GLOBAL ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGY, BENGALURU

Rubrics for Project Evaluation

RUBRICS FOR PROJECT

EVALUATION
 GLOBAL ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGY, BENGALURU
Rubrics for Project Evaluation

Project Evaluation Sheet

STABILIZATION OF BLACK SHRUTHI LANKA
Title of Project COTTON SOIL USING Name of Guide
MARBLE DUST
PO1, PO2, LIKHITHA.H
Applicable POs / PSOs (1st Stage) Name of Examiner (1st Review)
PS02 VIDYASHREE.D
Applicable POs /PSOs (2nd Stage) Name of Examiner (2nd Review)
PO4, PO8, CHAITHRA.N
Name of Examiner (Final
Applicable POs / PSOs (Final Stage) PO9,P010a,PS10b,PO11,P012,
Review)
PSO1

Project Evaluation (First Review)

USN Name PO1 PO2 PO9 PO10a PO10b PSO1
1GA13CV057 KAVYA
1GA13 CV408 KARTHIK
1GA14CV422 NIKHILESH
GOWDA
1GA11CV063 YASHAS PISSAY
1GA14CV402 ANITH GOWDA
Name & Signature of Examiner Name & Signature of Guide
Project Evaluation (Second Review)
USN Name PO1 PO2 PO9 PO10a PO10b PSO1
1GA13CV057 KAVYA
1GA13 CV408 KARTHIK
1GA14CV422 NIKHILESH
GOWDA
1GA11CV063 YASHAS PISSAY
1GA14CV402 ANITH GOWDA
Name & Signature of Examiner Name & Signature of Guide
Project Evaluation (Final Review)
USN Name PO1 PO2 PO9 PO10a PO10b PSO1
1GA13CV057 KAVYA
 GLOBAL ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGY, BENGALURU
Rubrics for Project Evaluation
1GA13 CV408 KARTHIK
1GA14CV422 NIKHILESH
GOWDA
1GA11CV063 YASHAS PISSAY
1GA14CV402 ANITH GOWDA
Name & Signature of Examiner Name & Signature of Guide
 GLOBAL ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGY, BENGALURU
Rubrics for Project Evaluation

Project Evaluation - Engineering Knowledge (PO1)

(Preferably for Final Review)

Performance Exceptional Acceptable Marginal Marks

F1 F2 Avg.
(Weightage) (5 - 4) (3 - 2) (1) (avg*Wt)

Critical selection and Effective application of Deficiencies in proper

Mathematical / Natural
application of Mathematical / Mathematical / Natural selection and use of
Science Fundamentals
Natural science principles science principles resulting Mathematical / Natural 4 5 4.5 45
(10) ensuring reasonable results. in reasonable solution. science principles.

Engineering Critical selection and Effective application of Deficiencies in proper

Fundamentals application of engineering engineering principles selection and use of
principles ensuring resulting in reasonable engineering principles. 5 3 4 40
(10) reasonable results. solution.

Total Marks 85
 GLOBAL ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGY, BENGALURU
Rubrics for Project Evaluation

Project Evaluation - Problem Analysis (PO2)

(Preferably for First Review)

Performance Exceptional Acceptable Marginal Marks

(Weightage) F1 F2 Avg.
(5 - 4) (3 - 2) (1) (avg*Wt)
Finds 5 or more scholarly articles that Finds 3 or more scholarly articles closely Finds less than 3 closely
Literature are closely related to the project; related to the project and at least two other related scholarly articles or
Review the discussion of the articles
thoroughly discusses the connection sources that are either not scholarly or not
is cursory
3 3 3 30
(10) between those articles and the project closely related; discussion of sources is
fairly thorough

Problem Makes use of reviewed literature and Makes use of reviewed literature and Not able to identify the gaps.
Identification identifies the gap accurately. identifies the gap with minor ambiguities.
4 4 4 20
(5)

Problem Problem clearly stated and well- Problem statement is mostly clear and fairly Problem statement is unclear
formulation defined; concepts and ideas are well-defined; concepts and ideas are or poorly defined; concepts
clearly articulated and formulated formulated with minor error and ideas are poorly 5 3 4 20
(5) articulated and formulated

