Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Current Applied Physics: Sciencedirect
Current Applied Physics: Sciencedirect
Keywords: The development of a highly effective and recyclable antibacterial agent is of great interest. In this work,
Silver magnetic Fe3O4/Ag antibacterial nanoagent was successfully fabricated through a facile surface functionaliza-
Fe3O4 tion approach. Utilizing the strong interaction between silver and the amino groups on the surface of Fe3O4
Magnetic nanospheres nanospheres, the nanosized silver particles were tightly bonded on the Fe3O4 nanospheres' surface, improving
Recyclable
silver nanoparticalsʼ antibacterial activity by preventing agglomeration of silver nanoparticles. Our antibacterial
Antibacterial activity
tests showed that the as-synthesized Fe3O4/Ag nanospheres presented high antibacterial performance against
Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. Moreover, these antibacterial nanohybrids can be easily recycled
from water solution by applying an external magnetic field. Overall, taking into consideration the facile pre-
paration method, excellent antibacterial activity and high magnetic recycling property, the as-synthesized
Fe3O4/Ag nanospheres have great potential applications in medicine and water disinfection.
∗
Corresponding author.
E-mail address: hhb@hxxy.edu.cn (H. Huang).
URL: https://mail.hxxy.edu.cn/ (H. Huang).
1
These authors contributed equally.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2018.11.008
Received 28 June 2018; Received in revised form 27 September 2018; Accepted 12 November 2018
Available online 20 November 2018
1567-1739/ © 2018 Korean Physical Society. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
W. Fang et al. Current Applied Physics 19 (2019) 114–119
Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). 3-(2-aminoethylamino) coli BL21) was added and imprinted onto the solidified agar plates and
propyltrimethoxysilane (APTMS) was purchased from Alfa Aesar. Milli- incubated at 37 °C for 14 h.
Q water (18.2 M Ω, filtered with filter pore size 0.22 μ M) was from Measurements of the antibacterial rate of recycled Fe3O4/Ag nano-
Millipore. The other reagents were analytical grade and were used as spheres: 2.0 mg of Fe3O4/Ag nanospheres was added to 2.0 mL
received without any purification. ∼107 CFU/mL E. coli BL21 suspensions and incubated at 37 °C for 4 h.
Synthesis of Fe3O4 nanospheres: The Fe3O4 nanospheres were pre- The bacterial growth inhibition was determined by measuring OD at
pared by the solvothermal method [23]. Briefly, 1.08 g of FeCl3·6H2O, 600 nm. This was the original antibacterial rate of the nanospheres.
1.312 g of NaOAc and 1.0 g of PVP were dissolved in 30 mL of EG, Then, the nanospheres were collected via magnetic force, washed with
followed by the addition of 30 mL of EG 600 under stirring. The mixed sterile water and recycled. 2 mL of fresh bacterial cell suspension was
solution was transferred in 100 mL Teflon-lined stainless-steel auto- added to the tube to incubate with the recycled nanospheres for another
claves, heated from 30 °C to 180 °C for 2 h, and maintained at 180 °C for 4 h. This step was to get the antibacterial rate of the recycled nano-
12 h. The nanospheres were collected by magnetic separation, washed spheres for the first cycle. The antibacterial rate of the recycled Fe3O4/
by ethanol and water for several times, and then redispersed in water Ag nanospheres from the second to the fourth cycle was obtained by
(30 mL) for subsequent use. applying the same procedure.
Surface modification of Fe3O4 nanospheres using APTMS Characterization: The morphologies of the as-synthesized products
(Fe3O4eNH2): 150 mg of Fe3O4 nanospheres were redispersed in were characterized by a scanning electron microscope (SEM, HITACHI
180 mL of ethanol/water mixture 5:1 (v/v). After ultrasonication for S-4800) and a transmission electron microscope (TEM, JEOL JEM-
10 min, 0.5 mL of 3-(2-aminoethylamino) propyltrimethoxysilane 2100) with an acceleration voltage of 200 kV. The compositions of the
(APTMS) was added. The mixture solution was stirred at 50 °C for 12 h. products was investigated by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) using a
The final Fe3O4eNH2 nanospheres were collected and washed with PANalytical X'Pert diffractometer with Cu-Kα radiation. The bacterial
ethanol and water. optical density (OD) was tested by the Microplate Reader (Tecan
Preparation of Fe3O4/Ag nanospheres: 30 mg of Fe3O4eNH2 nano- Infinite M200) at 600 nm.
