Module in Organization and Management

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 7

LEARNING MODULE

ORGANIZATION AND
MANAGEMENT
1st Quarter ( WEEK 1 )
CONTENT STANDARD: The learners have an understanding of basic concepts and theories of
management

PERFORMANCE STANDARD: The learners will be able to apply management theories & concepts in
solving business cases especially in the midst of Pandemic ( Covid-19 )

MELC-*Explain the meaning, functions, types and theories of management (ABM_AOM11-Ia-b-3)

OBJECTIVES:

Concentrate on the following objectives, be able to:

1. discuss the meaning and functions of management;

2. explain the various types of management theories;

CHAPTER 1

Nature and Concept of Management


IN THIS CHAPTER, you will discover that all organizations—public or private, large, medium-size,
or
small, profit or nonprofit—need good managers in order to accomplish their goals; that
organizational management is, definitely, not an easy task; and that coordination, efficiency,
and effectiveness are required to carry it out.

Activity 1

*Give a specific scenarios where management is involve.


*In your daily activities, which involves planning, organizing, staffing, leading and controlling?
Analysis
*During this pandemic (COVID-19), what did you do to manage yourself?
*How do you handle the situation?

LESSON 1 Definition and Functions of Management


Definition of Terms

Management Functions - functions needed in order to accomplish the management process of


coordinating and overseeing the work performance of individuals working together in
organizations
Coordination – harmonious, integrated action of the various parts and processes of an
organization
Efficiency – the character of being able to yield the maximum output from a minimum amount
of input
Effectiveness – being adapted to produce an effect that will help the organization attain it aims

What is Management?

Management is the process of coordinating and overseeing the work performance of


individuals working together in organizations, so that they could efficiently accomplish their
chosen aims or goals.
It is also defined as the process of designing and maintaining an environment for
efficiently accomplishing selected aims (Heinz, Weihrich, and Koontz, 2005).
Management analysis is done by breaking it down into five major managerial duties;
thus, making managerial knowledge more understandable. Management functions include the
following:
Planning. Involves determining the organization’s goals or performance objectives,
defining strategic actions that must be done to accomplish them, and developing coordination
and integration activities.
Organizing. Demands assigning tasks, setting aside funds, and bringing harmonious
relations among the individuals and work groups or teams in the organization.
Staffing. Indicates filling in the different job positions in the organization’s structure; the
factors that influence this function include: size of the organization, types of jobs, number of
individuals to be recruited, and some internal or external pressures.
Leading. Entails influencing or motivating subordinates to do their best so that they
would be able to help the organization’s endeavor to attain their set goals.
Controlling. Involves evaluating and, if necessary, correcting the performance of the
individuals or work groups or teams to ensure that they are all working toward the previously
set goals and plans of the organization.
FIGURE 1.1 The Five Functions of Management

Coordination, Efficiency, and Effectiveness: Intrinsic to the Nature of


Management
Management functions—planning, organizing, staffing, leading, and controlling—will all go to
waste if coordination, efficiency, and effectiveness are not practiced by an organization’s
appointed managers. In other words, top-level managers, middle-level managers, and team
leaders or supervisors must all be conscious of the said practices of successful organizations as
they perform their management functions.
Webster’s Dictionary defines coordination as the harmonious, integrated action of the various
parts and processes of an organization; efficiency is being able to yield the maximum output
from a minimum amount of input; and effectiveness as being adopted to produce an effect, or
being able to do things correctly. When applied to management functions, coordination
ensures that all individuals, groups, or teams are harmoniously working together and moving
toward the accomplishment of the organization’s vision, mission, goals, and objectives;
efficiency, meanwhile, refers to the optimal use of scarce resources—human, financial,
physical, and mechanical—in order to bring maximum productivity; and effectiveness means
“doing things correctly” when engaged in activities that will help the organization attain its
aims.

