Bhutan and Gross National Happiness

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 9

LATIHAN TUTORIAL 2

ULASAN ARTIKEL
(5%)

Berdasarkan ARTIKEL (Anda perlu membacanya terlebih dahulu) di bawah seperti yang disertakan (BHUTAN &
GROSS NATIONAL HAPPINESS): Apakah yang anda faham tentang Gross National Happiness - GNH (Kesejahteraan
Nasional/Negara Kasar) yang telah dipelopari oleh negara Bhutan? Negara tersebut mengukur kesejahteraan dan
kemakmuran hidup masyarakt berlandaskan GNH dan bukannya GDP-Gross Domestic Production (Keluaran Dalam Negara
Kasar-KDNK). Justru, pamerkan (boleh merujuk sumber tambahan selain dari keratan akhbar ini-melalui laman web)
perbezaan diantara GNH dan GDP dalam konteks pembangunan sesebuah negara serta terangkan dan hubugkaitkan
secara kritis antara pengukur GNH dan GDP, yang manakah mempunyai kelebihan/kebaikan atau lebih berkesan dalam
menentukan/mengukur kesejahteraan hidup serta berpaksikan pembangunan holistik sesebuah masyarakat atau negara.
ARTIKEL
BHUTAN AND GROSS NATIONAL HAPPINESS
IS ‘BHUTAN’ A PROOF THAT HAPPINESS DOES NOT NECESSARILY COME WITH HIGH INCOME ?
BHUTAN is still buzzing in elation over a royal wedding. Its hugely popular, Oxford-educated King Jigme Khesar Namgyel
Wangchuck, 31, has just presented them with his new queen, the beautiful commoner Jetsun Pema, 21.The Oct 13 ceremony was
colourful and steeped in tradition and Buddhist religion at a monastery in the ancient capital of Punakha. Noticeably, there were no
foreign princes, no visiting heads of state at the ceremony. Just the royal family, thousands of nearby villagers and the rest of the
country's 700,000 people watching the live telecast of the ceremonies on their television sets. For the Bhutanese, the wedding was
very personal. They love their young king and the kings before him and totally believe their kings love them back. Their faces flush
with pride and joy when they talk of them and they directly attribute their happiness to the “humble, kind and wise” kings who have
always placed their people's welfare and well-being at the top of their agenda. The Bhutanese have much to be proud about. Their
Druk Yul (Land of the Thunder Dragon) has mountains that are still thick with trees. Their glacier-fed rivers are teeming with fish. The
air is clean and, in many places, naturally pine-scented. Breathtaking mountain scenery is common. They still grow their food in
traditional ways. While we call it organic and pay a premium, it's everyday fare for the mostly vegetarian Bhutanese. The nation is an
environmentalist dream. Visitors are unlikely to see beggars or homeless people. The Bhutanese sense of family takes care of that.
Crime is rare even though many people live in poverty and have to trek hours on foot to get from one place to another. Bhutanese
are raised to observe decorum in dress and behaviour in public. A couple come together as man and wife once they get their parents'
blessings. No fuss. A man can have more than one wife. And in this fair-minded land, a woman can have more than one husband,
even though this is less common. And the surprises continue. Children streaming out of schools in traditional dress give visitors
friendly grins and are quite happy to chat in English. Yes, English is the medium of instruction. For tourists, shopping and sightseeing
is easy. There's no need to struggle in the local Dzongkha as guides and shopkeepers speak English, albeit with a heavy Indian accent
as many teachers are from India. Education and health care is free.
The Bhutanese know they have something special and they plan to keep it. Clearly, it's a country with a unique view of life and living.
Pure economic growth is not the end but just one of the means to achieve a more important objective happiness. This philosophy,
clearly enunciated by former King Jigme Singye Wangchuck, an absolute monarch who voluntarily abdicated after drawing up a
roadmap to democracy, underpins Bhutan's push forward into modernisation.
Bhutan's government has taken this beyond a philosophy and beyond the usual conventional markers for GDP. The Centre for
Bhutan Studies, the government's think tank, did an exhaustive sample survey and determined that a happy society involves the four
pillars of economy, culture, environment and good governance measured by 72 indicators clustered under nine domains.
A Gross National Happiness Commission (GNHC) has been formed and this commission reports directly to the prime minister and
bears a heavy and two-fold responsibility. It conducts surveys once every two years based on the indicators, crunches the results to
establish where the nation's well-being is at that point and then screens all policy initiatives to ensure they enhance GNH. The first
survey was conducted in 2008 and the next one in 2010. “Every policy in the government, irrespective of where it originates, goes
