Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Schizoid Personality Disorder
Schizoid Personality Disorder
919
920 TRIEBWASSER ET AL.
Since the publication of DSM-III (APA, 1980), in fact, ScPD has been
among the least studied of the personality disorders, with virtually no em-
pirical investigations specifically devoted to it in the published literature.
Descriptive information about ScPD is derived almost entirely from broad-
based epidemiological studies of personality disorders as a whole (e.g.,
Coid, Yang, Tyrer, Roberts, & Ullrich, 2006), plus a few examinations of
the cluster A personality disorders and their relationship to schizophrenia
(e.g., Kendler, Myers, Torgersen, Neale, & Reichborn-Kjennerud, 2007),
although this latter group of studies tends to focus on SPD rather than
ScPD (e.g., Hazlett et al., 2008; Torgersen et al., 2002). There are virtually
no published neurobiological studies devoted exclusively—or even primar-
ily—to ScPD, and there is no published quantitative somatic or psycho-
therapeutic treatment research. This academic neglect has persisted de-
spite evidence that ScPD has been found by Ullrich and colleagues (2007)
to imply the lowest functioning among the personality disorders with re-
spect to achievement and interpersonal relations and has been associated
with considerable reduction in quality of life (Cramer, Torgersen, & Kring-
len, 2006; Grant et al., 2004). Also, although probably the least common
of the cluster A disorders and one of the less prevalent (0.9%) of the DSM-
IV personality disorders (Torgersen, 2009), ScPD nevertheless occurs fair-
ly frequently in both clinical (Herpertz, Steinmeyer, & Sass, 1994) and
general (Torgersen, Kringlen, & Cramer, 2001) populations.
There are several possible reasons for the relative paucity of published
research on ScPD. In clinical populations, it is consistently one of the
least commonly encountered personality disorders (2.2%) (Stuart et al.,
1998; Zimmerman, Rothschild, & Chelminski, 2005): Although, as noted
above, ScPD patients sometimes find their way into treatment, because of
their isolativeness they are probably less likely to do so than almost all
other personality-disordered individuals (Tyrer, Mitchard, Methuen, &
Ranger, 2003); presumably this influences their willingness to be recruit-
ed or retained in research studies as well. Investigators interested in clus-
ter A disorders have tended to devote more attention to SPD, with its more
clear-cut familial association to schizophrenia and more easily identified
and quantifiable “positive” thought disorder symptoms, than to ScPD.
Sometimes this preferential recruiting of SPD subjects occurs by choice
(e.g., McClure, Barch, Flory, Harvey, & Siever, 2008), and sometimes it oc-
curs when families of schizophrenia probands are culled and SPD turns
out to be the predominant Axis II diagnosis (e.g., Filbey, Holcomb, Nair,
Christensen, & Garver, 1999).
The current conceptualization of ScPD has been challenged as repre-
senting the uneasy union of two separate disorders, an SPD-like “affect-
constricted disorder,” and a “seclusive disorder” similar to avoidant per-
sonality disorder (APD) (Kalus, Bernstein, & Siever, 1995). On the other
hand, it might be argued that ScPD and APD are fundamentally different
in that APD patients crave social interaction but are too anxious—because
of low self-esteem or rejection sensitivity—to pursue or enjoy it, whereas
ScPD patients are genuinely indifferent to the company of others. Howev-
SCHIZOID PERSONALITY DISORDER921
er, in practice it can be difficult to make this distinction, and family re-
search has suggested that APD is in fact part of the schizophrenia spec-
trum (Fogelson et al., 2007; Silberschmidt & Sponheim, 2008). It may be,
then, that the habitual reclusiveness central to ScPD can often better be
attributed to other disorders, for example, APD, mood disorders, anxiety
disorders, and disorders with a prominent paranoia or irritability compo-
nent, that cause affected individuals to isolate themselves.
As stated above, there are few published psychometric studies known to
us that comment on clinical validators for ScPD. Recently, the Interper-
sonal Measure of Schizoid Personality Disorder (IM-SZ), a means of diag-
nosing ScPD based on nonverbal and interpersonal behaviors, was tested
in two large forensic samples, one in the United States and one in the
United Kingdom. The IM-SZ demonstrated adequate reliability and validi-
ty (Kosson et al., 2008).