spheres was mixed with 10 mg of AgNO3 in 60 mL of ultrapure water,
and ultrasonicated for 10 min. Then 2.0 mL of formaldehyde aqueous 3. Results and discussion
solution was added. After 12 h stirring under dark conditions, the re-
sulting Fe3O4/Ag nanospheres were separated with a magnet, washed The synthesis procedure for fabrication of Fe3O4/Ag nanospheres is
with water, and redispersed in water for subsequent use. shown in Scheme 1. We firstly prepared high-dispersed magnetic Fe3O4
Measurements of silver content in Fe3O4/Ag nanospheres by ICP-MS: nanospheres via the modified method proposed by our group [37].
1.0 mg of Fe3O4/Ag nanospheres was dissolved in 1.0 mL aqua regia Then, we coated a thin layer of 3-(2-aminoethylamino) propyl-
solution. After digestion for 10 h, the digestion solution was diluted by trimethoxysilane (APTMS) on the surface of the magnetic Fe3O4 na-
ultrapure water, and the concentration of silver in the solution was nospheres (Fe3O4eNH2) to attract silver ions through coordination in-
tested by an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). teractions. The amino-functionalized Fe3O4 nanospheres were then
The ICP–MS used in this study was a Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer added to AgNO3 solution, followed by adding formaldehyde to yield
(iCAP Q, Thermo Fisher Scientific). The instrument was fitted with a Fe3O4/Ag nanospheres.
concentric nebuliser and a peristaltic pump nebuliser. Operating con- Fig. 1 shows the SEM images and TEM images of Fe3O4 nanospheres
ditions were as follows: RF power (1100 W); injection rate (1.85 mL/ and Fe3O4/Ag nanospheres. The pure Fe3O4 nanospheres (Fig. 1A and
min); nebuliser pressure (33 psi); cooling gas flow (4.0 L/min). Before B) exhibit high dispersion and spherical shape, and the average dia-
measurement, a series of standards, ranging from 0 to 10 ppm (0, 1, 2.5, meter of Fe3O4 nanospheres is about 350–500 nm. After decorated with
5 and 10 ppm) was assayed to demonstrate linearity. silver particles, lots of silver particles were observed on the surface of
Antibacterial activity test in LB liquid medium: The antibacterial ac- Fe3O4 nanospheres from SEM image (Fig. 1C). From the high-magnifi-
tivities of the Fe3O4/Ag nanospheres were tested against Gram-negative cation TEM image (Fig. 1D), it also can be seen that the small silver
Escherichia coli (E. coli BL21) and Gram-positive Bacillus subtilis (B. particles were well deposited on the Fe3O4 nanospheres surface with a
subtilis). These Bacteria were cultured in the LB liquid medium at 37 °C wide diameter distribution around 15–40 nm.
on a shaker bed at 200 rpm until the logarithmic phase (approximately The crystal structures of the samples were further investigated by
109 colony forming units per mL). Then 150 μL of 107 CFU/mL bacterial XRD. As shown in Fig. 2, the diffraction peaks (marked with #) at 30.1°,
suspension containing different concentrations of Fe3O4/Ag nano- 35.42°, 43.36°, 53.8°, 57.38°, and 62.82° can be ascribed to Fe3O4
spheres was added in a 96-well microplate and incubated at 37 °C with (JCPDS NO.75–1609). After modification with amino groups and dec-
continuous agitation (200 rpm). At given time intervals, the bacterial oration with silver particles, the emergence of diffraction peaks
growth curve was determined by measuring OD at 600 nm. (marked with *) at 38.12°, 44.36° and 64.52° are assigned to the (111),
Antibacterial activity test on agar plates: 100 μL solutions with dif- (200) and (220) crystal planes of silver (JCPDS NO.04–0783). These
ferent concentrations of Fe3O4/Ag nanospheres (0 mg/mL, 1.25 mg/ results confirmed that the silver-decorated Fe3O4 nanospheres (Fe3O4/
mL, 2.5 mg/mL and 5.0 mg/mL) was firstly plated on the surface of LB Ag) were successfully fabricated through our amino-functionalized
agar plates and left to dry for 5 min at room temperature. Then, 100 μL approach.
of LB liquid medium containing 103 CFU mL−1 of bacteria (Escherichia The pure Fe3O4 nanospheres without amino functionalization were
115
W. Fang et al. Current Applied Physics 19 (2019) 114–119
Fig. 1. SEM (A,C) and TEM (B,D) images of Fe3O4 nanospheres (A and B) and Fe3O4/Ag nanospheres (C and D).
