2020 School Plan For Student Achievement Adelanto Elementary School 20201125

School Year: 2020-21
SPSA Title Page
School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Template

Instructions and requirements for completing the SPSA template may be found in the SPSA Template Instructions.
School Name Adelanto Elementary School
Address 17931 Jonathan St.
Adelanto, CA 92301
County-District-School (CDS) Code 36-67587-6035174
Principal Ramon Rizo
District Name Adelanto Elementary School District
SPSA Revision Date
Schoolsite Council (SSC) Approval Date 9/30/20
Local Board Approval Date
Purpose and Description

Briefly describe the purpose of this plan (Select from Schoolwide Program, Comprehensive Support and Improvement, Targeted
Support and Improvement, or Additional Targeted Support and Improvement)
XComprehensive Support and Improvement
Briefly describe the school’s plan for effectively meeting the ESSA requirements in alignment with the Local Control and Accountability
Plan and other federal, state, and local programs.
Based on the 2019-2020 LCAP, the Adelanto Elementary School District and its board have identified (1) Conditions of Learning, (2)
Pupil Outcomes, and (3) Improving Parent and Student Engagement as three significant areas of focus to ensure success for ALL
students. Adelanto Elementary School's (AES) Single Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) is organized around the district goals, site
specific goals, and professional development needs of our staff. AES is committed to the use supplemental, concentration, Title I, and
School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 1 of 83 Adelanto Elementary School
Comprehensive Support and Improvement (CSI) funding to provide supplemental services to each of our targeted populations. Our
plan is to address the needs of our students by having appropriately assigned credentialed teachers, rigorous Common Core aligned
district adopted curriculum, and adequate access to technology for all students. As a way to address the emotional health of our
students, we will use Positive Behavior Intervention and Supports (PBIS) to set clear behavioral expectations and we will incorporate
Restorative Circles and Trauma Informed Practices to address the social-emotional needs of our students. To address our students'
academic needs, we will provide time for teachers to analyze data and work collaboratively to create engaging and targeted lessons
that address the needs of all students.
Table of Contents
SPSA Title Page ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................1
Purpose and Description..............................................................................................................................................................................................1
Table of Contents.........................................................................................................................................................................................................3
School Vision and Mission ...........................................................................................................................................................................................5
School Profile ...............................................................................................................................................................................................................5
SPSA Highlights...........................................................................................................................................................................................................5
Comprehensive Needs Assessment Components ......................................................................................................................................................7
Data Analysis .......................................................................................................................................................................................................7
Surveys ................................................................................................................................................................................................................7
Classroom Observations ......................................................................................................................................................................................7
Analysis of Current Instructional Program............................................................................................................................................................8
Stakeholder Involvement ...........................................................................................................................................................................................12
Resource Inequities ...................................................................................................................................................................................................12
School and Student Performance Data .....................................................................................................................................................................13
Student Enrollment.............................................................................................................................................................................................13
CAASPP Results................................................................................................................................................................................................16
ELPAC Results ..................................................................................................................................................................................................21
Student Population .............................................................................................................................................................................................25
Overall Performance ..........................................................................................................................................................................................27
Academic Performance ......................................................................................................................................................................................28
Academic Engagement ......................................................................................................................................................................................38
Conditions & Climate..........................................................................................................................................................................................42
Goals, Strategies, & Proposed Expenditures ............................................................................................................................................................45
Goal 1.................................................................................................................................................................................................................45
Goal 2.................................................................................................................................................................................................................49
Goal 3.................................................................................................................................................................................................................55
Goal 4.................................................................................................................................................................................................................61
Budget Summary .......................................................................................................................................................................................................64
Budget Summary ...............................................................................................................................................................................................64
Other Federal, State, and Local Funds ..............................................................................................................................................................64
Budgeted Funds and Expenditures in this Plan .........................................................................................................................................................66
Funds Budgeted to the School by Funding Source............................................................................................................................................66
Expenditures by Funding Source .......................................................................................................................................................................66
Expenditures by Budget Reference ...................................................................................................................................................................67
Expenditures by Budget Reference and Funding Source ..................................................................................................................................67
Expenditures by Goal .........................................................................................................................................................................................68
School Site Council Membership ...............................................................................................................................................................................69
Recommendations and Assurances ..........................................................................................................................................................................70
Instructions.................................................................................................................................................................................................................71
Instructions: Linked Table of Contents ...............................................................................................................................................................71
Purpose and Description ....................................................................................................................................................................................72
Stakeholder Involvement....................................................................................................................................................................................72
Resource Inequities ...........................................................................................................................................................................................73
Goals, Strategies, Expenditures, & Annual Review ...................................................................................................................................................73
Annual Review ...................................................................................................................................................................................................75
Budget Summary ...............................................................................................................................................................................................76
Appendix A: Plan Requirements ........................................................................................................................................................................77
Appendix B: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................80
Appendix C: Select State and Federal Programs ..............................................................................................................................................83
School Vision and Mission
Vision: Adelanto Elementary School is a community of safe, respectful, and responsible individuals. We strive to reach high expectations for school wide
academic and personal achievement by delivering high quality instruction to ALL students.
AESD Mission: To be the High Desert’s premier learning establishment where dreams are awakened, academic achievement soars, and integrity leads the way
to future success.
School Profile
Describe The students and community and how school serves them.
The Story
Adelanto Elementary School serves students from TK through 5th grade. We have one TK class, two kindergarten, two first grade, two second
grade, two third grade, two fourth grade, and two fifth grade classes. In addition, there is one RSP and one SDC class as well. Our demographics
are broken down as the following: 42% Hispanic, 34% African American, 12% White and 12% other. We are proud to be recognized as the First
School of the district, built in the year 1952. We are located a "walking distance" away from our district office, and across HWY 395 sits Adelanto
City Hall. More than 50% of our students are "walkers" since we are a few blocks away from several apartment complexes and low income
housing. Adelanto Elementary school has been described by many as the "Hub" of Old Adelanto, the community we serve. There are
approximately 280 students attending our school and 94% of those students being classified as socio-economically disadvantaged providing
free/reduced school lunches. Our school community is diverse and vibrant sharing many success and challenges as well. Adelanto Elementary
School students have reached the 1:1 student to chrome book ratio with newly adopted CCSS aligned ELA (English Language Arts) and
Mathematics curriculum. Our students have several online tools that they can access and an amazing library offering a wide variety of narrative
and expository literature. We celebrate student success each year and recognize classified and certificated staff for their accomplishments. We
are a PBIS (positive behavior interventions and supports) school recognized by the California PBIS Coalition at the Silver level four years in a row.
We are surrounded by mostly small businesses of grocery stores, gas stations, and privately owned restaurants. We are fortunate to have
developed positive relationships with our local Rotary Club, Catholic Church (across the street), and local library. Adelanto Elementary school is
an important part of our community and is proud to serve the children of our local families and organizations.
SPSA Highlights
Identify and briefly summarize the key features of this year’s SPSA.
Adelanto Elementary School is committed to achieving student success via the three district LCAP goals: 1. Conditions of Learning, 2. Pupil Outcomes, and 3.
Engagement. Our School Plan for Student Achievement will highlight specific areas of focus we hope to increase student achievement for ALL students, such as:
1. Fully credentialed and qualified staff to service our students.

2. Class size reduction: TK-3 24:1 & 4-5 30:1.
3. State approved and district adopted CCSS standards aligned curriculum.
4. Technology: every student as AES is assigned a chrome book; teachers have access to updated laptops and various teaching tools.
5. Certificated teacher professional development through on site and district wide P/D sessions throughout the school year.
6. MTSS (multi-tiered systems of support) that includes goals in RTI (response to interventions), PBIS (positive behavior interventions and supports), and SEL
(social-emotional learning)
7. Active parent groups: SSC (school site council), ELAC (English language advisory committee), and PTA (parent teacher association).
These highlights are directly aligned to the areas of focus and LCAP goals generated by both district wide and on site surveys with responses from parents and
certificated staff.
Comprehensive Needs Assessment Components
Data Analysis
Please refer to the School and Student Performance Data section where an analysis is provided.
Surveys
This section provides a description of surveys (i.e., Student, Parent, Teacher) used during the school-year, and a summary of results
from the survey(s).
Adelanto Elementary School uses a combination of parent and teacher data to gather pertinent information about the academic foci,
areas of growth, and student needs. In addition, the district will use Title I surveys to gather information on the parent's concerns or
how they may feel about the services provided by the school and/or district office. This survey asks what their level of satisfaction
would be in the areas of English Language Learners, SPED (special education), the use of technology, and what they perceive to be
the overall quality of education their student is receiving. This years parent and staff surveys were used to determine the plan of
action to be used during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Classroom Observations
This section provides a description of types and frequency of classroom observations conducted during the school-year and a summary
of findings.
Classroom teachers are observed formally and informally. Depending on a teachers' status or years of service, they can be formally
observed between one and three times a year. Our probationary teachers are formally observed three times a year. They choose the
topic for the first and third observations and the evaluator chooses the topic of the second. After obtaining a clear credential, teachers
are observed every other year. If a teacher has ten years of service, is highly qualified, and whose previous evaluation met standards,
they are evaluated every five years. The administrator also conducts informal observations through weekly walk-throughs. The formal
and informal observations allow the administrator to have a clear understanding of the school climate, professional development
needs, and also helps the staff to remain accountable for highly engaging weekly lessons. Administrator observations help build a
supportive environment for educators that will have a positive effect on the achievement of students.
Analysis of Current Instructional Program
The following statements are derived from the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) of 1965 and Essential Program
Components (EPCs). In conjunction with the needs assessments, these categories may be used to discuss and develop critical findings
that characterize current instructional practice for numerically significant subgroups as well as individual students who are:
• Not meeting performance goals

• Meeting performance goals
• Exceeding performance goals
Discussion of each of these statements should result in succinct and focused findings based on verifiable facts. Avoid vague or general
descriptions. Each successive school plan should examine the status of these findings and note progress made. Special consideration
should be given to any practices, policies, or procedures found to be noncompliant through ongoing monitoring of categorical programs.
Standards, Assessment, and Accountability
Use of state and local assessments to modify instruction and improve student achievement (ESEA)
As a school site teachers/Admin used:
• Renaissance STAR ELA & Early Literacy/Mathematics Screening Reports
• District CAASPP IAB Benchmarks
• Spring 2019 CAASPP
• ELA-Online (
• Go Math Data/Formative Assessments
• NGSS- pilot assessment
• EADMS
• ELPAC
A variety of assessments are given to students throughout the school year. These assessments are used for several different reasons.
First, the data collected is used to drive instructions. Teachers are given collaboration time to discuss specific data and then work
together to create innovated and differentiate ways to address the needs of all students. Data is also used to create groups for our
MTSS intervention time. During MTSS targeting ELA, students are mixed in clusters of two grade levels. This allows teachers to target
a specific need for a larger group of students at one time. Formative and summative data is collected every 6-8 weeks and new groups
are formed. ELPAC, district, and state assessments are used to determine EL students' language acquisition and progress to become
reclassified as RFEP. Finally, data is used for teachers to determine areas of growth. They use this information to help guide their
professional growth through professional development and coaching.
Use of data to monitor student progress on curriculum-embedded assessments and modify instruction (EPC)
ELA (English Language Arts) and Math levels of ALL students are monitored through Renaissance Learning and district benchmarks.
STAR ELA and Math are used in conjunction with CAASPP ICA's to monitor student progress. As a staff, we analyze this data for
planning and delivering a multi-tiered system of support (MTSS) for all students. With the use of Reading Wonders curriculum,
Go Math curriculum, and AESD recommended intervention materials, our staff is able to target the individual ELA/Mathematical needs
of all students/subgroups.
Staffing and Professional Development
Status of meeting requirements for highly qualified staff (ESEA)