Total Marks 70
 GLOBAL ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGY, BENGALURU
Rubrics for Project Evaluation

Project Evaluation - Design & Development of solutions (PO3)

(Preferably for Second and Final Review)

Performance Exceptional Acceptable Marginal Marks

(Weightage) F1 F2 Avg.
(5 - 4) (3 - 2) (1) (avg*Wt)
Plans and sets objectives and how Plans and sets objectives but how to Does not have working design strategy
Design to achieve objectives is clearly achieve objectives is not clearly stated.
Strategy stated. Proposes alternative Proposes no alternative methods
methods
(8)

Knows the constraints and accounts
for them in developing design
Constraints
strategy—Economical, ethical,
social, cultural and environmental
(8)
Knows the constraints and accounts for
them in developing design strategy with
minor errors or ignores one or two—
Economical, ethical, social, cultural and
environmental.
Does not know about the constraints
OR Does not account for them in
design strategy OR ignores more than
two-- Economical, ethical, social,
cultural and environmental.

Final Design Design meets and exceeds desired Design meets desired objectives. Barely capable of achieving desired
objectives. objectives.
(4)

Total Marks
 GLOBAL ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGY, BENGALURU
Rubrics for Project Evaluation

Project Evaluation - Conduct investigation of complex problem (PO4)

(Preferably for Final Review)

Performance Exceptional Acceptable Marginal Marks

(Weightage) F1 F2 Avg.
(5 - 4) (3 - 2) (1) (avg*Wt)
Demonstrated superior ability to Demonstrated adequate ability to Demonstrated some ability to
Execution of conduct experiments. conduct experiments. conduct experiments.
Procedures
Collected all the appropriate data. Collected most of the needed data. Collected some meaningful
(8)
data.

Results and discussion well focused Missed some important points. Analyzed only the most basic
Focus of Results and
points.
Discussion
(4)
Interpretation of Insightful, supported conclusions and Reasonable conclusions reached based Deficiencies in support for
Results recommendations. on achieved results. stated conclusions.
(8)
Total Marks
 GLOBAL ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGY, BENGALURU
Rubrics for Project Evaluation

Project Evaluation - Modern Tool Usage (PO5)

(Preferably for Final Review)

Performance Exceptional Acceptable Marginal Marks

F1 F2 Avg.
(Weightage) (5 - 4) (3 - 2) (1) (avg*Wt)
Selection and use of Clear evidence of ability to select Some evidence of ability to select Little evidence of ability to select
appropriate modern appropriate tools, techniques and appropriate tools, techniques and appropriate tools,
tools, skills and skills to effectively solve problems skills to solve problems or design techniques and skills to solve
techniques or design a system a system problems or design
(8) a system
Clear evidence of ability to correctly Some evidence of ability to correctly Little evidence of ability to
Application of tools, apply tools, techniques and skills to apply tools, techniques correctly apply tools, techniques
techniques and skills (6) effectively solve problems or design and skills to effectively solve and skills to effectively solve
a system problems or design a system problems or design a system
Analyzing the results Clear evidence of correct Some evidence of correct conclusion of Little evidence of correct
gained from the tools conclusion of results gained from results gained from the tool conclusion of results gained from
(6) the tool the tool
Total Marks
 GLOBAL ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGY, BENGALURU
Rubrics for Project Evaluation

Project Evaluation - Engineer and Society (PO6)

(Preferably for First Review)

Performance Exceptional Acceptable Marginal Marks

F1 F2 Avg
(Weightage) (5 - 4) (3 - 2) (1) (avg*Wt)
Complete understanding of public Reasonable understanding of public Deficiencies in understanding
Public Interest & interest and societal impact. interest and societal impact. public interest and/or societal
Societal Impact (6) impact.
Complete understanding of health and Reasonable understanding of health and Deficiencies in addressing health
Safety & Health safety issues leading to sound and safety issues. Mostly effective in and safety issues leading to a
Issues (8) supported results. achieving supported results. unsupported and/or infeasible
result.
Complete understanding of legal Reasonable understanding of legal No proper understanding of legal
Legal Issues (6) issues related to the project issues related to the project issues related to the project

Total Marks
 GLOBAL ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGY, BENGALURU
Rubrics for Project Evaluation

Project Evaluation - Environment and sustainability (PO7)

(Preferably for First Review)

Performance Exceptional Acceptable Marginal Marks

F1 F2 Avg
(Weightage) (5 - 4) (3 - 2) (1) (avg*Wt)
Complete understanding of Reasonable understanding of Environmental aspects are addressed
Environmental environmental aspects. Effective in environmental aspects. Mostly effective ineffectively with little or no effect on
Aspects addressing environmental issues in addressing environmental issues. end results.
(10) leading to a better result.

