Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Australian Dental Journal
Australian Dental Journal
ABSTRACT
Oral infections have been implicated in adverse pregnancy outcomes such as pre-eclampsia, premature delivery and
growth retardation. A 28-year-old and 9 months pregnant otherwise healthy woman with a complaint of facial swelling
and dental pain was referred to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Oral examination revealed periman-
dibular and masticator space infection related to the left mandibular third molar tooth. Eight hours after surgical inter-
vention, fetal distress developed. The patient was immediately taken into surgery and a male baby delivered by
Caesarean section. The baby was then admitted to the intensive care unit. On the twelfth day of his admission, the baby
was discharged in good health. Severe maxillofacial infection in pregnancy is a medically complicated situation which
should be treated by an oral and maxillofacial surgeon in consultation with an obstetric and gynaecology service.
Keywords: Tooth extraction, maxillofacial infection, pregnancy.
(Accepted for publication 12 August 2012.)
DISCUSSION
The mandibular third molar tooth is one of the most
common source of odontogenic infections. These
infections can spread into perimandibular spaces
namely submandibular, sublingual and submental
spaces, as well as masticator spaces, whose
components may be considered separately as sub-
masseteric, pterygomandibular and temporal spaces.4
The infection may disseminate through the blood-
stream to distant body sites causing cerebral abscess,
cavernous sinus thrombosis, and to the systemic circu-
lation causing bacterial endocarditis.5
Fig. 1 Submandibular and masticator space infection arising from left lower
third molar. Arrows show the enlargement of masticatory muscles. Certain conditions, such as immunosupression, may
place patients at risk of impaired resistance to infec-
A postoperative computed tomography confirmed that tion. Although pregnant patients are usually not
infection was limited to masticator spaces and not lead- immunocompromised, the maternal immune system
ing to airway obstruction (Fig. 1). Because the patient does become suppressed in response to the fetus.6 As
refused to be admitted, she was advised to continue her such, there is a decrease in cell-mediated immunity
medication and return for follow-up the next day. and natural killer cell activity.1 Therefore, bacterial
Eight hours after the intervention, the patient returned agents can easily enter the bloodstream and conse-
to the emergency department complaining of high fever quently intrauterine infection may develop.7
and decreased perception of fetal movement. At initial Diffusion of bacteria or their by-products from the
evaluation, blood pressure was 100/90 mm Hg, heart oral cavity to the bloodstream has been directly or
rate 90 and fever 38.7 °C. The patient was then sent to indirectly correlated with adverse pregnancy out-
the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Ultraso- comes8 such as preterm birth, low birth weight, fetal
nographic examination revealed a 35-week-old single- growth restriction, pre-eclampsia and perinatal mor-
ton fetus with normal growth. Amniotic fluid volume tality. The increase of pro-inflammatory cytokines has
and placental image were normal. Cardiotocography been considered to be responsible for placental modifi-
showed severe persistent late decelerations with cations that lead to such complications.7
Fig. 2 Preoperative fetal heart rate tracing showing normal baseline heart rate, variability and acceleration (arrows). Note the absence of deceleration. This
is a completely normal and reassuring fetal heart rate pattern.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This report was presented as a poster at the 6th
AC _ International Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
ß BID
Society Congress held in Antalya, Turkey (30 May –
Fig. 3 Fetal heart rate tracing showing late deceleration. 3 June 2012).