Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Crime of Documentary Falsification Ingles
The Crime of Documentary Falsification Ingles
English work
The crime of false document
Modulo III
Facilitated
Carmen Palencia
Speciali:
CIV-6.932.635
This crime is regulated in articles 390 to 399 of the Penal Code, within Chapter
II "On documentary falsehoods" of Title XVIII.
The protected legal asset is the security of legal traffic, but also the public faith
and trust of citizens and institutions in documents as evidence.
This is a very serious crime punishable by imprisonment and very high fines. In
addition, the Penal Code establishes distinctions based on the active subject,
so each case will be different.
Document
To understand what is understood by a document for criminal purposes, we
must consult article 26 of the current Venezuelan Penal Code.
In this way, a document for the criminal field is a material support that includes
data and information that have evidentiary effects or legal relevance. In
addition, for criminal purposes we must distinguish between public, official,
commercial and private documents.
For the purposes of this Code, any material support that expresses or
incorporates data, facts or narratives with evidential efficacy or any other type of
legal relevance is considered a document.
There are four types of document forgery that depend on the type of document
forged. Each one is punished with different penalties depending on its severity
and the subject who commits the crime.
This type of document forgery can only be committed by public officials and
authorities. This crime is punishable by imprisonment, a fine and a special
disqualification. They will be considered to have committed falsehood when:
1. He will be punished with prison terms of three to six years, a fine of six to
twenty-four months and special disqualification for a period of two to six
years, the authority or public official who, in the exercise of his functions,
commits falsehood:
1º altering a document in any of its essential elements or requirements.
3. º supposing in an act the intervention of people who have not had it, or
attributing to those who have participated in it statements or statements
different from those they would have made.
This crime is similar, but it refers only to private documents, leaving out public
documents. Furthermore, the active subject will always be a private individual.
Anyone who, to harm another, commits in a private document any of the
falsehoods provided for in the first three numbers of section 1 of article 390,
shall be punished with imprisonment from six months to two years.
Article 395 of the Venezuelan Penal Code
3. Forgery of certificates
As with the falsification of official, commercial and public documents, the crime
of falsifying certificates can be committed by individuals, authorities, public
officials and physicians. In the case of public authorities or officials, in addition
to the fine, a suspension penalty will be imposed.
Both the forger and the trafficker are punished, as well as the person who
makes use of the forged document knowing that it is false. However, this
precept will not apply in terms of certificates related to Social Security and
Public Finance.
The physician who releases a false certificate will be punished with a fine of
three to twelve months.
This precept will not be applicable to certificates related to Social Security and
Public Finance.
Signatures always leave a mark, and the handwriting expert is the professional
in charge of detecting it in the small details of the microcosm of writing and its
documentary supports.
1. Make use of a false act even if there was no part in the forgery, likewise
2. Taking advantage of the false act even if there was no part in the falsification.
The use of a false public document consists of applying the document to the job
for which it has been assigned. It is the presentation of the document as
authentic, legitimate in any legal situation.
We can mean that before a court, in a registry, before a public official, to use
the document as evidence, or for its protocolization after the signatures are
authenticated, or for the file as proof, or the recognition of a signature, in thesis
general, conforming the end to the nature of the act ”.
The protected legal asset is none other than protecting the public faith that can
be violated by using false documents. We can say that authors Hernando
Grisanti Aveledo saw the crime of using a false public document that is made
up of three elements: the falsity of the document used, the knowledge that the
active subject has of that falsity and an act of use.
Therefore, we have to say that the first requirement for the configuration of the
use of a false public document refers to the existence of a false act, so that at
the time of making the imputation of this criminal type, the existence of the false
act that was subsequently used, by means of an Authenticity or Falsehood
expertise performed on the document.