Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Anti-Nociceptive Activity of Muntingia Calabura Linn Leaves (Aratiles) Using Methanol Extract On Swiss Albino Mice
Anti-Nociceptive Activity of Muntingia Calabura Linn Leaves (Aratiles) Using Methanol Extract On Swiss Albino Mice
Anti-Nociceptive Activity of Muntingia Calabura Linn Leaves (Aratiles) Using Methanol Extract On Swiss Albino Mice
iii
1
Senior High School
2
Basic Education Department
3
Our Lady of Fatima University
4
Research Adviser
March 2019
Endorsement
This research paper entitled “Anti-nociceptive Activity of Muntingia calabura linn Leaves
(Aratiles) using Methanol Extract on Swiss Albino Mice” prepared by Winsher May Talbo
et al. of STEM 12YI-HEA-1 of Our Lady of Fatima University, in partial fulfillment of the
requirements for Senior High School has been examined and now recommended for Oral
Examination.
This is to certify that Winsher May Talbo et al. are ready for the Oral Examination.
Brylle T. Capili, RN
Adviser
This is to certify that the research paper, “ Anti-nociceptive Activity of Muntingia calabura
linn Leaves (Aratiles) using Methanol Extract on Swiss Albino Mice” prepared and
submitted by Winsher May Talbo et al. of STEM 12YI-HEA-1 is recommended for Oral
Examination.
Chair
Member Member
iii
Certificate of Originality
We hereby declare that this research paper is our own work and that, to the best of our knowledge
and belief, it contains no material previously published or written by another person nor material
to which to a substantial extent has been accepted for award of any other degree or diploma of a
university or other institute of higher learning, except where due acknowledgement is made in
text.
We also declare that the intellectual content of this research paper is the product of our work,
even though we may have received assistance from others on style, presentation and language
expression.
Members:
Josuah D. Alvarez
Patrick James Aquino
Raffy R. Arizapa
Cary Mae A. Cayanan
Sophia Kaye P. Pangilinan
Winsher May C. Talbo
Winslet May C. Talbo
Jojin Grace N. Tarriman
Trisha B. Valeriano
Nemuel Jabez M. Yaco
Brylle T. Capili, RN
Adviser
Date
Table of Contents
Endorsement ii
Table of Contents iv
Abstract 1
1.0 Introduction 2
3.1.1 Animals 11
References 13
Appendix
A- Certificate of Authentication 17
List of Figures
Abstract
Nociceptive pain refers to pain clearly associated with tissue damage or inflammation
(Loeser and Treede, 2008). It is caused by potentially harmful stimuli being detected by
nociceptors around the body. Results from stimulation of pain receptors for tissue injury
(nociceptors), which are located mostly in the skin or in internal organs. The injury may be a cut,
bruise, bone fracture, crush injury, burn, or anything that damages tissues.
The in vivo chemicals (formalin-induced paw licking test) models of nociception were
used to assess the extract anti-nociceptive activity. The extract (10, 5, and 400 mg/kg) was
administered orally 60 min prior to subjection to the respective test. The study gives quality to
Muntingia calabura Linn leaves and uses it as an inhibitor for nociceptive pain.
1.0 Introduction
Muntingia calabura linn, the sole species in the genus, has been traditionally used
in the Southeast Asia and tropical America to treat headaches and gastric ulcer,
tranquillizer and anti-nociceptive (Kaneda et al., 1991). Various medicinal properties
have been scientifically reported from Muntingia calabura leaves, including anti-tumor
(Su et al., 2003), hypotensive (Shih et al., 2006), antibacterial, antiplatelet aggregation
(Chen et al., 2007), anti-inflammatory, antipyretic and anti-nociceptive (Zakaria et al.,
2007). And one of the plants and leaves are reported to possess high anti-inflammatory
and antioxidant activities and as a potential source of hepato-protective compounds is
Muntingia calabura linn. Based on the literature review on Muntingia calabura for
pharmacological reports between 1991 and 2014, it has been reported to demonstrate
cytotoxic, anti-proliferative, insecticidal, hypotensive, anti-nociceptive, cardio-protective,
antipyretic, antiplatelet aggregation, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antidiabetic,
antiulcer, and antibacterial activities with approximately 87 flavonoid-based compounds
identified (Mahmood et al., 2014).