Adelanto Elementary School is fully staffed with certified/credentialed teachers that include SPED (special education) in both RSP and
SDC. In addition, the support staff, such as para-professionals are highly trained and must complete district level testing/assessment
in order to support the educational needs in a classroom setting.
Sufficiency of credentialed teachers and teacher professional development (e.g., access to instructional materials training on SBE-
adopted instructional materials) (EPC)
All training and professional development at Adelanto Elementary School & District revolve around providing the best education and
comprehensive support for all students. The district and school site sponsors staff development days annually where teachers and
support staff are offered a broad variety of professional growth opportunities to enhance their teaching and support practices. Specific
training on SBE-adopted materials are also offered throughout the year outside of contractual hours. Training on site-based initiatives
are held during weekly staff meeting time..
Alignment of staff development to content standards, assessed student performance, and professional needs (ESEA)
As part of the growth process, opportunities for training and staff development are provided at both the district and individual school
site levels to both certificated and classified staff throughout the school year as well as during non-contractual times.
Ongoing instructional assistance and support for teachers (e.g., use of content experts and instructional coaches) (EPC)
The district utilizes weekly early student release days on Tuesdays to allow for teacher collaboration, staff meetings, and additional
professional development throughout the school year. Teachers are encouraged to attend district sponsored trainings and
professional development programs. This year we added a Tech Specialist to support our distance learning efforts.
Teacher collaboration by grade level (kindergarten through grade eight [K–8]) and department (grades nine through twelve) (EPC)
Teacher collaboration opportunities are built into both the district and the individual site professional development days. The district
professional development schedule includes a specified CBA (collective bargaining agreement) amount of time our credentialed
teachers have for collaborative purposes. In addition, our site certificated staff have a regularly scheduled PLC (professional learning
community) after each MTSS (multi tiered system of supports) cycle to analyze data to support students at their reading levels. Our
site teachers also voluntarily meet weekly to offer training and support to one another. This allows for collaboration to happen between
grade bands such as 3rd-5th grade or TK-2nd grade.
Teaching and Learning
Alignment of curriculum, instruction, and materials to content and performance standards (ESEA)
All curriculum in the Adelanto Elementary School District, including online tools are CCSS standards based, aligned, and board
approved materials. Curriculum include: Wonder of Reading for ELA (English Language Arts), Go Math for mathematics, Scott
Foresman Social Studies, and we are currently piloting a Science curriculum that is NGSS aligned.
Adherence to recommended instructional minutes for reading/language arts and mathematics (K–8) (EPC)
Instructional minutes are set by grade level according to both the state/federal mandates as well as the district's CBA (collective
bargaining agreement) negotiated by the CTA. At the start of school year 2020/2021, distance learning will be in place also following
a negotiated number of minutes for both synchronous and asynchronous teaching.
Lesson pacing schedule (K–8) and master schedule flexibility for sufficient numbers of intervention courses (EPC)
Adelanto Elementary School schedules a morning block of time each day for MTSS (multi tiered system of supports) to include RTI
(response to interventions) as well as ELD (English Language Development) to support the needs of at risk and EL (English Learners)
students. Additionally, our goal is to add additional supports in Mathematics as well as other core subjects to include Social Studies
and Science.
Availability of standards-based instructional materials appropriate to all student groups (ESEA)

Adelanto Elementary School students have access to a variety of ELA, Math, Social Studies, and Science core materials that are both
aligned to the CCSS standards adopted and board approved. Additionally, we currently hold licenses to the following online tools and
supports: IXL, Lexia Learning, Connect Ed, Think Central, and Moby Max learning.
Use of SBE-adopted and standards-aligned instructional materials, including intervention materials, and for high school students, access
to standards-aligned core courses (EPC)
In addition to core intervention materials, baseline assessment, and common formative assessments, Adelanto Elementary School
employs researched based intervention materials such as Explode the Code and Phonics for Reading RTI supports. Additional
supports such as Touch Math and SRA Corrective Reading will play a role in our SPED RSP and SDC classes.
Opportunity and Equal Educational Access
Services provided by the regular program that enable underperforming students to meet standards (ESEA)
Adelanto Elementary School students will participate in daily MTSS groups that are geared to support their reading needs.
Additionally, our library will continue to have available leveled reading books for ALL students regardless of their reading ability. We
have carefully chosen high interest books, series books, and books with expository text at multiple levels of reading abilities.
Evidence-based educational practices to raise student achievement

Adelanto Elementary School uses only evidenced/researched based online and RTI academic supports to help close the achievement
gap for ALL sub-groups of students. Additionally, we have provided our certificated teachers professional development in the areas of
RTI, writing (Thinking Maps) and ACE which is both a writing tool and effective comprehension practice as well.
Parental Engagement
Resources available from family, school, district, and community to assist under-achieving students (ESEA)
Adelanto Elementary School has developed a close relationship with our local DMCC (Desert Mountain Children's Center) that provide
critical support in professional development in PBIS/SEL and restorative practices, SPED/IEP support, and critical SEL (social
emotional learning) counseling.
Involvement of parents, community representatives, classroom teachers, other school personnel, and students in secondary schools, in
the planning, implementation, and evaluation of ConApp programs (5 California Code of Regulations 3932)
Adelanto Elementary School offers it's community of learners several opportunities to participate in the daily school process, including:
parent groups such as SSC (school site council), ELAC (English Language Advisory Committee), PTA (parent teacher association),
and onsite parent volunteers. The parent groups include members from our learning community such as certificated staff, classified
staff, parents and other interested parties.
Funding
Services provided by categorical funds that enable underperforming students to meet standards (ESEA)
Title One funding provides supports to all underperforming, EL, and low SED (socioeconomic disadvantaged) students. This year we
qualify for additional CSI funding as well.
Fiscal support (EPC)

Financial support of the school is coordinated through the LCAP at the district level. Input is derived from all sites in regard to
development toward goals.
Stakeholder Involvement
How, when, and with whom did the school consult as part of the planning process for this SPSA/Annual Review and Update?
Involvement Process for the SPSA and Annual Review and Update
The Single Plan for Student Achievement is developed by the school principal, school staff, and nominated school site council
members. The principal facilitates discussions with the group to include: ELA and Math data, school safety, school budget,
assessment, and attendance.
Resource Inequities
Briefly identify and describe any resource inequities identified as a result of the required needs assessment, as applicable.
Adelanto Elementary School staff identified the need for additional professional development in the areas of reading comprehension,
math concepts, and SEL through the process of a needs assessment survey.
School and Student Performance Data
Student Enrollment
Enrollment By Student Group
Student Enrollment by Subgroup

Percent of Enrollment Number of Students
Student Group
17-18 18-19 19-20 17-18 18-19 19-20
American Indian 2.06% 0.31% 1.02% 8 1 3
African American 29.56% 35.71% 36.39% 115 115 107
Asian % % 0% 0
Filipino 0.26% % 0% 1 0
Hispanic/Latino 51.41% 45.34% 45.92% 200 146 135
Pacific Islander % 0.31% 0% 1 0
White 9.51% 9.63% 7.82% 37 31 23
Multiple/No Response 2.06% 1.86% 6.12% 8 6 8
Total Enrollment 389 322 294
Student Enrollment
Enrollment By Grade Level
Student Enrollment by Grade Level

Number of Students
Grade
17-18 18-19 19-20
Kindergarten 83 60 69
Grade 1 59 52 43
Grade 2 70 54 42
Grade3 56 53 47
Grade 4 67 50 49
Grade 5 54 53 44
Total Enrollment 389 322 294
Conclusions based on this data:
1. Adelanto Elementary School has a diverse student population. We are currently seeing a growth in our African American sub group.
2. Although our Hispanic group is at nearly 46%, our students identified as EL is low.
3. Overall our student population is going down at each grade level, possible causes: opening of new schools, transportation, and/or boundaries.
Student Enrollment
English Learner (EL) Enrollment
English Learner (EL) Enrollment

Number of Students Percent of Students
Student Group
17-18 18-19 19-20 17-18 18-19 19-20
English Learners 70 34 33 18.0% 10.6% 11.2%
Fluent English Proficient (FEP) 12 25 17 3.1% 7.8% 5.8%
Reclassified Fluent English Proficient (RFEP) 3 29 3 4.4% 41.4% 8.8%

1. Although our Hispanic sub group is nearly 46%, students who are identified as EL is low.
2. AES EL students are monitored each year as we consistently reclassify students when appropriate.
3. The percentage of students reclassified is depends on when students are enrolled and identifying candidates when possible.
CAASPP Results
English Language Arts/Literacy (All Students)
Overall Participation for All Students

# of Students Enrolled # of Students Tested # of Students with Scores % of Enrolled Students Tested
Grade Level
16-17 17-18 18-19 16-17 17-18 18-19 16-17 17-18 18-19 16-17 17-18 18-19
Grade 3 79 57 56 74 55 55 74 55 55 93.7 96.5 98.2
Grade 4 60 66 53 58 64 52 58 64 52 96.7 97 98.1
Grade 5 46 55 60 45 55 59 45 55 59 97.8 100 98.3
All Grades 185 178 169 177 174 166 177 174 166 95.7 97.8 98.2
* The “% of Enrolled Students Tested” showing in this table is not the same as “Participation Rate” for federal accountability purposes.
Overall Achievement for All Students

