APPENDIX 3-1a

Doc. Ref. No. Issue Version Date

UTP-ACA-PROG-FYP-01.01a 6.0 Sept 2019

FORM 01A

FINAL YEAR PROJECT TITLE PROPOSAL

Project Title:

Proposer’s Name :___________________________________Student’s ID:_________

Proposer's e-mail address: H/P No: ________________
CGPA: Total Credit Hours This Semester:
Area / specialization:
Suggested supervisor (if any) : _____________________________________________
Collaborator(s) (if any) :
Problem Statement:

Objectives:

Pre-requisite (if any):

Short summary of the research project:

Tools/equipment required:
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________

1
 APPENDIX 3-1b
Doc. Ref. No. Issue Version Date
UTP-ACA-PROG-FYP-01.01b 6.0 Sept 2019

FORM 01B

FINAL YEAR PROJECT TITLE PROPOSAL

Project Title:

Supervisor’s Name: _____________________________________________________

Area / specialization: ____________________________________________________
Collaborator(s) (if any) :
Co-Supervisor (s) (if any) :
Project Background :

Problem Statement:

Objectives:

Tools/equipment required:
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________

Project Deliverables:
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________

2
 APPENDIX 3-2

Doc. Ref. No. Issue Version Date

UTP-ACA-PROG-FYP-01.02 6.0 Sept 2019

FORM 02

TOPIC SELECTION

(To be completed by student in 2 copies.)

Semester : Year: _________________________

Name : _________________________________________________________
Student’s ID : ____________________________ Programme: __________________

List of topic chosen (ranking in order of preference):

Proj. No. Proj. Title Supervisor

1
2
3

Justification for the chosen topics:

____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
Students should return this form at least one week before the start of the semester to the
respective department Final Year Project Coordinator

COMMITTEE DECISION

Topic approved: _____________________________________________

Approved by FYP Coordinator

(only for Supervisor-allocated titles)
Signature:

Official stamp:

Date:

3
 APPENDIX 3-3

Doc. Ref. No. Issue Version Date

UTP-ACA-PROG-FYP-01.03 6.0 Sept 2019

FORM 03

FINAL YEAR PROJECT REQUISITION FORM

(Note: Supervisor can use this form to request (a) purchasing consumables and equipment , (b) testing /
technical support, (c) consultations fees and other related resources to the project, (d) visit for data
collection.)

REQUESTED BY
Supervisor’s Name
Project Title
Supervisor’s Signature
Student’s Name
Date

No. Description Purpose Quantity Estimated Cost

ENDORSEMENT BY CO-ORDINATOR/ APPROVAL BY COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN

LABORATORY EXECUTIVE
Name Name
Programme Programme
Signature Signature
Date Date
Comment: Approval
Approve Not Approve
Comment:

* Please attach this form with original receipt or any proof of purchase.
* Students are not entitled to claim for the cost of printing hard-bound thesis

4
 Doc. Ref. No. Issue Version Date APPENDIX 3-4
UTP-ACA-PROG-FYP-01.04 6.0 Sept 2019
FORM 04

FYP I – PROGRESS ASSESSMENT 1

(To be completed by Supervisor)

Dinnassh A/L A Ganesh
Student’s Name : __________________________________________ 24259
Student’s ID: ____________ Mechanical Engineering
Programme : _______________________________________________

Project Title : Economic Production Quantity Model for Continuous Production System : Case of Chilled Water Generation, Storage and Distribution.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Evaluation
Very Weak (1) Weak (2) Fair (3) Good (4) Very Good (5) Multiplier Marks
criteria
Interest Lack of interest in exploring Demonstrate limited interest Demonstrate moderate Demonstrate good interest Demonstrate excellent
issues for a given task in exploring issues for a interest in exploring issues in exploring issues for a interest in exploring issues x1
given task for a given task given task for a given task
Initiative Lack of initiative to Demonstrate limited Demonstrate moderate Demonstrate good initiative Demonstrate excellent
complete a task initiative to complete a task initiative to complete a task to complete a task initiative to complete a task x1