through the GNHC,” said Karma Tshiteem, the commission's secretary in an interview while he was on a visit to Malaysia. He said the
nine domains included four health, education, living standards, and to some extent, environment found in conventional policy-making
frameworks. But the survey found five more domains that people care deeply about psychological well-being, time use, community
vitality, culture and good governance often overlooked by governments but included in the unique Bhutanese approach to
development. Each of these was then broken down into indicators that total 72. Psychological well-being, for instance, includes
general psychological distress indicators, emotional balance indicators, and spirituality indicators. The community vitality, for
instance, consists of family vitality, safety, reciprocity, trust, social support, socialisation and kinship density. The first survey offered
up interesting revelations, said Tshiteem. Among others, the survey in this deeply Buddhist land discovered that 90% of Bhutanese
don't meditate at all. Meditation is an indicator under psychological well-being. Tshiteem said: “So what did we do with that
knowledge? We introduced a whole set of activities which we call education for GNH in schools. One of these activities is
meditation. “It's not that our children have to sit in the lotus posture like some accomplished practitioner. The idea is to get them to
experience stillness every day in their lives because that stillness is very powerful to stop all the distractions that life is made up of.
“It's been proven that this activity builds calmness. “Like many habits that children carry into their adult lives, we hope that it will
become part of their lifestyle. We feel that, irrespective of religious background, meditation has proven to be a very healthy activity
for psychological or mental well-being particularly with dealing in problems related to stress that people face in this modern work
environment. “In this case, it was just a policy response that we needed and we have introduced this throughout all schools.”
However, some matters needed responses that required resource allocation, creative ideas and lengthy discussions with relevant
sectors, he said. “From the survey we saw that the indicator of trust among neighbours is poor in urban areas. We have to get
creative and come up with ideas on what we need to do to build trust. “So we look at what we used to do in our villages, which was
what Bhutan really was until we started modernisation. “In a village setting, the soul of the village is the temple. It is not only a place
for worship, but the most important social space where people meet. “So we could apply similar strategies in the urban areas. But
this will require money one of our responsibilities is identifying priorities and allocating resources so we allocate resources to good
ideas that we think about and leads to this. And of course, a lot of that will be learning whether we achieved what we want,” he said.
Sometimes, the challenge is not just a direct response, strategy or resource allocation. It's about “creating incentives for the types of
choices we think are desirable,” said Tshiteem who then used time use as an example. “We have 24 hours in a day. We want to keep
as a policy the use of these 24 hours equal among the three aggregates work, leisure and rest. “And we believe that for a truly
sustainable and happy life, you cannot compromise these three for an extended time. You can go without sleep for one night, maybe,
but after the second night I think it will have a tremendous impact on your well-being if you continue. “Similarly, if you work too
hard, however meaningful your work is, it will have a detrimental impact. GNH is about balance leading a very balanced life. “The
policies involved in these new domains require time and not money. And you know, time is the only thing even money can't buy. “If
you look at the five new domains, you can see that you have to take the work-life balance very seriously. “If you do not have enough
time, then you cannot work on these areas because these areas, like the relationship between friends, will only flourish if you invest
the time. There is no substitute for that,” he said. “We have created a GNH policy screening tool. It's almost like wearing spectacles.
We put on this glass and look at the policy in question and we make sure all these other domains that are normally not considered in
policy are given due weight. “So, for instance, if the policy we're debating is joining WTO, we'll say what is the likely impact of joining
WTO on stress levels in society? Is it likely to increase it, decrease it, be neutral, or do we not know what its effects might be? “The
tool is very simple but what it does is it fosters debate. Because it fosters this debate, I believe that, hopefully, the choices we make
