Engineering Change Request (ECR)-DHARAVI STATION

Status
No. ECR No. Document Description Document Reference Revision Submission ECR REPLY STATUES Remarks
A B C
Temporary Structure
1. Suggesion
Engineering Change Request for Providing
(ECR) No. 001 'L' Station
for Dharavi 300mm near Not Submitted to GC.
1 pile toe. Internal Closed by DDC
2. Suggesion for welded and CJV
Splice.
1. Suggesion
Engineering Change Request for 100%
(ECR) No. 002 of bar Station
for Dharavi lapping. Not Submitted to GC.
2 Internal Closed by DDC
2. Suggesion for Tack weld for lapped and CJV
Bars.
1. Removing
Engineering Change Request (ECR) No. L-300mm at the Station
003 for Dharavi Toe of the
Not Submitted to GC.
cage.
3 Internal Closed by DDC
2. Suggesion for
and CJV
terminating L given in 7.00mtr length from
bottom
Engineering Change Request (ECR)
Levels ofNo.
of cage forfor
004
Capping 16M &Grid
17MStation
Dharavi
Beam 1pile.(Drg
to 4(NalaNo. - Not Submitted to GC.
JKC-CAC-SDH-4607-002-A2).
side).
4 Internal Closed by DDC
and CJV
Pile(ECR)
Engineering Change Request No. N46
No. is found
005 to be inside
for Dharavi excavation
Station Not Submitted to GC.
5 face approx-150mm. Internal Closed by DDC
and CJV
Providing
Engineering Change Request 25mm
(ECR) No. 006dia
forbars instead
Dharavi of 32mm
Station
6 Bars.

In Ancillary
Engineering Change Request (ECR) No. 007 for Dharavi Station
Pile(S25,S09,S85,S27,S17,S31.S13,S41,S8 Not Submitted to GC.
7 7,S35,S89,S01,S39,S15,S33,S11,S109,S07, Internal Closed by DDC
S37 & E141 to E113) casted of length less and CJV
than 6M.

Reinforcement
Engineering Change Request cage
(ECR) No. 008 forgot lowered
Dharavi Approx 1 to
Station Not Submitted to GC.
8 1.2 M for Pile No. N-222. Internal Closed by DDC
and CJV
Soft(ECR)
Engineering Change Request Pile E95,E97,E99 done by
No. 009 for Dharavi M10 instead
Station Not Submitted to GC.
9 of M20. Internal Closed by DDC
and CJV
Typical
Engineering Change Request (ECR)splicing
No. 010 change from 2Station
for Dharavi pices of Not Submitted to GC.
10 750mm to 3 pices of 400mm. Internal Closed by DDC
and CJV
Heating
Engineering Change Request (ECR)ofNo.
Reingorcement at top
011 for Dharavi of capping
Station
11 beam during 90 Degree bending.

Secant
Engineering Change Request (ECR)pile
No.main
012reinforcement of 32mm dia
for Dharavi Station Not Submitted to GC.
12 replaced by 25mm Dia due to delay in Internal Closed by DDC
procurement. At Grid 8-11 building side. and CJV
Ancillary
Engineering Change Request (ECR) building
No. 013 with chamfering
for Dharavi at south
Station Not Submitted to GC.
13 west corner due to site constrains. Internal Closed by DDC
and CJV
 Engineering Change Request (ECR)
South No.
Side 014 for Dharavi Station
pile Not Submitted to GC.
14 S612,S616,S632,S640,S242,S240 have Internal Closed by DDC
been boared at shotter depths. and CJV
Engineering Change Request (ECR) location
Revising No. 015 for
for KP
Dharavi
90 asStation
drilling bit Not Submitted to GC.
15 broke at 10M depth. Internal Closed by DDC
and CJV
King(ECR)
Engineering Change Request PostNo.
pile016
no. for Dharavi Station
16 33.35,29,30,31,32,25,26,12a,11a,8a,8,131,1
32 inflinging with RCC drain below.

South
Engineering Change Request Side
(ECR) pile
No. 017no.for
S241 and Station
Dharavi S243 have Not Submitted to GC.
17 been boared at shorter depths. Internal Closed by DDC
and CJV
1.Using
Engineering Change Request (ECR)NPV
No. section
018 for of 500 x Station
Dharavi 200 of
92.69Kg/M instead of UB 533 x 210 of
18 92Kg/M.
2.Making brick masonary
instead of RCC wall.

In grid
Engineering Change Request 17No.
(ECR) to 18
019building side Electrical
for Dharavi Station room
C 26 has been removed and also 1200 mm Not Submitted to GC.
19 dia SWD pile inflinging current layout of pile. Internal Closed by DDC
and CJV

Revising
Engineering Change Request (ECR) location
No. 020 for
for KP 41 and
Dharavi 42 as drilling
Station Not Submitted to GC.
20 hammer broke. Internal Closed by DDC
and CJV
Revising
Engineering Change Request (ECR) splicing
No. 021 details of walers.
for Dharavi Station Not Submitted to GC.
21 Internal Closed by DDC
and CJV
Revising
Engineering Change Request (ECR) the
No.bolting
022 fordetails
DharaviforStation
sitting of Deck Not Submitted to GC.
22 pannel on SB2. Internal Closed by DDC
and CJV
Removing
Engineering Change Request and023
(ECR) No. replacing the Load
for Dharavi cell by
Station Not Submitted to GC.
23 splicing details at Ancillary. Internal Closed by DDC
and CJV
Revising
Engineering Change Request (ECR) the
No.angle of Dharavi
024 for anchorsStation
at Nala side Not Submitted to GC.
24 due to inflingement of the Gabion. Internal Closed by DDC
and CJV
Revising
Engineering Change Request (ECR) the
No.Levels
025 forofDharavi
anchorsStation
at Building Not Submitted to GC.
25 side due to inflingement ot the decking king Internal Closed by DDC
post. and CJV
Revising
Engineering Change Request (ECR) the
No.details
026 forfor welding
Dharavi of diagonal
Station Not Submitted to GC.
26 strut at Ancillary. Internal Closed by DDC
and CJV
Crash
Engineering Change Request Barriar
(ECR) Revided
No. 027 details Station
for Dharavi per site Not Submitted to GC.
27 requirement Main taffic Decking. Internal Closed by DDC
and CJV
 Access
Engineering Change Request (ECR)forNo.
nehru
028 society.
for Dharavi Station Not Submitted to GC.
28 Internal Closed by DDC
and CJV
Engineering Change Request (ECR)Revising
Further No. 029the
for anchors
Dharavi at
Station
Nala side, Not Submitted to GC.
29 Staggering the anchors at 1st level & 2nd Internal Closed by DDC
level. and CJV
Revising
Engineering Change Request (ECR) the
No.details
030 forfor Anchors
Dharavi and walers
Station Not Submitted to GC.
30 at North head wall, lowering 1st layer by Internal Closed by DDC
100mm . and CJV
Providing
Engineering Change Request diagonal
(ECR) No. strut
031 for at north
Dharavi head wall
Station Not Submitted to GC.
31 and removing anchor at pile No. E 003. Internal Closed by DDC
and CJV
At Grid
Engineering Change Request 17-20
(ECR) below
No. 032 forRCC Deck
Dharavi Nala side it
Station
32 is not possible to provide Anchoring.

Engineering Change Request (ECR)

Nalla sideNo. 033 for drilled
3 anchors Dharavi at Station
+1.5m Level
33 and rest at +1.00m Level, Splicing not
possible.
Engineering Change Request (ECR)ofNo.
Splicing SB2034 forpossible
not DharaviatStation
grid 5 to 9
34 due to site constrains.

Lowering
Engineering Change Request 2nd035
(ECR) No. andfor
3rdDharavi
layer anchors
Stationat Nalla Not Submitted to GC.
35 side upto 200mm. Internal Closed by DDC
and CJV
At Building
Engineering Change Request side
(ECR) No. 036grid
for17 to 20 installation
Dharavi Station of
36 waler is not possible due to site constrains

At Building
Engineering Change Request side
(ECR) No. 037grid
for17 to 20 installation
Dharavi Station of
37 waler is not possible due to Bracket leg of
SWD 1200mm dia.

Using
Engineering Change Request UBNo.
(ECR) 533038
x 210
forof 92Kg/M
Dharavi section
Station
38 instead of ISMB 500.

At Building
Engineering Change Request side
(ECR) No. 039grid
for17 to 21 pile
Dharavi depth
Station Not Submitted to GC.
39 reduced from 14 to 8m. Internal Closed by DDC
and CJV
Not(ECR)
Engineering Change Request providing anchor
No. 040 at pile No.
for Dharavi E 003 due to
Station
40 operation problem of rig.

Revising
Engineering Change Request (ECR) the
No.details
041 forfor Anchors
Dharavi and walers
Station Not Submitted to GC.
41 at North head wall, lowering 1st layer by Internal Closed by DDC
100mm . and CJV
Revising
Engineering Change Request (ECR) the
No.angle and
042 for levels Station
Dharavi 1st,2nd,3rd Not Submitted to GC.
42 Level of anchors and walers at Nala side. Internal Closed by DDC
and CJV
 Engineering Change Request (ECR) the
Revising No.angle
043 for
andDharavi
levels Station
1st,2nd Level Engineering Change Request
43 of anchors and walers at Building side. (ECR) No. 004 for Dharavi
Station
Engineering Change Request (ECR) the
Revising No.angle
044 for
andDharavi
levels Station
1st,2nd Level
44 of anchors and walers at Building side due to
SWD pipe.

Strut
Engineering Change Request of second
(ECR) layer
No. 045 to be replaced
for Dharavi Stationby UGC05-GCC-DEC-000498 R00 25-09-2019
45 ground anchor/ Rock Anchor at Ancillary. OPEN

Capping
Engineering Change Request (ECR) beam reinforcement
No. 046 shoter at grid
for Dharavi Station
46 17 to 19.