Effort Lack of effort to complete Minimal effort to complete Moderate effort to complete Good effort to complete Excellent effort to complete
task task task task task x1

Self- • Not able to self-learn
Learning • Did not understand
project and lack of self-
initiative in handling and
planning the task for the
project
• Limited ability to self-
learn
• Have low understanding
on the project and show
minimal self-initiative in
handling and planning of
the tasks for the project
• Moderate ability to • Good ability to self-learn • Excellent ability to self-
self-learn • Understood most part of learn
• Understood some part the project and show • Understood the project
of the project and show good self-initiative in well and show excellent
x1
moderate self-initiative handling and planning of self-initiative in in
in in handling and the tasks for the project handling and planning of
planning of the tasks the tasks for the project
for the project
Total Score / 20

Comments:

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

.…………………………………………..…
Supervisor’s Signature
Name:
Date:

5
 Doc. Ref. No. Issue Version Date APPENDIX 3-5
UTP-ACA-PROG-FYP-01.05a 6.0 Sept 2019

FORM 05

FYP I – PROPOSAL DEFENCE

(To be completed by Supervisor/ Examiner)

Dinnassh A/L A Ganesh

Student’s Name : __________________________________________ 24259
Student’s ID: ____________ Programme Mechanical Engineering
: _______________________________________________
Project Title Economic Production Quantity Model for Continuous Production System : Case of Chilled Water Generation, Storage and Distribution.
: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Evaluation
Very Weak (1) Weak (2) Fair (3) Good (4) Very Good (5) Multiplier Marks
criteria

Able to present the research

Not able to present research Able to present research Able to present research Able to present the research
Subject ideas* and its implementation
ideas* and its ideas* and its implementation ideas* and implementation ideas* professionally and
knowledge professionally and clearly, x5
implementation clearly and with limited clarity and fairly clearly and require clearly, with some concern on
and content showing mastery of the
require major improvements require further improvements minor improvements its implementation
materials.

Able to deliver research ideas

Confident Not able to deliver research Able to deliver research ideas
with limited confidence and Able to deliver research ideas
delivery of ideas confidently, with poor with fair confidence, with Able to deliver research ideas
occasional use of filler word, confidently, with good x1
research language choice and little use of filler words, and with excellent confidence
thus requiring major language choice and tone
ideas frequent use of filler words require minor improvements
improvements

Effective
and
Able to deliver research ideas Able to deliver research ideas Able to deliver research ideas
articulate Not able to deliver research Able to deliver research ideas
with limited effect and fairly effectively and require with great effect and x1
delivery of ideas effectively effectively and articulately
require major improvements minor improvements articulate
research
ideas

Able to use visual aids /

Use of Able to use visual aids /
Not able to use visual aids / Able to use visual aids / Able to use visual aids / supporting materials that
visual aids supporting materials that
supporting materials supporting materials with supporting materials that significantly support the
and shows enhanced x1
effectively (disorganised minimum impact, requiring shows general understanding research ideas and shows
supportive understanding of the research
slides, unreadable materials) major improvement of the research ideas excellent understanding on
materials ideas.
the research ideas

6
 Doc. Ref. No. Issue Version Date APPENDIX 3-5
UTP-ACA-PROG-FYP-01.05b 6.0 Sept 2019
FORM 05

FYP I – PROPOSAL DEFENCE

Evaluation
Very Weak (1) Weak (2) Fair (3) Good (4) Very Good (5) Multiplier Marks
criteria

Able to understand and

Response to Not able to understand and
questions respond to a question
Able to understand and Able to fully understand and
answer questions but not able Able to understand and
answer questions responds to questions x1
to accurately answer the answer questions well
satisfactorily extremely well
question

Total Score / 45

Comments:

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

.…………………………………………..…
Supervisor’s / Examiner’s Signature
Name:
Date:

7
 Doc. Ref. No. Issue Version Date APPENDIX 3-6
UTP-ACA-PROG-FYP-01.06 6.0 Sept 2019
FORM 06

FYP I – PROGRESS ASSESSMENT 2

(To be completed by Supervisor)

