbraced Columns
100𝑏2
braced against side sway 𝐿0 = ≤ 60𝑏
ℎ
𝐾 𝐿𝑢
≤34 – 12(M1/M2) ≤ 40
𝑟
Neglect slenderness effect if : 𝐿𝑒 = 𝛽𝐿0
𝐾𝐻 Values of 𝛽 for braced
Braced < 15 Non-sway columns
𝑏1 𝑜𝑟 𝑡1 K Lu 𝑀
≤ 34 -12 (𝑀1) ≤ 40
r 2
𝐾𝐻 Sway
Unbraced < 10 𝐾 𝐿𝑢
𝑏1 𝑜𝑟 𝑡1
≤ 22
𝑟
- COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
Point of ECP ACI BSI
comparison
Neglect slenderness فى حالة األعمدة فى المبانى المقيدة جانبيا يؤخذ طولK: effective length factor (for Values of 𝛽 for
مساويا لألصغر منHe االنبعاج braced (non sway) frame ≤ 1 unbraced columns
effect if :
𝐻𝑒 = 𝐻0 0.7 + 0.05 𝛼1 + 𝛼2 ≤ 𝐻0
𝐻𝑒 = 𝐻0 0.85 + 0.05 𝛼𝑚𝑖𝑛 ≤ 𝐻0 Lu: unsupported height of
column from top of floor to the
وفى حالة األعمدة فى المبانى الغير مقيدة جانبيا يؤخذ
bottom of the beams or slab in
مساويا لألصغر منHe طول االنبعاج
the slab above Where:
𝐻𝑒 = 𝐻0 1 + 0.15 𝛼1 + 𝛼2 ≥ 𝐻0
𝐿0: clear height
𝐻𝑒 = 𝐻0 2 + 0.3 𝛼𝑚𝑖𝑛 ≥ 𝐻0 R: radius of gyration, equal to 0.3 between end restraints
and 0.25 times the overall depth b: width of column
𝐸 𝐼
Σ 𝑐 𝑐 of rectangular and circular h: depth of cross
𝐻0
𝐸𝑐 𝐼𝑏 columns , respectively section
α=Σ
𝐿𝑏 𝐿𝑒 :effective height of
𝐻 هو ارتفاع العمود الخالص0 حيث أن M1/M2: ratio of the moments at column
𝛼 عند الطرف1 و 𝑛𝑖𝑚𝛼 هى القيمة األصغر من the two ends of the column
𝛼 عند الطرف العلوى2 السفلى و
- COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
Point of comparison ECP ACI BSI
Cover
-Concrete not exposed to
weather or in contact
with ground:
Primary reinforcement,
Ties, stirrups, spirals………....40
- COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
- Notes:
- Column according to ( ECP ) is unsafe due to large factor of
safety although it is safe according to ( BSI & ACI ).
𝒅 𝒅 𝒅
Critical Section 𝐴𝑡 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝐴𝑡 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝐴𝑡 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑡ℎ𝑒
𝟐 𝟐 𝟐
𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡
𝑓𝑐𝑢
Max. strength ∗ 𝑞𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 0.7 N/𝑚𝑚2 ∗ 𝑉𝑚𝑎𝑥 = ∅8 𝑓′𝑐 𝑏𝑤 𝑑 ∗ 𝑉𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 0.8 𝑓𝑐𝑢
𝝲𝐶
(stress/force) 𝑜𝑟 4 𝑁/𝑚𝑚² 𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑠𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑚 − 𝐹𝑜𝑟𝑐𝑒. (𝐸𝑛𝑔𝑙𝑖𝑠ℎ 𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑡) 𝑜𝑟 5 𝑁/𝑚𝑚² 𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑠𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑚
− 𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠 − 𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠
- COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
Point of comparison ECP ACI BSI
𝐴𝑠𝑣 𝑉−𝑉𝑐
− 𝐼𝐹 𝑞𝑢 ˃ 𝑞𝑚𝑎𝑥 𝑆𝑣
=
0.95𝐹𝑦𝑣 𝑏𝑡
if V≤𝑉𝑐 +0.4𝑏𝑣 d
→ 𝐼𝑛𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛.
- COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
Point of comparison ECP ACI BSI
Max. grade 400 𝑁/𝑚𝑚2 60.000 𝑃𝑠𝑖 ≅ 400 𝑁/𝑚𝑚2 460 𝑁/𝑚𝑚2
of stirrups (𝑓𝑦 )
Slabs & footings − 𝑁𝑜 𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑅𝐹𝑇 𝑖𝑠 𝑢𝑠𝑒𝑑 − 𝑆ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑅𝐹𝑇 𝑖𝑠 𝑢𝑠𝑒𝑑. − 𝑆ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑅𝐹𝑇 𝑖𝑠 𝑢𝑠𝑒𝑑.
𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑖𝑠 𝑜𝑛𝑙𝑦 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑑
𝑏𝑦 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑒.
- COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
Flexural design
Egyptian code (2007)
: يتم أوال التأكد من القطاع الخرساني انه آمن باستخدام المعادلة االتية
𝑀𝑢 ∗ 105
𝑑 = 𝐶1
𝑏 ∗ 𝐹𝑐𝑢
Where:
d : depth of SEC.
Mu : Ultimate Moment Affecting on SEC.
b : Width of SEC.
Fcu : Characteristic Concrete Strength
C : Factor where Cmin=2.65 & Cmax=4.85
)Egyptian code (2007
-بمعلومية القطاع الخرساني ال b*dوكذلك قيمة ال Multنستطيع التعويض فى المعادلة السابقة
وايجاد قيمة ال . C
-فاذا كانت قيمة ال Cأقل من ال Cmin =2.65يكون القطاع غير امن فنزيد أبعاد قطاع
الخرسانة .
-واذا كانت قيمة ال Cأكبر من ال Cmaxفيكون القطاع more safeفالبد من ان تتراوح قيمة
ال Cبين ال Cminو . Cmax
-بعد التاكد من أن القطاع امن يتم التعويض فى المعادلة االتية اليجاد قيمة الحديد في القطاع . As
𝒖𝑴
= 𝒔𝑨
𝑱 ∗ 𝒅 ∗ 𝒚𝑭
Egyptian code (2007)
𝑴𝒖
𝑨𝒔 =
𝑭𝒚 ∗ 𝒅 ∗ 𝑱
Where
Fy : Yield Stress
d : depth of SEC
Mu: Ultimate Moment Affecting on
Section
J: Factor Get It's Value From Table
According to Value Of C1
ACI CODE
يتم أوال التأكد من قطاع الخرساني انه امن باستخدام المعادلة االتية
: Rn اليجاد قيمة ال
𝑀𝑢
∅ 𝑅𝑛 = 2 ………… We can get Rn=√√√
𝑏𝑑
Where
d: depth of Section.
Mu: Ultimate Moment Affecting on Section.
b: Width of Section.
∅ = 0.9
ACI CODE
Rn From Table (1-C) depend on Fc' & B1
𝟎.𝟓𝝆𝑭𝒚
𝑹𝒏 = 𝝆(𝟏 − ) 𝝆 𝒎𝒊𝒏 ≤ 𝝆 ≤ 𝝆𝒎𝒂𝒙
𝟎.𝟖𝟓 𝑭𝒄′
𝟑 𝑓𝑐 ′ 0.319 β1𝑓𝑐 ′
𝝆 𝒎𝒊𝒏 = 𝝆 𝒎𝒂𝒙 =
𝑭𝒚 𝑭𝒚
105
=K M𝑢 2 = .. < 𝐾 ′ = 0.156
𝑢𝑐𝐹∗ 𝑑∗𝑏
-بعد التعويض فى المعادلة السابقة والتأكد من أن قطاع الخرسانه امن تحت تأثير قيمة . Mult
-وتحقيق شرط أن Kتقل عن ( (K`=0.156عدا ذلك يتم زيادة التسليح في منطقة الضغط.