Mean Scale Score % Standard Exceeded % Standard Met % Standard Nearly Met % Standard Not Met
Grade Level
16-17 17-18 18-19 16-17 17-18 18-19 16-17 17-18 18-19 16-17 17-18 18-19 16-17 17-18 18-19
Grade 3 2318.9 2331.3 2321.5 2.70 3.64 1.82 4.05 10.91 9.09 20.27 23.64 16.36 72.97 61.82 72.73
Grade 4 2380.3 2382.9 2380.4 3.45 1.56 7.69 8.62 21.88 11.54 17.24 12.50 9.62 70.69 64.06 71.15
Grade 5 2389.7 2438.8 2416.7 2.22 3.64 1.69 11.11 21.82 25.42 11.11 21.82 10.17 75.56 52.73 62.71
All Grades N/A N/A N/A 2.82 2.87 3.61 7.34 18.39 15.66 16.95 18.97 12.05 72.88 59.77 68.67
Reading
Demonstrating understanding of literary and non-fictional texts
% Above Standard % At or Near Standard % Below Standard
Grade Level
16-17 17-18 18-19 16-17 17-18 18-19 16-17 17-18 18-19
Grade 3 5.41 5.45 5.45 17.57 27.27 20.00 77.03 67.27 74.55
Grade 4 3.45 4.69 5.77 50.00 39.06 34.62 46.55 56.25 59.62
Grade 5 4.44 1.82 6.78 31.11 47.27 35.59 64.44 50.91 57.63
All Grades 4.52 4.02 6.02 31.64 37.93 30.12 63.84 58.05 63.86
Writing
Producing clear and purposeful writing
Grade Level
16-17 17-18 18-19 16-17 17-18 18-19 16-17 17-18 18-19
Grade 3 1.35 3.64 1.82 25.68 30.91 29.09 72.97 65.45 69.09
Grade 4 0.00 0.00 3.85 37.93 40.63 32.69 62.07 59.38 63.46
Grade 5 6.67 9.09 8.47 31.11 40.00 40.68 62.22 50.91 50.85
All Grades 2.26 4.02 4.82 31.07 37.36 34.34 66.67 58.62 60.84
Listening
Demonstrating effective communication skills
Grade Level
16-17 17-18 18-19 16-17 17-18 18-19 16-17 17-18 18-19
Grade 3 1.35 3.64 7.27 48.65 52.73 43.64 50.00 43.64 49.09
Grade 4 1.72 4.69 5.77 51.72 62.50 65.38 46.55 32.81 28.85
Grade 5 0.00 1.82 3.39 44.44 60.00 49.15 55.56 38.18 47.46
All Grades 1.13 3.45 5.42 48.59 58.62 52.41 50.28 37.93 42.17
Research/Inquiry
Investigating, analyzing, and presenting information
Grade Level
16-17 17-18 18-19 16-17 17-18 18-19 16-17 17-18 18-19
Grade 3 2.70 10.91 0.00 22.97 32.73 32.73 74.32 56.36 67.27
Grade 4 5.17 6.25 3.85 37.93 42.19 34.62 56.90 51.56 61.54
Grade 5 2.22 10.91 5.08 28.89 41.82 35.59 68.89 47.27 59.32
All Grades 3.39 9.20 3.01 29.38 39.08 34.34 67.23 51.72 62.65

1. Although we saw a significant increase in our 17-18 school year results in ELA and slight decrease the following year (18-19), we continue to develop a
school wide MTSS program to reach ALL students.
2. From 16-17 to 18-19 our 3rd grade cohort grew from 4.05 in standards met to 25.42 as 5th graders.
3. In the Standards Not Met group, our 5th grade continuously decreased from 16-17 to 18-19.
CAASPP Results
Mathematics (All Students)
Overall Participation for All Students

# of Students Enrolled # of Students Tested # of Students with Scores % of Enrolled Students Tested
Grade Level
16-17 17-18 18-19 16-17 17-18 18-19 16-17 17-18 18-19 16-17 17-18 18-19
Grade 3 79 57 58 75 55 57 75 55 57 94.9 96.5 98.3
Grade 4 61 66 53 59 64 52 59 64 52 96.7 97 98.1
Grade 5 46 55 60 45 55 59 45 55 59 97.8 100 98.3
All Grades 186 178 171 179 174 168 179 174 168 96.2 97.8 98.2
* The “% of Enrolled Students Tested” showing in this table is not the same as “Participation Rate” for federal accountability purposes.
Overall Achievement for All Students

Mean Scale Score % Standard Exceeded % Standard Met % Standard Nearly Met % Standard Not Met
Grade Level
16-17 17-18 18-19 16-17 17-18 18-19 16-17 17-18 18-19 16-17 17-18 18-19 16-17 17-18 18-19
Grade 3 2338.4 2349.6 2338.4 0.00 3.64 0.00 6.67 7.27 7.02 17.33 30.91 26.32 76.00 58.18 66.67
Grade 4 2403.6 2393.1 2397.7 1.69 3.13 1.92 11.86 9.38 5.77 30.51 34.38 32.69 55.93 53.13 59.62
Grade 5 2387.9 2424.4 2401.6 0.00 1.82 3.39 2.22 0.00 3.39 20.00 30.91 16.95 77.78 67.27 76.27
All Grades N/A N/A N/A 0.56 2.87 1.79 7.26 5.75 5.36 22.35 32.18 25.00 69.83 59.20 67.86
Concepts & Procedures

Applying mathematical concepts and procedures
Grade Level
16-17 17-18 18-19 16-17 17-18 18-19 16-17 17-18 18-19
Grade 3 1.33 5.45 0.00 21.33 27.27 28.07 77.33 67.27 71.93
Grade 4 1.69 7.81 3.85 23.73 14.06 23.08 74.58 78.13 73.08
Grade 5 0.00 1.82 5.08 8.89 16.36 11.86 91.11 81.82 83.05
All Grades 1.12 5.17 2.98 18.99 18.97 20.83 79.89 75.86 76.19
Problem Solving & Modeling/Data Analysis
Using appropriate tools and strategies to solve real world and mathematical problems
Grade Level
16-17 17-18 18-19 16-17 17-18 18-19 16-17 17-18 18-19
Grade 3 2.67 5.45 0.00 30.67 27.27 33.33 66.67 67.27 66.67
Grade 4 0.00 6.25 3.85 33.90 28.13 32.69 66.10 65.63 63.46
Grade 5 0.00 1.82 3.39 24.44 40.00 22.03 75.56 58.18 74.58
All Grades 1.12 4.60 2.38 30.17 31.61 29.17 68.72 63.79 68.45
Communicating Reasoning
Demonstrating ability to support mathematical conclusions
Grade Level
16-17 17-18 18-19 16-17 17-18 18-19 16-17 17-18 18-19
Grade 3 0.00 5.45 0.00 34.67 32.73 40.35 65.33 61.82 59.65
Grade 4 5.08 4.69 3.85 30.51 39.06 30.77 64.41 56.25 65.38
Grade 5 0.00 0.00 3.39 26.67 34.55 33.90 73.33 65.45 62.71
All Grades 1.68 3.45 2.38 31.28 35.63 35.12 67.04 60.92 62.50

1. Our 2017-2018 & 2018-2019 Math CAASPP scores remained basically the same. Our focus this year is to add IXL and Moby Max online supports to our
Math circulation of supports.
2. Our 5th grade group did grow in the Standards Exceeded area, from 1.82 to 3.39.
3. Our 3rd to 5th grade students show that in the Standards Nearly Met area they maintain percentages within 25-32, making this group a focus for possible
growth.
CAASPP Results
Science (All Students)
CAASPP Science Results for All Students

Science
Grade
% Standard Exceeded % Standard Met % Standard Nearly Met % Standard Not Met
Level
18-19 18-19 18-19 18-19
5 3.45 0 41.38 55.17
ELPAC Results
ELPAC Summative Assessment Data
Number of Students and Mean Scale Scores for All Students
Number of
Grade Overall Oral Language Written Language
Students Tested
Level
17-18 18-19 17-18 18-19 17-18 18-19 17-18 18-19
Grade K 1399.7 * 1417.7 * 1357.5 * 13 5
Grade 1 * * * * * * * 7
Grade 2 1448.5 * 1463.3 * 1433.5 * 11 7
Grade 3 * * * * * * * 7
Grade 4 * * * * * * * 5
Grade 5 * * * * * * * *
All Grades 42 33
Overall Language
Percentage of Students at Each Performance Level for All Students
Total Number
Grade Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1
of Students
Level
17-18 18-19 17-18 18-19 17-18 18-19 17-18 18-19 17-18 18-19
K * * * * * * * * 13 *
1 * * * * * * * * *
2 * * * * * * * * 11 *
3 * * * * * * * * *
4 * * * * * * * * *
5 * * * * * * * *
All Grades * 3.03 26.19 15.15 42.86 48.48 * 33.33 42 33
Oral Language
Total Number
of Students
Level
17-18 18-19 17-18 18-19 17-18 18-19 17-18 18-19 17-18 18-19
K * * * * * * * * 13 *
1 * * * * * * * * *
2 * * * * * * * * 11 *
3 * * * * * * * *
4 * * * * * * * * *
5 * * * * * * * *
All Grades 30.95 15.15 40.48 30.30 * 36.36 * 18.18 42 33
Written Language
Total Number
of Students
Level
17-18 18-19 17-18 18-19 17-18 18-19 17-18 18-19 17-18 18-19
K * * * * * * * 13 *
1 * * * * * * * *
2 * * * * * * * 11 *
3 * * * * * * * *
4 * * * * * * * *
5 * * * * * * * * *
All Grades * 3.03 * 6.06 42.86 39.39 47.62 51.52 42 33
Listening Domain
Percentage of Students by Domain Performance Level for All Students
Total Number
Grade Well Developed Somewhat/Moderately Beginning
of Students
Level
17-18 18-19 17-18 18-19 17-18 18-19 17-18 18-19
K * * * * * * 13 *
2 * * * * * * 11 *
3 * * * * * * * *
4 * * * * * * * *
All Grades 42.86 15.15 42.86 66.67 * 18.18 42 33
Speaking Domain
Total Number
of Students
Level
17-18 18-19 17-18 18-19 17-18 18-19 17-18 18-19
K * * * * * * 13 *
1 * * * * * * * *
2 * * * * * * 11 *
3 * * * * * * * *
All Grades 35.71 18.18 47.62 60.61 * 21.21 42 33
Reading Domain
Total Number
of Students
Level
17-18 18-19 17-18 18-19 17-18 18-19 17-18 18-19
K * * * * * 13 *
2 * * * * * 11 *
5 * * * * * * * *
All Grades * 0.00 42.86 45.45 54.76 54.55 42 33
Writing Domain
Total Number
of Students
Level
17-18 18-19 17-18 18-19 17-18 18-19 17-18 18-19
K * * * * * * 13 *
2 * * * * * 11 *
All Grades * 6.06 57.14 45.45 38.10 48.48 42 33

1. This data shows that our EL students do best in both the Speaking and Listening domains of the ELPAC. Our focus is to continue to develop our ELD
programs to support the areas of Reading and Writing for our students.
2. Our Adelanto Elementary School teachers will also continue to receive professional development as it pertains to ELA, specifically writing.
Student Population
This section provides information about the school’s student population.
2018-19 Student Population
Total English Foster

Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
Enrollment Learners Youth
322 94.7 10.6 0.6

This is the total number of students enrolled. This is the percent of students who are eligible This is the percent of students who are This is the percent of students whose well-
for free or reduced priced meals; or have learning to communicate effectively in English, being is the responsibility of a court.
parents/guardians who did not receive a high typically requiring instruction in both the
school diploma. English Language and in their academic
courses.
2018-19 Enrollment for All Students/Student Group

Student Group Total Percentage
English Learners 34 10.6
Foster Youth 2 0.6
Homeless 13 4.0
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 305 94.7
Students with Disabilities 35 10.9
Enrollment by Race/Ethnicity
Student Group Total Percentage
African American 115 35.7
American Indian 1 0.3
Hispanic 146 45.3
Two or More Races 22 6.8
Pacific Islander 1 0.3
White 31 9.6
1. Our school is a 100% free and reduced lunch, Title I school. This year we are receiving additional funds as we were approved for CSI support.
2. Our two biggest sub groups are African American at nearly 36% and Hispanic group at 45%.
Overall Performance
2019 Fall Dashboard Overall Performance for All Students
Academic Performance Academic Engagement Conditions & Climate
English Language Arts Chronic Absenteeism Suspension Rate
Red Red Red
Mathematics
Red

1. We experienced a slight dip in our ELA and Math scores from 17-18 and 18-19, this the Red indicator. According to our SPSA, our goal is to improve by
5% in both ELA and Math for the 2020-2021 school year.
2. We also experienced a higher than normal suspension rate and we still struggle to improve in our attendance rate.
3. With additional support as a CSI school, our goal is to grow 5% in both ELA and Math, lower our suspension rate by 50%, and increase attendance by
15%.
Academic Performance
English Language Arts
The performance levels are color-coded and range from lowest-to-highest performance in the following order:
Lowest Performance Highest Performance

Red Orange Yellow Green Blue
This section provides number of student groups in each color.