Complete understanding and Reasonable understanding and No proper understanding of sustainable

Sustainability demonstrate the knowledge of, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and development
(10) need for sustainable development need for sustainable development

Total Marks
 GLOBAL ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGY, BENGALURU
Rubrics for Project Evaluation

Project Evaluation - Ethics (PO8)

(Preferably for Final Review)

Performance Exceptional Acceptable Marginal Marks

F1 F2 Avg
(Weightage) (5 - 4) (3 - 2) (1) (avg*Wt)
Identifies the ethical issues associated Identifies most of the ethical issues associated with Fails to recognize key
with the project and discusses these project, but misses some; discussion of the issues issues or the discussion is
Ethical Issues
(8) issues thoroughly in the text is not completely thorough superficial

Demonstrates ethical behavior among Does not model ethical behavior among peers and Student has been caught
Behavior peers and faculty faculty cheating or plagiarizing the
(8) work of others
Takes personal responsibility for Does not recognize the need to take personal Blames others for own
Responsibility his/her actions responsibility for his/her actions issues and problems
(4)

Total Marks
 GLOBAL ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGY, BENGALURU
Rubrics for Project Evaluation

Project Evaluation - Individual & Team Work (PO9)

(Mandatory for evaluation of all projects) (Preferably for Final Review)

Performance Exceptional Acceptable Marginal Marks

F1 F2 Avg
(Weightage) (5 - 4) (3 - 2) (1) (avg*Wt)
On time at all meetings Sometimes late at meetings. Frequently absent.
Attendance (5) 3 -- 3 15
Plays actively the assigned roles, takes Plays own role appropriately and Ineffective and blames others for
Participation (5) on extra work, assists others, takes the expects others to play theirs. own issues and problems 4 -- 4 20
lead
Cooperates with others (outside of the Occasionally works as a loner or Does not contribute to group work
discipline) interacts to a minor extent with extra- at all or submits own work as the
Cooperation (5)
disciplinary team members group's 5 -- 5 25

Utilizes technical strengths of each team Some leadership, planning and Deficiencies in leadership,
member to full advantage leading to interaction is evident. cooperation and/or interaction.
Teamwork (5)
productive interaction. End result may suffer to some
5 4 5 25
degree.

Total Marks 85
 GLOBAL ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGY, BENGALURU
Rubrics for Project Evaluation

Project Evaluation - Communication (Written) (PO10 a)

(Mandatory for evaluation of all projects) (Preferably for Final Review)

Performance Exceptional Acceptable Marginal Marks

F1 F2 Avg
(Weightage) (5 - 4) (3 - 2) (1) (avg*Wt)
Materials are organized in logical Materials are organized in logical sequences Poor organization: no
sequences with headings, sub-headings with headings, sub-headings and paragraphs, structures such as sub-
Organization and paragraphs, making it easy for the but some sections and sub-sections are not headings and paragraph, and
(8) reader to go through and understand. clearly identified, and some paragraphs no sequential flow of materials
5 5 5 40
combine multiple thoughts. and thoughts.

Accurate and proper use of figures, Proper use of figures, tables and captions, Inappropriate use of figures,
Format/ tables and captions, references and references and bibliography, and appendices tables and captions,
Style bibliography, and appendices. with minor error. references and bibliography, 4 4 4 16
(4) and appendices with major
errors.
Content Demonstration of full knowledge of the At ease with content and able to elaborate and Uncomfortable with content.
subject with explanations and explain to some degree. Only basic concepts are
& Knowledge 5 4 4.5 27
(6) elaboration demonstrated and interpreted.

