The Finite Element Method (FEM) is a procedure for the numerical solu-tion of the equations that govern the

problems found in nature. Usually thebehaviour of nature can be described by equations expressed in
differentialor integral form. For this reason the FEM is understood in mathematicalcircles as a numerical
technique for solving partial differential or integralequations. Generally, the FEM allows users to obtain the
evolution inspace and/or time of one or more variables representing the behaviour ofa physical system.When
referred to the analysis of structures the FEM is a powerfulmethod for computing the displacements, stresses
and strains in a struc-ture under a set of loads. This is precisely what we aim to study in thisbook.1.2

ANALYTICAL AND NUMERICAL METHODSThe conceptual difference between analytical and

numerical methods isthat the former search for the universal mathematical expressions repre-senting the general
and “exact” solution of a problem governed typically bymathematical equations. Unfortunately exact solutions are
only possiblefor a few particular cases which frequently represent coarse simplificationsof reality.

Basic concepts
The subdivision of a whole domain into simpler parts has several advantages:[2]

 Accurate representation of complex geometry

 Inclusion of dissimilar material properties
 Easy representation of the total solution
 Capture of local effects.

A typical work out of the method involves (1) dividing the domain of the problem into a
collection of subdomains, with each subdomain represented by a set of element equations to
the original problem, followed by (2) systematically recombining all sets of element
equations into a global system of equations for the final calculation. The global system of
equations has known solution techniques, and can be calculated from the initial values of the
original problem to obtain a numerical answer.

In the first step above, the element equations are simple equations that locally approximate
the original complex equations to be studied, where the original equations are often partial
differential equations (PDE). To explain the approximation in this process, FEM is
commonly introduced as a special case of Galerkin method. The process, in mathematical
language, is to construct an integral of the inner product of the residual and the weight
functions and set the integral to zero. In simple terms, it is a procedure that minimizes the
error of approximation by fitting trial functions into the PDE. The residual is the error caused
by the trial functions, and the weight functions are polynomial approximation functions that
project the residual. The process eliminates all the spatial derivatives from the PDE, thus
approximating the PDE locally with

 a set of algebraic equations for steady state problems,

 a set of ordinary differential equations for transient problems.

These equation sets are the element equations. They are linear if the underlying PDE is linear,
and vice versa. Algebraic equation sets that arise in the steady state problems are solved using
numerical linear algebra methods, while ordinary differential equation sets that arise in the
transient problems are solved by numerical integration using standard techniques such as
Euler's method or the Runge-Kutta method.
In step (2) above, a global system of equations is generated from the element equations
through a transformation of coordinates from the subdomains' local nodes to the domain's
global nodes. This spatial transformation includes appropriate orientation adjustments as
applied in relation to the reference coordinate system. The process is often carried out by
FEM software using coordinate data generated from the subdomains.

FEM is best understood from its practical application, known as finite element analysis
(FEA). FEA as applied in engineering is a computational tool for performing engineering
analysis. It includes the use of mesh generation techniques for dividing a complex problem
into small elements, as well as the use of software program coded with FEM algorithm. In
applying FEA, the complex problem is usually a physical system with the underlying physics
such as the Euler-Bernoulli beam equation, the heat equation, or the Navier-Stokes equations
expressed in either PDE or integral equations, while the divided small elements of the
complex problem represent different areas in the physical system.

FEA is a good choice for analyzing problems over complicated domains (like cars and oil
pipelines), when the domain changes (as during a solid state reaction with a moving
boundary), when the desired precision varies over the entire domain, or when the solution
lacks smoothness. FEA simulations provide a valuable resource as they remove multiple
instances of creation and testing of hard prototypes for various high fidelity situations.[3] For
instance, in a frontal crash simulation it is possible to increase prediction accuracy in
"important" areas like the front of the car and reduce it in its rear (thus reducing cost of the
simulation). Another example would be in numerical weather prediction, where it is more
important to have accurate predictions over developing highly nonlinear phenomena (such as
tropical cyclones in the atmosphere, or eddies in the ocean) rather than relatively calm areas.