Dinnassh A/L A Ganesh
Student’s Name : __________________________________________ 24259
Student’s ID: ____________ Mechanical Engineering
Programme : _______________________________________________
Project Title Economic Production Quantity Model For Continuous Production System : Case of Chilled Water Generation, Storage and Distribution.
: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Evaluation
Very Weak (1) Weak (2) Fair (3) Good (4) Very Good (5) Multiplier Marks
criteria

Work Ethics Practice inappropriate Practice less appropriate Practice good working Practice good working Always practice excellent
working culture such as bad working culture such as culture such as good culture such as good working culture such as
behavior, no punctuality as inconsistent behavior, less moral, timeliness as well moral, timeliness as well good moral, timeliness as
x1
well as not being efficient, punctuality as well as being less as being efficient, as being efficient, well as being efficient,
productive and ethical at work efficient, productive and ethical productive and ethical at productive and ethical at productive and ethical at
in all situations at work in many situations work in general work in most situations work in all situations
Integrity Perform a task with lack of Perform a task with limited Perform a task with Perform a task with trust, Always perform a task
trust, honesty, sincerity and trust, honesty, sincerity and acceptable trust, honesty, honesty, sincerity and with trust, honesty,
x1
transparency transparency sincerity and transparency in most sincerity and transparency
transparency situations in any situation
Work Does not perform assigned Perform assigned tasks within Perform assigned tasks Perform assigned tasks Perform assigned tasks
Responsibility tasks within the scope of work the scope of work with close within the scope of work within the scope of work beyond the scope of work x1
even with close supervision supervision and meet expectation and exceed expectation and exceed expectation
Total Score / 15

Comments:

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

.…………………………………………..…
Supervisor’s Signature
Name:
Date:
8
 Doc. Ref. No. Issue Version Date
APPENDIX 3-7
UTP-ACA-PROG-FYP-01.07a 6.0 Sept 2019
FORM 07

FYP I – PROGRESS MONITORING (To be used together with Form 04 and Form 06)

(To be completed by Supervisor)

PROGRESS MONITORING REPORT

Project title
Student’s Name Student’s ID

Supervisor’s Name Programme

A. PROJECT STATUS
No. Task / Milestone Progress status
Progress Progress Progress Progress Progress Progress
Meeting 1 Meeting 2 Meeting 3 Meeting 4 Meeting 5 Meeting 6

9
 Doc. Ref. No. Issue Version Date
APPENDIX 3-7
UTP-ACA-PROG-FYP-01.07a 6.0 Sept 2019
FORM 07

FYP I – PROGRESS MONITORING (To be used together with Form 04 and Form 06)

B. RISK MANAGEMENT – Please list the identified risk that will delay the project progress, and its mitigation plan.

Student’s Signature:
Date:

Comments:

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

.…………………………………………..…
Supervisor’s Signature
Name:
Date:

10
 Doc. Ref. No. Issue Version Date APPENDIX 3-8
UTP-ACA-PROG-FYP-01.08a 6.0 Sept 2019
FORM 08

FYP I – INTERIM REPORT

(To be completed by Supervisor/ Examiner)

Student’s Name : __________________________________________ Student’s ID: ____________ Programme : ________________________________________________

Project Title : ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

PART A

Evaluation criteria Very Weak (1) Weak (2) Fair (3) Good (4) Very Good (5) Multiplier Marks
ABSTRACT (5)

Abstract is relevant, and

• Problem Abstract is relevant,
Abstract is irrelevant include all elements, Abstract is relevant, clear and
statement Abstract is relevant but include all elements,
and does not provide however, is vague and fail concise description of all
• Objective did not include some of and highlight x1
the summary of the to highlight appropriate elements, highlighting the
• Methodology the elements stated appropriate details
whole project details about the research importance of the research.
• Future work about the research.

