Fotippopcycle2019 3 - Reyes

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 7

Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program

Pre/Observation/Post Cycle Form (POP)


Revised 4.20.17
Directions for Preparation for POP Cycle
1. New Teacher (NT) and Mentor (ME) identify date for lesson observation and set dates/times for pre- and post-observation conferences.
2. Minimum three days before lesson delivery, NT prepares POP Cycle Form.
3. NT completes Section 1: New Teacher Information, lesson plan, and Section 2, Part A NT Reflection.
4. NT emails POP Cycle Form and Lesson Plan to ME.
Directions for Pre-Observation
5. Minimum 48 hours before lesson delivery, ME reviews Lesson Plan and Section 2, Part A: New Teacher Reflection; completes Section 2, Part B: ME Feedback.
6. ME shares feedback with NT during pre-observation conference. Lesson plan is adjusted as needed and finalized for delivery.
Directions for Observation and Preparation for Post-Observation Conference
7. During lesson delivery, ME completes Section 3A: ME Observation of Lesson Delivery, noting both Teacher Actions and Student Actions.
8. Prior to Post-Observation Conference, NT reflects on lesson outcomes and completes Part 3B: NT Reflection on Lesson Delivery.
Post Observation Conference Directions:
9. Within 48 hours, NT and ME share notes; discuss lesson observations and outcomes; complete Section 4. All parts should be transcribed into one document and submitted to course instructor. Information is used for ILP.
Section 1: New Teacher Information
New Teacher Email Subject Area Grade Level
th
Itzel Reyes Itzel.reyes@animo.org Algebra 2 11 Grade
Mentor Email School/District Date
Mindy.melgar@greendot. Locke High School/ Green
Mindy Melgar 10/23/20
org Dot School District
Content Standard Lesson Objectives Unit Topic Lesson Title
In this unit, students will
explore polynomials and
rational functions. Students
will be able to…
-Identify the zeros of the
● HSA-APR.B graph and function form in
Unit 2 Lesson 5: Polynomial
● HSA-APR.B.3 factored form. Connecting Factors & Zeros
and Rational Functions
-Analyze and discuss the
connections between the
factors of a polynomial, its
zeros, and the horizontal
intercepts with at least 75%
accuracy.
CSTP Element(s) Focus for POP Cycle (In semesters 2, 3, 4, copy pertinent elements from ILP for POP Cycle focus.)
1 - Emerging 2 - Exploring 3 - Applying 4 - Integrating 5 – Innovating
NT pedagogical skills are newly formed and Skills are developing as NT investigates Skills are applied as NT makes Skills are refined as NT combines elements Skills are polished as NT expands ability to
just coming into prominence and examines pedagogical practices increased relevant and suitable use into a cohesive and unified pedagogical add new methods and strategies into
of pedagogical choices repertoire pedagogical repertoire
CSTP Element Initial Rating Rating Description (Identify both teacher and student rating for CSTP 1 and 2.)
Skills are applied as Itzel makes increased relevant and suitable use of
1 Element 1.1: Using knowledge of pedagogical choices, such as translating materials and instruction for
3
students to engage them in learning her Emergent Bilingual students and adapting for students with poor
internet connections.
Element 1.4: Using a variety of Skills are applied as Itzel makes increased relevant and suitable use of
instructional strategies, resources, pedagogical choices, such as learning how to use Zoom, NearPod and
4 3
and technologies to meet students’ Desmos to engage students and sequence learning activities
diverse learning needs appropriately.
Section 2: Pre-Observation Conference
Focus Students Focus Student 1: English Learner Focus Student 2: Student w/ILP/504 Focus Student 3: Your Choice
● Summarize critical needs and
how you will address them
Focus Student 1 critical needs include Focus Student 2 critical needs includes Focus student 3 is in need for a
during this lesson. enhancing verbal and written skills in minimizing distractions and off task greater instructional challenge. This
English. I plan to address this by having an behaviors. Focus student 2 is unable to student excels and he/she tends to
opportunity for academic discourse with digest large segments of written texts have frequent discussions because of
the use of at least 3 vocabulary words (x- and easily overwhelm with finishing assignments early. To