will be better and more sustainable ones. But it's still very early,” he said. Tshiteem is “absolutely” sure that Bhutan is on the right
path as determined by the former king's logic of why happiness should be the object of development policy. “Just look at every
country. They are pursuing a model of development where they want double-digit growth. Everybody wants to become rich. Can
you imagine what will happen if every country achieves this? I think there will be no planet left. “It is just not sustainable. There is
something badly wrong with the model of development that we have been taught, which is basically about endless and high growth,
but in a world with very definite and finite resources. And yet we all continue to take this path. “What we hope with GNH is, because
you look at things in its entirety, you make different choices. And our hope is that as small as we may be, maybe we can influence
development and hopefully change the agenda and the way people look at development. “As our fourth King always said, You cannot
divorce development from what people want from life. They are one and the same thing'. “But somehow, we are pretending that
what people want from life can be very different from development. “Eventually, development must be about a happy life, a life
where people evolve. I guess that would be a genuine measure of progress. The wealth of experiences, family, relationships and not
money are the true measure of progress,” he said. However, Tshiteem was frank about the challenges ahead, pointing out that
Bhutan remained dependent on development assistance from abroad. For decades, India has been its primary donor in terms of
money and the source of skilled workforce needed in many sectors, including construction, road building and hydroelectricity
projects. The Indian rupee is used side-by-side with the local Ngultrum in Bhutan. In return, Bhutan sells its hydro-electricity to India.
Ironically, electricity revenue provided no less than 60% of the government's entire revenue in 2009, dramatically boosting its GDP,
but only 66% of Bhutanese households and 39% of its villages are electrified. Other donors are the Scandinavian countries, Japan
and institutions such as the World Bank, United Nations and the Asian Development Bank.
GOOD REPAYMENT
According to the Royal Monetary Authority's annual report 2009, Bhutan's external debt was at US$779.9mil, 61% of GDP, mostly
tied to hydropower projects, which have good repayment capacity. “We still have high levels of poverty in Bhutan which is why,
even as we talk about GNH, you can be sure our focus is very much on reducing poverty. Poverty reduction is the number one
objective and our target is to reduce it from its current 23% to 15% or less in five years. “And towards this end, we have a number of
interventions such as building roads, irrigation, the usual conventional investment activities like drinking water, electricity, mobile
activity,” he said.
In addition, the young constitutional king, who retains the authority to grant land to people, had already gone “literally door-to-door”
through many of the 20 provinces in the country giving out land to those who need it, Tshiteem said.“Fortunately, land is something
we have in plenty. So with all this, we have confidence that we will be able to address poverty reduction quickly,” he said.Each
Bhutanese is entitled to own at least five acres but cannot own more than 25 acres.Tiny Bhutan's GNH has already received much
international interest and appears to have inspired the 34-member Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development's
(OECD) happiness index, more tentatively called YourBetterLife Index, which was launched in May as the OECD celebrates its 50th
anniversary this year. The index covers 11 areas housing, incomes, employment, social relationships, education, the environment, the
administration of institutions, health, general satisfaction, security and the balance between work and family and is the first concrete
result of a report by former Nobel economics prize-winner Joseph Stiglitz. The Paris-based OECD hopes to make the index
applicable to other countries soon, beginning with emerging economies such as Brazil, according to OECD officials quoted by news
reports. In July, the United Nations General Assembly passed, without dissent, a Bhutanese-initiated resolution recognising the
pursuit of happiness as a fundamental human goal and noting that this goal is not reflected in GDP. Modernisation means change.
But change is what the GNHC has to manage by continuing to tweak its GNH model to keep track of what the Bhutanese people
care about and make sure the fledgling democratic government continues to deliver well-being to its people.
As Tshiteem puts it, “we are in the early stages of this very exciting journey”.