Good background of
Background of Background of study is Well written, articulate and
Irrelevant Background of study is study that shows
Study and sufficient to highlight the concise background of study
background of study partially relevant, and connection to the
problem research work, however, that justifies the problem x2
and problem unclear problem problem statement.
statement problem statement is statement. Problem statement is
statement statement Problem statement is
INTRODUCTION (25)

generic and unclear clearly presented.

clearly presented.
Research objectives Research objectives are Research objectives are Research objectives Research objectives are clearly
Objective
irrelevant to the unclear and partially clear, however, partially are clear, relevant to stated and justified towards
problem statement. relevant to the problem relevant to problem problem statement and answering the problem x1
Unachievable within statement. Unachievable statement. Achievable achievable within the statement, and achievable
the time frame within the time frame within the time frame time frame within the time frame
Scope of Study, Scope of Study are relevant to
Scope of Study are Scope of Study are
including Scope of Study are Scope of Study are research objective and clearly
relevant to research relevant to research
relevancy and irrelevant to research partially relevant to stated, highlighting the x1
objectives but poorly objectives and fairly
feasibility objectives research objectives feasibility of the work within
described described
the time frame

11
 Doc. Ref. No. Issue Version Date APPENDIX 3-8
UTP-ACA-PROG-FYP-01.08b 6.0 Sept 2019
FORM 08
FYP I – INTERIM REPORT

Evaluation criteria Very Weak (1) Weak (2) Fair (3) Good (4) Very Good (5) Multiplier Marks

Literature review is
Literature review
LITERATURE REVIEW (30)

comprehensive, critically
Literature review Literature review provides good
Critical analysis, Irrelevant literature analyse previous work
explains previous study, explains previous study discussion on previous
relevancy and review relevant to current studies,
without connecting it to relevant to the current study relevant to the x4
recentness of with proper cross
the current study. Lack study, however, lack in current study, and
literature referencing. Clearly
in critical analysis. critical analysis. sufficiently highlight the
established the importance
problem statement.
of the current work.
Insufficient references, Sufficient references,
Quality of Insufficient Adequate references, Sufficient references, all are
minimal number of almost all are relevant,
references references, none some are relevant, and relevant, and almost all from
reference from and almost all are from x2
(journals/confere from published from published journal / published journal /
published journal / published journal /
nces/etc.) journal / conferences conferences. references
conferences references
Methodology and
Methodology and project
project activities are
Insufficient and Methodology and Methodology and activities are relevant to
METHODOLOGY (15)

Research relevant to achieve the

poorly described project activities are project activities are achieve the objectives and
methodology and objectives and fairly X2
methodology and unsuitable to achieve the partially relevant to comprehensively described,
Project Activities described and
project activities objectives achieve the objectives and highly achievable within
achievable within the
the time frame
time frame

Project milestone
Moderately clear, Exceptionally clear, feasible
and timeline No Project timeline Unclear, unfeasible and Clear, feasible and
feasible but unstructured and very well-structured x1
(Gantt-Chart) (for (Gantt-Chart) unstructured study plans structured study plans
study plans study plans
both semesters)
CONCLUSION

Summary of Insufficient Insufficient conclusion Sufficient conclusion Provide good Provide excellent conclusion
project progress conclusion and and irrelevant with and sufficiently relevant conclusion and that is comprehensive, and
and future work irrelevant with objective. Insufficient with objective. recommendation for recommended future work is
(10)

x2
objective. No future future work Sufficient future work future work, relevant to relevant to objective.
work recommended recommended recommended the objective.

Total Score / 85

12
 Doc. Ref. No. Issue Version Date
APPENDIX 3-8
UTP-ACA-PROG-FYP-01.08c 6.0 Sept 2019
FORM 08

FYP I – INTERIM REPORT

PART B
Evaluation criteria Very Weak (1) Weak (2) Fair (3) Good (4) Very Good (5) Multiplier Marks
Standard Guidelines Report does not Report that has frequent Report that has frequent Report that has some Report that complies
ORGANISATION AND CLARITY (15)