intercepts, factored form, zeros, factors, assignments. To address his/her needs, accommodate, she will be given more
horizontal intercepts, and etc.) These focus student 2 will be given challenging questions. Also, this focus
needs will be addressed through assignments with built in break tasks student will be given opportunities to
scaffolding strategies (word banks and down into manageable parts and work at her/his pace independently
sentence starters) and placing them in provide written instructions as needed. from others. Focus student 3 will
groups with other EL students. I will provide reminders to start a task, have the opportunity to work on
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 1 of 7
stay on task, and complete a task.
Teachers will also provide checks for
challenging Ready for More activity
understanding. In addition, Focus
along with other high performing
student 2 will be paired with another
students during break-out groups.
modeled student when working in
break-out groups.
Part A: NT Reflection Part B: ME Feedback
Use questions to guide reflection on the lesson plan. Provide feedback on lesson plan reflection.
What’s great is that you are identifying the KEY
The inquiry focus for this lesson is utilizing
CONCEPT you want to develop through these
technological and instructional strategies to
activities. Stay focused on that. In terms of
support all my students, especially my focus
more strategies, I suggest developing your
students. Students should be able to
Inquiry Focus/Special Emphasis language criteria for success, which may sound
● What is your inquiry focus and/or special emphasis?
independently make connections on identifying
like “Students can justify that a graph and an
● How will you incorporate the inquiry focus and/or x-intercepts from a given graph or function. I
special emphasis into the lesson? equation match by describing the features of
● What specific feedback do you want from your ME? plan to incorporate Desmos and engaging
the graph and the constraints of the function
scaffolding strategies such as Notice and
represented by the equation” and providing
Wonder, Card Sort, and guided questions in this
sentence frames such as “I can tell these match
lesson. I wonder if there are additional
because I see ______ on the graph and ____ in
strategies to better support my EL students.
the equation…”
I recommend creating breakouts before the
lesson if you can. You do this by uploading a
CSV of the students’ email addresses on Zoom.
Alternatively, make a list of who you want with
whom so that groups are heterogeneous, and
take the extra 30 seconds to make these
Inquiry Focus/Students
How can I better support focus students during configurations while students work on their
● What specific feedback regarding your focus students their break-out room session when working on Warmup in Desmos. You can set up the groups
do you want from your ME?
the Card Sort on Desmos? before you send them. You may also choose to
survey students because they have been in
school for a while, and you can ask them on a
Google Form “Name a student with whom you
feel comfortable working,” and then can pay
close attention to how your focus students
answer.
Specific Feedback I would like feedback when it comes to The first step for you in planning is to identify
● What additional specific feedback do you want from
your ME regarding lesson implementation? strategies monitoring progress and what to do which misconceptions might come up. You can
to further support students if they have a start by looking at the IM activity narrative,
common misconception. which will often describe a common
misconception. Decide which questions you
will ask when you go to each breakout group,
such as “I see you matched ___ and ___. Can
you say why?” and be ready to address the
misconception. However, keep in mind that
the nature of the activity- with the second
screen that checks their work - is that the
activity itself will correct students. So you want
to focus on asking the question, but you don’t
really need to intervene when students are
making mistakes unless they really have no
approach at all. You can simply say, “It sounds
like you have some ideas on this! Talk with
your group and keep checking the next
screen…” and then leave to another breakout.
Finally, plan intentionally for your activity
synthesis, which is a chance to address the
misconceptions you may hear coming up
during the activity. What is the BIG IDEA about

POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 2 of 7
how to match them up, and how will you
reiterate this once you pull them back
together.
For this opening of this lesson, students will
complete a notice and wonder on Desmos. Then
transition, to guided practice questions
interpreting different graphs and zeros. For the
body, students will work in their break-out
group completing a Card Sort Activity on
Desmos. In the closing, students will be
completing an error and analysis Exit Slip
through Desmos. Some varied teaching
strategies that will help students meet this
I agree with everything! I recommend
lesson goal include inquiry-based instruction
assigning the exit ticket (Cool Down) on Google
Instructional Planning through Desmos platform. This will allow
● How is the lesson structured (opening, body, and Classroom the morning of the class so that you
students to have an interactive approach with
closing)? can ensure all students do it. Since you won’t
● What varied teaching strategies and differentiated interpreting different factors and their zeros of
instruction will help students meet lesson goals? get to hear from every single student as you
● What progress monitoring strategies will be used? polynomial graphs. In addition, students will
move around to groups, it will be very
How will results inform instruction? have multiple opportunities for academic
important to see what each student landed
discourse in their appropriately assigned groups.
with by the end.
Responses will be recorded through Desmos to
check for student understanding. An exit ticket
will be provided towards the end of the lesson,
the same concept covered in the main activity in
the activity. Also, teachers will check in groups
and support students with additional help. The
results will inform the instruction, by providing
students with additional guided questions or
opportunities to discuss misconceptions as a
whole group.
These questions also make me think about
I plan to make the lesson relevant to students by relevance for students. Consider adding
providing the opportunity for students to something to the very beginning of the lesson
problem-solve on their own and flexibility in the (you don’t need a screen, but can say it after
beginning of the lesson to work out the given the Warm Up and before the first activity), like
activity at their own pace. Students will explore “Mathematicians are always working on their
Student Engagement/Learning
● How will you make the lesson relevant to all the
graphing zeros and identifying the number of ability to quickly notice something about a
students? solutions on their own in the given activity. graph or an equation - this makes their life
● How will students show progress towards master of
lesson objectives? Students may undergo productive struggle, easier so they don’t always have to do a lot of
however, will be encouraged to make calculations or even use graphing software.
connections and ask questions. Students will They can just look at it and know things about
show progress towards mastery of this lesson’s it. Today, we are working on the skill of “just
objective by completing the exit ticket with 75% looking at it and knowing.” This will make you
accuracy. faster with your tests and also make it, so you
have to do LESS work.”
Classroom Management I plan to maintain a positive learning Sounds good. I do not think we are seeing
● How will you maintain a positive learning
environment with a welcoming climate of caring, environment with a welcoming climate of disruptive behaviors. Students seem to be
respect, and fairness?
● Identify specific classroom procedures and strategies
caring, respect, and fairness by keeping students invested and trying. I think the ongoing
for preventing/redirecting challenging behaviors. accountable to my classroom’s norms and engagement of the Desmos platform is really
expectations. I set myself as an example to helpful - and I would think about what you’ll do
those behaviors and expect the same from my to ensure everyone who has a viable internet
students. Some of these behaviors include connection gets on the Desmos within the first
welcoming students to the virtual classroom, 3 minutes of class (e.g. assign it through Google
positive shout-outs, and being respectful when Classroom but also drop the link in the chat,
others speak. Some specific classroom narrating who you see on, private chatting
procedures and strategies to prevent those who aren’t on yet to see if they need
challenging behaviors include reminding help, and sharing your screen so they know
students visually and verbally of the classroom what it should look like).
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 3 of 7
expectations and holding them accountable to
those expectations/ routines. If a student
displays first offense misbehavior, the student
will be sent a direct private message redirecting
what that behavior is. The second offense the
student’s grade points will be affected. If
challenging behaviors continue to occur, I have a
one-to-one conversation with the student
through a private message or a separate break-
out room. If the behavior continues to become
an issue, parents/guardians will be contacted,
and Administration will be notified.
I will close the lesson through the lesson Great! I recommend tying it back to what I said
synthesis, summarizing what values of x will above about relevance. You can say BEFORE
cause the polynomial equations equal to zero. the Cool Down, I’m excited to see your thinking
They will be able to understand by setting each on the Cool Down. I can already tell that you
factor to zero we are able to solve the x- are getting faster and faster at identifying
intercepts of that graph. Students will be features of the graph and figuring out the
Closure assessed, through a given error and analysis Exit zeroes just by looking at the equation.” (Or
● How will you close your lesson?
● How will you assess student learning and prepare
Ticket on Desmos. Students will be able to something similar that matches the key idea.)
them for the next lesson? interpret a given graph and type their response *Also - make sure that the Cool Down has a
about the given error when identifying the x- text box. Even if the IM Cool Down is matching
intercepts of the graph. Using the data from the or multiple choice, I would add a text box that
Exit-ticket, I plan to prepare them for the next says “Explain how you know” so that you can
lesson by reviewing any misconceptions through get as much data as possible about the extent
the Warm-Up when it comes to finding the x- to which each student met both the content
intercepts in a factored form polynomial. objective and the language objective.
Section 3: Observation of Lesson Delivery
Part 3A: ME Observation of Lesson Delivery Part 3B: NT Reflection on
Teacher Actions Student Actions Lesson Delivery
EXAMPLE Student groups answered worksheet questions that included all
When teacher reviewed worksheet, she asked additional questions Students completed the worksheets and were able to ask
CSTP 1: Engaging All Students levels of Bloom’s (“Identify 6 problem-solving strategies; pick two
of analysis and evaluation (“which problem-solving strategy do you questions. Most groups needed revisions for their questions;
strategies and identify at least one similarity and one difference
● In what ways were students prefer? How could you create a math problem that could be solved
between them”). Groups then selected a strategy and created
comparison/contrast was the most common analysis question. I
engaged? with this strategy?”) need to give them a Bloom’s question stems handout next time.
two math problems to exchange tomorrow.

