Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Communication Skills Report
Communication Skills Report
Smart Wars
Madrid, 24/04-01/05/2016
Madrid, 28/04/2016
1. Introduction
The training took place in Madrid. The event was from the 24th of April to the 1st of
May. Natalia applied as a participant to the event and that gave us the opportunity
to deliver a training for the international participants of the event. The training took
place on the 5th day of the event, so us to get prepared after Natalias arrival, and in
order to get to know the participants a bit more.
2. Keywords
Channels, filters, communication, sender, receiver, feedback
3. Target Group
The target group was formed by the participants of the international workshop Smart
Wars, organized by LC Madrid. They were EESTEC members of different commitments
with different experience levels.
4. Trainers
Natalia Saranti, LC Patras, Trainer Candidate, 7th T4T (Zurich)
5. Training Details
Goals of Training Session
Give some basic informations about the
● Model of communication, how it works
● The channels we use during our everyday communication, emphasise on how
many they are and how important they are
● The filters,and how they affect our communication. How can we notice them.
● Ways to overcome this problems, and especially by using BIO Feedback
Timeline
You can find the timeline of the training in the following link:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8Wct-fIisVBbDdjem5OM2Q3TWs/view?usp=sharing
Activities
The activity related to this learning block was done at the beginning of it. In this
activity we asked for 3 volunteers. We gave to each one of them a paper with a
sentence and 3 different emotions to express while reading this sentence to the rest
of the participants. The participants should applause to the one of these 3 situations
that they believe the most.
With this activity we tried to show the participants the importance of the rest of the
channels in communication, not only verbal communication.
Theory
After playing the game in which each participant had a role, we had a discussion
about the role the had in the roleplay game and how did the others felt that the role
was affecting the communication. We discussed about the problems they faced
and by that we made the introduction to the filters. Then we introduced them to the
filters of communication, giving some real life examples, and how can you recognize
the filter which is making your communication more difficult in order to solve it with
the tools we were going to introduce later
Activities
We played a role play game. We divided the participants into 4 groups of 5. Then we
gave to the participants a small piece of paper on which we had a filter with a small
description underneath it. We asked the participants to adopt the role for the game
and try to not reveal to the others there role. The filters they had was for example:
you can’t express yourself easily or you are very emotional with everything that
happens , get excited or mad but you are over excited or too mad.
The subject they had to discuss was about planning a trip to a Greek island. We had
three different rounds in the game. The first round was with back to back in the
chairs, so the channel of eye contact, body language .etc wasn’t there (a way to
see the importance of the filters too). On the second round they could be face to
face and discuss about the topic. In both rounds they were keeping hide their filter.
In the third round we gave them the opportunity to reveal their filter to the others, so
they could see at the same time the characteristics of each filter.
Activities
We divided the participants into groups of two, and we asked them to sit on the
chairs, putting the chairs back to back. We gave them a different paper with a
drawing and we asked them to : for the first round describe the drawing they had to
the person behind them. The other person couldn’t talk. That would happen for the
other person, so that both would describe their drawing and both could have tried
to draw. Then on the second round they had the opportunity to talk and ask
questions.
During this block we had another game. We asked the participants to give BIO
Feedback to a poster we had on the slides in order to practice a bit on giving BIO
feedback.
Logistics Needed
We used the following materials:
6. Materials Used
Sources
We used the following materials for the preparation of this training:
Materials Created
Link for the PPT:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4MPdERBwTtlUVVIcm9OcDE3bVE/view?usp=sharin
g
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B8Wct-
fIisVBWFhtdWhQbTFpUE0&usp=sharing
7. Follow up
Participants’ Feedback
Negative:
Most of the participants would like to see something more during the training, and
emphasise on one thing more. For example they asked for more details about body
language during communication, maybe more about feedback and other
methods, others about the process of communication. One of the participants
suggested (something that we found really interesting) to present some statistics of
experiments and some percentage. Moreover, to encourage participants to share
their knowledge and maybe use media, audios, videos, or incorporate self
evaluation stuff(personal tests,self judgement).
Positive:
The training was interesting for the participants, as they said it was a dynamic training
about useful topic. Also, they think the activities made more clear the topic, and that
they were well balanced with the theory parts. Some of them said that this training
made the knowledge they have about communication more clear and structured in
their minds. They gave positive feedback about our way of communicating and
about the way of working between the two of us.
Patricia Ramos
Since T4T in Zurich Natalia and me wanted to delivered a training together and
finally we got our chance to do it, and I’m so happy we did. First of all the working
atmosphere before the training was really great. I felt really comfortable and we
created a positive atmosphere where we could give different ideas and work as a
team. Second of all, during the training we understood each other in case we
needed help from the other and we were comfortable with the fact of delivering
together. Also, while delivering the training, the participants were really active and
contributed during the whole training session. This fact made the training a perfect
activity for sharing knowledge and for learning about Communication Skills. It was a
pleasure for me to be part of this training, one of the trainings I’m most proud of.