Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form

Name of Employee: Mr. Paulo Magandangbuhay Name of Rater/s: Mrs. Paula Mahumot & Mr. Pedro Mahimsog
Position: Principal Position: PSDS & Coordinating Principal
Review Period: June, 2014-March, 2015 Date of Review: November, 2014/April, 2015
School/District: San Pablo ES, Dauis District

To be filled in during planning To be filled in during evaluation

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Performance Actual Result Rating Score
per KRA Indicators
(Quality, Efficiency,
Timeliness)
Delivery of 1. Instructional  Accounted for June, 2014-March, 25%  Increased school  Increased 5 1.25
Basic Leadership learning 2015 performance by school
Education
Services
outcomes of 2% at the end of performance
schools viz-a- the sy by 2% +
viz goals and
targets  GSA is attained 5
by 75% and  GSA is 10
above (ELEM) attained by
75% and 10/2=5
5x.25(weight of
above (ELEM) KRA)=1.25

2. Learning  Provided safe June, 2014-March, 15%  100% and above  90% 4 0.60
Environment and child 2015 accomplishment accomplish
4x.15(weight of
friendly s on the ments KRA)=0.60
learning and following
school (supported by
environment evidence such as
for school policy,
students/learn reports,
ers information
materials,
advocacy
activities, regular
meetings,
inventory)

-Adhered to Child-
Friendly
environment
standards and
Programs

-Institutionalized
child protection
mechanisms and
processes (per
Deped Order 40, s.
2012)

-Provided ICT
facilities/workshop
rooms as learning
support systems

-Has clear DRRM

mobilization plans
3. Human  Provided June, 2014- 20%  Provided  90% of 4 0.90
Resource technical March, 2015 technical teachers
Management assistance to assistance to provided with
and teachers and all teachers technical
Development to non- on matters assistance with
teaching pertaining to complete
personnel enhancement evidences.
within the of classroom
RPMS cycle management
, skills and
instructional
competence
within the
RPMS cycle  Provided
with the technical
following assistance
correspondin to all non-
g evidences: teaching
personnel
-teacher for support
portfolio services
containing within the
observation RPMS
reports, with
development completecy
al needs cle with +
intervention
 results,
performance
analysis and
recommenda
tions for
development
interventions
.

 Provided
technical
assistance to
non-teaching
personnel for
support
services
within the
RPMS cycle
with the
following
5
 evidences: 9
-performanc
9/2=4.5
e contracts, 4.5X.20(wei
and  Provided ght of
KRA)=0.90
performance technical
evaluation assistance
results in to all non-
prescribed teaching
tools. personnel
for support
services
with
complete
evidences.

4. Parents’  Established 15%  Has -Mobilization 5 0.71

Involvement school and stakeholders plan complete
and family and partnership/ with reports and
Community community mobilization documentations
Partnership partnership plan of
for (complete meetings/agreem
performance with reports ents
and +
documentati
ons of
meetings,
agreements)
  Organized 4
programs with
stakeholders, -Organized 3
esp. parents for programs with 4
academic and stakeholders, esp.
other purposes parents for
(esp. Strategic academic and
planning) other purposes

 Obtained
resources for the +
school through
stakeholders  Obtained
partnership resources for
the school 5
through 14
stakeholders
14/3=4.7
partnership 4.7x.15(weight
with complete of KRA)=0.71

records/docum
ents of its
utilization,
liquidation.

5. School Performed data-  Produced a 25%  Produced a  Produced a 3 0.75

LeadershipM based strategic school school school
3X.25(weight of
anagement planning strategic strategic strategic KRA)=0.75
and plan/SIP and plan/SIP and plan/SIP
Operations AIP through AIP through and AIP
the strategic the strategic through the
planning planning strategic
process: process, planning
approved process for
– conduct of and accepted submission
school by the SDS to DAC.
situational
analysis,
SWOT,
determining
strategies
through
prioritizing
strategic
options,
resource and
facilities
planning and
formulation
of PAPs
based of
analyses

-Strategic Plan
was based on
Deped vision,
contextualized in
 school vision
and mission

-all school
stakeholders
were engaged in
the strategic
planning process

-M&E for
process and
outcomes
checkpoints
were developed
and utilized

- 100% and above

accomplishment
of school targets
(with evidence
contained in
school report
card

Overall Rating for Accomplishments 4.21

* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned.
PPPPPPP dddddd
Rater Ratee