As United Nations, THW enforce trusteeship in
Africa continent
PM:
The problem in SQ: Problems in long time stability,
economy of turbulence damaging people in Africa.
They sustain their life and increase the conflict.
Systemic failure is existing; we want to enforce
trusteeship because Africa is in danger.
We will make official announcement to enforce
trusteeship, we send delegates to talk about the
trusteeship. We will take trusteeship, and will be
regulate by legal consensus by potential harm in
Africa.
Two argument:
1. Why justifiable
UN interest is to serve human in all country in the
world, we have people increases purpose to
prosperity and sustainability. Africa has lost their
scrutiny since very long time ago. It’s not valid since
humanitarian crisis should not be counted as
accountable gov. It goes to interest as UN purpose
collectively comes from all nation and its okay.
2. Why better in our world
Potential harm in government. When there is
military conflict, there will be a moderator consent.
In your world, it will be bad. Better economic and
stability at the end.
At best in their world, they can be stable. Harm is
happening once in the beginning and will not get
into the longer time. As UN, we want to enforce the
trusteeship in Africa.
LO:
We agree to OG that UN should fix humanitarian
problem in Africa. Is by enforce trusteeship become
the problem without further harm to Africa?
Further impact:
OO want to hamper further harm to African country
due the trusteeship that UN wants to implement in
Africa.
UN should fix humanitarian, but has another value.
UN as organization have value as neutral agent to fix
intl’ conflict. UN also an agent of peacekeeper.
We believe by enforcing trusteeship, UN are harming
their value as peacekeeper. Why? LATER
By enforcing trusteeship, will make Africa not going
to be better but cause more problem.
BOTTOMLINE?
SQ is already enough and progressive, by meaning is
people in Africa start to develop. The proof Africa
already leave their culture like harming themselves,
without reinforcement. SQ is progressive enough
(BUT TALKS ABOUT POLITICS AND ECONOMIC
BACKGROUND. NOT CULTURE)
More way to help them, like:
1. UN can make commitment to make incentives
like delivering volunteer without have to force
trusteeship in Africa. Why with this, UN doesn’t
have to force the international believe that Africa
hampered their development and culture.
Give bad impact to Africa.
1. Leave the culture
Africa are hampering their development; therefore,
we need inforce them to leave their culture. They’ll
shock(?) The new enforcement culture, they have to
deal by more problems by creating more harm to
make them deal with more problems and we don’t
want that to happen.
2. Create further impact and hamper the
development of Africa
We know that UN have veto right countries and have
several conflicts, by enforcing this it will create China
and America conflicts even more.
DPM:
Progressive? Hyperinflation in Zimbabwe, or Somalia
will never happen. The reason why UN want to
intervene, because no other actor is capable.
During the distribution of gov that is going to control
Africa, they’ll take moderate consensus in the name
of UN:
1. UN deal with sovereignty
UN represent various countries in world, in that
sense why UN send democratic values. That is why
UN can have condemned NK. Let’s talk about UN
represent US, they have no proper chance.
1. There is no elite continence
There is no superior continent, have collective
corrupted gov, every single aid is being
corrupted/rejected. Never truly care for society.
UN is more capable due more channeling, they are
binding by culture and propagandas by not trusting
foreigner in their country.
2. Africa will never be better in Opp
Interest the political leader is to take the position of
gov since they are not the one is oppressed. The one
is oppressed is society that is marginalized. Let’s take
a diplomatic way: send volunteer diplomatically, gov
itself won’t listen and won’t let you in.
3. Better in Gov
More opportunity to rebuild the agreement to
another country.
Worst case, in Gov:
Military conflict, is less likely to happen. When UN
stops aids, they losing their power. Power will not be
so strong with UN. Africa and the leader still think
about their own self-interest; they won’t attack UN
back since they put in jail. But if there’s conflict, it’s
too tangible and we can minimize the further harm.
Waste resources, reason why UN send help to
expect you to be able to survive that’s why we give
subsidy to the poor.
DLO:
UN need to serve humanity, that’s why they are
being made. Their idea will exist if UN is a simple
organization. The case if UN have political conflict
will be hard to do that’s why they are fail with
humanity.
UN can help them, but enforce trusteeship is not
working because we still have other option is
diplomacy.
Rebuttals:
1. Idea about build the infrastructure, although is
already happen not in form of UN.
Idea of UN, if you want to help humanitarian good,
the UN can help to build those. But if want to bring
the idea of African country rejecting the help. Since
African country have not been treated well, how
judging panel haven’t heard the Africa.
How international community being bias with them,
even if it leads to decreasing the humanity, it’s still
not a good way.
Argument:
1. SQ is progressing
Give or send peacekeepers, creating conference to
help themselves. In African country we have African
union but still never enforce trusteeships, among
African there are a lot political believe, we never
agree the idea of political homogenous.
Extend the idea how proposal will hamper the
African countries
1. Idea OO is not further the conflicts in nations, the
idea when they are being forced, they are forcing to
leave their gov system. When we give this shocking
moment, is a bad thing for progressive. Will be trap
in political drama, like US and China which in a cold
war. They want to show they are in a better position.
