Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Unit 4 IDEALISM AND EDUCATION Basil Val Jorge Stanley L
Unit 4 IDEALISM AND EDUCATION Basil Val Jorge Stanley L
and
EDUCATION
CONTENTS
Unit 4: Idealism and Education
4.1 Concept of Education
4.2 Objectives of Education
4.3 Syllabus of Education
4.4 Methods of Education
4.5 Discipline
4.6 Teachers
4.7 Student
4.8 School
4.9 Other Aspects of Education
4.10 Specific
Educational Implication of Idealism
References
Submitted by:
Submitted to:
4.5. Discipline
Idealists clarify that human organs attract him towards physical pleasures and his
soul towards spiritual pleasure. In his view, being regulated from soul is real discipline.
As per Plato, profounder of idealism, moral conduct is necessary for guiding children
towards spirituality, hence it is our duty to stop children from immoral conduct. For this
they accepted stringent discipline and penalty system. But on the other hand, he said
that real discipline is internal in which human gets inspiration from his inner self and
behaves accordingly. Hence, children should be given such environment where they
proceed towards moral conduct automatically.
Modern German idealist thinker Froebel clarified that real discipline can’t be
attained with fear of penalty, children need behavior of love and sympathy for
attainment of discipline. In his words while controlling the child, we should keep in mind
his interests and should have sympathetic behavior.
Horn too has stressed on internal discipline. In his words-discipline starts from
outside, but it would be better if it ends internally, by habit and self-control.
Thus, all idealists consider discipline internal sentiment and stress on building
and developing better environment in schools for developing it among students. In right
environment, children should be self-discipline, this is a psychological fact.
4.6. Teacher
Idealists give highest place to teachers in education process. As per them,
teacher is badly required in taking children from animal instinct to humanity and from
humanity to divine levels. They clarify that anyone can make children aware of physical
subjects, but for their character building and spiritual development, we need able,
virtuous and trained individuals. As per Plato, only reservoir of knowledge, philosopher
and people with inner vision can only be teachers. In words of Froebel, in garden of
schools, teachers in form of gardeners, help in the development of students as plants.
They can give co-operation only when they know about nature of child and process of
development. Hence, teacher should have the power to understand and develop the
children.
4.7. Students
Idealists consider humans as soulful animals. As per them, centre of experience
is soul and not mind. From this perspective, all children are equal and able to attain
experience of totality. Maximum idealists emphasize on subjecting children with such
experience from beginning only. But modern idealists accept difference in physical and
mental abilities of different children. He tells that in making knowledge reach soul,
various organs like-work organs, knowledge organs and mind functions and they have
differences. Hence while developing children, we should keep in mind their physical and
mental growth, interest, inclination and needs. Swiss pedagogue Pestalozzi was first
person who stressed on arrangement of education on the basis of psychological
difference. After him, his disciple German pedagogue Herbert and Froebel gave
concrete shape to his Guru’s thoughts.
4.8. School
Idealists say that human can be successful in self-realization only when his
physical, mental & intellectual, social & cultural, moral & character and spiritual
development is done. For all these, they understand the need of high class social
environment equipped with social idols, values and morality. All this is possible only in
schools. Children get education of high idols by coming in touch with ideal teachers. As
per idealists, schools should be at such places, where children could proceed towards
high social ideals and spiritual values.
4.10. Specific
In some of university syllabus, in context of western idealism, it has been
emphasized to study Indian idealism in place of western idealism. In this context, our
first request is that there is no philosophy in India in the name of idealism. And if you
say that western spiritual idealism should be uses as backdrop for studying Indian
spiritualism, then it is not logical. When we study different Indian philosophies
differently, then what is the authenticity to study them in some other philosophy’s
context. In such a pot pourri, existence of Indian philosophy shall destroy. Yes, any two
philosophies and their educational meditation can be compared.
In some university’s syllabus, it has been emphasized to study only Indian
Unitarian Vedanta in context of western idealism. In our view, this too is not logical. It is
agreed that both these philosophies are spiritual and hence some similarity and
thereafter some similarity in their educational meditation as well, but in their
fundamental nature, both these are different philosophies and have fundamental
difference in their educational meditation too. First point is that both have different
backgrounds. Second is that as per idealism ultimate aim of human life is self-
realization which can be attained by getting to satyam, shivam and sundaram and as
per Unitarian Vedanta, ultimate aim of human life is salvation which can be attained by
four tools-Chatushtay, Gyan yoga, Karma Yoga and Raj Yoga. Third point is that the
interpretation of lifeless, groundless, Chatushtay, Karma Yoga, Gyan Yoga and Raj
Yoga as done in Unitarian Vedanta, are not in knowledge of western idealists. Fourth
point is that there is difference in their educational meditation. Yes, comparative
analysis of both philosophies and its educational meditation can certainly be done. For
this purpose, something extra has been written in this book on Unitarian Vedanta and
education. See chapter- Vedanta Darshan and Education.
EDUCATIONAL IMPLICATION OF
IDEALISM
Idealism - it is oldest system of philosophy known to man. Its origin goes back to
ancient India in the east, and to Plato in the west. Its basic viewpoint stresses the
human spirit as the most important element in life.
Idealism considers student as an individuals with inner potentials. Education
should help the student to realize these potentials. Curriculum should consist of those
knowledge and experiences which help the student to attained development. The
teacher should impart essentials of knowledge and assist to develop moral and
aesthetic values in the child. As said earlier, idealism stresses more on the spiritual
development of the child.
The human spirit is most elements in life, the universe is essentially nonmaterial
in its ultimate nature. Idealism is concerned with supremacy of mind and self, and views
man and universe in terms of spirit or mind. Matter or objective may be the projection or
creation of mind, but ultimately real is the idea behind it. The physical world is
ephemeral and can be changed through the ideas or imagination of man. Plato, the
greatest philosopher of all ages, claimed that the ultimate reality consists of ideas. Plato
and his teacher Socrates conceived ideas as the basis of their philosophy.
Socrates, an idealistic philosopher placed importance on question-answer and
dialogue as the method of acquiring information or gaining knowledge whereas Plato
emphasized on logical reasoning as the method of gaining knowledge.
REFERENCES
FURTHER READINGS
1. Philosophical and Social Foundation of Education— Mathur, S.S., Vinod Pustak
Mandir
2. Philosophical Foundation of Education—Sharma,Yogendra Kumar, Madhulika
Sharma
3. Philosophical Foundation of Education— Sharma, O.P.
4. Education and Psychology— Mapan aur Mulyankan: Shashi Prabha
5. Philosophical Foundation of Education — Pandey, Ramshakal
6. Sociological Foundation of Education— Chaubey, S.P., International Books, Meerut
7. Philosophical Foundation of Education— Sharma, Dr. N.K.
8.http://ebooks.lpude.in/arts/ma_education/year_1/DEDU401_PHILOSOPHICAL_AND_
SOCIOLOGICAL_FOUNDATIONS_OF_EDUCATION_ENGLISH.pdf