Providing
Engineering Change Request Ledge
(ECR) No. 047eliminating
for Dharaviniche as shown UGC05-GCC-DEC-000460
Station R00 10-08-2019
47 in Drawing No. UGC05-CAC-SDH-5801-005- OPEN
A0

Permanent Structure
In CRD
Engineering Change Request (ECR)Drawing
No. 048offor
concourse slab two
Dharavi Station UGC05-GCC-DEC-000469 R00 22-08-2019 √ 30-08-2019
layers of vertical reinforcement is shown in
48 outer side of wall. Whereas CRD Drawing of CLOSED
extended concourse slab one layers of
vertical reinforcement is shown.

In grid
Engineering Change Request 22-24
(ECR) No. East side
049 for wall reinforcement
Dharavi Station UGC05-GCC-DEC-000496 R00 24-09-2019 √ 24-09-2019
49 patten is revised without change in area of CLOSED
reinforcement.

In grid
Engineering Change Request 18-24
(ECR) No. West side
050 for wall reinforcement
Dharavi Station UGC05-GCC-DEC-000497 R00 24-09-2019 √ 05-11-2019
50 patten is revised without change in area of CLOSED
reinforcement.

As per
Engineering Change Request CRD
(ECR) No.drawings base slab
051 for Dharavi dowels for
Station UGC05-GCC-DEC-000534 R01 03-03-2020 √ 04-03-2020
under platform walls from grid 2 to 22 are
given as 16 @135 mm c/c. kindly request
you to check that can bar spacing be revised
51 to 200mm. CLOSED

1) As
Engineering Change Request per No.
(ECR) CRD052
drawing of dharavi
for Dharavi Station
Station UGC05-GCC-DEC-000609 R00 24-02-2020 √ 05-03-2020
Walls, from grid 2 -4 on soil face of west side
52 & east walls,32mm dia starter bar is lapped CLOSED
with 20mm main bar & again it is lapped with
32mm bar at upper level and extra 32mm bar
is
In provided
grid 22-24inColumn
20 mm barC 15area.
and We wish
C 16, is to UGC05-GCC-DEC-000509 R00 10-10-2019 √ 10-10-2019
provide
provided32mm bar instead
with column of and
sketch 20mm main bar
design
54 and provide extra 20mm bar instead of CLOSED
document.
32mm
Engineering Change Request diaNo.
(ECR) bar.054 for Dharavi Station
The(ECR)
Engineering Change Request revised detailfor
No.055 of Dharavi
column and wall W003 UGC05-GCC-DEC-000551
station R00 03-12-2019 √ 03-01-2020
2) As per
W004 is provided withCRD drawing
revised of
drawing
55 dharavi Station Walls, from grid 2and
UGC05-STR-SDH-5551-004-A1 -4 on CLOSED
Excavation face of west side & east
UGC05-STR-SDH-5551-005-A2
walls,20mm dia starter bar is lapped with
32mm main bar & again it is lapped with
20mm bar at upper level and extra 16mm bar
is provided in 32 mm bar area. We wish to
provide 20mm bar instead of 32mm main bar
and provide extra 32mm bar instead of
16mm dia bar.
 Engineering Change Request
The(ECR) No. 056
horizontal for Dharavi are
reinforcement revised as UGC05-GCC-DEC-000518
Station R00 14-10-2019 √ 14-10-2019
56 per design requirement, and revised EAT CLOSED
check calculations attached.
Engineering Change Request
The(ECR) No.057
wall size for Dharavi
of 800mm shall station
be followed UGC05-GCC-DEC-000549 R01 28-12-2019 √ 30-01-2020
W06,W07 and W08 as per reinforcement
57 drawing. At Ancillary CLOSED

Engineering Change Request (ECR)C14

Column No.058 for Dharavi
of drop and sketch is UGC05-GCC-DEC-000533
station
is updated R00 14-11-2019 √ 02-12-2019
58 provided. CLOSED

Foundation
Engineering Change Request size for
(ECR) No.059 forC13 mismatch
Dharavi stationin GA UGC05-GCC-DEC-000562 R00 14-12-2019 √ 24-12-2019
59 plan & Section at Dharavi Station CLOSED

Concourse
Engineering Change Request Level for
(ECR) No.060 Slab top & bottom
Dharavi station UGC05-GCC-DEC-000561 R00 14-12-2019 √ 24-12-2019
60 reinforcement missing at Dharavi Station CLOSED

Engineering Change Request

The(ECR)
baseNo.061 for 02-04
slab in bw Dharavi track bed side UGC05-GCC-DEC-000548
of station R01 14-03-2020
is raised due to both TBMs are retrived and
61 under Review DTL Input Required
slab detail is kept same as of CRD with out
reducing
As per
Engineering Change Request theNo.062
(ECR) wall thickness station is only UGC05-GCC-DEC-000550
in opening
for Dharavi R00 09-12-2019 √ 03-01-2020
987mm and it is behaves like column with
62 min axial load, revised and detail provided CLOSED
(gird 18-19, ext wall building side)

Bar(ECR)
Engineering Change Request diameter of Horizontal
No.064 reinforcement
for Dharavi station of UGC05-GCC-DEC-000568 R00 31-12-2019 √ 16-01-2020
64 wall at both face from concourse to roof at CLOSED
Dharavi Station

As per
Engineering Change Request latest
(ECR) plumbing
No.065 arrangement
for Dharavi station of UGC05-GCC-DEC-000604 R00 17-02-2020 √ 05-03-2020
concourse level slab, Kindly provide revised
65 concourse level drawing for grid 22-24/J-L CLOSED

Engineering Change Request (ECR)

As per CRDNo.067 for Dharavi
drawing slab at grid 20 UGC05-GCC-DEC-000616
of base station R00 29-02-2020 √ 10-03-2020
to 22, top reinforcement bar T1 at drain pit
67 location is given as 25mm dia bar & at site CLOSED
20mm dia bar is provided. Please advice.

For (ECR)
Engineering Change Request head No.068
wall at grid 2, Kindlystation
for Dharavi provide ring UGC05-GCC-DEC-000622 R00 16-03-2020
68 beam general arrangement & reinforcement under Review DTL Input Required
detailsdetails

As per
Engineering Change Request CRD
(ECR) Drawings
No.069 of wall station
for Dharavi and column UGC05-GCC-DEC-000648- R01 21-07-2020 √ 31-07-2020
reinforcement details, Lift wall Reinforcement R01
69 were not given, Kindly provide lift wall and CLOSED
genaral allignment Details
 Engineering Change Request (ECR)
As per CRDNo.070 for Dharavi
Drawings of wall station
and column UGC05-GCC-DEC-000648- R01 27-08-2020
reinforcement details, Knockout panel R01
Reinforcement were not given, Kindly
70 provide Knockout panel reinforcement details under Review DTL Input Required
in east side external wall above concourse at
grid 12-14.

71
72
For (ECR)
Engineering Change Request Dharavi Station
No.073 forroof Slabstation
Dharavi at grid 17 to UGC05-GCC-DEC-000640- R02 18-08-2020
19, Temporary cutout is required for tower R02
73 crane kindly suggest if any extra under Review
reinforcement is required near tower crane
cut out.

For (ECR)
Engineering Change Request Dharavi Station
No.074 forroof Slabstation
Dharavi at grid 15 to UGC05-GCC-DEC-000700- R00 30-09-2020
17.As per approved CRD drawing of roof R00
slab, for column C10 top reinforcement of
74 column capital bar mark no. 432(T3), √ CLOSED
433(T5), & for column C11 top reinforcement
of column capital bar mark no. 436(T3), bar
dia is 25mmas per approved CRD drawing
(DWG NO, UGC 05STR-SDH-5402-004-A2,
UGC 05-STR-SDH-5402-007-A5).