and formatting follow the standard major mistakes with the minor mistakes with the mistakes with the with the standard
x1
guidelines and standard guidelines and standard guidelines and standard guidelines and guidelines and format
formatting format format format
English usage and Very poor English and Poor English and Fair English and writing Good English and writing Excellent English and
writing skills writing skills. writing skills with many skills with noticeable skills with minimal writing skills with no
(writing skills refers spelling and grammar spelling and grammar spelling or grammar spelling or grammar
x1
to clear, coherent mistake mistake mistake mistakes
and systematic
writing of ideas)
Referencing and Most reference are Many reference are Some reference are Most references are cited All references are
citations missing from missing from reference missing from reference in the reference list, cited in the reference
x1
reference list and did list and did not follow list and / or most did not which follow the style list, which follow the
not follow style guide style guide follow style guide guide style guide
Total Score / 15

Comments:
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

.…………………………………………..…
Supervisor’s / Examiner’s Signature
Name:
Date:

13
 Doc. Ref. No. Issue Version Date APPENDIX 3-9
UTP-ACA-PROG-FYP-01.09 6.0 Sept 2019
FORM 09

FYP II – PROGRESS ASSESSMENT 1

(To be completed by Supervisor)

Student’s Name : __________________________________________ Student’s ID: ____________ Programme : _______________________________________________
Project Title : ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Evaluation
Very Weak (1)
criteria
Work Ethics Practice inappropriate
working culture such as bad
behavior, no punctuality as
well as not being efficient,
productive and ethical at
work in all situations
Integrity Perform a task with lack of
trust, honesty, sincerity and
transparency
Work Does not perform assigned
Responsibility tasks within the scope of
work even with close
supervision
Weak (2)
Practice less appropriate
working culture such as
inconsistent behavior, less
punctuality as well as being less
efficient, productive and ethical
at work in many situations
Perform a task with limited
trust, honesty, sincerity and
transparency
Perform assigned tasks within
the scope of work with close
supervision
Fair (3) Good (4)
Practice good working Practice good working
culture such as good culture such as good
moral, timeliness as well moral, timeliness as well
as being efficient, as being efficient,
productive and ethical at productive and ethical at
work in general work in most situations
Perform a task with Perform a task with trust,
acceptable trust, honesty, honesty, sincerity and
sincerity and transparency transparency in most
situations
Perform assigned tasks Perform assigned tasks
within the scope of work within the scope of work
and meet expectation and exceed expectation
Very Good (5) Multiplier Marks
Always practice excellent
working culture such as
good moral, timeliness as
x1
well as being efficient,
productive and ethical at
work in all situations
Always perform a task
with trust, honesty,
x1
sincerity and transparency
in any situation
Perform assigned tasks
beyond the scope of work
x1
and exceed expectation
Total Score / 15

Comments:

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

.…………………………………………..…
Supervisor’s Signature
Name:
Date:

14
 Doc. Ref. No. Issue Version Date APPENDIX 3-10
UTP-ACA-PROG-FYP-01.10a 6.0 Sept 2019
FORM 10

FYP II – PROGRESS ASSESSMENT 2

(To be completed by Supervisor)

Student’s Name : __________________________________________ Student’s ID: ____________ Programme : _______________________________________________

Project Title : _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Evaluation criteria Very Weak (1) Weak (2) Fair (3) Good (4) Very Good (5) Multiplier Marks

• Meet supervisor • Student meet supervisor

PROJECT MANAGEMENT

• Meet supervisor less • Meet supervisor at • Student meet supervisor

less than 4 times more than 7 times during
than 4 times during the least 5 times during the at least 7 times during the
during the the semester
semester semester semester
semester • Student shows
• Shows very little • Shows moderate • Student shows
Progress • Never show any improvement as per
improvement on improvement on improvement as per
discussion and improvement on project timeline as well
research / project research / project project timeline on x2
time research / project as able to constructively
progress during progress during research / project
management progress during discuss the research /
discussion with discussion with progress during
discussion with project progress the
supervisor supervisor discussion with
supervisor during discussion with
• Almost always late for • Sometimes late for supervisor
• Always late for supervisor
meeting meeting • Punctual most of the time
meeting • Always punctual