Fast Learning Review


1. In your own words, define management. Compare your definition with the given definitions
in this lesson and point out the differences and similarities.
2. Explain why coordination, efficiency, and effectiveness are intrinsic to the nature of
management.
3. Enumerate and describe the five functions of management.
4. What is productivity? Is high productivity possible if efficiency is low? Explain your answer.

Exercise
1. Interview via messenger or smartphone two department chairpersons in your school and ask
if they make use of all of the five management functions. Compare their answers and try to
explain why there are similarities or differences.
2. Select two organizations (one public and one private, or one big and one small). Describe
how they are structured and explain why a study of management functions is necessary for
their managers.
LESSON 2
Evolution of Management Theories

Definition of Terms

Management Theories - theories that help improve the management process


Management Process - the coordinating and overseeing of the work performance of individuals
working together in organizations so that they could efficiently and effectively accomplish their
chosen goals

E volution is usually defined as slow stages of growth and development, starting from simple forms to
more complex forms. This, too, could be applied to management theories which have evolved from
simple improvement of work methods to more complex ones which focus not only on work method
improvement, but also on customer satisfaction and the conduct of people at work.
Studying the evolution of management theories will help you understand the beginnings of present-day
management practices; why some are still popular and why others are no longer in use; and why the
expansion and development of these theories are necessary in order to adapt to the changing times.
Management theories include the following:

Scientific Management Theory


This management theory makes use of the step by step, scientific methods for finding the single
best way for doing a job. Frederick W. Taylor (1856-1915) is known as the Father of Scientific
Management. While working as a mechanical engineer in a steel company in Pennsylvania in
the United States of America (USA) he could not help but notice the workers’ mistakes and
inefficiencies in doing their routine jobs. Their lack of enthusiasm, the discrepancy between
their abilities and aptitudes, and their job assignments result to low output. Because of these
observations, he tried to identify clear guidelines for the improvement of their productivity .
Taylor’s Scientific Management Principles (Robbins and Coulter, 2009) are as follows:
1. develop a science for each element of an individual’s work to replace the old
rule of thumb method;
2. scientifically select and then train, teach, and develop the workers;
3. heartily cooperate with the workers so as to ensure that all work is done in
accordance with the principles of the science that has been developed; and
4. divide work and responsibility almost equally between management and
workers.

FIGURE 1.2 Frederick W. Taylor

General Administrative Theory


The General Administrative Theory concentrates on the manager’s functions and what makes up good
management practice or implementation. Henri Fayol (1841–1925) and Max
Weber (1864–1920) are the personalities most commonly associated with it.
Fayol’s 19th century writings were concerned with managerial activities which
he based on his actual experience as a managing director in a big coal mining
company. He believed that management is an activity that all organizations must
practice and viewed it as separate from all other organizational activities such as
marketing, finance, research and development, and others.Weber, a German
sociologist wrote in the early 1900s that ideal organizations, especially large
ones, must have authority structures and coordination with others based on what he
referred to as bureaucracy. Present-day organizations still make use of Weber’s structural
design.
FIGURE 1.3 Henri Fayol

TABLE 1.1 Fayol’s and Weber’s contributions to General Administrative Theory

Henri Fayol’s Management Weber’s Bureaucracy


Principles
1. Work division or According to Weber,
specialization bureaucracy is an organizational
2. Authority form distinguished by the
3. Discipline following components:
4. Unity of command • division of labor
5. Unity of direction
• hierarchical identification of job
6. Subordination of individual
positions
interest to general interest
7. Remuneration/pay • detailed rules and regulations
8. Centralization • impersonal connections with
9. Scalar chain of authority one another
10. Maintenance of order
11. Equity/fairness
12. Stability/security of tenure
of workers
13. Employee initiative
14. Promotion of team spirit or
esprit de corps
TotaQuality Management (TQM) FIGURE 1.4 W. Edwards Deming

Total Quality Management is a management philosophy that focuses on the satisfaction of


customers, their needs, and expectations. Quality experts W. Edwards Deming (1900–1993) and
Joseph M. Juran (1904–2008) introduced this customer-oriented idea in the
1950s, however, the concept had few supporters. The Americans did
not immediately take to the idea since the US was enjoying
supremacy in the global market at the time. Japanese
manufacturers, on the other hand, took notice of it and
enthusiastically experimented on its application. When
Japanese firms began to be recognized for their quality
products, Western managers were forced to give a more serious
consideration of Deming’s and Juran’s modern management
philosophy that eventually became the foundation of today’s quality
management practices.