Reference section complete and Minor inadequacies in references. Inadequate list of references
References comprehensive. Consistent referencing system. or references in text.
(2) Consistent and logical referencing Inconsistent or illogical
5 3 4 8
system. referencing system.
Total Marks 91
 GLOBAL ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGY, BENGALURU
Rubrics for Project Evaluation

Project Evaluation - Communication (Oral) for (PO10b)

(Mandatory for evaluation of all projects) (Preferably for ALL Reviews)

Performance Exceptional Acceptable Marginal Marks

F1 F2 Avg
(Weightage) (5 - 4) (3 - 2) (1) (avg*Wt)
All information is presented in a Most information is presented in Difficult to follow presentation due to
Organization
& Structure (4)
logical, interesting and novel logical order which is easy to follow erratic topical shifts and jumps. 4 5 4.5 18
sequence, which is easily followed.
Demonstration of full knowledge of At ease with content and able to Uncomfortable with information.
Content & the subject with explanations and elaborate and explain to some Capable only of answering rudimentary
Knowledge (4)
5 5 5 20
elaboration. degree. questions.

Appearance (2) Neat and professional. Casual but appropriate. Inappropriate 3 1 2 4

Effective and well organized delivery. Delivery with minor error, but can be Poor delivery, difficult to follow and
Delivery (3)
followed and understood. understand.
5 4 4.5 13.5
Uses effective eye contact and voice Has some difficulty with eye contact Has major difficulties with eye contact
projection, speaks comfortably and and voice projection, occasionally and voice projection, blocks the screen
Features (2) smoothly, does not block visual blocks screen and shows and reads from it. Displays most of the 5 5 5 10
aides. nervousness. times signs of nervousness.

Visual aides (2) Uses visual aides effectively. Uses visual aides with minor error. Uses visual aides poorly 3 1 2 4
Listening to and Carefully listens to questions and Listens to questions and responds Misunderstands questions and provides
answering responds appropriately. with minor error. wrong answers. 3 3 3 9
questions (3)
Total Marks 79
 GLOBAL ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGY, BENGALURU
Rubrics for Project Evaluation

Project Evaluation - Project Management & Finance (PO11)

(Preferably for First Review)

Performance Exceptional Acceptable Marginal Marks

F1 F2 Avg
(Weightage) (5 - 4) (3 - 2) (1) (avg*Wt)
Project’s
Goals Goals for the project are clearly described and thoroughly Project’s purpose is stated and some
purpose is
identification (5) documented evidence of need is provided.
unclear
Moderate clarity on defined Tasks are not
Task
Tasks are clearly defined, assigned and owns responsibility assignments but conflict of defined or
Breakdown (4)
responsibilities assigned
Time
Completes the task assigned within time Completes the task with an extensionsTimeline not met
management (5)

Applies/use resources efficiently; uses a system of checks Not able to

Identifies resources but not clear on
Resources (4) and balances for continual management of all available identify
resource utilization
resources. resources

Proposes an
Budget (2) Proposes an optimal budget Proposes a budget which not optimal incomplete
budget
Total Marks
 GLOBAL ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGY, BENGALURU
Rubrics for Project Evaluation

Project Evaluation - Life Long Learning (PO12)

(Preferably for Final Review)

Performance Exceptional Acceptable Marginal Marks

F1 F2 Avg
(Weightage) (5 - 4) (3 - 2) (1) (avg*Wt)
Fully aware of external sources of material. Reasonable awareness and use of Some evidence of efforts to
Effective use of supplementary resources. external resources. locate and use external
Actively seeks learning opportunities (reading, Reasonable willingness to participate in resources.
self-study, extra-curricular activities). learning activities and take risks. Some willingness to
Need for Life- Excellent ability to locate and use library and Adequate ability to locate and use library participate in learning
Long Learning Internet resources. Seeks opportunities to and Internet resources. Shows activities and take risks.
(20) learn new material, e.g. software packages reasonable attempt to, e.g. learn new Some ability to use
software packages library/internet sources and
e.g. new software
packages.