BSI CODE
: يتم بعد ذلك حساب قيمة تسليح الخرساني باستخدام المعادلة التالية-
105
𝑨𝒔 = Mu ∗
0.87 ∗ 𝐹𝑦 ∗ 𝑑 ∗ 0.95
𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒:
𝐹𝑦 = characteristic concrete strength.
𝐹𝑐𝑢 = characteristic yield strength.
- COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
Point of comparison ECP ACI BSI
1.1 𝑑
Minimum Area Steel 𝑏𝑑 * 3 𝑓𝑐 ′ 𝑏𝑤 𝑓𝑦 Table (1-2)
𝐹𝑦
Asmin The least Where:
1.3𝐴𝑠𝑟𝑒𝑞 𝑑 d
the biggest 3 𝑓𝑐 ′ 𝑏𝑤 ≥ 200bw
𝑓𝑦 fy
0.15
𝑏𝑑 𝐻.𝑇.𝑆
100
Conditions For using L.L > 1.5D.L L.L > 3 D.L L.L > D.L
Empirical Methods Spans difference not exceed 20%
Table (1-2)
- COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
Slabs Design
- COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
Point of comparison ECP ACI BSI
Thickness of slabs
* Where
𝑙 :is long span length
measured from center to
center
- COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
Drop panel
Marginal
beam
Check punching
𝑞𝑝𝑢 ≤ 𝑞𝑐𝑝𝑢 ___ safe punching Vu ≤ ∅ Vn ___ safe punching If ʋ ≤ 1.6 ʋc use :
𝐴𝑣 𝑑 𝑓𝑦𝑡
Vs = 𝑆
• 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑠 𝑜𝑛 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑒
• 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑠 𝑜𝑛 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑒 And steel
And steel
- COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
Point of ECP ACI BSI
comparison
Actual Punching Stress Check for Wide-beam action Actual Punching Stress
Check Shear : 𝛽𝑽
ʋ=
punching 𝛽 𝑄𝑝𝑢 𝑉𝑢 ≤ ∅𝑉𝑛 𝒖𝑑
𝑞𝑝𝑢 =
𝑏𝑜 𝑑
𝑉𝑢 ≤ ∅(2𝜆 𝑓𝑐 ′ 𝑏𝑤𝑑 Allowable Shear Stress (ʋc)
Allowable Punching Stress refer to table (2.1)
Min. of Check for Two way Shear
𝑎 𝑓𝑐𝑢
Max. Shear Stress
𝑞𝑐𝑝𝑢 = 0.316(0.5 + ) 𝑉𝑢 ≤ 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 𝑜𝑓: ʋmax= 0. 𝟖 𝒇𝒄𝒖
𝑏 𝛾𝑐
α𝑑 𝑓𝑐𝑢 4
𝑞𝑐𝑝𝑢 = 0.316 0.2 + 1- 2 + 𝛽 𝜆 𝑓𝑐 ′ 𝑏𝑜 𝑑
𝑏𝑜 𝛾𝑐
𝛼𝑠 𝑑
And not exceed that 2- + 2 𝜆 𝑓𝑐 ′ 𝑏𝑜 𝑑
𝑏𝑜
𝑞𝑐𝑝𝑢 = 0.316
𝑓𝑐𝑢 3- 4𝜆 𝑓𝑐 ′ 𝑏𝑜 𝑑
𝛾𝑐
- COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
Point of ECP ACI BSI
comparison
𝑉𝑢 −∅ 𝑉𝑐 𝑆
if un safe punching If ʋ ≤ 1.6 ʋc use :
Check punching • Increase slab thickness
Av = ∅ 𝑑 𝑓𝑦𝑡
Table (2.1)
Hollow block design
- COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
Point of ECP ACI BSI
comparison
-PAN WIDE (500-750)mm -In situ ribs should be
PANS FORM spaced at centers not
exceeding 1.5 m & should
not exceed four times their
width
- COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
Point of ECP ACI BSI
comparison
RIBS
1 hour:
(20)mm for slab
Fire 2 hour:
resisting (25)mm for slab
- COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
Point of comparison ECP ACI BSI
