Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Artificial Intelligence in Conflict Zones
Artificial Intelligence in Conflict Zones
Question of: Ensuring the regulation and monitoring of the development and usage of
artificial intelligence in conflict zones
Main Submitter: Canada
Co-submitters: France, Ukraine, Australia, Iraq, Bosnia, South Africa, China, UK, Sweden,
Belgium
Bearing in mind past United Nations (UN) guidance concerning the use of Artificial
Intelligence (AI) in conflict zones, particularly through the UN Convention on Certain
Conventional Weapons and the Centre on Artificial Intelligence and robots,
Ensuring our technological capabilities are guided by ethics and international law,
1. Strongly condemns the use and development of lethal autonomous weapons in conflict
zones, which may include but is not limited to:
a) artillery
b) warheads
c) tanks,
d) aircraft
e) warships
f) robotic weaponry
g) drones;
3. Takes note that AI enhanced weaponry for the purposes of defense is permitted provided
human direction is necessary, and that no weaponry is capable of autonomous targeting;
4. Reaffirms that all use of AI should comply with previous UN resolutions, the Geneva
Convention, and national law, provided the latter is not contrary to human rights and
international regulations;
7. Suggests that financial backing to implement the above points be sourced from the IMF,
World Bank, The Future of Life Institute, and member countries.