2. In what phase of time is the methanol extract of Muntingia calabura linn leaves more
effective?
3. Is the methanol extract of Muntingia calabura linn leaves a more effective inhibitor
than the analgesic Morphine?
This study seeks to examine the viability of using the methanol extract of
Muntingia calabura linn (Aratiles) leaves as an alternative inhibitor for nociceptive pain
and to conclude these hypotheses:
Ha: Muntingia calabura linn leaves methanol extract is an effective inhibitor for
nociceptive pain.
Ho: Muntingia calabura linn leaves methanol extract is not an effective inhibitor
for nociceptive pain.
This study centers only on the examination of the methanol extract of Muntingia
calabura leaves (MEMC) on Swiss Albino mice using in vivo chemical tests of
nociception. The researchers will use the methanol extract of Muntingia calabura
(MEMC) to reduce pain on Swiss Albino mice to elucidate the anti-nociceptive activity
of MEMC. Any efforts made that are beyond framework and the aim of the study is
otherwise consider as separate to the whole study. The determination of toxic and lethal
doses of the extract of Muntingia calabura linn including its adverse effect will not be
determined in the study.
The study gives quality to Muntingia calabura Linn leaves and uses it as an
inhibitor for nociceptive pain. Since nociceptive pain is a worldwide issue, the use of
Muntingia calabura Linn leaves methanol extract as an alternative pain reliever could
help people more if it was proven effective or not. If effective, a more natural and cheap
treatment will be discovered. If not effective, it will be a step for the improvement and
exploration of a new drug for nociceptive pain. This paper will uncover the possible anti-
nociceptive activities of Muntingia calabura Linn leaves as well as the mechanisms
involved.
Government. This research can be used as a starting point for the government to use this
plant as a cheaper and alternative herbal medicine not only for nociceptive pain but to
start finding its other benefits as well.
Future Researchers. It will serve as their guide and can act as a reference in their
research. It will give them an idea to know what to do as the researchers answers
questions and produce data and information. This will also serve as an awareness for the
possible problems the future researches may encounter.
In vivo - An experiment that is done in vivo is done in the body of a living organism as
opposed to in a laboratory method that does not use the living organism as the host of the
test
Methanol - Is an ideal solvent because it can extract both hydrophilic and lipophilic
molecules from plant parts and after extraction, the solvent can be removed at low
temperature by distillation as methanol is highly volatile.
Nociceptive pain – Used to describe the pain from physical damage or potential damage
to the body.
Nociceptors –It can be defined as sensory receptors that are activated by noxious stimuli
that damage or threaten the body's integrity.
This section of the research is allotted for the previous known information about
different variables in the study. Unfortunately, since the research is severely understudied
in the country, the researchers had a difficult time finding a relevant local literature
regarding the subject matter. Although there are few, but still the amount compared to the
foreign literature used in the study is unfortunate.
These literatures are closely related to the current study for it directly mentions
the benefits of Muntingia calabura linn leaves that specifically provides medicinal cases
for the said study. The present study like the article reviewed will help researchers to
provide a cure for nociceptive pain.
The International Association for the study of pain defines pain as an unpleasant
sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage or
described in terms of such damage. It recognizes that tissue damage does not need to be
present for pain to be experienced (Nicholson, 2006). They appear to respond to many of
the same forms of noxious stimuli that activate cutaneous nociceptors and also participate
in neurogenic inflammation (Gebhart, 2000). Specialized peripheral sensory neurons
known as nociceptors alert us to potentially damaging stimuli at the skin by detecting
extremes in temperature and pressure and injury-related chemicals, and transducing these
stimuli into long-ranging electrical signals that are relayed to higher brain centers (Invest,
2010). The changes in nociceptive processing that occur during illness are believed to be
mediated partly by descending facilitation of spinal nociception. These pro-nociceptive
effects most likely represent the hyperalgesia noted in the many studies of illness in
awake animals (Anthony, 2013).
More recently, a growing effort has been put forth trying to assess pain in rats or
mice, rather than nociceptive reflexes, or at studying states affected by chronic pain
(Barrot, 2012). It is generally accepted that the activation of primary afferent C-fibers by
noxious stimuli leads to a sensation of pain (Cho, 2016). The close correspondence
between nociceptor properties and human pain perception has been confirmed using a
variety of experimental approaches (Marks, 2006). And also, nociceptive pain continues
only as long as the noxious stimulus is maintained. Sustained or recurrent noxious
stimulation can occur in certain disease. As a result, the nociceptive to control of
behavior routinely occurs in the absence of consciously perceived pain rendering it
"subconscious" (Meyer, 2006).