116
W. Fang et al. Current Applied Physics 19 (2019) 114–119
Table 1
Different silver-based magnetic nanocomposites for antimicrobial applications.
Nanocomposites Preparation Method Antibacterial Property(AE/MIC/MBC/DIZ) Ref
Ag/Fe3O4 One-step method: Core-shell Ag/Fe3O4 nanocomposites were prepared by co- precipitation route E.coli: 2.5 mM (silver concentration) [41]
followed by hydrothermal treatment in one-pot synthesis under various (Ag(NH3)2)+ ions DIZ = 4.2 mm
concentrations without adding any reducing agents. 10 mM (silver concentration) DIZ = 6.3 mm
25 mM (silver concentration) DIZ = 7.6 mm
Fe3O4@Ag Two-step method: Fe3O4@Ag nanoparticles were prepared by reducing silver nitrate on the E.coli: MIC ≥ 70 μg/mL [43]
surface of Fe3O4 nanoparticles using the water-in -oil microemulsion method S.epidermidis MIC ≥ 60 μg/mL
B.subtilis
MIC ≥ 70 μg/mL
Ag@Fe2O3-Glu Two-step method: In the first step, the yolk–shell Ag@Fe2O3 nanoparticles were prepared by the E.coli O157:H7: MIC = 15.2 μg/mL [46]
Kirkendall effect. These Ag@Fe2O3 nanoparticles were then modified with glucose molecules. B. subtilis: MIC = 21.8 μg/mL
GO-Fe3O4eAg Two-step method: Fe3O4 NPs anchored GO (GO-IONP) was synthesized first. For the further E.coli.: MIC = 14.4 μg/mL [14]
growth of AgNPs, GO-IONP solution was mixed with silver nitrate dissolved in deionized (DI) S.aureus.: MIC = 14.4 μg/mL
water under stirring in oil bath. Sodium citrate was then added into the boiling aqueous solution
to produce AgNPs.
rGO–Fe3O4–Au–Ag–Au Three-step method: rGO-COOH was exfoliated in deionized water by sonication. Fe3+/Fe2+ E.coli. O157:H7: 100 μg/mL, AE = 40% [44]
solution was added in the above mixture. The adsorbed Fe3+/Fe2+ cations on the surface of the (without NIR irradiation)
GO-COOH material facilitated the in situ formation of tiny magnetic Fe3O4 nuclei nanoparticles. 50 μg/mL, AB = 100% (with NIR 10-min
Then, PEI was modified on the surface of rGOeCOOHeFe3O4. Finally, the positive irradiation)
rGOeCOOHeFe3O4 NPs mixed with PSS-coated Au–Ag–Au nanorods to produce
rGO–Fe3O4–Au–Ag–Au nanocomposites.
Ag@rGO-Fe3O4-PEI Three-step method: Fe3O4-NPs were firstly decorated onto GO in the presence of Fe3+/Fe2+ in E.coli. O157:H7: 0.067 μg/mL, AE = 45% [24]
an alkaline medium. The rGO-Fe3O4 composite was then modified by PEI to provide a positive (without NIR irradiation)
charge and facilitate the capture of negatively charged bacteria. Ag-NPs were finally grown in situ 0.067 μg/mL, AE = 100%(with 15-min NIR
on the rGO-Fe3O4-PEI composite with AA as a reducing agent. irradiation)
Fe3O4@ECS/PAA-Ag Three-step method: Fe3O4 NPs were prepared through a chemical coprecipitation method. Next, E.coli.: 10 mg/mL, AE = 99.3% (30 min) [25]
immobilization of CS coating onto Fe3O4 NPs was achieved with the aid of polymerization of S.aureus.: 10 mg/mL, AE = 98.9% (30 min)
acrylic acid. Finally, the Ag NPs were deposited onto the magnetic nanoparticles by in situ
reduction of [Ag(NH3)2]+ with poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) as reductant and stabilizer in the presence
of ECS/PAA polymer coating as template.