FIGURE 1.5 Joseph M. Juran

TABLE 1.2 TQM Pointers from Deming and Juran


(Ramasamy 2009)

Deming’s 14 Points for Top Juran’s Fitness of Quality


Management
1. Create constancy of purpose for 1. Quality of Design – through market
improvement of products and research, product, and concept
services.
2. Adopt the new TQM philosophy. 2. Quality of Conformance – through
management, manpower, and
technology
3. Cease dependence on mass inspec- 3. Availability – through reliability,
tion by doing things right and maintainability, and logistic
doing it right the first time. support
4. End the practice of awarding 4. Full Service – through promptness,
business on the basis of price tag competence, and integrity
alone.
5. Constantly improve the system of Juran’s Quality Planning
production and services. Roadmap
6. Institute training. 1. Identify your customers.
7. Adopt and institute leadership. 2. Determine their needs.
8. Drive out fear. 3. Translate them into one’s language.
9. Break down barriers between staff 4. Develop a product that can respond
areas. to needs.
10. Eliminate slogans, focus on 5. Develop processes which are able
correction of defects in the to produce those product
system. features.
11. Eliminate numerical quota for the 6. Prove that the process can produce
work force. the product.
12. Remove barriers that rob people 7. Transfer the resulting plans to the
of “pride of workmanship.” operating forces.
13. Encourage education and self-improvement for everyone.
14. Take action to accomplish the transformation.

Organizational Behavior (OB) Approach


The Organizational Behavior (OB) approach involves the study of the conduct, demeanor, or
action of people at work. Research on behavior helps managers carry out their functions—
leading, team building, resolving conflict, and others. Robert Owen, Mary Parker Follett, Hugo
Munsterberg, and Chester Barnard were the early supporters of the OB approach. During the
late 1700s, Owen noticed lamentable conditions in workplaces and proposed ideal ways to
improve the said conditions. Follett, in the early 1900s, introduced the idea that individual or
group behavior must be considered in organizational management. Likewise, in the early 1900s,
Munsterberg proposed the administering of psychological tests for the selection of would-be
employees in companies. Barnard, in the 1930s, suggested that cooperation is required in
organizations since it is, mainly, a social system.

Fast Learning Review

1. Who is considered as the Father of Scientific Management? Briefly enumerate his


contributions to scientific management.
2. What is the main concern of Henri Fayol’s Management Theory? How does his management
theory differ from that of Max Weber?
3. What do the acronyms TQM and OB stand for? Discuss these management theories and give
your comments regarding their usefulness to present-day management practices.
4. In your opinion, who among the management theorists discussed had the best contribution
to management practices? Explain your answer.

Exercise
1. Think of a difficult task which you, as a student, must accomplish. What are the steps needed
to complete the said task. Will the management theories discussed earlier help you to be
more efficient in completing the task? Explain your answer.
2. Use the Internet and choose a website offering current management news. Choose one good
news item or a negative news item and relate it to the management theories discussed in the
lesson.

Reference:

Cabrera, et al. (2016). Organization and Management Textbook for Senior High School. Vibal Group, Inc.
Pp 2-8

Prepared by:

ROSIE O. COROT
Subject Teacher

Noted by:

GEMMA A. TAN, MAEd


OIC-Asst. Principal

Approved by:

MA. HELENA V. ALUMBRES, PhD., LlB


Secondary School Principal IV

You might also like