At site for colun C10 top

reinforcement ofcolumn capital bar mark no.
432(T3), 433(T5) & for Column C11 top
reinforcement of column capital bar mark no
436(T3), bar dia of 32mm has been provided
instead of 25mm. Please give your
concurrence.
 Engineering Change Request (ECR)-BKC STATION
Sl Reference Submission Status
ECR Submission No. Description Rev ECR REPLY Status Date Closed Remarks
No Document Date A B C
Temporary Structure
1. Clarify on note.4 As reinforcement table doesn't cover this aspect 1. No.4note is obsolete in this case.This requiremen
2. In note 3. Lap length LD is not metioned as 57 times srnaller diameter which comes around JKC/LAS/SBA/00 tis necessary when overlapping takes place at an Closed By GC without DSR
1 Engineering Change Request
1140mm. (ECR) No. 001Mentionned on the drawing as 1600m please clarify which to follow.
whereas 11/001
R01 3/20/2017 √ area of Closed 3/31/2017
Reply
3. Inthe reinforcement details shown for Piles of min.clear length of main bar no. 1 is shown as maximum moment. In the case of the relevant
11400mm and the length of top bar no. 2 is shown as 3980mm. To avoid wastage of 600m from design. bar reinforcement goes from 25mm to20mm
Inner reinforcement stirrup of capping beam of BKC North Shaft was fabricated 900x600mm These 2 configuration are equivalent hence no
bar no. 1 we would like to maintain the full length of 12000mm lenght and decrease the legth of JKC/LASS/BA/O bars. Not Submitted to GC. Internal
2 from advance
Engineering Change Request (ECR) drawings, instead of 900x300 as perapproved drawing JKC-LAS-SBA-0012-01·A1 objection from DDC
bar no. 2 by No.
600 002
more i.e.3380mm. O12/001/A1
0 6/2/2017 Therefore,it is prudent that it is not necessary to Closed 6/7/2017
Closed by DDC and CJV
Kindly suggest whether this is agreeable.
4. Lap legth of helical rings is not shown on the drawings. implement No.4 note and thus all bars can be
1. In BKC-North
5I''.It Launching
was also decided Shaft,
for tack for Retrievable
welding to be doneanchor
at bothinstallation in hard pile
edges of stiffener rinqwe
as require
well as at The structural
overlapped integrity
at the sameofsection. the se cantpiles is
Min.200mm
the area where dia main
core cutting for drilling
bar touched rig &Casing
the stifferner ring.installation. 2bars will be cut due this.Kindly UGCOS-LAS- confirmed
2.The increased considering lengththe reduction
of the of the main
bar overlapping is due Not Submitted to GC. Internal
3 Engineering Change Request
confirm (ECR) No. of
stability 003
structure. SBA-0007-001- 0 1/15/2018 reinforcement of secant
to the fact of the above notice. When the total Closed 1/18/2018
Closed by DDC and CJV
A4 piles
number by two(2)
of barsbars to16Ø25, under
are overlapped at thethe same condition
section
that
an the water levelofoutside the excavation at the first
1. In grid 32-33 East side of BKC Station sufficient lap length is not availbale for the main As extra increase
per IS9417:1989 lapping
and for the length case is required
of 20mm dia.
excavation
according tostage
standards. and prior the installation of the first
reinforcement bars of the piles We are getting clear length of reinforcement bars as 300-500mm bars, the minimum lap length required for welding is Not Submitted to GC. Internal
4 Engineering Change Request row
3.The of proposed
anchors ismodification
at maximumiselevation accepted +2.00(design
by DDC.
Kindly(ECR) No. 004
suggest. 2/19/2017 300mm Closed 2/23/2018
Closed by DDC and CJV
water
4.Spiral elevation).In
overlap
which consist sofis2set to be lengths
welded equal toofhalf 100mmof the
order
perimeter to ensure that ground water Additionally
(820*3.14/2=1287mm). elevation does tacknot
(min.5d,ddiameter of bar) and 100mm with a clear
rise
M-20
weldingabove
or have thetodesign
higher grade of ground
concrete water may level, the for
be used
Wherever the gap between waler and secant pile is more, M-20 or higher grade of concrete gap of 100mm
excavation
filling the gap
take place and installation
between waler
at two
minimum of first row
and secant of anchors
pile,points
underat
5 Engineering Change Request
shall be
(ECR)
used.
No.If the
005gap is very narrow then M-20 grout will be used as specified in tile dwg.
JKC-LAS-SBA-
2/28/2018 between the welds three (see imageequally spaced
below).Therefore, Closed 3/5/2018
Not Submitted to GC. Internal
BKC
the
along North
condition
thelengthLaunching
that the
overlap Shaft shall
concrete take place'maximum
aggregates prior
Kindly suggest.
U11-UU1-l the clear ofarea.
reinforcement bars of 300-500mm Closed by DDC and CJV
commencement
diameter
5,DDC is not more
confirms of the
the than
query Monsoon
50%
NO.5ofof Period.
the
CJV. It is
gap(space)
is
highlighted
between thethat
waler despite
and the thatsecant
fact the reduced
pile. For narrow
As per site condition, capping beam & piles supporting SWD Truss infringing with 600mm dia. sufficient for weldingofofbridge
There-arrangement lap joints where
location required.
doesn't affect
reinforcement
gaps, M-20 or by higher2 bars grade marginally
grout shall satisfies
be used the as
live water pipeline. To avoid the clashing, we have rearranged the location of capping beam & Proceed
the bridge with this arrangement
structure behaviour and andanalysis.
comply with there Not Submitted to GC. Internal
6 Engineering Change Request (ECR) No.in006 4/10/2018 design
specified requirements,
in drawing. care shall be taken in order not Closed
pile, as shown attached drawing with coordinates. Please check & give, your concurrence. Secant pile Closed by DDC and CJV
to damage the main reinforcement in secant piles at
reinforcement drawings for sufficient anchorange
anchor
length of the main reinforcement bars of the piles in
Temporary base slab above shouth shaft. UGC05-LAS- positions.
Modification accepted. According to drawing UGC05-
the capping beam.
SBA-0098-001 LAS-SBA-0098-001, <1> 321190 steel bar Not Submitted to GC. Internal
7 Engineering Change Request (ECR) No. 007 4/26/2018 reinforcements may Closed
Closed by DDC and CJV
be used instead of <1>28/150. Note that a minimum
lap length of 70d for top reinforcement and 50d for
Struts arrangement in North Launching Shaft 1.Since the concrete grade of packing concrete(M30)
side and
UGC05-LAS- is equal or larger than the concrete grade of Not Submitted to GC. Internal
8 Engineering Change Request (ECR) No. 008 4/26/2018 bottom reinforcement shall be applied.Also, shear Closed
SBA-0098-001 reinforced piles (M25), there is no decrease in the Closed by DDC and CJV
links spacing shall b emodified to comply with bar
compressive resistance of the system. Therefore, the
reinforcement spacing. In particular, shearlinks(7)
packing concrete M30 grade is sufficient to cater
1,During execution of secant pile, pileslittle bit shifted from its original position. Though, the UGCOS-LAS- shallbe <1>16/ 190-380
1.The arrangement of the andshearshear keylinks(8)
at pilesshallF52 &
load.
shear key provided in Pile no.FS2 at 4th level of struts is embeded inside the pile little bit less SBA-001S-002- be<1>16/380-380
F51, as documented in the relevant photos, is not Not Submitted to GC. Internal
9 Engineering Change Request (ECR) No. 009 7/10/2018 2.In the design, it is assumed conservatively that the Closed
than the length given in the drawing As aresult of which the alignment of the 4th level strut is A3 approved by the DDC. These shear keys are not Closed by DDC and CJV
forces are applied at the edge of the bracket (instead
also dislocated from its expected location. Please suggest. operational and can not transmit the lateral forces to
at mid·
the adjacent rgeinforced pile M52 & M51. For this
The 5th layer rockbolts of North Launching Shaft towards East & West Side are infringing with span).
It Also, a factor
is confirmed that the of 5thsafetylayer equal to1.50 isofapplied.
of rockbolts North
GC05-LAS-SBA- arrangement and the subsequent application of
theniches provided in the base slab This was discussed with DDC during excavation of base Both
Launchingare considered
Shaft towards in order Eastto&deal West withSidelocal
at Not Submitted to GC. Internal
10 Engineering Change Request (ECR) No. 010 0008-001-A5 7/10/2018 packing concrete between the waling beam and Closed
slab As per DDC' ssuggestion CJV have not applied rockbolts in this region to avoid the construction
elevation deviations
-17.50 shall not frombe the design
installed in and
order minimize
to Closed by DDC and CJV
these cant piles, the DDC was not informed in order
infringment. Kindly provide your concurrence. their effect.
avoid clash Therefore,
with the niches the extension
of the base steel
slabmembers
at the
to provide an appropriate technical solution
shall and
east be ofwestequivalent
sides and strength to the basic bracket in
During execution of east wall secant piles between gridno.4.5 to 6. Some of the hard piles were C05-SBA-SKT- evaluating
Refer the on-site
to eliminate
drawings situation.
no.UGC05·SBA-SKT-0097-001
order
the to
relevant excavation.any effect
Referalto bracket
so to the strength.
excavation
got terminated at lesser depth than its required depth. We have sending you the proposed 0097-001 However,conSideringthat.
and 002 for repair scheme at east wall secant piles Not Submitted to GC. Internal
11 Engineering Change Request (ECR) No. 011 10/26/2018 3.The
geometry welding
cross- applied
section forofthe splice
north connection
launching shaft (dwg Closed
repairs cheme of shorter piles at that location. Kindly review and revert us with final drawing (a)The
between lateral
gridbasicforces
no. 4.5to of 6the and waling
the beams (used
relevant attachedfor Closed by DDC and CJV
between the
UGC05-LAS-SBA-007-OO3-AO). bracket and the extension is
with design backup calaculation. the estimation
design backup of the design
calculation of the shear
document with keys) were
doc. No.
considered sufficient, if welding is as per drawing.
extracted from 20 Finite Element analyses, are rather
JKC-GCC-DEC-SBA-180058.
1.'Type H' shearlinks "016-150-150" shown in the drawing below column"C4"are not feasible at UGC05-STR- This