Fe3O4@SiO2eAg Three-step method: Fe3O4 nanoparticles were synthesized by using a solvothermal method, and E. coli.: MBC = 10 mg/mL [11]
then, a thin layer of SiO2 shell was coated on the surface of Fe3O4 nanoparticles to produce
Fe3O4@SiO2. Then, Ag(NH3)2+ was well-dispersed on the surface of the Fe3O4@SiO2 magnetic
composite, which was then reduced by the Ag mirror reaction.
Fe3O4@Ag@ TiO2 Three-step method: Bimetallic Fe@Ag nanoparticles with a raspberry structure were firstly E.coli: 1.43 mg/mL, AE = 99.3% [45]
prepared from chemical reduction of ferrous sulfate in water with presence of sodium borohydride
as a reducing agent, followed then by redox transmetalation with addition of silver nitrate
solution at room temperature. Finally, the Fe@Ag particles were grafted with reagent-grade 2-
mercaptoethanol molecules on the surface for preparing the Fe3O4@Ag@TiO2 nanocomposites.
AE = Antibacterial Efficiency, MIC = Minimum Inhibitory Concentration, MBC = Minimum Bactericidal Concentration, DIZ = Diameter of Inhibition Zone.
117
W. Fang et al. Current Applied Physics 19 (2019) 114–119
Fig. 5. Magnetic hysteresis loop of Fe3O4/Ag nanospheres. Fig. 6. Antibacterial activity of Fe3O4/Ag nanospheres against E. coli BL21 with
four antibacterial recycles.
118
W. Fang et al. Current Applied Physics 19 (2019) 114–119
References [24] W. Ning, H. Bo, C.M. Li, W.J. Hua, Nanotechnology 26 (2015) 195703.
[25] C. Yong, X. Chen, Q. Xiang, Q. Li, X. Xing, Bioact. Mater. 3 (2018) 80.
[26] A. Maleki, H. Movahed, P. Ravaghi, Carbohydr. Polym. 156 (2017) 259.
[1] S. Eckhardt, P.S. Brunetto, J. Gagnon, M. Priebe, B. Giese, K.M. Fromm, Chem. Rev. [27] A. Maleki, T. Kari, M. Aghaei, J. Porous Mater. 24 (2017) 1481.
113 (2013) 4708. [28] A. Maleki, Helv. Chim. Acta 97 (2014) 587.
[2] M. Rycenga, C.M. Cobley, J. Zeng, W. Li, C.H. Moran, Q. Zhang, D. Qin, Y. Xia, [29] A. Maleki, S. Azadegan, Inorg. Nano-Metal Chem. 47 (2017) 917.
Chem. Rev. 111 (2011) 3669. [30] A. Maleki, M. Ghassemi, R. Firouzi-Haji, Pure Appl. Chem. (2018) 387.
[3] S. Chernousova, M. Epple, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52 (2013) 1636. [31] A. Maleki, R. Firouzi-Haji, Z. Hajizadeh, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 116 (2018) 320.
[4] B. Le Ouay, F. Stellacci, Nano Today 10 (2015) 339. [32] A. Maleki, M. Aghaei, N. Ghamari, Appl. Organomet. Chem. 30 (2016) 939.
[5] J.C. Jin, X.J. Wu, J. Xu, B.B. Wang, F.L. Jiang, Y. Liu, Biomater. Sci. 5 (2017) 247. [33] A. Maleki, E. Akhlaghi, R. Paydar, Appl. Organomet. Chem. 30 (2016) 382.
[6] W.J. Fang, C.F. Xu, J. Zheng, G.J. Chen, K. Jiang, RSC Adv. 5 (2015) 39612. [34] A. Maleki, Ultrason. Sonochem. 40 (2018) 460.
[7] R.Y. Pelgrift, A.J. Friedman, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 65 (2013) 1803. [35] A. Maleki, P. Ravaghi, H. Movahed, Micro & Nano Lett. 5 (2018) 591.
[8] N.F. Adegboyega, V.K. Sharma, K.M. Siskova, R. Vecerova, M. Kolar, R. Zbořil, J.L., [36] A. Maleki, H. Movahed, P. Ravaghi, T. Kari, RSC Adv. 6 (2016) 98777.
Environ. Sci. Technol. 48 (2014) 3228. [37] W.J. Fang, C. Han, H.B. Zhang, W.M. Wei, R. Liu, Y.X. Shen, RSC Adv. 6 (2016)
[9] C. Marambio-Jones, E.M.V. Hoek, J. Nanoparticle Res. 12 (2010) 1531. 67875.