A large population-based study found that ScPD and paranoid person-
ality disorder (PPD) were strongly associated with dysthymia, mania, pan-
ic disorder with agoraphobia, social phobia, and generalized anxiety disor-
der (Grant et al., 2005). ScPD has also been found to be correlated with
violent behavior (Pulay et al., 2008) as well as with arthritis (McWilliams,
Clara, Murphy, Cox, & Sareen, 2008), obesity (Petry, Barry, Pietrzak, &
Wagner, 2008) and, in two separate cohorts, coronary artery disease (Mo-
ran et al., 2007; Pietrzak, Wagner, & Petry, 2007). A subset of individuals
self-described as “asexuals” appear to meet criteria for ScPD (Brotto,
Knudson, Inskip, Rhodes, & Erskine, 2010), as does a subset of individu-
als found guilty of multiple sexual murders (Hill, Habermann, Berner, &
Briken, 2007). It has been suggested on theoretical grounds that ScPD
may be a precursor of violence toward self and/or others (Loza & Hanna,
2006), and ScPD symptoms have been found to be prospective risk factors
for recidivism in criminals (Hiscoke, Långström, Ottosson, & Grann,
2003). In a sample of individuals with kleptomania, ScPD was the second
most common personality disorder (after PPD) (Grant et al., 2004).
Individuals with ScPD thus appear to be at high risk for marked func-
tional and/or behavioral disturbance.
PREMORBID BACKGROUND
Childhood and adolescent major depressive disorder was found to be more
strongly predictive of adult ScPD than of any other adult personality dis-
order (Ramklint, von Knorring, von Knorring, & Ekselius, 2003). In adult
prisoners, a history of childhood institutionalization has been found to be
associated with ScPD traits (Yang, Ullrich, Roberts, & Coid, 2007).
LABORATORY STUDIES
As stated above, there are no psychological test data, genetic studies, or
neurobiological studies on ScPD itself. Such studies have been done with
samples that include patients with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders
922 TRIEBWASSER ET AL.
EPIDEMIOLOGICAL/FAMILY STUDIES
According to DSM-IV, ScPD “is uncommon in clinical settings” (APA, 1994,
p. 639). Since DSM-IV’s publication, the prevalence of ScPD in clinical
populations has been estimated as ranging from 0.0% (Molinari, Ames, &
Essa, 1994) to 11.5% (Herpertz et al., 1994), depending on the diagnostic
methods used and the nature of the sample studied. In general, struc-
tured diagnostic methods yield higher prevalence rates than unstructured
clinical assessments. The most convincing estimate of the prevalence
among psychiatric outpatients is probably that of Zimmerman and col-
leagues (2005), who found 1.4% of patients meeting criteria for ScPD and
0.3% for whom ScPD was the only personality disorder. In nonclinical
samples, prevalence estimates have ranged from 0.0%, in studies of
healthy and obsessive-compulsive controls and their relatives (Black, Noy-
es, Pfohl, Goldstein, & Blum, 1993; Moldin, Rice, Erlenmeyer-Kimling, &
Squires-Wheeler, 1994), to 3.13%, in the National Epidemiologic Survey
on Alcohol and Related Conditions, a population-based U.S. study using
lay interviewers (Grant et al., 2004). The most convincing population-
based estimates are probably those obtained by Torgersen and colleagues
(2001), who found a weighted prevalence of 1.7% in Oslo, Norway; and
Coid and colleagues (2006), who found a weighted prevalence of 0.8% in
the United Kingdom.
The heritability of ScPD itself has been estimated as .29 in a twin study
using a Norwegian clinical sample (Torgersen et al., 2000), and .28 in a
twin study of dimensional representations of the cluster A personality dis-
orders using a Norwegian population-based sample (Kendler et al., 2006).