2019 Fall Dashboard English Language Arts Equity Report

3 0 0 0 0
This section provides a view of Student Assessment Results and other aspects of this school’s performance, specifically how well students are meeting grade-level
standards on the English Language Arts assessment. This measure is based on student performance on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment, which is
taken annually by students in grades 3–8 and grade 11.
2019 Fall Dashboard English Language Arts Performance for All Students/Student Group
All Students English Learners Foster Youth
Red No Performance Color No Performance Color
96.9 points below standard 92.1 points below standard Less than 11 Students - Data Not Displayed for Privacy
Declined -12.9 points Declined -4.6 points

2
117 25
Homeless Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Students with Disabilities
No Performance Color Red No Performance Color
Less than 11 Students - Data Not Displayed for Privacy 97.2 points below standard 185.2 points below standard
Declined -13.3 points Declined Significantly -21.5 points

4
112 11
2019 Fall Dashboard English Language Arts Performance by Race/Ethnicity
African American American Indian Asian Filipino
Red No Performance Color No Performance Color No Performance Color
127.5 points below standard Less than 11 Students - Data Not 0 Students 0 Students
Displayed for Privacy
Declined Significantly -18.7 points
1
36
Hispanic Two or More Races Pacific Islander White
83.1 points below standard Less than 11 Students - Data Not Less than 11 Students - Data Not 63.3 points below standard
Displayed for Privacy Displayed for Privacy
Declined -7.9 points 12
4 1
59
standards on the English Language Arts assessment. This measure is based on student performance on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment, which is
taken annually by students in grades 3–8 and grade 11.
2019 Fall Dashboard English Language Arts Data Comparisons for English Learners
Current English Learner Reclassified English Learners English Only

134.7 points below standard 58.6 points below standard 100.1 points below standard
11 Increased ++6.4 points Declined -13.3 points
14 88

1. Our goal is to grow 5% in both ELA and Math. Our focus for this year is in reading comprehension and Math concepts.
2. With the added support of additional CSI funding, our teachers will continue with professional development in writing and UDL (universal design lessons).
3. Our focus sub group is our African American group who will offered before and after tutoring.
Mathematics


2019 Fall Dashboard Mathematics Equity Report

3 0 0 0 0
standards on the Mathematics assessment. This measure is based on student performance on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment, which is taken
annually by students in grades 3–8 and grade 11.
2019 Fall Dashboard Mathematics Performance for All Students/Student Group
Red No Performance Color No Performance Color
106.6 points below standard 107.4 points below standard Less than 11 Students - Data Not Displayed for Privacy
Declined -12 points Declined -11.5 points

2
117 25
No Performance Color Red No Performance Color
Less than 11 Students - Data Not Displayed for Privacy 106.1 points below standard 189.3 points below standard
Declined -11.2 points Declined -12 points

4
112 11
2019 Fall Dashboard Mathematics Performance by Race/Ethnicity
Red No Performance Color
131.7 points below standard Less than 11 Students - Data Not

Declined Significantly -16.4 points
1
36
103 points below standard Less than 11 Students - Data Not Less than 11 Students - Data Not 61.1 points below standard
Displayed for Privacy Displayed for Privacy
Declined -13.5 points 12
4 1
59
standards on the Mathematics assessment. This measure is based on student performance on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment, which is taken
annually by students in grades 3–8 and grade 11.
2019 Fall Dashboard Mathematics Data Comparisons for English Learners
Current English Learner Reclassified English Learners English Only

135.5 points below standard 85.4 points below standard 108.5 points below standard
11 Declined -8.6 points Declined -13.4 points
14 88

1. Our goal for this year is to grow 5% in mathematics. To help with this goal our teachers will participate in Next Gen Math professional development and UDL
(universal design lessons).
2. Our focus group is both the Hispanic and African American sup groups, who will have an opportunity to participate in before and after school tutoring.
3. While we are in distance learning, our teachers are doing their best to offer interventions using Moby Max, IXL and Go Math student materials.
English Learner Progress
This section provides a view of the percentage of current EL students making progress towards English language proficiency or maintaining the highest level.
2019 Fall Dashboard English Learner Progress Indicator
English Learner Progress
No Performance Color
28.6 making progress towards English

language proficiency
Number of EL Students: 28
Performance Level: VeryLow
This section provides a view of the percentage of current EL students who progressed at least one ELPI level, maintained ELPI level 4, maintained lower ELPI levels
(i.e, levels 1, 2L, 2H, 3L, or 3H), or decreased at least one ELPI Level.
2019 Fall Dashboard Student English Language Acquisition Results
Decreased Maintained ELPI Level 1, 2L, 2H, Maintained Progressed At Least

One ELPI Level 3L, or 3H ELPI Level 4 One ELPI Level
39.2 32.1 28.5

1. Our EL and RFEP students continue to be monitored to include ELD instruction while in distance learning.
College/Career


2019 Fall Dashboard College/Career Equity Report
This section provides information on the percentage of high school graduates who are placed in the "Prepared" level on the College/Career Indicator.
2019 Fall Dashboard College/Career for All Students/Student Group
2019 Fall Dashboard College/Career by Race/Ethnicity
This section provides a view of the percent of students per year that qualify as Not Prepared, Approaching Prepared, and Prepared.
2019 Fall Dashboard College/Career 3-Year Performance
Class of 2017 Class of 2018 Class of 2019

Prepared Prepared Prepared
Approaching Prepared Approaching Prepared Approaching Prepared
Not Prepared Not Prepared Not Prepared

1.
Academic Engagement
Chronic Absenteeism


2019 Fall Dashboard Chronic Absenteeism Equity Report

7 0 0 0 0
This section provides information about the percentage of students in kindergarten through grade 8 who are absent 10 percent or more of the instructional days they
were enrolled.
2019 Fall Dashboard Chronic Absenteeism for All Students/Student Group
Red Red No Performance Color
38.5 31.8 Less than 11 Students - Data Not Displayed for Privacy
Increased Significantly +15.5 Increased +14.1

9
421 44
No Performance Color Red Red
66.7 37.9 34.5
Increased +29.6 Increased Significantly +14.7 Increased +9.5
27 401 58
2019 Fall Dashboard Chronic Absenteeism by Race/Ethnicity
43.8 Less than 11 Students - Data Not Less than 11 Students - Data Not Less than 11 Students - Data Not
Displayed for Privacy Displayed for Privacy Displayed for Privacy
Increased Significantly +19.6
5 1 0
160
Red Red No Performance Color Red
32.8 53.1 Less than 11 Students - Data Not 30.8

Increased Significantly +9.8 Increased +25 Increased +12.6
4
180 32 39

1. This data shows the need to significantly address the issue of attendance, especially with ALL subgroups especially our African American and Hispanic
groups.
2. While we are in distance learning our staff continues to reach out to our families for support and ensuring that AES students have all of their required materials
and technology.
3. Incentives such as "perfect attendance" "student of the month" and others, will play a part in motivating our students to log into their zoom classes each day.
Academic Engagement
Graduation Rate


2019 Fall Dashboard Graduation Rate Equity Report
This section provides information about students completing high school, which includes students who receive a standard high school diploma or complete their
graduation requirements at an alternative school.
2019 Fall Dashboard Graduation Rate for All Students/Student Group
2019 Fall Dashboard Graduation Rate by Race/Ethnicity
This section provides a view of the percentage of students who received a high school diploma within four years of entering ninth grade or complete their
graduation requirements at an alternative school.
2019 Fall Dashboard Graduation Rate by Year
2018 2019

1.
Conditions & Climate
Suspension Rate


2019 Fall Dashboard Suspension Rate Equity Report

4 1 1 2 0
This section provides information about the percentage of students in kindergarten through grade 12 who have been suspended at least once in a given school year.
Students who are suspended multiple times are only counted once.
2019 Fall Dashboard Suspension Rate for All Students/Student Group
Red Orange No Performance Color
9.3 1.9 15.4
Increased Significantly +2.4 Increased +0.7 Increased +8.7

486 52 13
Green Red Red
2.9 9.9 9.2
Declined -3.3 Increased Significantly +2.4 Maintained +0.1

34 453 65
2019 Fall Dashboard Suspension Rate by Race/Ethnicity
Yellow No Performance Color No Performance Color
13.4 Less than 11 Students - Data Not Less than 11 Students - Data Not
Displayed5for Privacy Displayed1for Privacy
Declined Significantly -1.9

186
Red Red No Performance Color Green
7.6 7.9 Less than 11 Students - Data Not 2.4

Displayed4for Privacy
Increased Significantly +5.4 Increased +7.9 Declined -8.7

211 38 41
This section provides a view of the percentage of students who were suspended.
2019 Fall Dashboard Suspension Rate by Year
2017 2018 2019

6.9 9.3

1. Adelanto Elementary School will continue to address the suspension rates of all students by exploring positive alternatives such as "on campus interventions"
and "restorative practices."
2. We will focus on our Hispanic and Two or more races groups using MTSS (multi tiered systems of supports) to include PBIS Tier I, II & III supports.
3. Our African American sub group declined in suspensions thus making them an "on watch" subgroup for now.
Goals, Strategies, & Proposed Expenditures
Complete a copy of the following table for each of the school’s goals. Duplicate the table as needed.
Goal Subject
Conditions of Learning
LEA/LCAP Goal
All students are provided appropriately assigned and credentialed teachers, teachers and students will have access to standards aligned materials in all content
areas leading to high school readiness by grade 8, students will have access to instructional technology, and school facilities will be in good repair.
Goal 1
Adelanto Elementary School, in coordination with our district HR department, will have fully credentialed teachers servicing both
general and special education students. All students will have access to rigorous, CCSS (Common Core) aligned, district adopted
curriculum to include having 1:1 chrome books to students.
Identified Need
Through our participation in annual Williams Act visitations, AES continues to score well in all areas including: structural and facilities
in good working order, textbook sufficiency, and credentialed teachers in each classroom. Additional Technology is required in
order for AES students to reach one-to-one technology ratio as well as maintain an appropriate level of instructional technology for
our staff.
Annual Measurable Outcomes

Metric/Indicator Baseline/Actual Outcome Expected Outcome
Williams Act Visit Report 100% Compliant: Student Materials and all 100% Compliant
CCSS Standards aligned Text Books
Technology Inventory Additional student chrome books and 100% 1:1
supplemental technology needed
(HR) Human Resource & Staffing 100% Fully Credentialed Teachers 100% Fully Credentialed Teachers
Complete a copy of the Strategy/Activity table for each of the school’s strategies/activities. Duplicate the table, including Proposed
Expenditures, as needed.
startcollapse
Strategy/Activity 1
Students to be Served by this Strategy/Activity
(Identify either All Students or one or more specific student groups)
All students to include sub groups who we have identified as a focus area for improvement.
Strategy/Activity
*The school will continue to maintain work orders in a timely manner with guidance from the district for Williams Act annual visits,
improve school wide technology infrastructure, and develop opportunities for our teachers to meet in collaborative PLCs
throughout the school year.
Proposed Expenditures for this Strategy/Activity

List the amount(s) and funding source(s) for the proposed expenditures. Specify the funding source(s) using one or more of the
following: LCFF, Federal (if Federal identify the Title and Part, as applicable), Other State, and/or Local.
Amount(s) Source(s)
6500 District Funded
4000-4999: Books And Supplies
Text Books
None Specified
None Specified
Strategy/Activity 2
Strategy/Activity
*Purchase computers, monitors, printers in each classroom to support ELA & Math curriculum and needs determined by IT
department and District.