[10] M. Mahmoudi, V. Serpooshan, ACS Nano 6 (2012) 2656. [38] Y. Tian, J. Qi, W. Zhang, Q. Cai, X. Jiang, Facile, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6
[11] X. Wang, Y. Dai, J.L. Zou, L.Y. Meng, S. Ishikawa, S. Li, M. Abuobeidah, H.G. Fu, (2014) 12038.
RSC Adv. 3 (2013) 11751. [39] W. Wei, A. Li, S. Pi, Q. Wang, L. Zhou, J. Yang, F. Ma, B.J. Ni, ACS Sustain. Chem.
[12] D.C. Riccardo, P. Domenico, M. Roberto, S. Marco, C.R. Susana, R.G. Pilar, P.W.J., Eng. 6 (2018) 749.
P. Teresa, Small 8 (2012) 2731. [40] B. Ramalingam, M.M.R. Khan, B. Mondal, A.B. Mandal, S.K. Das, ACS Sustain.
[13] S. Singh, D. Bahadur, Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces 133 (2015) 58. Chem. Eng. 3 (2015) 2291.
[14] T. Tian, X. Shi, L. Cheng, Y. Luo, Z. Dong, H. Gong, L. Xu, Z. Zhong, R. Peng, Z. Liu, [41] A. Amarjargal, L.D. Tijing, I.T. Im, C.S. Kim, Chem. Eng. J. 226 (2013) 243.
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6 (2014) 8542. [42] W.J. Fang, J. Zheng, C. Chen, H. Zhang, Y. Lu, L. Ma, G. Chen, J. Magn. Magn.
[15] P.Y. Furlan, A.J. Fisher, M.E. Melcer, A.Y. Furlan, J.B. Warren, J. Chem. Educ. 94 Mater. 357 (2014) 1.
(2017) 488. [43] G. Ping, L. Huimin, H. Xiaoxiao, W. Kemin, H. Jianbing, T. Weihong, Z. Shouchun,
[16] W.J. Fang, H.Y. Zhang, X. Wang, W.M. Wei, Y.J. Shen, J.S. Yu, J.X. Liang, J. Zheng, Y. Xiaohai, Nanotechnology 18 (2007) 285604.
Y.X. Shen, New J. Chem. 41 (2017) 10155. [44] B. Hu, N. Wang, L. Han, M.L. Chen, J.H. Wang, Chem. A Eur J. 21 (2015) 6582.
[17] M. Maham, M. Nasrollahzadeh, S.M. Sajadi, M. Nekoei, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 497 [45] W.J. Tseng, Y.C. Chuang, Y.A. Chen, Adv. Powder Technol. 29 (2018) 664.
(2017) 33. [46] Z. Wei, Z. Zhou, M. Yang, C. Lin, Z. Zhao, D. Huang, Z. Chen, J. Gao, J. Mater.
[18] X.X. Zhou, Y.J. Li, J.F. Liu, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 5 (2017) 5468. Chem. 21 (2011) 16344.
[19] L. Jing, Y. Xu, S. Huang, M. Xie, M. He, H. Xu, H. Li, Q. Zhang, Appl. Catal. B [47] A. Maleki, Z. Hajizadeh, R. Firouzi-Haji, Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 259
Environ. 199 (2016) 11. (2018) 46.
[20] W.J. Fang, J. Zheng, C. Chen, H.B. Zhang, Y.X. Lu, L. Ma, G. Chen, J. Magn. Magn. [48] A. Maleki, Tetrahedron 68 (2012) 7827.
Mater. 357 (2014) 1. [49] A. Maleki, RSC Adv. 4 (2014) 64169.
[21] A. Maleki, H. Movahed, R. Paydar, RSC Adv. 6 (2016) 13657. [50] A. Maleki, R. Paydar, RSC Adv. 5 (2015) 33177.
[22] V.K. Sharma, T.J. McDonald, H. Kim, V.K. Garg, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 225 [51] A. Maleki, P. Zand, Z. Mohseni, RSC Adv. 6 (2016) 110928.
(2015) 229. [52] A. Maleki, P. Ravaghi, M. Aghaei, H. Movahed, Res. Chem. Intermed. 43 (2017)
[23] T. Wang, B. Ma, A. Jin, X. Li, X. Zhang, W. Wang, Y. Cai, J. Hazard. Mater. 342 5485.
(2018) 392.
119