Leaves can either be boiled or steeped in water to provide relief from gastric ulcer
or to reduce swelling of the prostate gland, while the strips of its bark are boiled and
washed to reduce the swelling in the lower extremities. The leaves have been used to treat
pain associated with gastric ulcers, headache, and cold or to depress the prostate gland
swelling (Zakaria et al., 2007). In addition to that, the leaves were used as antiseptics or
antipruritic; also, to treat abdominal cram and also used to relieve colds and headaches in
provinces (Stuart, 2016). Studies have shown antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-
pyretic, analgesic, cytotoxic, hepatoprotective, gastroprotective, cardioprotective,
antibacterial, antiulcer, insecticidal, tyrosinase-inhibitory, Antispasmodic, emollient and
antifungal properties (Stuart, 2016).
Methanol, petroleum ether, and ethyl acetate are the solvents used for plant
extraction of phytochemical analysis including formic acid, and LCMS grade acetonitrile
(Selangor, 2019). The way to separate desired substance when mixed together is called
Extractions (Triswaningsih et al., 2017).
The researchers found it challenging to gather local literature about the research
topic. Thus this topic is severely understudied in the country. Fortunately, phytochemical
analysis show properties that make researchers assume that the Muntingia calabura linn
leaves will have a possible impact to inhibit nociceptive pain.
Aratiles is a fruit which grows naturally anywhere within the Philippines (Zulueta,
2019). Muntingia calabura linn leaves shows potential anti-proliferative and antioxidants
activities that could be accredited to their high contents of phenolic compounds. The
leaves also apply potent anti-tyrosinase and antioxidants activities (Maria et al., 2008).
Also in the Philippines, the flowers are used to treat headache, relief of incipient colds,
antiseptics and to treat swelling in the lower extremities (Cruiz, 2016).
This section of the research paper is allotted for the description of the
methodologies involved in the study. Divided into two subsections, the research materials
and research procedures are listed below along with a brief description provided for each
subsection.
These are the materials that the researchers utilized to know if the methanol
extract of Muntingia calabura linn leaves may inhibit nociceptive pain in Sprague
Dawley rats.
3.1.1 Animals
9 male Swiss Albino mice were divided into 3 groups. On each group, there are 3
mice that weighs between 20-30g ages 8-10 weeks old and which the researchers bought
in the Bioresearch at SM North EDSA Annex which is accredited by the Bureau of
Animal Industries Philippines. They were kept under room temperature (27 ± 2°C; 70–
80% humidity; 12 h light/darkness cycle) in the Pet-link Wellness Center and Veterinary
Clinic in Victoneta Avenue, Malabon City. The animals had free access to food and
water. They were fasted overnight before the experiment. The animals were acclimatized
to the laboratory conditions for at least five days prior to the experiments. The mice were
at all times handled in accordance with current BAI guidelines for the care of laboratory
animals and the ethical guidelines for investigations of experimental pain and conscious
animals (Zimmermann, 1983). Furthermore, experiments (n=3) were conducted between
09.30 and 18.30 h to minimize the effects of environmental changes.
The Leaves of Muntingia calabura are collected from within Valenzuela City.
The sample was tested in the UP Biology Institute of Biology College of Science
(University of the Philippines) for identification and certification purposes.
Research is an orderly and systematic procedure, and these are the following
procedures that the researchers followed in order for the experiment to be successful and
have a reliable outcome.
This procedure was carried out as described in detail by Zakaria et al. (2011).
Briefly, 500g of matured leaves that have been air-dried for 2 weeks at room temperature
(27 ± 2°C) and grinded into powder will be soaked in methanol in the ratio of 1: 20 (w/v)
or 10 L for 72 hours. After that, the supernatant is filtered using steel filter, cotton, and
What man no. 1 filter paper. The residue subjected to the same procedures for another
two times. The supernatant collected from each extraction pooled together and then
subjected to evaporation process using a rotary evaporator at 40°C under reduced
pressure.