Amount(s) Source(s)
30000 Title I Part A: Disadvantaged Students
None Specified
Student/staff computers
Strategy/Activity 3
Strategy/Activity
Continue district and school site teacher collaboration, trainings and grade level meetings which include documentation.

Amount(s) Source(s)
5500 Comprehensive Support and Improvement (CSI)
1000-1999: Certificated Personnel Salaries
Teacher PLCs and Data Chats
Subs & support
2000-2999: Classified Personnel Salaries
Para & Classified Support
Annual Review
SPSA Year Reviewed: 2019-20
Respond to the following prompts relative to this goal. If the school is in the first year of implementing the goal, an analysis is not
required and this section may be deleted.
ANALYSIS
Describe the overall implementation of the strategies/activities and the overall effectiveness of the strategies/activities to achieve the
articulated goal.
Adelanto Elementary School has achieved a one to one chrome book to student ratio. All teachers are either fully credentialed or
have appropriate progress toward clear credential or are enrolled in appropriate credentialing program to be fully credentialed.
Briefly describe any major differences between the intended implementation and/or the budgeted expenditures to implement the
strategies/activities to meet the articulated goal.
Eligible teachers are enrolled in AESD induction program to complete credentialing program. Appropriate funding sources will be
used to maintain one to one chromebook to student ratio and all required technology in class or used in a distant learning model.
Describe any changes that will be made to this goal, the annual outcomes, metrics, or strategies/activities to achieve this goal as a
result of this analysis. Identify where those changes can be found in the SPSA.
Goal Subject
Student/Pupil Outcomes
LEA/LCAP Goal
Student achievement will increase in ELA, Math, Science, and Social Studies/History, with a focus on closing the achievement gap for struggling students
Goal 2
For the 2020-2021 school year the proficiency level for all students (sub groups) in the ELA SBAC/CAASPP categories of Met or
Exceeded will increase by 5 % or more (i.e. from 19% to at least 25%) .
For the 2020-2021 school year the proficiency level for all students (sub groups) in the Math SBAC/CAASPP categories of Met or
Exceeded will increase by 5 % or more (i.e. from 7.15% to at least 12.15%)
Identified Need
A comprehensive review of school-wide data including: Renaissance STAR ELA & Math, district grade level benchmarks/ICAs, Spring
CAASPP. A review of 3 years of data for the CAASPP indicates that although there was significant student growth in ELA in 2018, our
Math scores have made minimal growth.

CAASPP Data 19% Met or exceeded in ELA 25% Met or exceeded in ELA
7% Met or exceeded in Math 12% Met or exceeded in Math
(STAR)Renaissance Reading & Early Kinder: 32% At or Above Kinder: 45% At or Above
Literacy 1st Grade: 47% At or Above 1st Grade: 55% At or Above
2nd Grade: 32% At or Above 2nd Grade: 40% At or Above
3rd Grade: 27% At or Above 3rd Grade: 35% At or Above
4th Grade: 22% At or Above 4th Grade: 30% At or Above
(STAR)Renaissance Math
1st Grade: 50% At or Above 1st Grade: 58% At or Above
2nd Grade: 33% At or Above 2nd Grade: 40% At or Above
3rd Grade: 35% At or Above 3rd Grade: 43% At or Above
startcollapse
Strategy/Activity 1
All Students and Sub Groups including those identified as a focus for improvement.
Strategy/Activity
During 2020-2021, the school will continue to implement a school-wide ELA & Mathematics multi-tiered system of support to address
the academic needs of all students/subgroups as measured by Common Formative Assessments, Benchmarks (CFA), and
STAR Renaissance Progress Monitoring Reports. In order to ensure a holistic, balanced ELA program, writing continues to be our
school wide focus to include staff development with the use of Thinking Maps and ACE Strategy. AES will also adopt the use of
Khan Academy as an additional MTSS resource and likewise participate in the NGSS state assessment, provide staff development
in the Next Generation Science Standards, and participate in the district wide science fair.
To address the needs of the SpEd and EL subgroups (the subgroups that did not do well in CAASPP), we have purchased and used
this year SRA Corrective Reading, MobyMax, and Touch Math for SpEd students. We have also intensified use of EL strategies and
programs such as GLAD, Thinking Maps, and Ellevation. Moreover, we have conducted more effective data checks and chats,
student progress monitoring conferences (SPMC), Professional Learning Community (PLC), and collaboration to more effectively
implement MTSS.
The school will train, reinforce, and support all teachers, leaders, and staff regarding the following four core instructional strategies:
District adopted strategy for implicit, explicit, and interactive
instruction, English Language Development(ELD) and Frontloading/GLAD, Academic Language Development, and formative and
diagnostic assessments. To include professional development in graphic organizers Thinking Maps (write from beginning and
beyond), UDL (universal design lessons: to support reading comprehension and Math concepts foci), IXL online tools, google
classroom, Explode the Code and SRA to support RTI (response to interventions) materials.

Amount(s) Source(s)
5,000 Title I
MTSS/RTI materials in ELA & Math
10,000 Comprehensive Support and Improvement (CSI)
Subs for PLCs teacher data planning data chats
5800: Professional/Consulting Services And Operating
Expenditures
Professional development in: Thinking Maps, UDL, RTI materials
usage, P/D in online supports
Strategy/Activity 2
Strategy/Activity
Identify the math levels of all students on STAR ELA & Math along with district benchmarks. We will use this data to plan and deliver
a multi-tiered system of supports using Reading Wonders and Go Math curriculum, along with AESD recomended intervention
materials to target individual ELA & Math needs of all students/subgroups to include ongoing assessment of student performance.
Teacher PLCs will be scheduled at the end of each MTSS cycle to analyze data and plan instruction.

Amount(s) Source(s)
RTI Materials
Strategy/Activity 3
Strategy/Activity
Plan/evaluate implementation of the ELA & Math intervention program. Select and develop ELA/Math intervention materials and
resources. Purchase supplementary RTI materials to include Explode the Code and SRA Corrective Reading Materials needed for
SPED & MTSS. Develop master schedule that reflects allocated time for ELA/Math interventions during site staff meeting. Schedule
and provide P/D to support RTI materials and online intervention tools such as IXL, Ren Learn, etc.

Amount(s) Source(s)
4500 ESSA School Improvement
RTI & P/D For MTSS Materials
Strategy/Activity 4
Strategy/Activity
Improvement of instructional strategies, materials and online Math intervention based on program. Plan and implement uniform
strategies and interventions for targeted students identified as strategic and intensive levels in ELA/Math. Grade level teams will
discuss data in their scheduled PLCs.
Amount(s) Source(s)
Strategy/Activity 5
Strategy/Activity
Extended learning opportunities. Support before and after school intervention programs as evidenced by attendance and expenditure
reports.

Amount(s) Source(s)
Before and after school tutoring
Strategy/Activity 6
Strategy/Activity
Auxiliary Services for Students and parents. Support activities such as student awards assemblies, promotion ceremonies, back to
school night, PBIS incentives, and Literacy/Math/Science Night to promote student/parent engagement and motivation. Services
determined by flyers, In-Touch all calls, online social media sites, agendas, and sign-in sheets.

Amount(s) Source(s)
Title I Part A: Disadvantaged Students
Awards and Motivational Materials
Annual Review
ANALYSIS
articulated goal.
Adelanto Elementary School will continue to develop use data to drive instruction. Teacher collaboration is an important part of
building an effective on site MTSS program to reach ALL students at their instructional level. Professional development and the use
of researched based RTI (response to interventions) materials will ensure that our students will receive appropriate levels of support.
Major changes/differences will be most apparent in the use and access to technology and the various online tools we have to support
both instruction and communication. Targeted teacher professional development will play an important role in the effectiveness of
instruction and technology supports.
The results of program analysis and data, will effect changes in materials, teaching strategies, and the use of core curriculum to
support student achievement.
Goal Subject
Engagement
LEA/LCAP Goal
Increase student engagement by providing a safe school environment which fosters increased communication between home and school, encourages parent
and community involvement, and focuses on improving the school climate for all students?. Decrease suspension by 5% and increase attendance to over 98%
Goal 3
School suspensions will decrease by 15% by the end of the 3rd semester of 2020-2021 School Year by using school wide Positive
Behavior Supports, positive alternatives to suspensions, increased use of SEL school wide strategies, and analyzing student behavior
data.
Identified Need
As we look at SWIS and CICO (check-in, check-out) tier II data, we find that many students who have been identified as at risk also
tend to make poor choices and have high rates of classroom referrals. By adhering to the established PBIS student handbook and
providing proactive strategies that will help avoid conflict, we will begin to see a decrease in student office referrals. We need to
strengthen all levels of support.
Teacher professional development in the area of PBIS implementation, SEL strategies, the use of restorative practices, and the use of
effective classroom management strategies.

Suspension Data CDE Red Indicator on Dashboard Cut suspension Rate by 50%
Chronic Absenteeism Data CDE Red Indicator on Dashboard Increase attendance by 15%
SWIS Student Behavior Data Number of Classroom Referrals and Decrease number of classroom referrals
Students on CICO by 30% and use alternative measures for
Tier II students needing additional
supports
startcollapse
Strategy/Activity 1
Strategy/Activity
During 2020-2021, the school will implement a school-wide system Positive Behavior Intervention and Supports System to provide
access to Tier One, Tier Two, and Tier Three supports appropriate to their needs.
PBIS Team will act as committee to support the PBIS initiative on campus. Collect and analyze school-level PBIS data to identify all
students that need support.

Amount(s) Source(s)
PBIS Professional development, and sub costs
2,000 LCFF - Supp/Concentration
5000-5999: Services And Other Operating Expenditures
PBIS Signage, posters, and other media to support program
Expenditures
Parent trainings, certificated staff over time, materials
2,000 LCFF - Supp/Concentration
Expenditures
Anti-bullying assemblies, professional development
Strategy/Activity 2
Strategy/Activity
All students will be taught and offered reinforcement in PBIS Tier I Classroom Instruction through PBIS Lesson Plans and
Expectations Matrix. All classrooms will provide evidence of PBIS in classroom environment. Office referrals will be made to outside
resources as needed with the support of parents.