The is duelinks
shear to the fact the system to(1) is a cantilever and
conservative andcan dobe notamended
account for the16/220/220
3D effect of as
Not Submitted to GC. Internal
site due to site
No.constraints. Can we use shear links at "016-220-220" spacing. Kindly review and SBA-0150-006- the larger
per forces are
your request. Pleasedeveloped close to the base
12 Engineering Change Request (ECR) 012 1/15/2019 the comer of the shaft forfind
the attached
design of calculation
the struts. Closed
Closed by DDC and CJV
give your concurrence.. A2 plate. Therefore,
sheet below. the larger the distance from the
This has shownig practice a reduction of 20-25% in
base plate, the smaller the forces exerted to
1.As per architectural drawings. the dimensions of cable duct gallery between grid 30 to 32 of
Architectural & the forces of system,
1 . Reduction of base which slab of pit to 200mm is
connections.
BKC station base slab is 125S0mm x 1800mm. But as per structural general arrangement General are not taken
accepted by DDCinto account
in order to in the
match design.
relevant Not Submitted to GC. Internal
13 Engineering Change Request (ECR)
drawings theNo. 013
dimensions of cable duct is 1250mmx 1750mm. Can we match the structural Arrangement 3/6/2019 (b) The marine
structural drawing clayasbeing the main soildrawings
per architectural material for for Closed
Closed by DDC and CJV
drawing as per architectural? 2. Can we reduce the diameter of reinforcement bars of cable duct drawings of base generating thrust on
Grid30-32 as per proposal of CJV. the shaft's retaining system, has
cover slab? slab between grid been
2. on site proven
Reduction to have better
of reinforcement soil properties
diameter to B12/150 of
As per bars marked in the attachment, Can we reduce the length of bars as listed below? Specifically
intenns for commentno.6,
of strength and thethanmandrel (tapered
Structural&Worki
30 to 32 cable duct cover slab is stiffness
confirmed. those
Shear assumed
Links are
1) Bar No.01 at(B1) reduced to 700mm against 1050mm shown in CRD. ngdrawingsofbas or cylindrical
in the design.axle) As a diameter of External wall bars 501, Not Submitted to GC. Internal
14 Engineering Change Request not required.
2) Bar(ECR)
No.12No. 014reduced to 550mm against 900mm shown in CRD.
at(B3) eslabbetweengrid
3/28/2019 502, 503, 504 should be
result, the monitored lateral earth pressures are lower
Closed
Closed by DDC and CJV
3) Bar No.03 at(B1) reduced to 6330mm against 6400mm shown in CRD. 06to08 minimum
than those204> assumed in order in theto reduce
designthe andlength
thus the to
4)Bar No.201, 202, 201a, 204, 204a, 205, 206 at(TT1) reduced to 700mm against 1050mm 350mm.
resulting forcesisof the system (including the
Structural&Worki CJV Proposal agreed and confirmed.
shown in CRD.
As per CRD drawings Typical Reinforcement Detailing at the junction of Column & Footing is requirement for shear keys) are lower respectively.
ngdrawingsofbas Not Submitted to GC. Internal
5) Bar(ECR)
15 Engineering Change Request
shown No.316 at(TT2)
in theNo.
attached reduced as
015 drawing to 1170mm againstand
"DDCProposal", 1300mm shown
detailing in CRD.
as per Codal Provisions is 4/10/2019 (c) There sults of the monitoring program of the BKC Closed
eslabofBKCstatio Closed by DDC and CJV
6) External
shown wall Bar No.501,
as "CJVProposal". 502,suggest,
Kindly 503, 504the
reduced to 350mm
appropriate against
propposal to 1280mm
follow. shown in CRD. n north launching shaft, provided at a where the axial
7) Height of shear link Type-C reduced from 1450mm to 1420mm. forces on struts monitored are-100kN (at final
8) Height of shear link Type-E ,E1 reduced from 1450mm to 1420mm. UGC05-STR- An equivalent
excavation system
level), where of 2asplates of 10mm
the design has thickness
assumed
Please check & no.
As per drawing confirm.
UGC05-STR-SBA-0147-001-A3 , The thickness of deck panel is given as SBA-0147-001- each
valuesinstead
of approx.of 1 plate400kNoffor 20mm can beofused
the 4throw withThe
struts. the Not Submitted to GC. Internal
16 Engineering Change Request (ECR) No. 016
20mm. Kindly furnish us with connection details to use two plates of 10mm thickness of each. A3 4/13/2019 following
sheark ~~a1 limitations/
"lies F52 specifications:
& F51 may be consider idI Closed
Closed by DDC and CJV
1. The not
tlalare top necesssiy.
plate can be chequered plate of 10mm
thickness placed in strips of width between 70 and
As discussed with DDC. we have constructed as eapted bottom beam at-O.30m level between UGC05-CAC- The modification proposed by the CJV has no impact
420mm, welded with continuous till the welds of
GL38- 39 near SWD of 2x2000mm dia. The longitudinal reinforcements of Pile No. M110 & SBA-0005-002- on the structural integrity of the capping beam and of Not Submitted to GC. Internal
17 Engineering Change Request throat thickness of atleast 5mm along the 2
M116(ECR) No. used
has been 017 for inter connection between top & bottom beam. & act as a vertical beam. A7.UGC05-CAC- 5/27/2019 the secant pile wall at grids 38-39, near SWD of Closed
Closed by DDC and CJV
longitudinal sides of the strips with bottom MS plates
Kindly give your concurrence. SBA-0009-002- 2x2000mm dia.Thus, the modification is approved by
of 10mm thickness. The strips are placed
A1 the DDC.
perpedicular to the longitudinal axis of the bridge. 2.
All gaps/ joints between chequered plates that do not
coincide with the predifined gaps/ joints of the
individual panels of the initial plates of 20mm
thickness (jointaxes1,2&3 at distances 1728 f3823
Sl Reference Submission Status
ECR Submission No. Description Rev ECR REPLY Status Date Closed Remarks
No UGC05-LAS-
Document Date A B C
1) While excavation in southshaft, reinforcement of Pile no.M440 got exposed due to noconcrete SBA-0064-002- 1) As soon as repair according to approved method
inside. CJV has repaired that pile as per approved method statement. A2,UGCOS-LAS- statement is applied in Pileno. M440, in order to Not Submitted to GC. Internal
18 Engineering Change Request (ECR)
2) Bottom No. 018
reinforcement of capping beam in some portion was cut to accommodate the S BA-0092-001-
7/20/2019 ensure the structural integrity of the pile and prevent Closed
Closed by DDC and CJV
shearkeys of 1st level struts in depressed portion of capping beam. After embedment of shear A2 any water ingress, the DOC approves the ECR.
keys, cavity was filled with higher grade concrete 2) The reinforcement of the capping beam offers a
As per approved drawing "UGC-06-LAS-SBA-0094-004-A1", shear key embedment was given UGC-05-LAS- Embedment depth of shear keys in diagonal struts of
(M40) fnon shrinkable grout as per approved drawings. very small fraction of the overall resistance of the
as 700mm. But, due to misalignment of piles to embedment depth could not be achieved In few SBA-0094-004- the order of 200 to 300mm inside the secant piles Not Submitted to GC. Internal
Kindly(ECR)
19 Engineering Change Request review the019same & give your concurrence. structural system designed with shearkeys. Note that
shear keys inNo.second level strut on west wall. depth of SLIGh shear keys ,was upto 200 to A1 7/20/2019 (instead of the embedment of 700mm) is not Closed
Closed by DDC and CJV
the steel struts are not directly supported by the
300mm lnslds tho secant piles.The voids made for shear keys & space between struts & secant according to the design. However, conSidering the
capping beam. since there is a waler beam at the 1st
piles was filled with hiqher qrade concrete(M40)1 non-hrinkable grout. fact that:
row. Therefore,
Acording the fill with
to the design (referhigher grade number
to drawing
The installed Waler Beam is not resting on the supporting bracket as shown in the approved GC05-CAC-SBA- (a) the positive mechanism of friction between waler
concrete(M40) non-shrinkable grout the
UGCOS-CAC-SBA-0091-OO3-A3). for anchorage
the specific Not Submitted to GC. Internal
20 Engineering Change Request
drawing
(ECR)
no. UGC05-CAC-SBA-0091-003-A3".
No. 020 Prestressed anchors mounted on these walers 0091-003-A3 7/20/2019 beams and the secant piles, which is not considered Closed
location
steel head is approved.
support is designed to rest on the Closed by DDC and CJV
has been stressed already. in the design (conservative assumption). results to a
supporting brackets, in order to provide support for
reduced actual force on the secant pile wall applied
the vertical component of the anchor force.
through
The the shear
increase of thekeys
width in of
respect to the design
the packing concrete value,
Due to misalignment of piles, width of packing concrete behind walers was around 300mm on UGC05·CAC·GD Therefore, It is not a requirement the waler beam to
(b) the local
behind application
the waler beam is ofthe
stress from the shear
correctaction, incasekeys
of Not Submitted to GC. Internal
21 Engineering Change Request
east side
(ECR)
wallNo.
between
021 grid 34 to 35. As per approved drawing no. "UGC05-CAC-SBA·0091- A·OO91-002-A3 7/20/2019 be directly supported by the supporting brackets Closed
to the secant piles can theoritically
misalignment of piles. As per design, the packing exceed the Closed by DDC and CJV
002-A3", the width of packing concrete is shown 70mm only. Kindly suggest (i.e.be in contact with the supporting brackets). In the
concrete is compressive
required forstrength without provoking
the transmission of any
photos shown in 0AS-2018-32, the anchorage steel
damage, It is forces
compressive , that locally
between thethe
embedment
secant piles depth
andmay
the
For dewatering of underground water from surface between grid line 4.5 to 6, JKIL has provided head support is supported through the addition of
ITEPHOTOGRAP be
walerless than the
beams. Notedesigned
that thewithout
width ofprovoking
the packing any
the small drains below permanent base slab. It helps to channelise the water accumulated steel al. amants (below the head support), which is
22 Engineering Change Request (ECR) No. 023 HS 8/5/2019 failure. Therefore,
concrete does not the affectlocally applied embedment
this mechanism due to the Open
