The document provides a grading rubric for a community leader's interview submission assignment. It evaluates the submission based on content (70%) and structure (30%). For content, it scores the discussion of the interview selections and explanations for why individuals were selected. For structure, it scores proper formatting, grammar, and whether the interviewees are appropriate and related to the chosen topic. The highest possible score is 25 points.
The document provides a grading rubric for a community leader's interview submission assignment. It evaluates the submission based on content (70%) and structure (30%). For content, it scores the discussion of the interview selections and explanations for why individuals were selected. For structure, it scores proper formatting, grammar, and whether the interviewees are appropriate and related to the chosen topic. The highest possible score is 25 points.
The document provides a grading rubric for a community leader's interview submission assignment. It evaluates the submission based on content (70%) and structure (30%). For content, it scores the discussion of the interview selections and explanations for why individuals were selected. For structure, it scores proper formatting, grammar, and whether the interviewees are appropriate and related to the chosen topic. The highest possible score is 25 points.
The document provides a grading rubric for a community leader's interview submission assignment. It evaluates the submission based on content (70%) and structure (30%). For content, it scores the discussion of the interview selections and explanations for why individuals were selected. For structure, it scores proper formatting, grammar, and whether the interviewees are appropriate and related to the chosen topic. The highest possible score is 25 points.
PPOG 506 COMMUNITY LEADER’S INTERVIEW SUBMISSION GRADING RUBRIC
Criteria Levels of Achievement
Content Advanced Proficient Developing Not Total (70%) 92-100% 84-91% 1-83% Present 7 to 7.5 points 6.25 to 6.75 points 1 to 6 points 0 points The student names the The student’s discussion falls The student’s discussions are vague and Not interview selections that focus short of the quality and do not meet the expectations of quality present Names and quantity expected in this or quantity expected in this assignment. on the geopolitical framework Job Titles of assignment and some of the are discussed. Candidates information on the names and titles is missing. 9.25 to 10 points 8.5 to 9 points 1 to 8 points 0 points Interview The student explains why The student’s discussion is The student’s discussion does not Not Discussion he/she selected the 2 people to missing parts regarding why mention why the people were selected. present interview. the people were selected.
Structure Advanced Proficient Developing Not Total
(30%) 92-100% 84-91% 1-83% Present 7 to 7.5 points 6.25 to 6.75 points 1 to 6 points 0 points Formatting The assignment uses proper The assignment fails to The assignment does not follow Not and formatting and all required fully inform the reader directions for formatting or grammar. present Grammar elements are present. about the context of the The chosen interviewees are interviews or appropriate and directly interviewees. related to the topic chosen. The assignment has significant formatting errors.