Amount(s) Source(s)
Strategy/Activity 3
Strategy/Activity
As needed, students will have access to Tiers II and III supports. Students in need of these supports will be referred to the sites SST
team for additional supports that include Check-In/Check-Out, "Think Sheets" and other supports that may include SELPA/DMCC
referrals.

Amount(s) Source(s)
Teacher P/D and SWIS Documents
Strategy/Activity 4
Strategy/Activity
SELPA Counselors will assist as a Tier II and Tier III support. Provide strategies in social skills and building ways in which to support
positive school culture.

Amount(s) Source(s)
4500 None Specified
0000: Unrestricted
Strategy/Activity 5
Strategy/Activity
Parent/Teacher/Admin SSC (school site council) onsite and district training. In-depth view of support and make up of SSC to include
bylaws and officers.

Amount(s) Source(s)
5500 Title I Part A: Parent Involvement
Parent Involvement and training
Strategy/Activity 6
Strategy/Activity
Trauma informed professional development for all staff, classified and certificated. Join webinars, trainings by SEL professionals and
child psychologists specializing in early detection and support for students who have experienced trauma.

Amount(s) Source(s)
400 Title I Part A: Allocation
Staff Professional Development
Annual Review
ANALYSIS
articulated goal.
A PBIS student hand book has been developed by our AES PBIS team. In the hand book all aspects of the program are detailed and
explained with procedures and outcomes of each strategy. The staff is trained on its implementation and students learn of the
purpose and expectations through the use of the PBIS matrix, Cougar Code, and the daily Cougar pledge.
Major differences may be due to the effectiveness of the program and what we might need to do after we analyze student behavioral
data. Adjustments in funding, professional development, and/or goals of specific points might need to be adjusted.
Changes and/or projected results will be found in the CDE School Dashboard which will describe any improvements or lack there of.
Goal Subject
Addressing the needs of EL (English learners) students.
LEA/LCAP Goal
Adelanto Elementary School district will continue with progression towards EL proficiency in ELA.
Goal 4
EL student achievement will increase 5% toward English Language Proficiency with a focus on closing the achievement gap for
English Learners as measured by CAASPP ELA, CA School Dashboard English Learner Progress Indicator and Star Reading/Early Lit
data.
Identified Need
Looking at ELPAC and reclassification rates, AES has identified the following as areas of need:
* Supplemental instructional materials for ELD.

* Continue to monitor ELD program and student progress in the Elevation platform.
* Continue with EL Coordinator at each site.
* CABE Conference for staff and Parents.

ELPAC Assessment
Reclassification Rate
startcollapse
Strategy/Activity 1
To address the needs of our EL subgroup (the subgroup that did not do well in CAASPP), we have purchased and used SRA
Corrective Reading, MobyMax (that can support all academic student reading levels), and Touch Math for SpEd students. We have
also intensified use of EL strategies and programs such as GLAD (guided language acquisition design) , Thinking Maps, and
Ellevation. Moreover, we have conducted more effective data checks and chats, student progress monitoring conferences (SPMC),
Professional Learning Community (PLC), and collaboration to more effectively implement MTSS.
Strategy/Activity
Adelanto Elementary School will train, reinforce, and support all teachers, leaders, and staff regarding the following
instructional strategies: District adopted strategy for implicit, explicit, and interactive instruction, English Language
Development(ELD), and Frontloading/GLAD, Academic Language Development, and formative and diagnostic assessments.

Amount(s) Source(s)
4,600 Title I
ELD Supplemental Materials and professional development.
5500 ESSA School Improvement
2000-2999: Classified Personnel Salaries
Teacher Professional Development
4655 Title I Part A: Allocation
Supplemental ELD Materials
Annual Review
ANALYSIS
articulated goal.
Although our identified EL population has gotten smaller, our goal continues to achieve ELA proficiency by continuing effective ELD
strategies supported by providing professional development to our staff and purchasing researched based ELD supplemental
materials.
The reclassification rate of our EL students will have some changes due to the number of identified EL students who are having
reading and writing goals in their IEPs.
As we look at data such as reclassification rates, initial and summative ELPAC assessments, CFAs and district benchmarks, we will
plan and adjust ELD strategies we think might best support student success.
Budget Summary
Complete the table below. Schools may include additional information. Adjust the table as needed. The Budget Summary is required for schools funded through the
ConApp, and/or that receive funds from the LEA for Comprehensive Support and Improvement (CSI).
Budget Summary
Description Amount
Total Funds Provided to the School Through the Consolidated Application $
Total Federal Funds Provided to the School from the LEA for CSI $
Total Funds Budgeted for Strategies to Meet the Goals in the SPSA $183,155.00
Other Federal, State, and Local Funds

List the additional Federal programs that the school is including in the schoolwide program. Adjust the table as needed. If the school is not operating a Title I
schoolwide program this section is not applicable and may be deleted.
startcollapse
Federal Programs Allocation ($)
Comprehensive Support and Improvement (CSI) $77,500.00
Title I $9,600.00
Title I Part A: Allocation $5,055.00
Title I Part A: Disadvantaged Students $60,500.00
Title I Part A: Parent Involvement $5,500.00
Subtotal of additional federal funds included for this school: $158,155.00
List the State and local programs that the school is including in the schoolwide program. Duplicate the table as needed.
startcollapse
State or Local Programs Allocation ($)
District Funded $6,500.00
ESSA School Improvement $10,000.00
LCFF - Supp/Concentration $4,000.00
None Specified $4,500.00
Subtotal of state or local funds included for this school: $25,000.00
Total of federal, state, and/or local funds for this school: $183,155.00
Budgeted Funds and Expenditures in this Plan
The tables below are provided to help the school track expenditures as they relate to funds budgeted to the school.
Funds Budgeted to the School by Funding Source

startcollapse
Funding Source Amount Balance
No Reporting Requirements 2,533,651.00 2,533,651.00
LCFF - Supp/Concentration 28,483.00 24,483.00
Site Discretionary 31,199.00 31,199.00
Title I Part A: Basic Grants Low-Income and Neglected 29,088.00 29,088.00
ESSA School Improvement 90,184.00 80,184.00
After School and Education Safety (ASES) 10,002.00 10,002.00
Lottery: Instructional Materials 5,660.00 5,660.00
Special Education 165,849.00 165,849.00
Expenditures by Funding Source

startcollapse
Funding Source Amount
Comprehensive Support and Improvement (CSI) 77,500.00
District Funded 6,500.00
ESSA School Improvement 10,000.00
LCFF - Supp/Concentration 4,000.00
None Specified 4,500.00
Title I 9,600.00
Title I Part A: Allocation 5,055.00
Title I Part A: Disadvantaged Students 60,500.00
Title I Part A: Parent Involvement 5,500.00
Expenditures by Budget Reference

startcollapse
Budget Reference Amount
0000: Unrestricted 4,500.00
1000-1999: Certificated Personnel Salaries 65,900.00
2000-2999: Classified Personnel Salaries 13,500.00
4000-4999: Books And Supplies 29,255.00
5000-5999: Services And Other Operating Expenditures 2,000.00
5800: Professional/Consulting Services And Operating Expenditures 38,000.00
None Specified 30,000.00
Expenditures by Budget Reference and Funding Source

startcollapse
Budget Reference Funding Source Amount
1000-1999: Certificated Personnel Salaries Comprehensive Support and Improvement (CSI) 33,500.00
2000-2999: Classified Personnel Salaries Comprehensive Support and Improvement (CSI) 8,000.00
5800: Professional/Consulting Services And Comprehensive Support and Improvement (CSI) 36,000.00
Operating Expenditures
4000-4999: Books And Supplies District Funded 6,500.00
2000-2999: Classified Personnel Salaries ESSA School Improvement 5,500.00
4000-4999: Books And Supplies ESSA School Improvement 4,500.00
5000-5999: Services And Other Operating LCFF - Supp/Concentration 2,000.00
Expenditures
5800: Professional/Consulting Services And LCFF - Supp/Concentration 2,000.00
Operating Expenditures
0000: Unrestricted None Specified 4,500.00
4000-4999: Books And Supplies Title I 9,600.00
1000-1999: Certificated Personnel Salaries Title I Part A: Allocation 400.00
4000-4999: Books And Supplies Title I Part A: Allocation 4,655.00
1000-1999: Certificated Personnel Salaries Title I Part A: Disadvantaged Students 26,500.00
4000-4999: Books And Supplies Title I Part A: Disadvantaged Students 4,000.00
None Specified Title I Part A: Disadvantaged Students 30,000.00
1000-1999: Certificated Personnel Salaries Title I Part A: Parent Involvement 5,500.00
Expenditures by Goal
startcollapse
Goal Number Total Expenditures
Goal 1 58,000.00
Goal 2 75,500.00
Goal 3 34,900.00
Goal 4 14,755.00
School Site Council Membership
California Education Code describes the required composition of the School Site Council (SSC). The SSC shall be composed of the principal and representatives
of: teachers selected by teachers at the school; other school personnel selected by other school personnel at the school; parents of pupils attending the school
selected by such parents; and, in secondary schools, pupils selected by pupils attending the school. The current make-up of the SSC is as follows:
1 School Principal
3 Classroom Teachers
1 Other School Staff
3 Parent or Community Members
startcollapse
Name of Members Role
Ramon Rizo X Principal
Marty Draper X Classroom Teacher
Kevin Kassel X Classroom Teacher
Robin Brown X Classroom Teacher
Katie McKalister X Parent or Community Member
Sarah Hosey X Other School Staff
Esmeralda Anaya X Parent or Community Member
At elementary schools, the school site council must be constituted to ensure parity between (a) the principal, classroom teachers, and other school personnel, and
(b) parents of students attending the school or other community members. Classroom teachers must comprise a majority of persons represented under section (a).
At secondary schools there must be, in addition, equal numbers of parents or other community members selected by parents, and students. Members must be
selected by their peer group.
Recommendations and Assurances
The School Site Council (SSC) recommends this school plan and proposed expenditures to the district governing board for approval and assures the board of the
following:
The SSC is correctly constituted and was formed in accordance with district governing board policy and state law.
The SSC reviewed its responsibilities under state law and district governing board policies, including those board policies relating to material changes in the School
Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) requiring board approval.
The SSC sought and considered all recommendations from the following groups or committees before adopting this plan:
Signature Committee or Advisory Group Name
X English Learner Advisory Committee
The SSC reviewed the content requirements for school plans of programs included in this SPSA and believes all such content requirements have been met, including
those found in district governing board policies and in the local educational agency plan.
This SPSA is based on a thorough analysis of student academic performance. The actions proposed herein form a sound, comprehensive, coordinated plan to reach
stated school goals to improve student academic performance.
This SPSA was adopted by the SSC at a public meeting on 11/18/20.
Attested:
Principal, Ramon Rizo on 11/18/20
SSC Chairperson, Katie McAlister on 11/18/20
Instructions
The School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) is a strategic plan that maximizes the resources available to the school while
minimizing duplication of effort with the ultimate goal of increasing student achievement. SPSA development should be aligned with and
inform the Local Control and Accountability Plan process.
The SPSA consolidates all school-level planning efforts into one plan for programs funded through the consolidated application
(ConApp), and for federal school improvement programs, including schoolwide programs, Comprehensive Support and Improvement
(CSI), Targeted Support and Improvement (TSI), and Additional Targeted Support and Improvement (ATSI), pursuant to California
Education Code (EC) Section 64001 and the Elementary and Secondary Education Act as amended by the Every Student Succeeds
Act (ESSA). This template is designed to meet schoolwide program planning requirements. It also notes how to meet CSI, TSI, or ATSI
requirements, as applicable.
California’s ESSA State Plan supports the state’s approach to improving student group performance through the utilization of federal
resources. Schools use the SPSA to document their approach to maximizing the impact of federal investments in support of
underserved students. The implementation of ESSA in California presents an opportunity for schools to innovate with their federally-
funded programs and align them with the priority goals of the school and the LEA that are being realized under the state’s Local Control
Funding Formula (LCFF).
The LCFF provides schools and LEAs flexibility to design programs and provide services that meet the needs of students in order to
achieve readiness for college, career, and lifelong learning. The SPSA planning process supports continuous cycles of action,
reflection, and improvement. Consistent with EC 65001, the Schoolsite Council (SSC) is required to develop and annually review the
SPSA, establish an annual budget, and make modifications to the plan that reflect changing needs and priorities, as applicable.
For questions related to specific sections of the template, please see instructions below:
Instructions: Linked Table of Contents