The SSDs as a group tend to show strong familial aggregation in some
(Filbey et al., 1999; Parnas et al., 1993; Siever et al., 1990) although not
all (Kendler, Gruenberg, & Kinney, 1994) evaluations. This familial aggre-
gation, if it exists, appears not to be caused by shared environmental ef-
fects (Reichborn-Kjennerud, 2008), but may in part be secondary to a
gene–environment interaction (Tienari et al., 2004). In ScPD, the best-fit
hereditary model includes both genetic and environmental factors (Kend-
ler et al., 2007).
FOLLOW-UP STUDIES
In a 2-year follow-up study of personality disorder symptoms in older ado-
lescent psychiatric outpatients, ScPD dimensions, along with antisocial
personality disorder dimensions, showed the highest degree of stability
over time (Chanen et al., 2004). Within a stratified random community
SCHIZOID PERSONALITY DISORDER923
sample assessed for DSM-III personality disorders and then for psychoso-
cial functioning 13–18 years later, ScPD traits were inversely associated
with later Global Assessment of Functioning Scale scores, even when con-
trolling for Axis I co-morbidity (Hong et al., 2005).
TREATMENT-RELATED STUDIES
There is a marked paucity of treatment-response studies of ScPD as such
in the published literature. A low number of schizoid personality disorder
symptoms have been found to be predictive of good outcome in the phar-
macological treatment of depression (Mulder, Joyce, Frampton, Luty, &
Sullivan, 2006).
In a large epidemiological survey, ScPD has been shown to be associat-
ed with emotional disability (Grant et al., 2004). Cramer and colleagues
(2006) found an association between ScPD and poorer quality of life that
was stronger than the effect of sociodemographic variables, physical
health, or Axis I pathology. More recently, ScPD was the second most fre-
quently diagnosed personality disorder (after PPD) in a sample of clients at
an urban homeless shelter (Connolly, Cobb-Richardson, & Ball, 2008).
CONCLUSIONS
Unlike SPD, which has received substantial validation as a distinct disor-
der, ScPD suffers from a paucity of such validating data. Although ScPD
occurs frequently in clinical and nonclinical samples reported in the pub-
lished literature, it may be that ScPD’s core features often can best be
explained by other disorders that provide a more comprehensive formula-
tion of the individual’s psychological issues. There is some evidence for
ScPD belonging among the SSDs, although the empirical support for this
inclusion is not nearly as compelling as for SPD. Meanwhile, the research
community largely has avoided conducting descriptive, neurobiological, or
treatment studies in ScPD. Given these conceptual, psychometric, and
practical problems with the DSM-IV-TR ScPD construct, it seems reason-
924TRIEBWASSER ET AL.
able for DSM-5 to move away from ScPD as a categorical diagnosis and
instead to include Detachment traits as a codable dimension that can
have a substantial impact on an individual’s functioning and quality of
life, and that can moreover be a focus of treatment.
REFERENCES
orders as observed with a new inven- Koo, M.-S., Dickey, C. C., Park, H.-J., Ku-
tory for the assessment of personality bicki, M., Ji, N. Y., Bouix, S., et al.
disorders. European Archives of Psy- (2006). Smaller neocortical gray mat-
chiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, ter and larger sulcal cerebrospinal
244(3), 161–169. fluid volumes in neuroleptic-naive
Hill, A., Habermann, N., Berner, W., & Brik- women with schizotypal personality
en, P. (2007). Psychiatric disorders in disorder. Archives of General Psychia-
single and multiple sexual murderers. try, 63(10), 1090–1100.
Psychopathology, 40(1), 22–28. Kosson, D. S., Blackburn, R., Byrnes, K. A.,
Hiscoke, U. L., Långström, N., Ottosson, H., Park, S., Logan, C., & Donnelly, J. P.
& Grann, M. (2003). Self-reported per- (2008). Assessing interpersonal as-
sonality traits and disorders (DSM-IV) pects of schizoid personality disorder:
and risk of criminal recidivism: A pro- Preliminary validation studies. Jour-
spective study. Journal of Personality nal of Personality Assessment, 90(2),
Disorders, 17(4), 293–305. 185–196.