overpee to travel upto the dewatering sumps in several location. Site photographs are also acceptable.
depth
fact theofcompressive
shear keys instresses
the secant pile wallare
developed is below
attached for better understanding. adequate.
the design compressive strength of the packing
In BKC North Shaft due to loose soil strata & loose boulders, west side ledge wall could not able UGC05-STR- concrete. Therefore,
According to the secant no effect is expected
pile wall in the piles
design, secant
to sustain properly & overcutting was also tookplace. For rectification of ledge wall JKIL SBA-0073-001- design.
shall be properly embedded in grade III or better Not Submitted to GC. Internal
23 Engineering Change Request (ECR)
submitted theNo. 026
drawingno.'UGCOS-APR-SBA-0075-016-AO' to GC for approval & got approved. AO&UGC05- 8/6/2019 rock. During excavation, a Closed
Closed by DDC and CJV
While doing actual rectification work at site, JKIL executed the repair work after final excavation APR-SBA-007S- ledge shall be formed in front of the secant piles. in
as per revised drawing no'UGC05-STR-SBA-0073-001-AO'. Kindly check the structural 016-AO order to allow excavation in competent rock down to
1 The pocket formed in soft pile has been filled with higher grade of concrete Le.M40, as per 1.Soft piles are made of RCC M15 concrete grade.
adequacy. the final excavation level Closed with NCR no
Method Statement for pile repairing. 2 The hard piles exposed reinforcement shas been cleaned The application of higher grade of concrete (i.e.M40)
24 Engineering Change Request (ECR)
& treated as No.
per 027
methodstatement.Then piles has been restored to their original shape by 8/6/2019 √ (with the application of appropriates upport
to fill the pockets is approved. No further structural Closed NCR/SBA/QAS/2018/0003
measures).
erecting shuttering & filling the higher grade of concretei.e.M40. 3 In some pileswe are getting check is required.
However. as stated in the design report (JKC-GCC-
less embadement depth for shear key s in soft piles, for such cases we have already raised an 2.Treatment of hardpiles exposed reinforcement as
1 In south launching LAS-SBA-170003-A4)
1. Pile tennln at lon criteria and in arefavor of conservatism.
provided In drawings
'ECR-SBA-009'. 4 Forshaft
harddue
piletoM702
shortbetween
length ofgridline
secant 33
piles, JKIL
to 34, raised the
exposed ledge level ofhas
reinforcements permethod statement is appoved. No further
south shaft upto-9.50m. Asper
permethod
drawingstatement.
no.'UGCOS-LAS-SBA-0064-001-A2' ledge "the pile'sembedment
UGC05·LA8-SBA·0065-001 to 005. due to the
been (ECR)
25 Engineering Change Request cleaned & treated
No. 028 as Then pile has been restored to itslevel is at
original 8/6/2019 structural check is required. Closed
Not Submitted to GC. Internal
-11.50m. 2 Due to raised level of ledge, we are getting width of ledge upto 800mm at -9.50m andledgeformationhasnotbeentakenintoaccountinord
requirement to tennin piles Closed by DDC and CJV
shape by erecting shuttering & filling the higher grade of concrete i.e, M40. Kindly check the 3. Refer to DOC reply on ECR-SBA-009 for shear
level. ertoanalysetheworstcasescenariowherenosupportfro
with incompetent rock. Therefore. if the plies
structural adequacy. keys at north shaft. No further structural check is
mledgeis shallower depth than the one provided In
tennlnateat
required.
Permanent Structure proVidedtothepile".Le,noembedmentandnoledgeforth
the design, the correct practise
4.Treatment of hardpiles exposed reinforcement as
esecantpilesisconsideredintheanalysis.Thereforeinter
Is to raise the ledge level respectively. Note that
Please find CJVs Reply on NCR No.:"NCRlSBAlQAS/2018/0027" as following, Drawing No. UGCOS-STR- per method statement is appoved.No further
msof
according to the available pile calibration test results.
'UGCOS-STR-SBA-01S9-0S1-AO' is attached, to rectify the waterpoofing membrane application SBA-01S9-0S1- structural check is required.
structuraladequacy.theappliedsolution(drawingUGC0
competent rock levelIs
1 on east
Engineering Change Request wall No.
(ECR) of north
022 shaft. We have also attached site photographs as an evidence to show the
rectification work has been carried out by CJV as per attached drawing.
AO&SITEPHOTO
GRAPHS
7/22/2019 √ approximately at· B.SOm level, i.e. the ledge level
5-STR-SBA-0073-001- Closed 1/7/2020 Submitted in PMIS
AO)isapprovedbytheDOCprovidedthat:
should be fanned at level· g.50m. Therefore, the
(a)Anyover-
ledge level at· B.50m levelIs
excavationbelowthesecantpiletipistreatedasdepictedin
2. As a result and in order to keep a constant cuts
As per CRD drawing for Column No. C39, C40, C41 & C42, column drops were not shown in drawingUGC05-STR-SBA-0073-001-AO.
lope down to final excavation level, the ledge width is
their sections. Due to this CJV site team has casted the columns without column drops. To UGC05-GCC-
2 Engineering Change Request (ECR) No. 024
compensate the punchings hear we have used 016-300-300 Shear Links instead of 012-300- DEC-000456-R00
8/2/2019 √ Structuraladequecyssufficient.findattacedcalculations
(b)Rock: in
reduced
heet.
boltsbelOW
respect to thepiletip.asperdrawingUGC05-
the Closed 10/30/2019
STR-SBA-0073-001-AO.areapplied.
one provided in the design. However, considering the
300 Shear Links in column drop locations. Kindly check the structural adequecy.
fact that in the design "the contribution of the material
Due to site constraint, longitudinal reinforcement in Column No.C41 & C42 were reduced to in front of the
UGC05-GCC- Calculation revised and
3 Engineering Change Request
32Ø32.(ECR)
As per
No.CRD
025 drawings, the longitudinal reinforcement of columns were 40Ø32. Kindly
DEC-000486-R00
8/2/2019 √ embedded length of the pile (ledge) In providing toe Closed 11/22/2019
resubmitted
check the structural adequecy. support has been neglected in the analysis' (refer to
Construction team interpretation is that the Concourse slab and Roof slab is Grade 40, and for design
Please report with Doc
find attahced calculation note indicating M40
Columns it is Grade 60 from Base slab level to soffit of Concourse slab, and from top of UGC05-GCC- No JKC·GCC·LAS·SBA·170018),
grade concrete that it is sufficient for no the
stability issue
concourse
4 Engineering Change Request (ECR)slab
Concourse No. to
029Soffit of Roof slab/ column drop. As such during casting of Concourse slab DEC-000458-R00 8/7/2019 √ slab
(considering
at column also the fact that competent
location. Closed 1/8/2020 Submitted in PMIS
and Roof slab only Grade40 concrete will be used through out the pour of the slabs. Kindly rockIsencounteradatashallower
reconfirm our intentions with necessary calculations for justification. depththantheoneassumedinthedesign)israisedprovide
Due to MEP & Architectural changes in base slab
dthatappropriatesupportmeasuresareInstalledinthese
Due to MEP & Architectural changes in base slab between gridline 30 to 31.5, the dimensions of between gridline 30 to 31.5, the dimensions of wall
UGC05-GCC-
5 Engineering Change Request
wall no.
(ECR)
W7, No.
W8,030W9, W10, W11 & W12 has been revised after casting of base slab. Kindly
DEC-000508-R00
9/16/2019 √ cantpile
no. W7, W8, W9, W10, W11 & W12 has been revised
andintheopencutportionbelowtheledgelevelasdepicted
Closed 10/5/2019 Submitted in PMIS
provide us, the detail drawings form a king structural modifications at site. after casting of base slab.
inthadrawingsUGC05·LAS·SBA~064·001andUGC05-
Revised
LAS·SBA· and new drawings have been created with
1) As we have finalised the structural drawings for permanent structure of BKCstation, such as this ECR and send to JK for helping site to install the
0039~O1.
Please refer to attached drawings.
base slab, concourse slab, roof slab, extemal-internal walls & columns. We required typical UGC05-GCC-
6 Engineering Change Request (ECR) No. 031
junction details of structural members with anchorage lengths for different diameter DEC-000523-R00
11/1/2019 √ reinforcement for. Closed 11/26/2019 Submitted in PMIS
reinforcement bars.
As pe rCRD drawing the wall starter bar has shown with L starting base slab bottom mat.Based Engineer Notice of No Objection is provided for
on construction notes we will provide vertical bars having required anchorage lengl hin base slab UGC05-GCC- Engineering Change Request (ECR) no. 032 for
7 Engineering Change Request (ECR) No. the
for constructing 032platform walls. Refer marked up drawing.
DEC-000556-R00
12/9/2019 √ platform wall starter bar from base slab at BKC Closed 12/24/2019 Submitted in PMIS
This scenario of platform wall starter bars. will be applicable in all future base slabs station.
Kindly reconfirm our intentions with necessary calculations for justification as necessary.
Asper approved CRD drawingnumber "UGC05-STR-SBA-0273-009-A1" of Concourse Slab Engineer Notice of No Objection is provided for
Grid8-10.Side Face Horizontal (BarMark502) & U-Bar (BarMark504) has shown in the drawing UGC05-GCC- Engineering Change Request (ECR) no. 034 for side
8 Engineering Change Request (ECR) No.joint
at construction 034location. Since. the construction joints & temporary cut-outs will remain
DEC-000579-R00
1/23/2020 √ face bars Closed 1/27/2020 Submitted in PMIS
open till the casting of adjucents lab pour. And after casting of adjucent pour, slab will be have
as a continuous slab. Please suggest.So, there is no requirement of side face reinforcements at
Escalator Pits between grid line C-D-21-24 & F-G21-24 at Undercroft Level for BKC Station Engineer Notice of No Objection is provided for
the C.J. locations.
UGC05-GCC- Engineering Change Request (ECR) no. 035 for side
9 Engineering Change Request (ECR) No. 035
DEC-000597-R00
2/6/2020 face bars Closed 6/2/2020 Submitted in PMIS
Sl Reference Submission Status
ECR Submission No. Description Rev ECR REPLY Status Date Closed Remarks
No Document Date A B C
Distance between External wall of Ancillary Building & Emergency Staircase at Grid 5-C at BKC
Station UGC05-GCC-
10 Engineering Change Request (ECR) No. 036 DEC-000610-R00
2/19/2020 √ Closed Submitted in PMIS