The SPSA template meets the requirements of schoolwide planning (SWP). Each section also contains a notation of how to
meet CSI, TSI, or ATSI requirements.
Planned Strategies/Activities
Annual Review and Update
Budget Summary
Appendix A: Plan Requirements for Title I Schoolwide Programs
Appendix B: Plan Requirements for Schools to Meet Federal School Improvement Planning Requirements
Appendix C: Select State and Federal Programs
For additional questions or technical assistance related to LEA and school planning, please contact the Local Agency Systems Support
Office, at LCFF@cde.ca.gov.
For programmatic or policy questions regarding Title I schoolwide planning, please contact the local educational agency, or the CDE’s
Title I Policy and Program Guidance Office at TITLEI@cde.ca.gov.
For questions or technical assistance related to meeting federal school improvement planning requirements (for CSI, TSI, and ATSI),
please contact the CDE’s School Improvement and Support Office at SISO@cde.ca.gov.
Purpose and Description

Schools identified for Comprehensive Support and Improvement (CSI), Targeted Support and Improvement (TSI), or Additional
Targeted Support and Improvement (ATSI) must respond to the following prompts. A school that has not been identified for CSI, TSI, or
ATSI may delete the Purpose and Description prompts.
Purpose
Briefly describe the purpose of this plan by selecting from Schoolwide Program, Comprehensive Support and Improvement, Targeted
Support and Improvement, or Additional Targeted Support and Improvement)
Description
Briefly describe the school’s plan for effectively meeting ESSA requirements in alignment with the Local Control and Accountability Plan
and other federal, state, and local programs.
Meaningful involvement of parents, students, and other stakeholders is critical to the development of the SPSA and the budget process.
Schools must share the SPSA with school site-level advisory groups, as applicable (e.g., English Learner Advisory committee, student
advisory groups, tribes and tribal organizations present in the community, as appropriate, etc.) and seek input from these advisory
groups in the development of the SPSA.
The Stakeholder Engagement process is an ongoing, annual process. Describe the process used to involve advisory committees,
parents, students, school faculty and staff, and the community in the development of the SPSA and the annual review and update.
[This section meets the requirements for TSI and ATSI.]

[When completing this section for CSI, the LEA shall partner with the school in the development and implementation of this plan.]
Resource Inequities
Schools eligible for CSI or ATSI must identify resource inequities, which may include a review of LEA-and school-level budgeting as a
part of the required needs assessment. Identified resource inequities must be addressed through implementation of the CSI or ATSI
plan. Briefly identify and describe any resource inequities identified as a result of the required needs assessment and summarize how
the identified resource inequities are addressed in the SPSA.
[This section meets the requirements for CSI and ATSI. If the school is not identified for CSI or ATSI this section is not applicable and
may be deleted.]
Goals, Strategies, Expenditures, & Annual Review

In this section a school provides a description of the annual goals to be achieved by the school. This section also includes descriptions
of the specific planned strategies/activities a school will take to meet the identified goals, and a description of the expenditures required
to implement the specific strategies and activities.
Goal
State the goal. A goal is a broad statement that describes the desired result to which all strategies/activities are directed. A goal
answers the question: What is the school seeking to achieve?
It can be helpful to use a framework for writing goals such the S.M.A.R.T. approach. A S.M.A.R.T. goal is one that is Specific,
Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, and Time-bound. A level of specificity is needed in order to measure performance relative to the
goal as well as to assess whether it is reasonably achievable. Including time constraints, such as milestone dates, ensures a realistic
approach that supports student success.
A school may number the goals using the “Goal #” for ease of reference.
[When completing this section for CSI, TSI, and ATSI, improvement goals shall align to the goals, actions, and services in the LEA
LCAP.]
Identified Need
Describe the basis for establishing the goal. The goal should be based upon an analysis of verifiable state data, including local and
state indicator data from the California School Dashboard (Dashboard) and data from the School Accountability Report Card, including
local data voluntarily collected by districts to measure pupil achievement.
[Completing this section fully addresses all relevant federal planning requirements]

Identify the metric(s) and/or state indicator(s) that the school will use as a means of evaluating progress toward accomplishing the goal.
A school may identify metrics for specific student groups. Include in the baseline column the most recent data associated with the
metric or indicator available at the time of adoption of the SPSA. The most recent data associated with a metric or indicator includes
data reported in the annual update of the SPSA. In the subsequent Expected Outcome column, identify the progress the school intends
to make in the coming year.
[When completing this section for CSI the school must include school-level metrics related to the metrics that led to the school’s
identification.]
[When completing this section for TSI/ATSI the school must include metrics related to the specific student group(s) that led to the
school’s identification.]
Strategies/Activities
Describe the strategies and activities being provided to meet the described goal. A school may number the strategy/activity using the
“Strategy/Activity #” for ease of reference.
Planned strategies/activities address the findings of the needs assessment consistent with state priorities and resource inequities,
which may have been identified through a review of the local educational agency’s budgeting, its local control and accountability plan,
and school-level budgeting, if applicable.
[When completing this section for CSI, TSI, and ATSI, this plan shall include evidence-based interventions and align to the goals,
actions, and services in the LEA LCAP.]
[When completing this section for CSI and ATSI, this plan shall address through implementation, identified resource inequities, which
may have been identified through a review of LEA- and school-level budgeting.]

Indicate in this box which students will benefit from the strategies/activities by indicating “All Students” or listing one or more specific
student group(s) to be served.
[This section meets the requirements for CSI.]
[When completing this section for TSI and ATSI, at a minimum, the student groups to be served shall include the student groups that
are consistently underperforming, for which the school received the TSI or ATSI designation. For TSI, a school may focus on all
students or the student group(s) that led to identification based on the evidence-based interventions selected.]

For each strategy/activity, list the amount(s) and funding source(s) for the proposed expenditures for the school year to implement
these strategies/activities. Specify the funding source(s) using one or more of the following: LCFF, Federal (if Federal, identify the Title
and Part, as applicable), Other State, and/or Local.
Proposed expenditures that are included more than once in a SPSA should be indicated as a duplicated expenditure and include a
reference to the goal and strategy/activity where the expenditure first appears in the SPSA. Pursuant to Education Code, Section
64001(g)(3)(C), proposed expenditures, based on the projected resource allocation from the governing board or governing body of the
LEA, to address the findings of the needs assessment consistent with the state priorities including identifying resource inequities which
may include a review of the LEA’s budgeting, its LCAP, and school-level budgeting, if applicable.
[This section meets the requirements for CSI, TSI, and ATSI.]
[NOTE: Federal funds for CSI shall not be used in schools identified for TSI or ATSI. In addition, funds for CSI shall not be used to hire
additional permanent staff.]
Annual Review
In the following Analysis prompts, identify any material differences between what was planned and what actually occurred as well as
significant changes in strategies/activities and/ or expenditures from the prior year. This annual review and analysis should be the basis
for decision-making and updates to the plan.
Analysis
Using actual outcome data, including state indicator data from the Dashboard, analyze whether the planned strategies/activities were
effective in achieving the goal. Respond to the prompts as instructed. Respond to the following prompts relative to this goal. If the
school is in the first year of implementing the goal the Annual Review section is not required and this section may be deleted.
● Describe the overall implementation of the strategies/activities and the overall effectiveness of the strategies/activities to achieve
the articulated goal.
● Briefly describe any major differences between either/or the intended implementation or the budgeted expenditures to implement
the strategies/activities to meet the articulated goal.
● Describe any changes that will be made to the goal, expected annual measurable outcomes, metrics/indicators, or
strategies/activities to achieve this goal as a result of this analysis and analysis of the data provided in the Dashboard, as
applicable. Identify where those changes can be found in the SPSA.
[When completing this section for CSI, TSI, or ATSI, any changes made to the goals, annual measurable outcomes, metrics/indicators,
or strategies/activities, shall meet the CSI, TSI, or ATSI planning requirements. CSI, TSI, and ATSI planning requirements are listed
under each section of the Instructions. For example, as a result of the Annual Review and Update, if changes are made to a goal(s),
see the Goal section for CSI, TSI, and ATSI planning requirements.]
Budget Summary
In this section a school provides a brief summary of the funding allocated to the school through the ConApp and/or other funding
sources as well as the total amount of funds for proposed expenditures described in the SPSA. The Budget Summary is required for
schools funded through the ConApp and that receive federal funds for CSI. If the school is not operating a Title I schoolwide program
this section is not applicable and may be deleted.
From its total allocation for CSI, the LEA may distribute funds across its schools that meet the criteria for CSI to support implementation
of this plan. In addition, the LEA may retain a portion of its total allocation to support LEA-level expenditures that are directly related to
serving schools eligible for CSI.
Budget Summary
A school receiving funds allocated through the ConApp should complete the Budget Summary as follows:
● Total Funds Provided to the School Through the Consolidated Application: This amount is the total amount of funding provided to
the school through the ConApp for the school year. The school year means the fiscal year for which a SPSA is adopted or
updated.
● Total Funds Budgeted for Strategies to Meet the Goals in the SPSA: This amount is the total of the proposed expenditures from
all sources of funds associated with the strategies/activities reflected in the SPSA. To the extent strategies/activities and/or
proposed expenditures are listed in the SPSA under more than one goal, the expenditures should be counted only once.
A school receiving federal funds for CSI should complete the Budget Summary as follows:
● Total Federal Funds Provided to the School from the LEA for CSI: This amount is the total amount of funding provided to the
school from the LEA.
[NOTE: Federal funds for CSI shall not be used in schools eligible for TSI or ATSI. In addition, funds for CSI shall not be used to hire
additional permanent staff.]
Appendix A: Plan Requirements
Schoolwide Program Requirements
This School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) template meets the requirements of a schoolwide program plan. The requirements
below are for planning reference.
A school that operates a schoolwide program and receives funds allocated through the ConApp is required to develop a SPSA. The
SPSA, including proposed expenditures of funds allocated to the school through the ConApp, must be reviewed annually and updated
by the SSC. The content of a SPSA must be aligned with school goals for improving student achievement.
Requirements for Development of the Plan

