Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Saunders 2016
Saunders 2016
Saunders 2016
TA N YA L . SAU N D E RS
15 0 • Tanya L . S aun de r s
15 2 • Tanya L . S aunde r s
15 4 • Tanya L . S aunde r s
15 6 • Tanya L . S aunde r s
the ones they normally see onstage, where many of them accompany their
husbands, many of them singing choruses for the mcs.”18
Krudas cubensi felt that the critical artistic and intellectual space
of hip hop was one in which they could make a feminist interven-
tion vis-à-vis hegemonic discourses surrounding women. They decided
to first focus on feminist discourses, arguing for women’s autonomy,
self-esteem building, and a self-identity developed independent of men
instead of in relation to men. Also, as Jorge notes above and as I dis-
cuss elsewhere, there exists a public discourse concerning male homo
sexuality, largely because of male privilege.19 However, a lesbian was
something that p eople could not fathom. In a 2006 event organized
at the Rhizome Anarchist Collective in Austin, Texas, a public discus-
sion that happened just weeks a fter Krudas cubensi arrived in Cuba,
Odalys spoke about the themes they discuss in their music and Las
Krudas’s arts-based activism:
ere are people expressing themselves and dotting the “i’s” in Cuba,
Th
that is, Krudas, who are d
oing their activism, and their way of being
15 8 • Tanya L . S aunde r s
1 60 • Tanya L . S aunde r s
Conclusion
In 2008, at a concert at baad !, the Bronx Academy of the Arts and
Dance, a young, black, queer-identified w oman approached Las Krudas.
While they were talking to the other artists at the event who w ere from
various parts of the Americas, I struck up a conversation with the young
woman. Come to find out, she was from Baltimore as well. She heard
about Las Krudas from some friends and decided to go to Cuba to see
them perform. She showed me her forearm; the lyrics of Las Krudas’s
song “Eres Bella” (You Are Beautiful) were tattooed onto her forearm.
She commented that she did not have a chance to talk to them in Cuba
after their concert, but when she found out that they were g oing to be in
the Bronx, she traveled to see them. She was excited that she had an op-
portunity to show them personally how much they impacted her.
A lot has happened over the artivists’ c areers. Las Krudas cubensi
is now composed of two members, and the three original members live
outside the United States. They have traveled throughout Latin America,
the United States, and Canada and are on their way to Europe. Krudas
cubensi has actively been engaged in queer social movements, as well as
transnational hip hop movements. In the case of Tiely and the two remain-
ing members of Las Krudas cubensi, their lesbian feminist identities have
also changed over time—these three artists no longer identify as female.
They still identify as black feminists, but they are also more male-identified,
with one of the artists being in the process of transitioning, while the other
two are rethinking their relationship to their gender identities.
These artivists are even making an intervention into language politics,
forgoing the use of “o” in words to represent the universal subject—for
example, ser humanos (human beings), where “o” is both masculine and
the default universal ending in Spanish and Portuguese words, as well as
“@,” which is one language intervention that is currently popular. The “@”
looks like “o” (masculine) and “a” (feminine) together. Instead, the artivists
are using “x,” which challenges the male/female binary in their languages
and also rejects the masculine “o” as the universal gender for “humans.”
The usage of “x” in zines, blogs, Facebook pages, and other forms of print
1 62 • Tanya L . S aunde r s
no t e s
1. A 2011–12 Fulbright Scholar Award to Brazil also facilitated part of my data
collection in São Paulo.
2. Tricia Rose, Black Noise: Rap M
usic and Black Culture in Contemporary America
(Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 1994); Halifu Osumare, The Africanist
Aesthetic in Global Hip-Hop: Power Moves (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008).
3. Howard Becker, Art Worlds (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2008).
4. Tricia Rose, Black Noise: Rap Music and Black Culture in Contemporary Americ a
(Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 1994); Black Public Sphere Collective,
The Black Public Sphere: A Public Culture Book (Chicago: University of Chicago Press,
1995); Mark Anthony Neal, What the M
usic Said: Black Popul ar Music and Black Public
Culture (New York: Routledge, 1998); Osumare, Africanist Aesthetic in Global Hip-Hop.
5. Marcyliena Morgan and Dionne Bennett, “Hip Hop and the Global Imprint
of a Black Cultural Form,” Daedalus, the Journal of the American Academy of Arts and
Sciences 2 (Spring 2011): 177.
6. Gwendolyn D. Pough, “An Introduction of Sorts for Hip-Hop Feminism,”
in Home Girls Make Some Noise!: Hip-Hop Feminism Anthology, eds. Gwendolyn D.
Pough, Elaine Richardson, Aisha Durham, and Rachel Raimist (New York: Parker
Publishing, 2007), vii. Also see Himanee Gupta-Carlson, “Planet B-Girl: Community
Building and Feminism in Hip-Hop,” New Political Science 32, no. 4 (2010): 515–29; and
Ana Sobral, “Unlikely mcs,” European Journal of English Studies 16, no. 3 (2012): 259–71.
1 64 • Tanya L . S aunde r s