mm50
المغمورة والمعرضة للهواء
Min Cover 75mm 70mm
mm70
المعرضة للبلل والجفاف
- COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
Point of ECP ACI BSI
comparison
Check shear
Check for Wide-beam action Actual Punching Stress
Check punching Actual Shear Stress 𝛽𝑽
𝑄𝑢 Shear :
ʋ=
Check shear 𝑞𝑢 = 𝑉𝑢 ≤ ∅𝑉𝑛 𝒖𝑑
𝑏𝑑
Allowable Shear Stress
𝑉𝑢 ≤ ∅(2𝜆 𝑓𝑐 ′ 𝑏𝑤𝑑 Allowable Shear Stress (ʋc)
𝐹𝑐𝑢 refer to table (2.1)
𝑞𝑠𝑢 = 0.15
𝛾𝑐 Check for Two way Shear
Max. Shear Stress
Check punching
𝑉𝑢 ≤ 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 𝑜𝑓: ʋmax= 0. 𝟖 𝒇𝒄𝒖
Actual Punching Stress
𝛽 𝑄𝑝𝑢
𝑞𝑝𝑢 = 1-
4
2 + 𝛽 𝜆 𝑓𝑐 ′ 𝑏𝑜 𝑑
𝑏𝑜 𝑑
Allowable Punching Stress 𝛼𝑠 𝑑
2- + 2 𝜆 𝑓𝑐 ′ 𝑏𝑜 𝑑
As slabs 𝑏𝑜
3- 4𝜆 𝑓𝑐 ′ 𝑏𝑜 𝑑
- COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
Point of ECP ACI BSI
comparison
𝑉𝑢 −∅ 𝑉𝑐 𝑆
if un safe punching If ʋ ≤ 1.6 ʋc use :
Check punching • Increase footing
Av = ∅ 𝑑 𝑓𝑦𝑡
If v > 2 ʋc use :
• Increase fc’
• increase footing thickness
or
Using drop panel
• Providing shear
reinforcement
- COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
Point of ECP ACI BSI
comparison
Where :
Where : Where : ʋc : design concrete shear stress
Check punching Qpu : Punching Force V : Punching Force V :design ultimate value of the
bo : Length of the Perimeter concentrated load.
𝛽: ratio of (long side/ short side) of
of uo : effective length of the perimeter
Critical Sec the column concentrated load or which touches a loaded area.
d : Effective depth of slab reaction area ʋ : design shear stress.
𝛽: 1.15 for Interior columns 𝛼𝑠 : 40 for interior columns u : effective length of the outer
1.30 for Edge columns 30 for edge columns perimeter of the zone.
1.50 for Corner columns 20 for corner columns β: 1.15 for Interior columns
bo : perimeter of critical 1.25 for Edge columns
section 1.40 for Corner columns
ΣAsv :is the area of shear reinforcement
fyv :is the characteristic strength of
shear reinforcement (in N/mm2 )
α : is the angle between the shear
reinforcement and the plane of the
slab.
- COMPARISON BETWEEN ECP & ACI & BSI
Point of comparison ECP ACI BSI
𝑞𝑝𝑢 ≤ 𝑞𝑐𝑝𝑢 ___ safe punching Vu ≤ ∅ Vn ___ safe punching If ʋ ≤ 1.6 ʋc use :
Check punching
• 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑠 𝑜𝑛 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑒 only Where : Vn = Vc+ Vs
𝐴𝑣 𝑑 𝑓𝑦𝑡
Vs = 𝑆
• 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑠 𝑜𝑛 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑒
• 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑠 𝑜𝑛 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑒 And steel
And steel
THANK YOU