I. The development of the SPSA shall include both of the following actions:
A. Administration of a comprehensive needs assessment that forms the basis of the school’s goals contained in the SPSA.
1. The comprehensive needs assessment of the entire school shall:
a. Include an analysis of verifiable state data, consistent with all state priorities as noted in Sections 52060 and 52066,
and informed by all indicators described in Section 1111(c)(4)(B) of the federal Every Student Succeeds Act, including
pupil performance against state-determined long-term goals. The school may include data voluntarily developed by
districts to measure pupil outcomes (described in the Identified Need); and
b. Be based on academic achievement information about all students in the school, including all groups under
§200.13(b)(7) and migratory children as defined in section 1309(2) of the ESEA, relative to the State's academic
standards under §200.1 to—
i. Help the school understand the subjects and skills for which teaching and learning need to be improved; and
ii. Identify the specific academic needs of students and groups of students who are not yet achieving the State's
academic standards; and
iii. Assess the needs of the school relative to each of the components of the schoolwide program under §200.28.
iv. Develop the comprehensive needs assessment with the participation of individuals who will carry out the
schoolwide program plan.
v. Document how it conducted the needs assessment, the results it obtained, and the conclusions it drew from those
results.
B. Identification of the process for evaluating and monitoring the implementation of the SPSA and progress towards
accomplishing the goals set forth in the SPSA (described in the Expected Annual Measurable Outcomes and Annual Review
and Update).
Requirements for the Plan
II. The SPSA shall include the following:
A. Goals set to improve pupil outcomes, including addressing the needs of student groups as identified through the needs
assessment.
B. Evidence-based strategies, actions, or services (described in Strategies and Activities)
1. A description of the strategies that the school will be implementing to address school needs, including a description of
how such strategies will--
a. provide opportunities for all children including each of the subgroups of students to meet the challenging state
academic standards
b. use methods and instructional strategies that:
i. strengthen the academic program in the school,
ii. increase the amount and quality of learning time, and
iii. provide an enriched and accelerated curriculum, which may include programs, activities, and courses necessary to
provide a well-rounded education.
c. Address the needs of all children in the school, but particularly the needs of those at risk of not meeting the
challenging State academic standards, so that all students demonstrate at least proficiency on the State’s academic
standards through activities which may include:
i. strategies to improve students’ skills outside the academic subject areas;
ii. preparation for and awareness of opportunities for postsecondary education and the workforce;
iii. implementation of a schoolwide tiered model to prevent and address problem behavior;
iv. professional development and other activities for teachers, paraprofessionals, and other school personnel to
improve instruction and use of data; and
v. strategies for assisting preschool children in the transition from early childhood education programs to local
elementary school programs.
C. Proposed expenditures, based on the projected resource allocation from the governing board or body of the local educational
agency (may include funds allocated via the ConApp, federal funds for CSI, any other state or local funds allocated to the
school), to address the findings of the needs assessment consistent with the state priorities, including identifying resource
inequities, which may include a review of the LEAs budgeting, it’s LCAP, and school-level budgeting, if applicable (described
in Proposed Expenditures and Budget Summary). Employees of the schoolwide program may be deemed funded by a single
cost objective.
D. A description of how the school will determine if school needs have been met (described in the Expected Annual Measurable
Outcomes and the Annual Review and Update).
1. Annually evaluate the implementation of, and results achieved by, the schoolwide program, using data from the State's
annual assessments and other indicators of academic achievement;
2. Determine whether the schoolwide program has been effective in increasing the achievement of students in meeting the
State's academic standards, particularly for those students who had been furthest from achieving the standards; and
3. Revise the plan, as necessary, based on the results of the evaluation, to ensure continuous improvement of students in
the schoolwide program.
E. A description of how the school will ensure parental involvement in the planning, review, and improvement of the schoolwide
program plan (described in Stakeholder Involvement and/or Strategies/Activities).
F. A description of the activities the school will include to ensure that students who experience difficulty attaining proficient or
advanced levels of academic achievement standards will be provided with effective, timely additional support, including
measures to
1. Ensure that those students' difficulties are identified on a timely basis; and
2. Provide sufficient information on which to base effective assistance to those students.
G. For an elementary school, a description of how the school will assist preschool students in the successful transition from early
childhood programs to the school.
H. A description of how the school will use resources to carry out these components (described in the Proposed Expenditures
for Strategies/Activities).
I. A description of any other activities and objectives as established by the SSC (described in the Strategies/Activities).
Authority Cited: S Title 34 of the Code of Federal Regulations (34 CFR), sections 200.25-26, and 200.29, and sections-
1114(b)(7)(A)(i)-(iii) and 1118(b) of the ESEA. EC sections 6400 et. seq.
Appendix B:
Plan Requirements for School to Meet Federal School Improvement Planning Requirements
For questions or technical assistance related to meeting Federal School Improvement Planning Requirements, please contact the
CDE’s School Improvement and Support Office at SISO@cde.ca.gov.
Comprehensive Support and Improvement
The LEA shall partner with stakeholders (including principals and other school leaders, teachers, and parents) to locally develop and
implement the CSI plan for the school to improve student outcomes, and specifically address the metrics that led to eligibility for CSI
(Stakeholder Involvement).
The CSI plan shall:
1. Be informed by all state indicators, including student performance against state-determined long-term goals (Goal, Identified
Need, Expected Annual Measurable Outcomes, Annual Review and Update, as applicable);
2. Include evidence-based interventions (Strategies/Activities, Annual Review and Update, as applicable) (For resources related to
evidence-based interventions, see the U.S. Department of Education’s “Using Evidence to Strengthen Education Investments” at
https://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/essa/guidanceuseseinvestment.pdf);
3. Be based on a school-level needs assessment (Goal, Identified Need, Expected Annual Measurable Outcomes, Annual Review
and Update, as applicable); and
4. Identify resource inequities, which may include a review of LEA- and school-level budgeting, to be addressed through
implementation of the CSI plan (Goal, Identified Need, Expected Annual Measurable Outcomes, Planned Strategies/Activities;
and Annual Review and Update, as applicable).
Authority Cited: Sections 1003(e)(1)(A), 1003(i), 1111(c)(4)(B), and 1111(d)(1) of the ESSA.
Targeted Support and Improvement
In partnership with stakeholders (including principals and other school leaders, teachers, and parents) the school shall develop and
implement a school-level TSI plan to improve student outcomes for each subgroup of students that was the subject of identification
(Stakeholder Involvement).
The TSI plan shall:
1. Be informed by all state indicators, including student performance against state-determined long-term goals (Goal, Identified
Need, Expected Annual Measurable Outcomes, Annual Review and Update, as applicable); and
2. Include evidence-based interventions (Planned Strategies/Activities, Annual Review and Update, as applicable). (For resources
related to evidence-based interventions, see the U.S. Department of Education’s “Using Evidence to Strengthen Education
Investments” https://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/essa/guidanceuseseinvestment.pdf.)
Authority Cited: Sections 1003(e)(1)(B), 1003(i), 1111(c)(4)(B) and 1111(d)(2) of the ESSA.
Additional Targeted Support and Improvement
A school identified for ATSI shall:
1. Identify resource inequities, which may include a review of LEA- and school-level budgeting, which will be addressed through
implementation of its TSI plan (Goal, Identified Need, Expected Annual Measurable Outcomes, Planned Strategies/Activities,
and Annual Review and Update, as applicable).
Authority Cited: Sections 1003(e)(1)(B), 1003(i), 1111(c)(4)(B), and 1111(d)(2)(c) of the ESSA.
Single School Districts and Charter Schools Identified for School Improvement
Single school districts (SSDs) or charter schools that are identified for CSI, TSI, or ATSI, shall develop a SPSA that addresses the
applicable requirements above as a condition of receiving funds (EC Section 64001[a] as amended by Assembly Bill [AB] 716, effective
January 1, 2019).
However, a SSD or a charter school may streamline the process by combining state and federal requirements into one document which
may include the local control and accountability plan (LCAP) and all federal planning requirements, provided that the combined plan is
able to demonstrate that the legal requirements for each of the plans is met (EC Section 52062[a] as amended by AB 716, effective
January 1, 2019).
Planning requirements for single school districts and charter schools choosing to exercise this option are available in the LCAP
Instructions.
Authority Cited: EC sections 52062(a) and 64001(a), both as amended by AB 716, effective January 1, 2019.
Appendix C: Select State and Federal Programs
For a list of active programs, please see the following links:

Programs included on the Consolidated Application: https://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/aa/co/
ESSA Title I, Part A: School Improvement: https://www.cde.ca.gov/sp/sw/t1/schoolsupport.asp
Available Funding: https://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/fo/af/
Developed by the California Department of Education, January 2019

2020 School Plan For Student Achievement Adelanto Elementary School 20201125

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

2020 School Plan For Student Achievement Adelanto Elementary School 20201125

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

2020 School Plan For Student Achievement Adelanto Elementary School 20201125

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

School Year: 2020-21

SPSA Title Page

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Template

Purpose and Description

1. Fully credentialed and qualified staff to service our students.

• Not meeting performance goals

Standards, Assessment, and Accountability

Staffing and Professional Development

Status of meeting requirements for highly qualified staff (ESEA)

Teaching and Learning

Availability of standards-based instructional materials appropriate to all student groups (ESEA)

Evidence-based educational practices to raise student achievement

Fiscal support (EPC)

Student Enrollment by Subgroup

Student Enrollment by Grade Level

English Learner (EL) Enrollment

Conclusions based on this data:

Overall Participation for All Students

Overall Achievement for All Students

Conclusions based on this data:

Overall Participation for All Students

Overall Achievement for All Students

Concepts & Procedures

Conclusions based on this data:

CAASPP Science Results for All Students

Conclusions based on this data:

2018-19 Student Population

Total English Foster

322 94.7 10.6 0.6

2018-19 Enrollment for All Students/Student Group

2019 Fall Dashboard Overall Performance for All Students

Academic Performance Academic Engagement Conditions & Climate

English Language Arts Chronic Absenteeism Suspension Rate

Red Red Red

Conclusions based on this data:

Lowest Performance Highest Performance

This section provides number of student groups in each color.

Red Orange Yellow Green Blue

All Students English Learners Foster Youth

Red No Performance Color No Performance Color

Declined -12.9 points Declined -4.6 points

Homeless Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Students with Disabilities

No Performance Color Red No Performance Color

Declined -13.3 points Declined Significantly -21.5 points

African American American Indian Asian Filipino

Red No Performance Color No Performance Color No Performance Color

Hispanic Two or More Races Pacific Islander White

Red No Performance Color No Performance Color No Performance Color

Current English Learner Reclassified English Learners English Only

11 Increased ++6.4 points Declined -13.3 points

Conclusions based on this data:

Lowest Performance Highest Performance

This section provides number of student groups in each color.

Red Orange Yellow Green Blue

All Students English Learners Foster Youth

Red No Performance Color No Performance Color

Declined -12 points Declined -11.5 points