Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pansemioentheism As An Ontological Pan-Entheism of Creatio Ex Nihilo & A Mereological Panen-Theism of Creatio Ex Deo
Pansemioentheism As An Ontological Pan-Entheism of Creatio Ex Nihilo & A Mereological Panen-Theism of Creatio Ex Deo
In neither divine nor creaturely formal modes of identity would a person ever be considered
constituted as an hypostasis bereft of an essential nature, as if the essential whatness of persons
did not necessarily inhere along with the hownesses of each whoness.
Neither would a secondary personal nature ever not necessarily inhere along with both the
whoness, hence peculiar howness, of a person’s hypostatic nature and the whatness of their
essential nature.
Natures, both as hypostatic whonesses & hownesses as well as both essential & secondary
whatnesses, are only ever, i.e. eternally, enhypostasized. The concept of an anhypostatic nature
does not successfully refer.
Not only should we neither reify (anhypostasize) the essence nor hypostasize the energeia, but –
we shouldn’t reduce the persons to mere idiomata.
To that extent, then, any temporal distribution of logoi will necessarily be – not only an
emanation of formal whatnesses, but – a procession of hypostatic hownesses.
Creation, then, processively enhypostasizes the created natures – hypostatic, essential &
secondary – through, with & in the Logos as eternally incarnated (enhypostasized or assumed)
by Him.
Per ipsum, et cum ipso, et in ipso, est tibi Deo Patri omnipotenti in unitate Spiritus Sancti, omnis
honor et gloria per omnia saecula saeculorum.