PHASE 6 PRACTICAL  Summary

COMPONENT - PART 1. REVIEW OF

DEVELOPMENT OF THE LABORATORY ANALYSIS
ALTERNATE PRACTICAL TECHNIQUES
COMPONENT COURSE
DESIGN OF DRINKING - ALKALINITY ANALYSIS:
PLANTS "Alkalinity is specified as the ability
of water to neutralize acids, in
Colombia Resolution 2115 of 2007
STUDENT:
of the Ministry of Social Protection,
DIANA MARCELA RODRIGUEZ Environment, Housing and Territorial
CODE 1121418340
Development establishes the
maximum admissible value of
CaCO3 of 200 mg / L" (University
North of Barranquilla) 1. In the
GROUP: 358040_
explanatory video, Methyl Orange,
0.02N sulfuric acid (H2SO4) is used
as an indicator as a titrant to
TUTOR: determine the alkalinity of the
WILSON AVILA AVILA sample, in which the amount of
sulfuric acid used in the solution is
measured until the color change is
obtained to orange, it tends to be very
subtle.
NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OPEN AND
DISTANCE (UNAD)
PROGRAM: ENVIRONMENTAL - JUGS TEST: 1000 ml of residual
ENGINEERING water was observed in each biker,
COURSE: DESIGN OF DRINKING
PLANTS then they were placed in the
ACACÍAS META flocculator, then 1% aluminum
2020
sulfate was added in different doses
to each jug using dosages of 20 ppm,
 40 ppm, 60 ppm and 80 ppm, the
Which are placed at a fast speed in a
short time and then at a slow speed
for a long time in order to achieve the
desired flocs and then proceed to
settle the mixtures to achieve
sedimentation. Then, a sample of the
water resulting from the
sedimentation is taken and the
turbidity is measured, using the
turbidimeter.
CASE STUDY:
A surface water sample was characterized
to carry out the jar test in a water
purification plant using two coagulants,
aluminum sulfate and ferric chloride in
doses ranging from 10 ppm to 1000 ppm.
The guide gives us the pH, Color and
turbidity data of the initial sample and the
final sample, respectively, in 4 tests
(20ppm, 40 ppm, 60ppm and 80ppm),
which were calculated according to the
definition of ppm, density and coagulant
concentration.
 INTRODUCTION
For the Design of Water Treatment Plants
it is essential to understand different
aspects and characteristics of water, the
measurement and change of these
characteristics allow us to define their
safety for human consumption, which is
essential for our lives and the
development of our daily physical
functions.
Taking into account the above, according
to the development of this activity we
reinforce the understanding acquired in
the revision of the theory of the course,
through the analysis of a case study.
Where a surface water sample was
characterized, to which the pH, alkalinity,
color and turbidity were evaluated, after
being subjected to the jar test, where two
coagulants (aluminum sulfate and ferric
chloride) were added in different
concentrations to your treatment.
PURPOSE OF THE PRACTICE
 Reinforce the knowledge acquired
by the student of the present
course, in the theory provided,
combining it with practical
knowledge through a practical
activity in a with a score of 90
points; as a complementary tool in
the student's higher education.
 Strengthen the knowledge of
English as a second language by
 appropriating the terminology and
applying the knowledge acquired
in the research.
 Strengthen the knowledge
acquired by the student of this
course, in the theory provided,
through practical design exercises
Phase 5 with a score of 60 points
that will be executed within the
Evaluation and Monitoring
Environment of the course; in
order to acquire skills in
calculating structures and dosages
of a PTAP.
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
material de
cristaleria turo de plastio (50 pipeta tipo psteur
ml) con perilla (ml)
pipetas serologicas
material de plastico
y graduas
matraz de bola celda de lectura
vasos precipitados
(1000 ml) para aspecto
vaso de
celdas de lectura
precipitación (150
para turbimetro
ml)
Sulfato de aluminio: Tomar
con una pipeta 17.5 ml de
Preparación de reactivos sulfato y disolver en agua
corriente hasta aforar un litro
en un matraz de bola
Nitrato de plata: Moler 5 gr
Polímero: Pesar 1 gr de de cristales de Nitratos de
polímero, colocarlo en un Plata y secar durante 2 hrs.
vaso de precipitado con agua Pesar en la balanza
de corriente y disolver. Aforar aproximadamente 5.1 gr de
hasta un litro en un matraz los cristales pulverizados de
de bola. Nitratos de plata, disolver en
2000 ml de agua destilada
EDTA: Secar
aproximadamente 18 gr de
cristales de EDTA a 140°C en Hidróxido de sodio: Pesar
horno durante 2 hrs. Pesar aproximadamente 40 gr de
aproximadamente y con hidróxido de sodio en
precisión 15 gr. Vaciar al lentejas y disolver en 1000 ml
matraz aforado de 2 Lt y de agua destilada.
aforar con agua destilada
hasta 4 Lts.
reactivos
agua destilada
sulfato de alunio
gradilla
polimetro
nitrato de plata
edta
hidroxido de sodio
 RESULTS: Test 2
PARAMETER INITIAL FINAL EFFICIENCY
According to what was stated in the case SAMPLE SAMPLE
study, calculate pH 7.8 6.8 12.8%