The formalin test was carried out as described by Pharmacol et al. (2011) but with
slight modifications. Pain was induced by injecting 20 μL of 1% formalin in the
subcutaneous under dorsal surface of the right hind paw. Controls received distilled water
(10 ml/kg), the positive group received 100 mg/kg Tolfenamic acid as the reference drug,
and the experimental group received MEMC (500 mg/kg), 60 min prior to the formalin
injection. Immediately after the formalin administration, the mice was individually place
in a transparent glass cage observation chamber. The amount of time the animal spent
licking their injected paw, was considered as an indicator of pain, and was be recorded
for a duration of 30 min in two phases, known as the early (0–5 min) and late (15–
30min) phases.
The statistical analysis of Sani et al. (2012) will be followed wherein the results
will be presented as Mean ± standard error of mean (SEM). The one-way ANOVA test
with Dunnett post hoc test is used to analyze and compare the data, with P < 0.05 as the
limit of significance.
References
Pahwa R, Goyal A, Bansal P, et al. Chronic Inflammation. [Updated 2020 Feb 14]. In:
StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020 Jan-.
Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK493173/
Tjølsen A, Berge OG, Hunskaar S, Rosland JH, Hole K. The formalin test: an evaluation
of the method. Pain. 1992;51(1):5–17. doi:10.1016/0304-3959(92)90003-t
J. F. Morton, “Jamaica cherry,” in Fruits of Warm Climates, J. F. Morton, Ed., pp. 65–69,
J.F. Morton, Miami, Fla, USA, 1987.
M. Jensen, “Trees commonly cultivated in South East Asia: an illustrated field guide,” in
FAO Corporate Document Repository, Craftsman Press, Bangkok, Thailand, 2nd
edition, 1999.
E. W. M. Verheij and R. E. Coronel, Plant Resources of South East Asia: Edible Fruits
and Nuts, PROSEA, Bogor, Indonesia, 2nd edition, 1992.
N. Kaneda, J. M. Pezzuto, D. D. Soejarto et al., “Plant anticancer agents, XLVIII. New
cytotoxic flavonoids from Muntingia calabura roots,” Journal of Natural Products,
vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 196–206, 1991.
Mense S, et al. Anatomy of nociceptors. In: Bushnell MC, Smith DV, Beauchamp GK,
Firestei SJ, eds. The Senses: A Comprehensive Reference. New York, New York,
USA: Academic Press; 2008:11–41.
Andrew D, Greenspan JD. Peripheral coding of tonic mechanical cutaneous pain:
comparison of nociceptor activity in rat and human psychophysics. J
Neurophysiol. 1999;82(5):2641–2648.
Bullock GS, Collins G, Peirce N, et alPhysical activity and health-related quality of life
in former elite and recreational cricketers from the UK with upper extremity or
lower extremity persistent joint pain: a cross-sectional studyBMJ Open
2019;9:e032606. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032606
Nociception. (2020, February 23). Physiopedia, . Retrieved 13:57, March 18, 2020 from
https://www.physio-pedia.com/index.php?title=Nociception&oldid=231639
Zakaria, Zainul Amiruddin & Hassan, M.H. & Mohamad Nor Hazalin, Nurul Aqmar &
Ghani, M. & Zaid, S. & Sulaiman, Mohd Roslan & Kumar, G. & Fatimah, C.A.
(2007). Effects of various nonopioid receptor antagonists on the antinociceptive
activity of Muntingia calabura extracts in mice. Methods and findings in
experimental and clinical pharmacology. 29. 515-20.
10.1358/mf.2007.29.8.1119164.
Pahwa R, Goyal A, Bansal P, et al. Chronic Inflammation. [Updated 2020 Feb 14]. In:
StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020 Jan-.
Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK493173/
Herzberg, D., Strobel, P., Ramirez-Reveco, A., Werner, M., & Bustamante, H. (2020).
Chronic Inflammatory Lameness Increases Cytokine Concentration in the Spinal
Cord of Dairy Cows. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 7, 125.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00125
N.D. Mahmood, N.L. Nasir, M.S. Rofiee, S.F. Tohid, S.M. Ching, L.K. Teh, et
al..Muntingia calabura: a review of its traditional uses, chemical properties, and
pharmacological observationsPharm Biol, 52 (12) (2014), pp. 1598-1623
Appendix A
Certificate of Authentication
Appendix B
Appendix C
Appendix D