Will Covid Have A Lasting Impact On Globalization PDF

t
os
rP
REPRINT H05MAR
PUBLISHED ON HBR.ORG
MAY 20, 2020
ARTICLE
GLOBALIZATION
yo
op
Will Covid-19 Have a
Lasting Impact on
tC
Globalization?
No
by Steven A. Altman
Do
This document is authorized for educator review use only by Durgesh Tinaikar, Other (University not listed) until Oct 2020. Copying or posting is an infringement of copyright.
Permissions@hbsp.harvard.edu or 617.783.7860
t
os
GLOBALIZATION
Will Covid-19 Have a
rP
Lasting Impact on
Globalization?
by Steven A. Altman
MAY 20, 2020
yo
op
tC
No
MICHAEL H/GETTY IMAGES
As leaders wrestle to guide their organizations through the Covid-19 pandemic, decisions running the
Do
gamut from where to sell to how to manage supply chains hinge on expectations about the future of
globalization. The pandemic has prompted a new wave of globalization obituaries, but the latest data
and forecasts imply that leaders should plan for — and shape — a world where both globalization and
anti-globalization pressures remain enduring features of the business environment.
COPYRIGHT © 2020 HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL PUBLISHING CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 2
The crisis and the necessary public health response are causing the largest and fastest decline in
international flows in modern history. Current forecasts, while inevitably rough at this stage, call for
t
a 13-32% decline in merchandise trade, a 30-40% reduction in foreign direct investment, and a
os
44-80% drop in international airline passengers in 2020[i]. These numbers imply a major rollback of
globalization’s recent gains, but they do not signal a fundamental collapse of international market
integration.
rP
yo
op
tC
No
Do
t
os
rP
yo
op
tC
No
Do
The volume of global goods exports in 2020 could fall to a level last seen in the mid-to-late 2000s,
according to the latest WTO forecast. That would be a tremendously painful drop, especially in the
t
context of today’s larger and more complex world economy. But even the most pessimistic trade
os
forecasts do not imply a retreat to a world of disconnected national markets. Most of the run-up in
trade integration since the end of World War II should remain intact.
If plummeting trade flows are unlikely to undo globalization, what about the even steeper decline
predicted in foreign direct investment (FDI)? Like other capital flows, FDI tends to be volatile, so a
rP
double-digit decline is not as shocking as one might presume. FDI flows, for example, fell 38% during
the global financial crisis. Nor do shrinking FDI flows necessarily augur a real retreat from corporate
globalization. The foreign business activity of multinational firms does not always closely track FDI
trends.
The collapse of international travel, in contrast, stands out against a much steadier growth trend, and
yo
its damage is indisputable. Tourism contributes more to global output than automotive
manufacturing, and business travel facilitates international trade and investment. As of late April
2020, every country had imposed restrictions on international travel, and 45% of countries had
partially or completely closed their borders to foreign visitors. Airlines were flying 90% fewer seats
on international flights, as compared to 62% on domestic flights. This unprecedented collapse does,
op
however, follow an international travel boom. Even if international airline passengers fall by two-
thirds, there would still be more people flying abroad than there were in 2003.
What Are Globalization’s Post-Coronavirus Prospects?