Rebar Extension at Roof Level in Grid 5 to 6 at Column No. C06 at BKC Station CJV has eposed reinforcement upto desired length
UGC05-GCC- and lapped new reinforcement to existing exposed
11 Engineering Change Request (ECR) No. 037 DEC-000605-R00
2/25/2020 √ reinforcement. Proposal is not valid at Roof Level in Closed Submitted in PMIS
Grid 5 to 6 at Column No. C06 at BKC Station
Rebar Extension at Base Slab level Construction Joint at Grid 34 for BKC Station Engineer has objection for Engineering Change
UGC05-GCC- Request (ECR) no. 038 Rebar Extension at Base
12 Engineering Change Request (ECR) No. 038 DEC-000608-R00
2/25/2020 √ Slab level Construction Joint at Grid 34 for BKC Closed Submitted in PMIS
Station
placing of T3 Layer Reinforcement at T1 Layer at roof slab level between grid 9 to 10 at BKC calculation for supporting this scheme is not
Station. UGC05-GCC- submitted.
13 Engineering Change Request (ECR) No. 039 DEC-000608-R00
2/26/2020 √ Closed Submitted in PMIS

ABSENCE OF COUPLERS FOR REBAR EXTENSION AT CONSTRUCTION JOINT AT Grid 34

at BKC Station UGC05-GCC-
14 Engineering Change Request (ECR) No. 040 DEC-000618-R00
3/4/2020 √ Closed Submitted in PMIS

Engineering Change Request (ECR) no. 041 for replacement of for providing temporary opening As the opening is small it have less impact on design.
in under platform wall to create space for electrode riser at BKC station. UGC05-GCC- However CJV should mention the nos and diameter
15 Engineering Change Request (ECR) No. 041 DEC-000631-R00
6/8/2020 √ of extra reinforcement provided at top of opening. Closed Submitted in PMIS

Engineering Change Request (ECR No. 42) for Beam above knock out panel between GL 24-26 Calculation to be provided.
at East Side Wall of Station at BKC Station UGC05-GCC-
16 Engineering Change Request (ECR) No. 042 DEC-000633-R00
6/26/2020 √ Closed Submitted in PMIS

Engineering Change Request (ECR No. 42) for Beam above knock out panel between GL 24-26 Calculation provided.
at East Side Wall of Station at BKC Station UGC05-GCC-
Engineering Change Request (ECR) No. 042 (R01)
DEC-000633-R02
9/21/2020 √ Closed Submitted in PMIS

Engineering Change Request (ECR) no. 043 for Change in dia of B3 level bar from 40mm to Required Area of steel of calculation is provided.
36mm in base slab at grid 32-34 at BKC Station UGC05-GCC- Found Ok
17 Engineering Change Request (ECR) No. 043 DEC-000644-R00
7/13/2020 √ Closed 7/18/2020 Submitted in PMIS

Engineering Change Request (ECR) no. 044 for use of 32 dia.bar instead of 25 + 20 dia bars as 7/28/2020 Engineer's notice of No objection is given for using 32
top reinformcement in temporary sump of south shaft base slab location at Grid E near south UGC05-GCC- diameter reinforcement bar with coupler instead of 25
17 Engineering Change Request (ECR)
head No.at044
wall BKC Station. DEC-000649-R01 √ diameter( T1 and T2 bar) + 20 diameter (T2 and T4 Closed 7/29/2020 Submitted in PMIS
bar) at top in temporary sump of south shaft location
at grid E near south head wall at BKC station.
Chagne Request (ECR) no. 045 for Column Drop Elimination for Column no. C37 & C38 at 8/19/2020 Engineer's notice of No objection is given for using 32
concourse Slab Level at BKC Station UGC05-GCC- diameter reinforcement bar with coupler instead of 25
17 Engineering Change Request (ECR) No. 045 DEC-000676-R00 diameter( T1 and T2 bar) + 20 diameter (T2 and T4 Open Submitted in PMIS
bar) at top in temporary sump of south shaft location
at grid E near south head wall at BKC station.
Engineering Change Request (ECR) no. 046 for finalisation of Dimensions & Location of Cutout 8/25/2020
PF12 Near Column C5 at Concourse Slab Level at BKC Station. UGC05-GCC-
17 Engineering Change Request (ECR) No. 046 DEC-000673-R00 √ Closed 9/21/2020 Submitted in PMIS
 Engineering Chang
ECR NO. ECR Submission No. SUBJECT

TEMPORARY STRUC
1 ECR-01 ANCHORS OF SHAFT-VDN
2 ECR-02 CAPPING BEAM OF SHAFT
3 ECR-03 PACKING CONCRETE BEHIND WALER
4 ECR-04 CLARIFICATION ON ANCHOR STRESSING
GANTRY CRANE FOUNDATION REINFORCEMENT
5
ECR-05 DWG.
ROCKBOLT OF SHAFT FOR EXCAVATION LAYER 2-3-
6
ECR-06 4
7 ECR-07 ROCKBOLT CENTRALIZATION

8 ROCKBOLT TORQUING
ECR-08
9 ECR-09 ROCK BOLTS OF SHAFT
10 ECR-10 Shot Crete in G-1& 2 
Engineering Change Request (ECR) No.011 for
Instrumentation & Monitoring due to monitoring for
11
1200mm dia pipeline is done manually with increased
ECR-11 frequency at Vidyanagri Station
12 ECR-12 ECR CANCELLED
13 ECR-13 Shifting of Piles W-371 to W-403.
14 ECR-14 Reinforcement changes in Secant pile.
15 ECR-15 ECR CANCELLED
16 ECR-16 Kingpost for Strutting and Water line support system.
17 ECR-17 ECR CANCELLED
18 ECR-18 Capping beam at station area

19 Anchor Drilling Point at North Launching shaft

ECR-19

20 Secant Piles 82 Nos (Short Piles)

ECR-20

21 Splicing Details (750mm plate done in 400mm 3 pieces )

ECR-21

22 Shifting of Piles From E-359 to E-380.

ECR-22

23 Soldier Pile
ECR-23

24 Kingpost coordinates infringing with waterline

ECR-24

25 unavailability of iswb500 so using ismb instead

ECR-25

26 Omitting 1 strut as anchors infringing

ECR-26
27 ECR-27 ISWB 500 Strut Waler
 Due to constraints encountered at site we wish to move
28 KP1, KP2, KP3 & KP4 from their origin location by
ECR-28 500mm along the line of strut.
Due to presence of 1200mm and 600mm dia waterline
29
ECR-29,30&31 unable to drill anchor and rockbolt at south head wall.

Due to change encountered in alignment of 600mm

waterline at location of KP1, KP3, KP5, KP7, KP9, KP11
30
& KP13, can we shift the kingpost 1100mm towards KP2,
KP4, KP6, KP8, KP10, KP12 & KP14 respectively?
ECR-29,30&31
We have provided support for 1200mm waterline at south
31 headwall as per the drawing provided by you for north
ECR-29,30&31 shaft area.
For single strut supporting 1200 and 600 waterline, Due to
32 non availability of ISMB 600 section we wish to continue
ECR-32 with ISMB 500.
33 ECR-33 strut splicing details for splays needed in 6 to 12.5
34 ECR-34 Splicing of waler at grid no 12 to 18 both sides

35 To compensate the difference in the levels of btoh UB1 and

existing gantry beam we had to provide tools (fabricated by
ECR-45 30mm plate) according to the leel difference.
36
ECR-47 Deviation of anchor level from the given approve drawing

PERMANENT STRUC
1.Plan at Column Foundation shows 16mm dia bar in B5
layer, where as section shows 32dia bar 2.bar no 5 & 27
shows a haunch of 300mm in CRD drawing where as in
working drawing it is missing 3.Bar no la have been
36 curtailed at External face of sump Whereas in CRDGFC It
shown tilt the end 4.In Southwest corner. as per CRO
32mm bar is shown in Bl layer. Whereas in working
drawing it is 25mm dia 5.Coupler in Column are flushed in
Base stab, whereas in CRD it is shown 2C0rnm above the
ECR-35 top of slab

37 In the present drawing the reinforcement shown in the

ECR-36 UPE wall ,can we reduce spacing of walls.

38 shear links increased from 135mm spacing to 270mm in

ECR-37 external wall

39 We have provide a lapping of bars at construction joint at

ECR-38 vidyanagri station walls.

40 There is a mismatch in column position and size of

ECR-39 column SC03. Kindly suggest.

41 Can we reduce the longitudinal horizontal reinforcements

ECR-40 of soil and excavation side in walls of vidyanagri station.
 There is shortage of bar lengths at roof slab location
observed ,the details are as below-1. in column C03
42 shortage of Ld 550mm in 2 nos of bars and Ld 380mm in
4 nos of bars, 2. in column C03 shortage of Ld 180-
200mm in 22 nos of bars, 3. Column C04 shortage of Ld
ECR-41 is 140mm is observed in 10 nos of bar
In column C03 and C04, due to steel congestion tying and
43 fixing of rebars is difficult in coulmn drop location , can we
ECR-42 increase the depth of column drop.
1. In WC01, we have not left the couplers for platform
slab and staircase landing slab.Kindly suggest further
44 course of action. 2. In WC02 we have changed the shape
of dowel bars of platform slab and staircase landing slab
but we have maintained the Ld of bars. Kindly confirm
ECR-43 whether it will have any rctural effect.
We are using M40 Grade concrete through out the pour of
45 concourse and roof slab including the column juction
ECR-44 location.Kindly confirm our intentions.
1. 2nd lift of East & West wall is infringing sruts 1 & 2.
2. Staicase wall WC02 is
directly below strut 1. Same problem
ECR-46 to ccr in grid 8-10 and 10-12.5

The shifting of anchor by 500mm from the original loction does

46 not has any impact on overall design criteria as per DDC and
GC design team.
ECR-47

ECR-48 ECR regarding development length of haunch bar in base slab

47
ECR regarding length of Soil Face1 bar in permanent wall being
ecr 51 reduced in order to achieve staggerred lap amog the bars.

48
ECR regarding change in Dia of top longitudnal bar from 32mm
ecr 52 to 25mm in extended concouse slab
conourse slab casted without considering knock out panel in
49 the wall and reinforcement not maintained as per drawing
ecr 53 requirement.

50 reinforcement details not provided for lift walls in the

ecr 55 drawings for grid 12 to 14

51 rmc not to be used for small volumes of concrete, volumetric

ecr 56 design to be used.

52
ecr 59 Plaster work on block work.
53
ecr 60 Block work in place of RCC wall.

