Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Assignment BA in Communication Studies, Media and Journalism Media Law and Ethics
Assignment BA in Communication Studies, Media and Journalism Media Law and Ethics
Intermediate Court
District Court
Industrial Court - Juvenile Court - Court of Rodrigues
Bail and Remand Court - Chamber Jurisdiction
Table of Contents Page
Introduction 4
Supreme Court 5
Court of Appeal 6
Bankruptcy Division 6
Commercial Division 6
Mediation Division
Industrial court
Juvenile Court
Court of Rodrigues
Chamber Jurisdiction
Medpoint Case
Conclusion
References
Introduction
The Mauritian Legal System is often called as a hybrid system since the island was
successively a French and a British colony. When the British captured the island from
the French in 1810, certain laws like the 'Code Civil', 'Code Penal' and 'Code de
commerce' were already established. The British also influenced the Mauritian law by
the Anglo-Saxon traditions on the judiciary. Business laws, company laws and evidence
laws are all based on the Westminster model. In Mauritius the Constitution is the
supreme law and it is substantively based on the French Napoleonic Code whereas
both the civil and criminal litigations are procedures based on the British law. The
Constitution provides for an independent judiciary system based on separation of
powers with the other two organs of the state - the Legislative and the Executive.
According to the 'Courts Act' of 1945, the single-structured judicial system consists of
two parts, the supreme court which is highest in position and the subordinate courts.
The subordinate courts are mainly the Intermediate Court, the District Courts, the
Industrial Court and the Court of Rodrigues. There exist other divisions in the supreme
court as well as in the subordinate courts. The mission of the Judiciary of Mauritius is to
administer justice in Mauritius as well as in all outer islands and to maintain an
independent and competent judicial system in order to safeguard the rights and freedom
of the individual. The Chief Justice who is the head of the judiciary also makes provision
that the system commands domestic and international confidence. However, an
appellant can still seek justice to a higher court than the Supreme Court by an
application to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council.
This means that the Supreme Court has the highest judicial authority in the country and
it has unlimited jurisdiction to hear and determine any civil and criminal proceedings and
it has the same jurisdiction as the Court of England. Situated in Port Louis, the Supreme
Court is composed of the Chief Justice, the Senior Puisne Judge and 20 Puisne Judges
actually. The Chief Justice is appointed by the President of the Republic acting in
accordance with the advice of the Prime Minister. The Senior Puisne Judge is appointed
by the President of the Republic acting in accordance with the advice of the Chief
Justice. The Puisne Judges are appointed by the President of the Republic acting on
the advice of the Judicial and Legal Service Commission. The Supreme Court is vested
with all the necessary powers for equitable jurisdiction as a Court of Equity. The
Supreme Court also exercises a supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate courts
ensuring justice is duly administered by any court.
The Supreme Court has original civil jurisdiction to hear and determine :
any civil matter, although it will generally deal with matters where the value of the
subject-matter of the claim is more than Rs 2,000,000:
The Supreme Court also convey all criminal proceedings through its Criminal Division
(Assizes), under any law other than a disciplinary law with full powers and jurisdiction
conferred upon it by the Constitution or any other law.
The Master and Registrar (M&R) and the Deputy Master and Registrar are officers of
the Supreme Court having more than 5 years of experience as barristers. Their duties
concern mostly the financial administration of the Supreme Court such as (section 19 of
the Courts Act) ''taxing of costs, conducting and managing judicial sales, probate of
wills and the matters connected therewith, interdictions and local examinations, and to
deal with matters of audit, inquiry and accounts and generally all such matters that may
be referred to him by the Chief Justice or the Judges''. Both the M&R and the Deputy
M&R are qualified to become judge in the Supreme Court.
The Master & Registrar together is the judge responsible for the Bankruptcy division of
the Supreme Court. Cases of insolvency, winding up of companies are referred to within
the jurisdiction of the bankruptcy division. The Master & Registrar and the Deputy
Master & Registrar shall have the same powers of a judge in Bankruptcy.
Chamber Jurisdiction
Section 71 of the Courts Act sets out the matters which may be disposed of by the
Judge sitting in chambers.
A Judge may, whether in term or vacation, grant an injunction subject to a motion to the
court to set aside the injunction.
- Swearing of affidavits;
- Reinstatement of minor;
- Conciliator between neighbours and spouses though advice does not have force of
law;
- Payment of alimony.
For example:
Appeals from the Industrial Court go to the Supreme Court. Appeal must be made within
21 days like any other appeal to the Supreme Court. Review refers the case to a
Reviewing Authority. If the Chief Justice grants the application, a day is fixed for
hearing. The opinion of the receiving authority is transmitted to the magistrate of the
Industrial Court and becomes the judgement of the Industrial Court. However, an appeal
can be made against the judgement in the Supreme Court.
Upon an appeal to the Supreme Court, the judgement was set aside by the Chief justice
concluding that the act of reallocation of funds was merely to effect payments from his
ministry without his personal implication in the decision process. Therefore no conflict of
interest was intended by Pravind Jugnauth at that time according to the judgement.
Following the judgement of the Supreme Court, the Director of Public Prosecution
appealed to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council for clarifications upon the
judgement of the Supreme Court. The Law Lords dismissed the appeal of the DPP and
the Judgement of the Supreme Court was retained.
Conclusion
The Medpoint case involved three instances of the Judiciary System of Mauritius for
nearly 8 years. This shows how complex issues can be when cases are on trials. This
also portrays the importance of having different jurisdictions for different types of cases
in different courts. All the courts forming part of the Mauritian Legal System have an
important role to the safeguard of people's rights and to the conduct of fair trials. That is
why new laws are constantly being enacted by the Legislative and new divisions of
different courts are always being created to better service the needs of the population in
terms of legal assistance in a changing social, economic and political environment.
References:
Open University Manual
http://supremecourt.govmu.org
http://jcpc.uk