Student’s come into the zoom class


with the expectation to have their
camera on and follow the direction The introduction for this lesson is
for the warm-up. Student will very crucial for student
create a split screen and open the understanding. It helps set the tone
Teacher allowed students 5 minutes
Desmos link. Students are given 5 and provides a productive learning
in the beginning of class to enter
minutes to begin their Warm-Up environment. By having students
Desmos activity with a link provided
and complete the Notice and begin the lesson, by expressing their
in the zoom chat and google
Wonder activity. Then, once the observations and mathematical
classroom. Students began their
timer is up teacher announces it will thinking creates a level of comfort
warm-up with an activity called
Specific Feedback be time to verbally share their where they feel they can respond
● What information can you
“What do you Notice? What do you
responses from the given Warm-Up appropriately to given problem. This
provide the NT regarding wonder?” The activity has a set of
requested special through a guided group discussion. sort of problem takes away the
feedback? equations, graphs, and word bank
Teacher calls on volunteers before pressure of being correct or
displayed for the students to
cold-calling on random students to incorrect. I am content how the
answer. Students provided their
share out-loud. After, students initial part of this lesson happened.
analysis and mathematical thinking
share out their ideas and Student’s were given multiple
immediately within the given text
connections they have made. opportunities to share either within
box. Teacher can monitor and
Teacher wraps up the overall idea a verbal or written format. Students
provide immediate feedback.
of the Warm-up and discusses how were able to make connection and
the skill they will learn today will conclude ideas of the problem on
have to do with identifying features their own
of graphs/equations and creating a
definitive conclusion.

POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 4 of 7
Student engagement depends
heavily on classroom expectations
and norms. Students are
accountable for when they
Ms. Reyes carefully prepared a participate. Through distance
Desmos activity, which help learning student can display their
Students often replied to share their engagement with students. Few participation through several
thinking when called on, especially students became disengage methods such as sharing out-loud in
CSTP 1: Engaging All when Ms. Reyes asked them to through group work. Students were whole class discussions, written
Students share about something, they had able to monitor their own learning form through Desmos and zoom
● In what ways were students
engaged? How were written through the Desmos by receiving feedback from teacher chat, and through responding
students not engaged?
● How did students platform. I joined a breakout group or the built-in Desmos activity through zoom polls. Around 85% of
contribute to their with two students who were highly which allowed students to see how the class were engaged throughout.
learning?
● How did teacher and/or engaged in the card sort activity. In well they were performing. Focus The remaining 25% of the class were
students monitor
learning?
addition, throughout the activity she students were engaged and unresponsive through either written
● How were the focus included Spanish directions for supported throughout the lesson by or verbal communication. Students
students engaged and
supported throughout the students and several scaffolds built having clear and concise direction are followed up with regarding an
lesson? into the lesson, such as activity to work both independently and accountability grade and a parent
syntheses and reflection questions with their peers. In addition, built-in phone call. However, it is still
about the objective along the way. scaffolding techniques were taken difficult to get in touch with most of
place such as word banks, sentence these parents considering the
starters, and visuals. current circumstances. I leave
private texts through an Remind
mind to both the student and
parents, hoping to receive some
response.
Ms. Reyes contributed to an
effective learning environment by
providing clear directions for
students what was expected for Students contributed to the
them to understand to master the learning environment by staying on
Overall, the learning environment
lesson objective for this lesson. task and engaging through the
was very effective for this lesson.
Teacher provided multiple online platform. Students
Since the learning takes place
CSTP 2: Effective Learning opportunities to promote academic participated within whole-group
Environment through zoom. Student’s practice
● How did students and discussion through whole group and discussion and smaller groups.
different form of communication. I
teacher contribute to an small group environments. Teacher Students took on the role within
effective learning help students become more
environment? assigned student roles within their their groups and completed the
comfortable sharing out loud
groups including speaker, leader, online activity. Students responded
through incentive points and
and recorder. In addition, teacher out-loud and in a written form
through positive reinforcement.
provided students with visuals, within the Desmos activity/zoom
sentence starters, and word banks chat.
to accommodate both focus
students and others to encourage
critical thinking.
CSTP 3: Organizing When I taught this lesson, I made it For the next activity, students will The objective how I chose allowed
Subject Matter
● What actions of the NT my priority to create an atmosphere be introduced to end behaviors of me to organize my subject matter in
contributed to student
assimilation of subject
where students felt comfortable to polynomials graphs, thus it is a way where it flowed conceptual
matter? share out loud. In addition, I did my important for students to master where they would be better to
● How did students construct
knowledge of subject best to encourage student feedback the subject matter of identifying master the unit exam. Students
matter? in their level of understanding the horizontal intercepts given an were given examples and guided
● What misconceptions did
students have and how subject matter both vocally and equation and graph. Students will practice in identifying the degree
were they addressed by
the teacher?
through a written format. use prior knowledge of identifying and number of horizontal intercepts.
Throughout the lesson, students the degree and interpreting the Then, they were given multiple
were expected to answer several graph through given horizontal opportunities to check their own
guided and practice questions that intercepts to correctly understand answer and discuss with heir peers
assessed their knowledge on the end behavior. Students will have to about any misconceptions.
subject matter. For instance, think and reflect how the leading
students were required to answer term determines the end behavior.
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 5 of 7
From this lesson, students will be
already be able to know how to
questions to identify the number of rewrite factored form into standard
zeros and draw their predicted form to determine the direction
horizontal intercepts among the and behavior of the polynomial.
graphs through the self-guided Teacher addressed the main
activity. The main misconception misconception from this to students
student had was incorrectly by making the connection to the
identifying the horizontal intercept graph’s horizontal intercepts and
that lead to a fraction. the factored form equation.
Students were asked to then, look
at the factor itself and solve for x.
Students were responding on the I believe students were well
In addition to the high-quality
Desmos, especially in the first part of supported through differentiated