FEM mesh created by an analyst prior to finding a solution to a magnetic problem using FEM
software. Colours indicate that the analyst has set material properties for each zone, in this
case a conducting wire coil in orange; a ferromagnetic component (perhaps iron) in light
blue; and air in grey. Although the geometry may seem simple, it would be very challenging
to calculate the magnetic field for this setup without FEM software, using equations alone.
FEM solution to the problem at left, involving a cylindrically shaped magnetic shield. The
ferromagnetic cylindrical part is shielding the area inside the cylinder by diverting the
magnetic field created by the coil (rectangular area on the right). The color represents the
amplitude of the magnetic flux density, as indicated by the scale in the inset legend, red being
high amplitude. The area inside the cylinder is low amplitude (dark blue, with widely spaced
lines of magnetic flux), which suggests that the shield is performing as it was designed to.

Different Types of Finite Element Method

As discussed earlier in the section on PDE’s, traditional FEM technology has demonstrated
shortcomings in modeling problems related to fluid mechanics, wave propagation, etc.
Several improvements have been made over the last two decades to improve the solution
process and extend the applicability of finite element analysis to a wide genre of problems.
Some of the important ones still being used include:

Extended Finite Element Method (XFEM)

The Bubnov-Galerkin method requires continuity of displacements across elements.

Problems like contact, fracture and damage however, involve discontinuities and jumps that
cannot be directly handled by Finite Element Methods. To overcome this shortcoming,
XFEM was born in 1990’s. XFEM works through expansion of the shape functions with
Heaviside step functions. Extra degrees-of-freedom are assigned to the nodes around the
point of discontinuity so that the jumps can be considered.

Generalized Finite Element Method (GFEM)

GFEM was introduced around the same time as XFEM in the 90’s. It combines the features
of traditional FEM and meshless methods. Shape functions are primarily defined in the global
coordinates and further multiplied by partition-of-unity to create local elemental shape
functions. One of the advantages of GFEM is the prevention of re-meshing around
singularities.
Mixed Finite Element Method

In several problems, like contact or incompressibility, constraints are imposed using

Lagrange multipliers. These extra degrees of freedom arising from Lagrange multipliers are
solved independently. The system of equations is solved like a coupled system of equations.

hp-Finite Element Method

hp-FEM is a combination of using automatic mesh refinement (h-refinement) and increase in

order of polynomial (p-refinement). This is not the same as doing h- and p- refinements
separately. When automatic hp-refinement is used, and an element is divided into smaller
elements (h-refinement), each element can have different polynomial orders as well.

Finite Element Analysis & SimScale

The Finite Element Analysis (FEA) component of SimScale enables you to virtually test and
predict the behavior of structures and hence solve complex structural engineering problems
subjected to static and dynamic loading conditions. The platform uses scalable numerical
methods that can calculate mathematical expressions and would otherwise be very
challenging due to complex loading, geometries or material properties.

Here are six advantages to this technique:

1. Modeling. FEM allows for easier modeling of complex geometrical and irregular
shapes. Because the designer is able to model both the interior and exterior, he or she
can determine how critical factors might affect the entire structure and why failures
might occur.
2. Adaptability. FEM can be adapted to meet certain specifications for accuracy in
order to decrease the need for physical prototypes in the design process. Creating
multiple iterations of initial prototypes is usually a costly and timely process. Instead
of spending weeks on hard prototyping, the designer can model different designs and
materials in hours via software.
3. Accuracy. While modeling a complex physical deformity by hand can be impractical,
a computer using FEM can solve the problem with a high degree of accuracy.
4. Time-dependent simulation. FEM is highly useful for certain time-dependent
simulations, such as crash simulations, in which deformations in one area depend on
deformation in another area.
5. Boundaries. With FEM, designers can use boundary conditions to define to which
conditions the model needs to respond. Boundary conditions can include point forces,
distributed forces, thermal effects (such as temperature changes or applied heat
energy), and positional constraints.
6. Visualization. Engineers can easily spot any vulnerability in design with the detailed
visualizations FEM produces, then use the new data to make a new design.