Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Problems in Mathematical Analysis III by W J Kaczor and M T Nowak PDF
Problems in Mathematical Analysis III by W J Kaczor and M T Nowak PDF
(£ sre)” (f[eon)”.
1.6.28. Suppose that f is continuous on (0, 1] and there is ¢ > O such
that 0< f(x) < 0/3 for x € [0,1]. Show that if fj /(e)dz = a, then
So Vile)de > 0.
1.6.29. Suppose that f is Riemann integrable on [a,b] and m <
F(z) < M. Prove that if y is continuous and convex on [m, M], then
oe f stone) s f estoy.
‘This inequality is called Jensen's inequality.
1.6.30. Prove the following generalization of the Jensen inequality
stated in the last problem. Suppose that f and p are Riemann inte-
grable on [a, 0], m < f(z) < M, p(x) > 0 and f p(z)dz > 0. If y is
‘continuous and convex on [m, AM], then
1 1 ro
° (abe Hk neuter) 0 there is 6 > 0 such that for every
measurable subset B of A, fy lfaldm < ¢ for n = 1,2,... when-
ever m(B) < 6. Show that if {fq} is a convergent sequence of equi-
integrable functions on a set A. of finite measure, then
tim, [ fadm= [tim fam.
Be, [m= f des
2.3.21. Prove the following version of Lebesgue's dominated conver~
gence theorem. Suppose {fn} is a sequence of measurable functions
converging in measure on A to f. If there exists a function g in-
tegrable on A and such that |fn(z)| < g(z),n = 1,2,...,2€ A,
then
af tatm= f sam.
2.8.22. Show that the theorem stated in 2.3.20 remains true when
convergence is replaced by convergence in measure.
2.3.28. Suppose the sequence {fn} converges in measure to fon a
set A of finite measure, and [fn(z)| < C for r € A, n= 1,2,....
Show that if is continuous on {—C,C}, then
Jatin.
2.8.24. Suppose that {fn} is a sequence of functions defined on a set
A of finite measure that converges in measure on A to f. Show that
ia, f stint = ff sng),
2.8.25. Suppose f € 1?[a,}), 1 < p< oo. Show that, given € > 0,
there is
() a simple function ¢ such that Ji, 1f — yam lanl —
‘Taking the partition
toa 0O be given. Since f € R(a), there is a partition P’ such that
q) U(P', fia) — L(P’, fua)
) = d > 0, then by the definition
of one-sided limits there is 6 > 0 such that
He) < fle) +4 for 2€ (20-620)
and
Sle) > He8)-$ for 2€ (ez +8).
‘Then, if y € [F(aq) + 4/3, Flat) — 4/3] \ {F(z0)} C [F22), f(z0)] \
{s(a0)} with 2 € (zo — 620) and x2 € (20,20 + 6), there is no
2 € (21,22) such that f(2) = y, a contradiction. If f(zg) = f(2a) #
‘S(zo), analogous reasoning can be applied.
Since the derivative f' enjoys the intermediate value property
(eee, e.g. I, 2.2.31), the other statement follows immediately.
1.2.25. For 2 € [a,0), let P = {29,21,..-y2a} be a partition of 2}.
Since f” is continuous on [a,6), the results in 1.2.16 and in 1.1.26 imply
that
vy(2) = dim om Ulex) — Fen)
= BE | "ro
“ponae
Suen - 2)
7
= lim
iP),Solutions. 1: The Riemann-Stieltjes Integral
1.2.26. Clearly, there is M > 0 such that [f(2)]