Current forecasts call for international flows to start growing again as the pandemic comes under
tC
control. Thus, 2020 is likely to be a low point for many globalization metrics. But how deep will the
plunge really be? How fast can we expect global flows to rebound? And how might future flow
patterns look different from the past? None of these questions can be answered definitively yet, but
leaders can find clues about the future and actionable implications for their companies by focusing
on five key drivers of globalization’s trajectory:
No
1. Start with global growth patterns, where the key lesson is that international flows tend to swing
dramatically with macroeconomic cycles. In good times, they usually grow faster than GDP, and in
bad times they shrink faster, too, as people and firms hunker down behind borders.
This time around, robust growth can only be restored once the pandemic is clearly brought under
control. But remember that globalization can also be a powerful contributor to growth and health.
Countries with higher scores on the DHL Global Connectedness Index tend to enjoy faster economic
Do
growth. And there is some evidence that more connected countries, even after controlling
statistically for levels of economic development, are less vulnerable to infectious disease outbreaks,
in part because of their stronger health care systems.
This means global business leaders can go beyond just watching disease trends and economic data —
they can help tilt the balance from negative to positive feedback loops by contributing to health,
t
growth, and international cooperation. Companies across industries have already swung into action
os
to manufacture urgently needed medical supplies. Large corporations can also soften the pandemic’s
economic impact, for example, by following Unilever’s lead in paying suppliers faster and extending
support to employees, contractors, and customers. And they can support open markets, as 3M did
when it resisted a proposed block on its mask exports from the U.S. to Canada and Latin America.
rP
2. Supply chain policies have come back to the top of the agenda, and shifting approaches have the
potential to reshape trade and FDI flows. The key globalization-related debate here is redundancy
versus reshoring. Will companies and countries seek greater safety in international diversification, or
will they try fostering domestic self-sufficiency? Economic logic almost always favors the former
approach, coupled with national stockpiles for true essentials, but politics will sometimes force the
latter.
yo
Research by NYU Stern Professor Pankaj Ghemawat highlights several characteristics of politically
sensitive industries, such as production of necessities for health or national security, sales to
government rather than private buyers, and the size of an industry’s domestic workforce.
op
If redundancy becomes the norm and reshoring the exception, expect just a modest long-run drag on
global trade growth, coupled with greater diversification of countries’ trade partners.
3. Superpower frictions and fragility had already destabilized the international business
environment before Covid-19, and the pandemic adds new layers of complexity. It has led to a vast
tC
expansion of state power, while introducing pandemic control as yet another arena for ideological
competition. In this environment, where companies come from and how well their home country
governments get along will matter even more than before to decisions about where to raise capital,
which markets to prioritize, and which supply bases to cultivate.
Many have predicted that Covid-19 will hasten a fracturing of the global economy along regional
No
lines, with competing blocs centered on China, the United States, and perhaps Europe. But the fact
that Europe, the world’s most connected region, has struggled to mount a unified response to the
pandemic is just one reason that a resurgence of regions should not be a foregone conclusion. Most
international flows already take place within regions, and short-distance trade has not grown faster
than long-distance trade over the past few years. Be ready for the possibility of a more regionalized
world, but don’t count on it.
Do
4. Ongoing technological shifts such as the adoption of e-commerce, videoconferencing, and robots
have all been supercharged by Covid-19. Before the pandemic, many focused on how new
technologies could reduce global flows, e.g. via manufacturers substituting robots at home for low-
cost labor abroad. But many pandemic-induced shifts could also strengthen globalization if they are
not curbed by protectionist policies. Cross-border e-commerce expands export opportunities,
especially for smaller companies. Forced experimentation with remote work, where successful, could
spur more services offshoring. And even 3D-printing sometimes leads to more rather than less trade.
t
os
Business leaders can think productively about Covid-19, technology, and globalization, by taking a
structured approach to considering both internal and external implications. Internally, think how
individual functions can harness opportunities afforded by new technologies, while managing
organizational change with sensitivity to the heightened stress employees and teams are facing.
Externally, think about how technological trends could potentially change a company’s standing vis-
rP
à-vis its competitors, customers, suppliers, and so on. For most companies, technological trends
should lead to more globalization in some areas and less in others, rather than a uniform shift in one
direction or the other.
5. Public opinion about globalization may take another negative turn due to Covid-19, scaling back
the surprisingly strong support for trade and immigration reported in recent polling. More
yo
international travel does accelerate the spread of infectious diseases, and economic stress could
boost calls for trade protectionism. While robust public health strategies do not require ongoing
barriers to globalization, nationalist politicians will point to the pandemic and failures of
international coordination in the response to fortify opposition to globalization.
op
Customers and employees increasingly expect corporate leaders to take a stand on social issues,
making public opinion about globalization a potential management issue. The blending of anti-
globalization and anti-capitalist movements further complicates the role of business in the public
debate about globalization. And leaders of multinational corporations face the special challenge of
public and government engagement across national divides. Focusing on facts, becoming more
tC
sensitive to inequality, and emphasizing real economic contributions can help to support a healthier
globalization debate.
In conclusion, Covid-19 looks like a “bend but won’t break crisis” for globalization. International
flows are plummeting, but globalization — and opposition to globalization — will continue to present
business opportunities and challenges. Careful attention to the drivers of globalization’s future can
No
help companies navigate through and even profit from globalization’s turbulence. A volatile world of
partially connected national economies expands possibilities for global strategy even as it
complicates the management of multinational firms. Now is the time for global corporations to show
their value by harnessing the best of the world’s capabilities to end the pandemic and bolster the
recovery.
[i] FDI forecast pertains to 2020/21.

Do
Steven A. Altman is a senior research scholar at the NYU Stern School of Business, executive director of NYU Stern’s
Center for the Globalization of Education & Management, and an adjunct assistant professor in NYU Stern’s Department
of Management and Organizations.

Will Covid Have A Lasting Impact On Globalization PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Will Covid Have A Lasting Impact On Globalization PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

t

Will Covid-19 Have a

MICHAEL H/GETTY IMAGES

What Are Globalization’s Post-Coronavirus Prospects?

[i] FDI forecast pertains to 2020/21.

You might also like