Hong, J. P., Samuels, J., Bienvenu, O. J., Loza, W., & Hanna, S. (2006). Is schizoid
Hsu, F.-C., Eaton, W. W., Costa, P. T., personality a forerunner of homicidal
Jr., et al. (2005). The longitudinal rela- or suicidal behavior?: A case study. In-
tionship between personality disorder ternational Journal of Offender Thera-
dimensions and global functioning in py and Comparative Criminology, 50(3),
a community-residing population. Psy- 338–343.
chological Medicine, 35(6), 891–895. McClure, M. M., Barch, D. M., Flory, J. D.,
Kalus, O., Bernstein, D. P., & Siever, L.J. Harvey, P. D., & Siever, L. J. (2008).
(1995). Schizoid personality disorder. Context processing in schizotypal per-
In W. J. Livesley (Ed.), The DSM-IV sonality disorder: Evidence of specific-
personality disorders (pp. 58–70). New ity of impairment to the schizophrenia
York: Guilford. spectrum. Journal of Abnormal Psy-
Kendler, K. S., Czajkowski, N., Tambs, K., chology, 117(2), 342–354.
Torgersen, S., Aggen, S. H., Neale, McWilliams, L. A., Clara, I. P., Murphy, P.D.J.,
M. C., et al. (2006). Dimensional rep- Cox, B. J., & Sareen, J. (2008). Asso-
resentations of DSM-IV cluster A per- ciations between arthritis and a broad
sonality disorders in a population- range of psychiatric disorders: Find-
based sample of Norwegian twins: A ings from a nationally representative
multivariate study. Psychological Med- sample. Journal of Pain, 9(1), 37–44.
icine, 36(11), 1583–1591. Moldin, S. O., Rice, J. P., Erlenmeyer-Kim-
Kendler, K. S., Gruenberg, A. M., & Kinney, ling, L., & Squires-Wheeler, E. (1994).
D. K. (1994). Independent diagnoses of Latent structure of DSM-III-R Axis II
adoptees and relatives as defined by psychopathology in a normal sample.
DSM-III in the provincial and national Journal of Abnormal Psychology,
samples of the Danish Adoption Study 103(2), 259–266.
of Schizophrenia. Archives of General Molinari, V., Ames, A., & Essa, M. (1994).
Psychiatry, 51(6), 456–468. Prevalence of personality disorders in
Kendler, K. S., Myers, J., Torgersen, S., two geropsychiatric inpatient units.
Neale, M. C., & Reichborn-Kjennerud, Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and
T. (2007). The heritability of cluster A Neurology, 7(4), 209–215.
personality disorders assessed by both Moran, P., Stewart, R., Brugha, T., Bebbing-
personal interview and questionnaire. ton, P., Bhugra, D., Jenkins, R., et al.
Psychological Medicine, 37(5), 655–665. (2007). Personality disorder and car-
Klein, M. (1975). Envy and gratitude and other diovascular disease: Results from a
works, 1946–1963. London: Hogarth. national household survey. Journal of
Koenigsberg, H. W., Buchsbaum, M. S., Clinical Psychiatry, 68(1), 69–74.
Buchsbaum, B. R., Schneiderman, Mulder, R. T., Joyce, P. R., Frampton, C. M.
J. S., Tang, C. Y., New, A., et al. (2005). A., Luty, S. E., & Sullivan, P. F. (2006).
Functional MRI of visuospatial work- Six months of treatment for depres-
ing memory in schizotypal personality sion: Outcome and predictors of the
disorder: A region-of-interest analysis. course of illness. American Journal of
Psychological Medicine, 35(7), 1019– Psychiatry, 163(1), 95–100.
1030. Parnas, J., Cannon, T. D., Jacobsen, B.,
926TRIEBWASSER ET AL.
Schulsinger, H., Schulsinger, F., & L., Grove, W., & Cadoret, R. (1998).
Mednick, S. A. (1993). Lifetime DSM- The cooccurrence of DSM-III-R person-
III-R diagnostic outcomes in the off- ality disorders. Journal of Personality
spring of schizophrenic mothers. Re- Disorders, 12(4), 302–315.
sults from the Copenhagen High-Risk Tienari, P., Wynne, L. C., Sorri, A., Lahti, I.,
Study. Archives of General Psychiatry, Läksy, K., Moring, J., et al. (2004).