Related Stories: Can Malaysia aim to be happier? Bhutan's former king the architect of GNH

Read more at http://www.thestar.com.my/business/business-news/2011/10/22/bhutan-and-the-pursuit-of-


happiness/#AM9r3L4HOrDAa4q0.99
PUSAT PENGAJIAN SAINS KEMASYARAKATAN

Contoh Rubrik Latihan Tutorial

GRED MARKAH PERINGKAT KRITERIA


A  Mempamerkan rajah yang sangat menarik dan jelas, infomatif,
menepati soalan, menonjolkan contoh dasar/program pembangunan
85-100 luar bandar yang baik
A- 10 CEMERLANG  Mempunyai kemahiran penyampaian hujah yang baik, jelas dan
mantap beserta contoh yang sesuai.
76-84  Memenuhi format seperti diminta, tiada kesalahan ejaan, tiada
kesalahan teknikal yang lain
B+  Mempamerkan rajah yang menarik dan jelas, infomasi yang
8-9 SANGAT BAIK mencukupi, menepati soalan, menonjolkan contoh dasar/program
66-75 pembangunan luar bandar yang baik.
B
 Mempunyai kemahiran penyampaian hujah yang baik dan jelas
beserta contoh yang sesuai
58-65
 Memenuhi format seperti diminta, terdapat kurang dari 3 kesalahan
ejaan, kurang dari 3 kesalahan teknikal yang lain.
B-  Mempamerkan rajah yang agak menarik dan boleh difahami, infomatif
yang mencukupi, menepati soalan, mempunyai contoh dasar/program
52-57 pembangunan luar bandar yang baik.
C+ 6-7 BAIK  Mempunyai kemahiran penyampaian hujah yang baik beserta contoh
yang sesuai.
46-51  Memenuhi format seperti diminta, terdapat kurang dari 5 kesalahan
ejaan, kurang dari 5 kesalahan teknikal yang lain.
C  Mempamerkan rajah yang sederhana menarik dan masih boleh
difahami, maklumat yang memadai, menepati soalan, mempunyai
40-45 contoh dasar/program pembangunan luar bandar yang umum dan
C- SEDERHANA tidak terfokus.
4-5
BAIK  Mempunyai kemahiran penyampaian hujah yang kurang baik tapi ada
36-39 contoh yang sesuai.
 Kurang memenuhi format seperti diminta, terdapat kurang dari 10
kesalahan ejaan, kurang dari 5 kesalahan teknikal yang lain.
D+  Mempamerkan rajah yang sederhana menarik dan agak sukar
difahami, maklumat kurang tepat, tidak menepati soalan, tidak
32-35 menonjolkan contoh dasar/program pembangunan luar bandar yang
D SEDERHANA jelas dan terfokus.
2-3
LEMAH  Mempunyai kemahiran penyampaian hujah yang agak lemah dan
28-31 tiada ada contoh yang sesuai.
 Tidak memenuhi format seperti diminta, terdapat lebih dari 10
kesalahan ejaan, lebih dari 5 kesalahan teknikal yang lain.
D-  Mempamerkan rajah yang salah dan sukar difahami, maklumat
kurang tepat, tidak menepati soalan, tidak menonjolkan contoh
25-27 dasar/program pembangunan luar bandar yang jelas dan terfokus.
1 LEMAH  Tidak mempunyai kemahiran penyampaian hujah seperti yang
dikehendaki serta tiada ada contoh yang sesuai ditunjukkan
 Tidak memenuhi format seperti diminta, terdapat lebih dari 10
kesalahan ejaan, lebih dari 5 kesalahan teknikal yang lain.

You might also like