54 Column capital of roof slab 11.5-13.5 coming in between strut

ecr 65 alignment.
top longitudnal reinforcement of column capital C11 (Bar Mark
55 619 & 620) provided are 940mm but as per CRD it shows
ecr 67 1500mm
56
ineering Change Request (ECR)-VIDYANAGRI STATION
Submission Status
Document Reference Revision
Date A B C

STRUCTURE
8/31/2017
9/1/2017
9/2/2017
9/4/2017
9/4/2017

6/11/2017
9/27/2017

9/25/2017

6/30/2018
 REJECTED
UGC05-GCC-CON- R0
000376-R00
18/12/2018

CANCELLED
1/17/2018
2/8/2018
CANCELLED
2/28/2018
CANCELLED
2/27/2018

3/22/2018

26-Mar-18

3/22/2018

3/28/2018

6/30/2018

4/12/2018

4/28/2018

5/18/2018
5/24/2018
 8/22/2018

9/25/2018

9/25/2018

9/25/2018

10/5/2018
11/24/2018
12/10/2018
UGC05-GCC-DEC- R0 P
000516-R00

14/10/2019
UGC05-GCC-DEC- R0 16/11/2019
000539-R00

STRUCTURE

1/2/2019

2/25/2019

3/2/2019
UGC05-GCC-DEC- R0
000373-R00
3/13/2019
UGC05-GCC-DEC- R0
000416-R00
5/8/2019

7/6/2019
 UGC05-GCC-DEC- R1
000457-R01

8/5/2019

8/7/2019

8/14/2019
UGC05-GCC-DEC- R0
000470-R00 8/20/2019

UGC05-GCC-DEC-
000517-R00
R0 14/10/2019 P

UGC05-GCC-DEC-000539-R00 R0 30/10/2019 P

UGC05-GCC-DEC-
000538-R00
R0 16/11/2019 P

UGC05-GCC-DOC-1203-
R00
R0 3/12/2019 P

UGC05-GCC-DEC-000585-
R00
R0 25/01/2020 P

UGC05-GCC-DEC-000564- 14/01/2020
R00 R0 P
UGC05-GCC-DEC-000570- R0 8/1/2020
R00 P
UGC05-GCC-DOC-1263- R0 6/2/2020
R00 P
UGC05-GCC-DOC-1275- R0 19/2/2020
R00 P
UGC05-GCC-DOC-1276- 19/2/2020
R00 R0
UGC05-GCC-DOC-1300- R0 3/3/2020
R00 P
UGC05-GCC-DEC-
000686-R00 R0 5/9/2020 P
AGRI STATION
ECR REPLY STATUS Remarks

OPEN
OPEN
OPEN
OPEN

OPEN

OPEN

OPEN
Closed By GC without
CLOSED
DSR Reply
OPEN
REJECTED

OPEN

CANCELLED
OPEN
OPEN
CANCELLED
OPEN
CANCELLED
OPEN

CLOSED
Closed By GC without
DSR Reply
Closed By GC without
CLOSED
DSR Reply
CLOSED
Closed By GC without
DSR Reply
Closed By GC without
CLOSED
DSR Reply
Closed By GC without
CLOSED
DSR Reply
CLOSED
Closed By GC without
DSR Reply
Closed By GC without
CLOSED
DSR Reply
Closed By GC without
CLOSED
DSR Reply
UNAVAILABLE Not Submitted to GC.
 UNAVAILABLE Not Submitted to GC.

OPEN

OPEN

OPEN

OPEN

OPEN
OPEN
The ECR reply by DDC doesn’t elobrate the
modification required or adopted by CJV in site.
No calculation or backups provided or attached. CLOSED Rejected by GC, 'A'
ECR doesn’t specify actual modifications done at Status
site.

CLOSED "C" Status

CLOSED
Closed By GC without
DSR Reply

CLOSED
Closed By GC without
DSR Reply
Closed By GC without
CLOSED
DSR Reply
CLOSED
Closed By GC without
DSR Reply
Closed By GC without
CLOSED
DSR Reply
Closed By GC without
CLOSED
DSR Reply
 Closed By GC without
CLOSED
DSR Reply

CLOSED
Closed By GC without
DSR Reply

CLOSED
Closed By GC without
DSR Reply

CLOSED
Closed By GC without
DSR Reply
The struts are directly shown emmbeding into Rejected by mail (GC
wall concrete, Which GC designer has rejected CLOSED desing team), DSR
the proposal. No calculation or backups comments not given.
provided.only drawing attached which give no
clarrification.

CLOSED "C" Status

CLOSED "C" Status

CLOSED
Rejected by GC, 'A'
Status

CLOSED "C" Status

rejected with "A" status.

CLOSED

CLOSED "C" Status

rejected with "A" status.
CLOSED

CLOSED "C" Status

OPEN

CLOSED "C" Status

GC reply awaited
OPEN
 Engineering C
ECR NO. ECR Submission No. SUBJECT

TEMPORARY STRUC
1

CJV has installed waler beams on north & east wall at

2 ECR-02 -2m level b/w Gr 23 - 24. sher keys b/w these grids not
getting the embedment lengh as per given in the drawing

CJV has cut the top flanges of bracket at waler beam 0.00
level in Gr no 11 - 12 east side because the bolts of
3 ECR-03
bracket plate were coming on the same line of the flange
level

During execution of micro pile on west side ,MM490

4 ECR-04 (Gr no 14 - 15) has fallen out the alignment of micro
piles

Inclinometer on west wall b/w Gr 8 to 10 and 11 to 19 are

5 ECR-05
fallling inside shear key excavation

East wall in b/w Gr no 15 to 19 at Elevation -4.00 to -6.00

6 ECR-06
wire mesh fixed 150x150x4mm in place of 150x150x6mm

In order to expedite the station excavation work, the level

of rock breaking on east side is proceded more than on
7 ECR - 07
west side with suppoeting after TBM break through and
after retrieving all TBM Backup supports

8 ECR-08 Waler supporting bracket at -2.00 level

Site proposes to dismentling the upline tunnel segments

9 ECR - 10 by opening a hole and filling excavated mock inside to
avoid the installation of propsinside tunnel

PERMANENT STRUC
1 ECR- 09 Niches in the plant room base slab
2 ECR - 11 Base slab B2 reinforcement lapping b/w Gr 17.6 to 19

Replacement of Steel Beam to RCC Beam in Cover Slab

3 ECR- 12
of Plantroom at Santacruz Station

Engineering Change Request (ECR) no. 013 for Change

4 ECR- 13 in cutout sizes in cover slab of plantroom at Santacruz
Station

Engineering Change Request (ECR) no. 014 for Removal

5 ECR- 14
of 300mm wall from lift pit at grid 11 at Santacruz Station

Engineering Change Request (ECR) no. 014 for Removal

6 ECR- 14
of 300mm wall from lift pit at grid 11 at Santacruz Station

Engineering Change Request (ECR) No. 15 for Reduction

7
in length of Swellex Bolts at Santacruz Station.
ECR-15

DSR - Engineering Change Request (ECR) no. 016 for

8
Spilling Umbrella at Access Gallery at SSC at UGC05
ECR - 16
Engineering Change Request (ECR) No. 17 for Rock
9 Bolts on West side of Station Platform Tunnel at
ECR - 17 Santacruz Station.
Engineering Change Request (ECR) no. 018 for
10 replacement of steel beam to RCC beam and changes in
ECR-18 couout sizes in concourse slab at santacruz station
Engineering Change Request (ECR no. 019) for
11 replacement of spiles 51-41mm (4.8mm thik) with e YST
ECR-19 310 OD-48.3mm (4mm thick) at Santacruz Station
Engineering Change Request (ECR no. 020) for
12 ECR-20 Anchorage Lenghts of Reinforcement Bars with Various
Diameters at Santacruz Station

13 ECR-21 Engineering Change Request (ECR) no. 021 for

replacement of 300mm RCC wall with Block Work Wall
of 200 mm thick staircase portion of plant room at Grid 06
14 ECR-21(RO1) at Santacruz Station

Addition of Beam At The Junction of East Wall And

15 ECR-22 Concourse Slab Above SC A3, SC C2, SC B2 Between
Grids 10-12 and 21-24 At Santacruz Station
Engineering Change Request (ECR) no. 023 for reduction
in column drop size of C16 by 400mm due to its
16 ECR-23
infringement with OTE ducts of station side for Santacruz
Station
Engineering Change Request (ECR)- Santacruz station
Submission Status
Document Reference Revision
Date A B C