Alkalinity
Colour 68 12 82.3%

Concentarcion H 2 SO4  volumen gastado deH 2 SO4  50000

Alcalinidad  Turbidity 5.52 1.84 66.6%
volumen de la muestra
Note Test 3
50000: CaCO3 weighs 100g, this value is
PARAMETER INITIAL FINAL EFFICIENCY
divided by the eq-g, which is two, and
SAMPLE SAMPLE
multiplied by 1000 milliequivalents. pH 7.9 5.6 29.1%
𝐴𝑙𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑
Colour 1545 16 98.9%
0.02𝑁 ∗ 22.5𝑚𝑙𝐻2 S𝑂4 ∗ 50000
=
100𝑚𝑙 Turbidity 272 5.09 98.1%
= 225𝑁

1. Parameter Removal Percentage: Test 4

Turbidity, Color and pH PARAMETER INITIAL FINAL EFFICIENCY
SAMPLE SAMPLE
𝐸𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 (%) pH 8.1 4.7 41.9%
Parametro (afluente) − Parametro (efluente)
=( )
Parametro (afluente)
Colour 4475 14 99.6%
∗ 100
Turbidity 683 2.5 99.6%

Trial 1
PARAMETER INITIAL FINAL EFFICIENCY
SAMPLE SAMPLE
pH 8.7 6.8 21.8%

Colour 2. 3. 4 13 94.4%

Turbidity 24.5 1.47 94%

 2. Based on the example within the  Nvueltas 
case study, the volume for each 1segundo  
 60 segundos 
reagent is calculated at the
P   * 3 *  paleta * k
5
different dosages and the table is
completed: P
G
v
Coa Conce De 20 2 6 8
gula ntrati nsi pp 0 0 0
nt on ty m p p p 100𝑅𝑃𝑀
p p p 1𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑜 ( ) = 1,66 𝑅𝑃𝑆
m m m 60𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑜𝑠
Alu 17% 1.1 0. 0. 0.
minu 2g 0.0 1 2 3 𝑘𝑔
𝑃 = 998.43 ∗ 2.53 ∗ 0.07635 𝑚 ∗ 2.3
m / 84 6 5 3 𝑚3
sulfa mL ml m m m = 0.09
te l l l
Chlo 40% 1.4 0.0 0. 0. 0. 0.09
ride 2g 2 0 0 1 𝐺=√
𝐾𝑔
iron / ml 5 8 1 0.001034 𝑚 ∗ 𝑠 ∗ 0.0008 𝑚3
mL m m m
l l l = 329.84

 Discussion
3. A comparative table must be made
with the regulations Resolution
JARS TEST
2115 of 2007 according to the Through the explanatory video it
analysis of the parameters in each
was possible to deduce that the
of the tests carried out.
flocculation of particles in the
4. Design gradients for fast mix waste water is more effective in
and slow mix will be calculated;
taking into account: the doses of 20 ppm, 40 ppm and
 H 2O  0.001034 kg / m * s 60 ppm, in the concentrations of
  998 .43kg / m 3 10 ppm and 100 ppm it is not even
  100 rpm / 40 rpm possible to observe the generation
k  2.3
of the flocs. Therefore, these
  0.0763 m
concentrations are suitable for use
v  800 ml
in wastewater treatment.
 BIBLIOGRAPHY
WITH APA RULES

1. University of the North of

Barranquilla. Chemical
characteristics of water.
Introduction and determination of
alkalinity. Recovered
fromhttps://www.youtube.com/wat
ch?v=mmkY5ET9GTM