Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SIEGLER Et Al v. TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY Et Al Administrative Stay
SIEGLER Et Al v. TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY Et Al Administrative Stay
SIEGLER Et Al v. TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY Et Al Administrative Stay
The Parties show that Plaintiffs, in their capacities as alleged additional insureds under
certain liability policies issued to various Texaco entities, have sued Travelers, Ace, and
AMMIC seeking defense and indemnity in the lawsuit styled as Katherine G. Orillion, et al. v.
Texaco, Inc., et al., bearing No. 30718 on the docket of the 18th Judicial District Court for the
Parish of Point Coupee, State of Louisiana (the “Underlying Lawsuit”). The principal disputed
legal issue is whether any policies of insurance that the Defendants may have issued to any
Texaco entity afford coverage to Plaintiffs in connection with the Underlying Lawsuit.
Since the filing of this suit, however, Plaintiffs’ counsel have confirmed to Defendants’
counsel that based on information from counsel for Chevron/Texaco in the Underlying Lawsuit,
the Underlying Lawsuit has been settled in principle and that the instant declaratory judgment
action will no longer need to be maintained upon finalization of Plaintiffs’ settlement with
Texaco in the Underlying Lawsuit. Plaintiffs have also advised that the Underlying Lawsuit is a
legacy lawsuit involving Act 312 of 2006, so that even though the parties to the Underlying
involving not only the finalization of settlement papers, but also notice to the State of Louisiana
As a result of the underlying settlement negotiations, Plaintiffs have consented to, and the
Defendants have obtained, several extensions of time to file responsive pleadings in the
Consequently, the Defendants have not yet filed responsive pleadings or analyzed their
respective defenses to Plaintiffs’ allegations. Defendants’ responsive pleadings are presently due
to be filed on November 29, 2010. In addition, based on the representations of the Parties in a
Joint Status Report [Rec. Doc. 21], this Court previously issued an Order on November 2, 2010
[Rec. Doc. 26], inviting the parties to file a motion to administratively close or stay the case on
or before December 3, 2010. In addition, in response to a letter advising the Court of the current
status submitted by Plaintiffs’ counsel, the Court advised on November 29, 2010, that the Parties
for everyone, the Parties file this Joint Motion seeking an administrative stay so that Plaintiffs
can focus their efforts on assisting counsel for Chevron/Texaco in the Underlying Lawsuit in
finalizing the underlying settlement with Plaintiffs in the Underlying Lawsuit, which will obviate
further litigation among the Parties to this declaratory judgment action. Upon the
accomplishment of the settlement and a final judgment in the Underlying Lawsuit approving the
WHEREFORE, the Parties jointly request that the instant litigation be administratively
stayed for a period of ninety days while efforts are undertaken to finalize the settlement of the
Respectfully submitted,