Desmos activity, Ms. Reyes used
the lesson. An area for continued instruction by making the content
breakout groups, the Zoom chat,
CSTP 4: Learning planning moving forward is how to accessible and easy to navigate. I try
Experiences and a Zoom poll to engage students
● How were students ensure that ALL students stay to set up the learning as a enjoyable
in thinking about the most
supported through engaged and are able to show their and promote critical thinking by
differentiated instruction? important math ideas. She also
● How did students thinking throughout the lesson, as asking checking for understanding
participate? helped students develop their ideas
● How did the NT contribute
Ms. Reyes balances the need to and follow-up questions. I feel like
by naming the concepts they were
to student learning? move at an appropriate pace with engaging students will contribute
describing, such as end behavior,
the need to stop and gauge when not only to participation, but their
giving them access to academic
students get stuck and support them overall understanding of the lesson’s
vocabulary.
through it. objective.
After the introduction, students
were provided guided practice
example and an independent
example activity to complete.
The cool-down/ exit slip I provide
Within both examples, students
them evaluates not only the
Student’s demonstrated their were given the opportunity to
student’s performance, but mine as
achievement of the lesson objective explore and apply their prior
well. I use the exit slips as a
by achieving at least 75% accuracy knowledge of identifying zeros
reference to gauge each student’s
CSTP 5: Assessing Student within the exit slip (Cool-Down). within the provided equations and
level of understanding and mastery
Learning Their performance on the exit slip graphs. Students displayed some
● How did students of the objective for that day. The
demonstrate achievement help me gauge student’s level of limited knowledge, however were
examples and activities provided for
of lesson objectives? understanding and what specific also given immediate feedback of
● In what ways did students the student’s should be a reflection
struggle or demonstrate concepts I need to re-teach in the their work this help support their
limited understanding? and a guide for students to help
● What teacher actions
upcoming lesson. In this lesson, understanding when it came to
them reach the learning goals for
contributed to student students were able to clearly correctly identify the number of
achievement? any specific lesson. I consider any
understand and the connection zeros, evaluate the actual zeros for
activity and practice problems
between identifying the zeros in the given factored form equation,
provided to them as an indicator to
factored form, standard form, and a and identify those zeros on the
their overall academic performance
given polynomial graph. given polynomial graph. Students
and ability to reach mastery of the
were then asked after these series
lesson’s objectives.
of examples, to explain their
strategy and connection when
identifying the zeros given the
equation and graph.
Section 4: Post Observation Conference
Approximately 80% of my students were able to achieve the cool-down with at least 75% accuracy. They showed
To what degree did students their demonstrated of understanding by correctly answering an error-and-analysis problem. They were ask to
achieve lesson objectives? identify and explain the error when it came to discovering the horizontal intercepts in graphically and
algebraically.
To what degree did focus Focus Student 1: English Learner Focus Student 2: Student w/ILP/504 Focus Student 3: Your Choice
students achieve lesson
objectives?
Of the 80% of students who In this lesson delivery, this period Of the 80% of students who
successfully completed the cool-down, only held 1 focus student and he successfully completely their
50% of them were EL students. From was able to finish his cool-down cool-down, approximately 10%
those EL students, approximately all with at least 75% accuracy by the were above grade level. These
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 6 of 7
end of the lesson. My school is
those students were able to designed where the majority of the students were able to successfully
successfully complete their cool-down special needs’ students are placed complete the cool-down with an
and achieve 75% accuracy. within different departments and average score of 95% accuracy.
cohorts.
If I were to deliver this lesson again, what I would differently be adjusting the pacing of time in each activity. I
What would you do
differently next time? would have quickly skim through objective, agenda, and classroom norms and expectations to allow more time to
be invested in the card sort group activity.
1. Checks for understanding.
What were three top Lesson
Strengths? 2. Promoting Student Participation and Engagement,
3. Pacing and prioritizing learning segments.
1) Improve time-management and pacing.
What were three top areas
for improvement? 2) Improve checks for understanding.
3) Stronger learning segments.
My next steps include ensuring all my students are given efficient time to absorb and process new learning
material. I plan to pace out and time each segment in a more efficient manner prioritizing key activities to ensure
What are next steps? students will be able to master the objective by the end of the lesson In addition, to help my students become
better prepared for future lesson, I plan to incorporate previous concepts and more check for understandings
through academic prep (homework).
Other Comments/Notes

All parts of this form should be transcribed (typed; not hand-written) into a single document and submitted to course instructor.
Information from this POP Cycle should be summarized on the NT ILP as appropriate.

POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 7 of 7

You might also like