Total Marks
GLOBAL ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGY, BENGALURU
Rubrics for Project Evaluation

GENERATE RUBRICS FOR PSOs

 GLOBAL ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGY, BENGALURU
Rubrics for Project Evaluation

Project Evaluation Sheet

Title of Project STABILIZATION OF BLACK Name of Guide SHRUTHI LANKA
COTTON SOIL USING
MARBLE DUST
Applicable POs / PSOs (1st Stage) PO1, PO2, Name of Examiner (1st Review) LIKHITHA.H

Applicable POs /PSOs (2nd Stage) PS02 Name of Examiner (2nd Review) VIDYASHREE.D

Applicable POs / PSOs (Final Stage) PO4, PO8, Name of Examiner (Final CHAITHRA.N
PO9,P010a,PS10b,PO11,P012, Review)
PSO1

Project Evaluation (First Review)

USN Name PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO10a PO10b PSO1
1GA13CV05 KAVYA 100 80
7
1GA13CV40 KARTHIK 100 80
8
1GA14CV42 NIKHILES 100 80
2 H GOWDA
1GA11CV06 YASHAS 100 80
3 PISSAY
1GA14CV40 ANITH 100 80
2 GOWDA
Name & Signature
of Guide
Project Evaluation (Second Review)
USN Name PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO10a PO10b PSO1 PSO2
1GA13CV05 KAVYA 70
7
1GA13CV40 KARTHIK 67
8
1GA14CV42 NIKHILES 95
2 H GOWDA
 GLOBAL ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGY, BENGALURU
Rubrics for Project Evaluation
1GA11CV06 YASHAS 88
3 PISSAY
1GA14CV402 ANITH GOWDA 58
Name & Signature
of Guide
Project Evaluation (Final Review)
USN Name PO4 P08 PO9 PO10a PO10b PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2
1GA13CV05 KAVYA 95 91 93 92 80 88
7
1GA13CV40 KARTHIK 95 97 95 90 80 95
8
1GA14CV42 NIKHILES 95 97 95 95 80 95
2 H GOWDA
1GA11CV06 YASHAS 95 97 95 90 80 95
3 PISSAY
1GA14CV40 ANITH 95 97 95 80 80 80
2 GOWDA
Name & Signature of Name & Signature
Examiner of Guide

Consolidated Project Evaluation Sheet

Academic Year 2016-17 Department CIVIL ENGINEERING

Title of Project STABILIZATION OF BLACK COTTON Guide SHRUTHI LANKA
SOIL USING MARBLE DUST

Averag
PO PO10 PO10
USN Name PO2* PO4 P08 PO9* P011 P012 PSO1 PSO2 e (Total
1 a b
Marks)
1GA13CV05 KAVYA 92 80 88 70 87
7 100 80 80 90 95 91 93
1GA13CV40 KARTHIK 90 80 95 67 88
8 100 80 80 90 95 97 95
 GLOBAL ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGY, BENGALURU
Rubrics for Project Evaluation
1GA14CV42 NIKHILES 95 80 95 95 92
2 H GOWDA 100 80 80 95 95 97 95
1GA11CV06 YASHAS 90 80 95 88 90
3 PISSAY 100 80 80 90 95 97 95
1GA14CV40 ANITH 90 80 80 80 85
2 GOWDA 100 80 80 90 95 97 95
AVERAGE 100 89 80 91 76
80 80 91 95 96 95
PO Mapping Strength 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
PO Attainment 89 80 91 76
[(Avg*Strength)/3] 100 80 80 91 95 96 95

Name & Signature of Guide Name & Signature of Head of Department

 GLOBAL ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGY, BENGALURU
Rubrics for Project Evaluation
PO Attainment through Final Year Projects
Academic year 2016-17

Projects PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2 PSO3

Project 1 85 50 29 75 32

Project 2 92 96 95 56 98 56 92 34 100

Project 3 94 98 92 89 99 94 94 48 96 100

Project 4 96 98 92 76 92 100 76 88 38 100

Project 5 96 98 99 96 98 84 67 45 68 100

PO
Attainment
93 74 97 95 97 75 93 99 68 83 42 65 69 100
 GLOBAL ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGY, BENGALURU
Rubrics for Project Evaluation

Rubrics Seminar Project

2014-15 x x
2015-16 √ x
2016-17 √ √