STRUCTURE
UGC05-STR-SSC-0053-005-A4 1/14/2019

UGC05-STR-SSC-0052-003-A4 5/28/2019

UGC05-CAC-SSC-0008-002-A6 5/28/2019

UGC05-CAC-SSC-0014-001 7/29/2019

UGC05-CAC-SSC-0015-002 8/5/2019

UGC05-CAC-SSC-0010-003 8/5/2019

UGC05-STR-SSC-0052-007-A4 8/5/2019

UGC05-CAC-SC-0075-005
9/12/2019
UGC05-CAC-SC-0075-006

STRUCTURE
UGC05-STR-SSC-0086-001-A3
8/7/2019 √
UGC05-STR-SSC-0086-002-A3
UGC05-STR-SSC-0112-003-A3 12/10/2019 √

UGC05-GCC-DEC-000577-R00 1/21/2020

UGC05-GCC-DEC-000578-R00 1/21/2020

UGC05-GCC-DEC-000580-R00 1/24/2020 √

UGC05-GCC-DEC-000580-R01 3/16/2020 √

UGC05-GCC-DEC-000594-R00 2/5/2020 √

UGC05-GCC-DEC-000595-R00 2/6/2020 √

UGC05-GCC-DEC-000596-R00
2/6/2020 √

UGC05-GCC-DEC-000623-R00 3/18/2020 √

UGC05-GCC-DEC-000635-R00 7/2/2020 √

UGC05-GCC-DEC-000639-R00 7/6/2020 √

UGC05-GCC-DEC-000654-R00 27/07/2020 √

UGC05-GCC-DEC-000654-R01 8/10/2020 √

UGC05-GCC-DEC-000698-R00 9/25/2020 √

UGC05-GCC-DEC-000701-R00 10/2/2020
uz station
ECR REPLY STATUS Remarks

CLOSED CLOSED WITH NCR

CLOSED CLOSED WITH NCR

CLOSED CLOSED WITH NCR

CLOSED CLOSED WITH NCR

CLOSED CLOSED WITH NCR

CLOSED CLOSED WITH NCR

CLOSED CLOSED WITH NCR

CLOSED
CLOSED BY GC WITH
DSR REPLY

CLOSED BY GC WITH
CLOSED
DSR REPLY
 CLOSED BY GC WITH
CLOSED
DSR REPLY

No Objection as no impact on design CLOSED

CLOSED BY GC WITH
DSR REPLY

No Objection as no impact on design CLOSED

CLOSED BY GC WITH
DSR REPLY

REJECTED

OBJECTION BY GC

REJECTED

CLOSED BY GC WITH
CLOSED
DSR REPLY

CLOSED BY GC WITH
CLOSED
DSR REPLY

CLOSED
CLOSED BY GC WITH
DSR REPLY

CLOSED
CLOSED BY GC WITH
DSR REPLY

CLOSED
CLOSED BY GC WITH
DSR REPLY

CLOSED
CLOSED BY GC WITH
DSR REPLY

REJECTED OBJECTION BY GC

CLOSED BY GC WITH
CLOSED
DSR REPLY

CLOSED BY GC WITH
CLOSED
DSR REPLY
 Engineering Change Request (ECR)-I&M

No. Document Reference

1 UGC05-GCC-CON-000194-R00
A ECR-I&M-001
B ECR-I&M-002
C ECR-I&M-003
D ECR-I&M-004
E ECR-I&M-005
1A UGC05-GCC-CON-000194-R01 (ECR-I&M-002 to 004)
2 UGC05-GCC-CON-000217-R00 (ECR-I&M-006)
3 UGC05-GCC-CON-000216-R00 (ECR-I&M-007 & 008)
3A UGC05-GCC-CON-000216-R01(ECR-I&M-007)
4 UGC05-GCC-CON-000307-R00(ECR-I&M-009)
5 UGC05-GCC-CON-000321-R00(ECR-I&M-010)
6 UGC05-GCC-CON-000376-R00(ECR-I&M-011)
7 UGC05-GCC-CON-000402-R00 (ECR-I&M-012)
8 UGC05-GCC-CON-000428-R00 (ECR-I&M-013)
9 UGC05-GCC-CON-000527-R00 (ECR-I&M-014)
10 UGC05-GCC-CON-00488-R01 (ECR-I&M-015) R01
11 UGC05-GCC-CON-000559-R00 (ECR-I&M-016)
12 UGC05-GCC-CON-000599-R00(ECR-I&M-017)
13 UGC05-GCC-CON-000570-R00 (ECR-I&M-018)
14 UGC05-GCC-CON-000600-R00 (ECR-I&M-019)
15 UGC05-GCC-CON-000691-R00 (ECR-I&M-020)
 Status
Revision Submission
A B C
R00 4-Jun-18
M-001 √
M-002 √
M-003 √
M-004 √
M-005 √
02 to 004) R01 8-Sep-18 √
M-006) R00 7-Jul-18 √
07 & 008) R00 7-Jul-18 √
M-007) R01 23-Aug-18 √
M-009) R00 6-Oct-18 √
M-010) R00 20-Oct-18 √
M-011) R00 18-Oct-18 √
M-012) R00, R01 16-Jan-19 √
M-013) R00 12-Feb-19 √
M-014) R00 14-May-19 √
15) R01 R00 13-Apr-19 √
M-016) R00 28-Jun-19 √
M-017) R00 3-Aug-19 √
M-018) R00 10-Jul-19 √
M-019) R00 6-Aug-19 √
M-020) R00 21-Sep-19 √
ECR REPLY STATUES
CLOSED
CLOSED
CLOSED
15-May-18
CLOSED
CLOSED
CLOSED
CLOSED
29-Jun-18 CLOSED
27-Jun-18 CLOSED
CLOSED
CLOSED
OPEN
CLOSED
CLOSED
CLOSED
CLOSED
CLOSED
CLOSED
CLOSED
CLOSED
CLOSED
CLOSED
 ECR REGISTER
Document
ECR No.001 for MEP at BKC Station
1 ECR No.001 for MEP at BKC Station
2 Engineering Change Request (ECR) No.002 for MEP at BKC Station
Engineering Change Request (ECR) No.03 for MEP at Vidyanagari Station
Supplementary Submission of Engineering Change Request (ECR) No.003 for
3 MEP at Vidyanagari Station - R01
Supplementary Submission of Engineering Change Request (ECR) No. 03 for
MEP at Vidyanagari Station for Structural Earthing Mat-01
Engineering Change Request (ECR) No. 04 for MEP at Vidyanagri Station
Supplementary Submission of Engineering Change Request (ECR) No.004 for
MEP at Vidyanagari Station
4

Supplementary Submission of Engineering Change Request (ECR) No. 04 for

MEP at Vidyanagari Station for Structural Earthing and Drainage Work
5 Engineering Change Request (ECR) No.5 for MEP at BKC Station
Engineering Change Request (ECR) No.06 for MEP at Vidyanagari Station
6 Supplementary Submission of Engineering Change Request (ECR) No.06 for
MEP at Vidyanagari Station for Earthmat Cable
Engineering Change Request (ECR) No.07 for MEP at BKC Station
Supplementary Submission of Engineering Change Request (ECR) No. 07 for
7 MEP due to Structural Earth Work at BKC Station - R01
Engineering Change Request (ECR) No.08 for MEP at Vidyanagari Station for
Clean Earth-Mat
Supplementary Submission of Engineering Change Request (ECR) No. 08 for
MEP at Vidyanagari Station for Structural Earthing MET - 01
Supplementary Submission of ECR No. 08 for MEP at SVN for Clean Earth
8 Mat
Engineering Change Request (ECR) no. 09 for MEP due to Drainage Layout at
9 Dharavi Station
Engineering Change Request (ECR) no. 10 for MEP due to Drainage Work at
10 Santacruz Station
Engineering Change Request (ECR) no. 11 for MEP due to Drainage Layout at
11 Dharavi Station
 ECR REGISTER
Document Reference Submission ECR REPLY Status
UGC05-GCC-DEC-000368-R00 25/03/19 A
UGC05-GCC-DEC-000368-R01 22/05/19 C
UGC05-GCC-DEC-000390-R00 18/04/19 C
UGC05-GCC-DEC-000482-R00 16-Sep-19 A

UGC05-GCC-DEC-000482-R01 30-Oct-19 A

UGC05-GCC-DEC-000482-R02 7-Dec-19 C

UGC05-GCC-DEC-000483-R00 16-Sep-19 A

UGC05-GCC-DEC-000483-R01 30-Oct-19 A

UGC05-GCC-DEC-000483-R02 7-Dec-19 C

UGC05-GCC-DEC-000504-R00 3-Oct-19 A
UGC05-GCC-DEC-000510-R00 9-Oct-19 A

UGC05-GCC-DEC-000510-R01 7-Dec-19 C

UGC05-GCC-DEC-000511-R00 9-Oct-19 A

UGC05-GCC-DEC-000511-R01 7-Dec-19 C

UGC05-GCC-DEC-000525-R00 8-Nov-19 A

UGC05-GCC-DEC-000525-R01 7-Dec-19 A

UGC05-GCC-DEC-000525-R02 17-Dec-19 C

UGC05-GCC-DEC-000540-R00 16-Nov-19

UGC05-GCC-DEC-000569-R00 2-Jan-20 C

UGC05-GCC-DEC-000571-R00 10-Jan-20
DSR REPLY
18-Nov-19
18-Nov-19
18-Nov-19
10-Dec-19

10-Dec-19

10-Dec-19

10-Dec-19

10-Dec-19

10-Dec-19

10-Dec-19
11-Dec-19

11-Dec-19

11-Dec-19

11-Dec-19

17-Dec-19

17-Dec-19

17-Dec-19
 ECR'S-NATM
S.No. Document Document Reference Submission
Engineering Change Request (ECR) No.NATM-CP-03
1 UGC05-GCC-CON-000665-R00 7-Sep-19
for Cros Passages
Engineering Change Request (ECR) No.NATM-CP-01
2 UGC05-GCC-CON-000677-R00 14-Sep-19
for Cross Passages
Engineering Change Request (ECR) no. NATM-CP 04
for Construction Cross Passage from TBM Tunnel End UGC05-GCC-DEC-000543-R00 20-Nov-19
3 at BKC Station
DSR reply on ECR no. NATM-CP 04 for Construction CP
UGC05-GCC-DEC-000543-R01 9-Jan-20
from TBM Tunnel End at BKC Station
Engineering Change Request (ECR) no. NATM-CP 05 of
4 Opening Provided in Tunnel Segments for Cross UGC05-GCC-DEC-000558-R00 10-Dec-19
Passage Construction
Engineering Change Request (ECR) no. 015 for
5 Reduction in Length of Swellex bolts at Santacruz UGC05-GCC-DEC-000594-R00 6-Feb-20
Station

6 Engineering Change Request (ECR) no. 016 for Spilling UGC05-GCC-DEC-000595-R00 6-Feb-20
Umbrella at Access Gallery at Santacruz Station

Engineering Change Request (ECR) no. 017 for Rock

7 Bolt on West side of Station Platform Tunnel at UGC05-GCC-DEC-000596-R00 6-Feb-20
Santacruz Station
Engineering Change Request (ECR) no.08 for NATM-CP
8 due to Advancement of Excavation Steps at BKC UGC05-GCC-DEC-000614-R00 28-Feb-20
Stabling Tunnel
Engineering Change Request (ECR) no. NATM-CP-09
9 for Temporary Support Meausres at BKC Station UGC05-GCC-DEC-000699-R00 24-Sep-20
Turnback / Stabling NATM Tunnels - Cross Passages
ECR REPLY Status REPLY
18-Sep-19 A CLOSED

19-Sep-19 C CLOSED

27-Dec-19 A CLOSED

22-Jan-20 A CLOSED

30-Dec-19 C CLOSED

U.R BY GC

U.R BY GC

U.R BY GC

4-Mar-20 CLOSED

U.R BY GC