50(9), 707–714. Genotype-environment interaction in
Petry, N. M., Barry, D., Pietrzak, R. H., & schizophrenia-spectrum disorder. Long-
Wagner, J. A. (2008). Overweight and term follow-up study of Finnish adop-
obesity are associated with psychiatric tees. British Journal of Psychiatry,
disorders: Results from the National 184, 216–222.
Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Torgersen, S. (2009). Prevalence, sociodemo-
Related Conditions. Psychosomatic graphics, and functional impairment.
Medicine, 70(3), 288–297. In J. M. Oldham, A. E. Skodol, & D. S.
Pietrzak, R. H., Wagner, J. A., & Petry, N. M. Bender (Eds.), Essentials of personali-
(2007). DSM-IV personality disorders ty disorders (pp. 83–102). Washington,
and coronary heart disease in older DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.
adults: Results from the National Epi- Torgersen, S., Edvardsen, J., Øien, P. A.,
demiologic Survey on Alcohol and Re- Onstad, S., Skre, I., Lygren, S., et al.
lated Conditions. Journals of Gerontol- (2002). Schizotypal personality disor-
ogy. Series B, Psychological Sciences der inside and outside the schizo-
and Social Sciences, 62(5), P295–P299. phrenic spectrum. Schizophrenia Re-
Pulay, A. J., Dawson, D. A., Hasin, D. S., search, 54(1–2), 33–38.
Goldstein, R. B., Ruan, W. J., Picker- Torgersen, S., Kringlen, E., & Cramer, V.
ing, R. P., et al. (2008). Violent behav- (2001). The prevalence of personality
ior and DSM-IV psychiatric disorders: disorders in a community sample. Ar-
Results from the National Epidemio- chives of General Psychiatry, 58(6),
logic Survey on Alcohol and Related 590–596.
Conditions. Journal of Clinical Psychi- Torgersen, S., Lygren, S., Oien, P. A., Skre,
atry, 69(1), 12–22. I., Onstad, S., Edvardsen, J., et al.
Ramklint, M., von Knorring, A.-L., von Knor- (2000). A twin study of personality dis-
ring, L., & Ekselius, L. (2003). Child orders. Comprehensive Psychiatry,
and adolescent psychiatric disorders 41(6), 416–425.
predicting adult personality disorder: Tyrer, P., Mitchard, S., Methuen, C., & Rang-
A follow-up study. Nordic Journal of er, M. (2003). Treatment rejecting and
Psychiatry, 57(1), 23–28. treatment seeking personality disor-
Reichborn-Kjennerud, T. (2008). Genetics of ders: Type R and Type S. Journal of
personality disorders. Psychiatric Clin- Personality Disorders, 17(3), 263–268.
ics of North America, 31(3), 421–440, Ullrich, S., Farrington, D. P., & Coid, J. W.
vi–vii. (2007). Dimensions of DSM-IV person-
Siever, L. J., Silverman, J. M., Horvath, T. ality disorders and life-success. Jour-
B., Klar, H., Coccaro, E., Keefe, R. S., nal of Personality Disorders, 21(6),
et al. (1990). Increased morbid risk for 657–663.
schizophrenia-related disorders in rel- Yang, M., Ullrich, S., Roberts, A., & Coid, J.
atives of schizotypal personality disor- (2007). Childhood institutional care
dered patients. Archives of General and personality disorder traits in
Psychiatry, 47(7), 634–640. adulthood: Findings from the British
Silberschmidt, A. L., & Sponheim, S. R. national surveys of psychiatric mor-
(2008). Personality in relation to ge- bidity. American Journal of Orthopsy-
netic liability for schizophrenia and chiatry, 77(1), 67–75.
bipolar disorder: Differential associa- Zimmerman, M., Rothschild, L., & Chelmin-
tions with the COMT Val 108/158 Met ski, I. (2005). The prevalence of DSM-
polymorphism. Schizophrenia Research, IV personality disorders in psychiatric
100(1–3), 316–324. outpatients. American Journal of Psy-
Stuart, S., Pfohl, B., Battaglia, M., Bellodi, chiatry, 162(10), 1911–1918.
Copyright of Journal of Personality Disorders is the property of Guilford Publications Inc. and its content may
not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written
permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.