How it can give bad impact in UN?
UN start to enforce the country, while UN goals is to
keep doing the job as humanitarian or betterment,
but not to enforce the trusteeships.
MG:
Contextualize what UN is, while UN was portrayed
like has no power of African while never be able to
understand that UN is not antagonist actor.
Analyze why UN coming, while African will welcome
them.
1. Why social culture issues, we need to engage
internally.
Root of the problem, by only engaging in mechanism
like problem like constructive policy, when you are
leaving it will remain the same.
2. Strategic issue to fix economic issue internally
We don’t have to rely to UN, we have China. China
has a stance of their own interest, and its not a best
actor. Why UN is perfect? It will solve the root of the
problem, inability to utilize the language properly.
Even if we want to send the volunteer, Microsoft fail
to send the computers because African doesn’t
understand.
WHY EXCLUSIVE? EXCLUSIVE STRUCTURAL
CHANGES AND POLICY CAN ONLY BE RATIFIED SIT
IN PARLIAMENT OF AFRICAN THEMSELVES, CAN
ONLY BE HAPPEN IF TAKE TRUSTEESHIP.
3. Why African people will accept that.
1. Due to the long invasion by their own African
government directly, or what happen in Somalia, like
what happen in South Somalia lands, the reason of
their language barrier there is a systematic failure
inside Somalia. People in Somalia and African have
been far too long with government due to long
failure that exist.
There is possibility of people to accept, why gov
want to accept UN the sense of belonging of
Government.
Notice the failure of gov is due corrupted system,
that is to say that laid for personal use. It’s a failure,
but by engaging internally, we can take over the
problem and enforce the trusteeships.
1. African people want mostly to enter.
2. Tribal leader are not the one who lead the
parliament.
MO:
Differentiate between intervention and enforce
trusteeship, OG establishing to you about troops and
stop the terrorist.
In CO, process of acceptance and mutual acceptance
and difference characteristics.
Why it’s not okay to define?
Varieties issues and varieties nations, existence of
UN will never be able to represent the UN is
dominated by western country and mostly bias.
In order to idealize the rule of UN, which never
explained, stability is ability to minimize the conflict
and we need strategic.
UN: active engagement, active enforcement. Also
direct engagement.
Enforcement is UN, will invade the country by
oppose by entire nations. OG acknowledge about
which party is corrupted is chosen by political party.
Invasion is not in-line with UN purpose, by maximum
stability.
Will not provide under side of the house, various of
African country, will trigger more rebellious act and
also western sentiment with historically previous.
We are opposing the idea of western, it will increase
terrorist group, it will also create massive terrorist
group against UN, by prolonging identity and wreck
your own persona as UN to maintain peace.
As UN, trust that are going to help the nations or
society.
GW:
Whole debate antagonized the UN, in fact UN is not
only consist of western country. It’s not the best
form, consist of whole world which is basically not
only western people. THESE WESTERN PEOPLE
EMBRACE AFRICAN, IT WILL ALSO REJECT THE AIDS
OR OTHER FORM OF HELP IF ENFORCEMENT IS
ALSO DIFFERENT.
Why African accept UN?
UN is also consisting of African, and there is a direct
engagement, UN is also consisting of African, as
what partner mention, the issues that happen in
African government is incapable to solve the issues
that happening in their country.
Why the international engagement is so much better
to external issues is much more effective way to
solve the problem
What happen is best scenario after engagement, first
like main reason is the government is incapable, UN
is consist of many different people want.
Even if when UN leave, they can still stand on their
own ground. In Somalia, with language barrier, with
the help of UN, people can understand any other
languages, and achieve the same goal and achieve
education of those people.
Why internal engagement is more efficient?
We believe the volunteer won’t affect towards the
decision of what will be made, it can change the
social politics and engage to the problem, it will last
very long and will be the best investment towards
Africa.
What happen after internal engagement?
UN is the only international organization that is
capable and all their action is under supervision by
all members of UN, and African is one of the
member and supervised by any other countries.
OW:
We understand UN is not only consisting of white,
but due the voting systems, western domination is
still evitable. We can see that UN, the majority is
white people and have power to win the vote system
in UN.
So what they are talking about that UN it gives the
impact of the systems.
Why intervention is better in outside? When we talk
about acceptance, is very little because we respect
of sovereignty, because it’s not a important
parameter since they play in best case. Nations will
have their own sovereignty. BUT WHY THIS IS OKAY
TO KEEP SOVEREIGNITY BUT CONDITION IS
EMERGENCY?
Its more accountable, without enforcing our
personal value and keep traditional value like
cultural they have and also the mentality of society
who don’t want to be participated like Europe
country.
They don’t want the massive progressive, it will be
better to maintain society trust and UN to be able to
help the African nation without enforcing
trusteeship in African continent doesn’t mean to
trusteeship in African like economic growth and
others.
It will be better to help the African nation without
trusteeship in Africa continent, in their side will be
worse because they want UN to take control for all
kinds of governance in society.