15
 Doc. Ref. No. Issue Version Date APPENDIX 3-10
UTP-ACA-PROG-FYP-01.10b 6.0 Sept 2019
FORM 10

FYP II – PROGRESS ASSESSMENT 2

Evaluation criteria Very Weak (1) Weak (2) Fair (3) Good (4) Very Good (5) Multiplier Marks
• Research / project
• Research / project • Research / project
work does not • Research / project
PROJECT MANAGEMENT

work follows the work follows the

follow the • Research / project work work follows the
proposed methodology proposed methodology
proposed follows the proposed proposed
Project with major with minor
methodology methodology methodology x1
implementation modification modification
• Less than 20% key • 80% of key milestone • All key milestone
• 40% key milestone • 60% key milestone
milestone achieved within timeline achieved within
achieved within achieved within
achieved within timeline
timeline timeline
timeline
Unable to identify
Risk identified, but no
Risk any risk that may Risk identified, and 50% Risk identified, and 80% of Risk identified, and all risk
action taken to mitigate x1
Management delay the project of risk are mitigated risk are mitigated are mitigated
risk
completion
Total Score / 20

Comments:

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

.…………………………………………..…
Supervisor’s Signature
Name:
Date:

16
 Doc. Ref. No. Issue Version Date
APPENDIX 3-11
UTP-ACA-PROG-FYP-01.11a 6.0 Sept 2019
FORM 11

FYP II – PROGRESS MONITORING (To be used together with Form 09 & Form 10)

(To be completed by Supervisor)

PROGRESS MONITORING REPORT

Project title
Student’s Name Student’s ID

Supervisor’s Name Programme

A. PROJECT STATUS

No. Task / Milestone Progress status

Progress Progress Progress Progress Progress Progress
Meeting 1 Meeting 2 Meeting 3 Meeting 4 Meeting 5 Meeting 6

17
 Doc. Ref. No. Issue Version Date
APPENDIX 3-11
UTP-ACA-PROG-FYP-01.11b 6.0 Sept 2019
FORM 11

FYP II – PROGRESS MONITORING (To be used together with Form 09 & Form 10)

B. RISK MANAGEMENT – Please list the identified risk that will delay the project progress, and its mitigation plan.

Student’s Signature:
Date:

Comments:

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

.…………………………………………..…
Supervisor’s Signature
Name:
Date:

18
 Doc. Ref. No. Issue Version Date APPENDIX 3-12
UTP-ACA-PROG-FYP-01.12 6.0 Sept 2019
FORM 12

FYP II – PRACTICAL SKILLS (FOR FACULTY OF SCIENCE & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ONLY)

(To be completed by Supervisor)

Student’s Name : __________________________________________ Student’s ID: ____________ Programme : _______________________________________________

Project Title : ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Evaluation criteria Very Weak (1) Weak (2) Fair (3) Good (4) Very Good (5) Multiplier Marks

Lack of original idea Good original idea to Excellent new and

Weak idea to solve the Moderate idea to solve
Originality to solve the research solve the research original idea to solve x1
research problem the research problem
PRACTICAL SKILLS

problem problem the research problem

Critical Lack of attention to Limited attention to Moderate attention to Good attention to Mindful of research
x1
observation research activities research activities research activities research activities activities
Lack of analysis of Limited analysis of Moderate analysis of Acceptable analysis of Clear and extensive
Critical
results to form results to form results to form results to form analysis of results to x1
thinking
conclusions conclusions conclusions conclusions form conclusions
Lack of
Demonstrate limited Moderate Good Excellent
curiosity/motivation
Curiosity curiosity/motivation to curiosity/motivation to curiosity/motivation in curiosity/motivation in x1
to complete the
complete the project complete the project completing the project completing the project
project

Total Score / 20

Comments:

.…………………………………………..…
Supervisor’s Signature
Name:
Date:

19

(To be completed by Supervisor/ Examiner)
Student’s Name : __________________________________________ Student’s ID: ____________
Project Title : ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Evaluation criteria Very Weak (1)
• Not able to present
research outcome*
clearly
Subject knowledge
• Presentation contains
and content
multiple fact errors,
some are major in
nature
Not able to deliver
research outcome*
Confident delivery
confidently, with poor
of research ideas
language choice and
frequent use of filler words
Effective and Not able to deliver
articulate delivery research outcome*
of research ideas effectively
Doc. Ref. No. Issue Version Date APPENDIX 3-13
UTP-ACA-PROG-FYP-01.13a 6.0 Sept 2019
FORM 13
FYP II – VIVA
Programme : _______________________________________________
Weak (2) Fair (3) Good (4) Very Good (5) Multiplier Mark
• Able to present the
• Able to present the research outcome*
• Able to present research • Able to present
research outcome* professionally and
outcome* with limited research outcome*
professionally and clearly, showing
clarity fairly clearly x5
clearly mastery of the
• Presentation contains • Presentation contains
• Major facts are materials.
multiple fact errors minimal fact errors
accurate • Facts presented are
accurate
Able to deliver research Able to deliver research
outcome* with limited outcome* with moderate Able to deliver research
Able to deliver research
confidence and occasional confidence, with little outcome* confidently,
outcome* with excellent x1
use of filler word, thus use of filler word, thus with good language
confidence
requiring major require minor choice and tone
improvements improvements
Able to deliver research Able to deliver research
Able to deliver research Able to deliver research
outcome* with limited outcome* with moderate
outcome* effectively and outcome* with great effect x1
effect and require major effect and require minor
articulately and articulate
improvements improvements
20
 Doc. Ref. No. Issue Version Date APPENDIX 3-13
UTP-ACA-PROG-FYP-01.13b 6.0 Sept 2019
FORM 13

FYP II – VIVA

Evaluation criteria Very Weak (1) Weak (2) Fair (3) Good (4) Very Good (5) Multiplier Mark

Use of visual aids

Not able to use visual aids Able to use visual aids / Able to use visual aids / Able to use visual aids / Able to use visual aids /
and supportive
/ supporting materials supporting materials with supporting materials that supporting materials that supporting materials and
materials
effectively (disorganised minimum impact, shows general shows good shows excellent x1
(including product
slides, unreadable requiring major understanding of the understanding of the understanding on the
demo, if
materials) improvement research outcome* research outcome* . research outcome*
applicable)

Able to understand and

Able to understand and Able to fully understand
Response to Not able to understand and answer questions but not Able to understand and
answer questions and responds to questions x1
questions respond to a question able to accurately answer answer questions well
satisfactorily extremely well
the question

Total Score / 45

Comments:

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

.…………………………………………..…
Supervisor’s / Examiner’s Signature
Name:
Date:

21
 Doc. Ref. No. Issue Version Date APPENDIX 3-14
UTP-ACA-PROG-FYP-01.14a 6.0 Sept 2019
FORM 14

FYP II – DISSERTATION

(To be completed by Supervisor/ Examiner)

Student’s Name : __________________________________________ Student’s ID: ____________ Programme : _______________________________________________

Project Title : ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

PART A

Evaluation criteria
Very Weak (1) Weak (2) Fair (3) Good (4) Very Good (5) Multiplier Marks

• Problem Abstract is Abstract is relevant, and

Abstract is relevant, Abstract is relevant, clear and
Abstract (10)

statement irrelevant and does Abstract is relevant but include all elements,
include all elements, and concise description of all
• Objective not provide the did not include some of however, is vague and fail x2
highlight appropriate elements, highlighting the
• Methodology summary of the the elements stated to highlight appropriate
details about the research. importance of the research.
• Future work whole project details about the research

Good background of
Background of study is Well written, articulate and
• Background Irrelevant Background of study is study that shows
sufficient to highlight the concise background of study
of study and background of partially relevant, and connection to the problem
research work, however, that justifies the problem x1
problem study and problem unclear problem statement. Problem
problem statement is statement. Problem statement is
statement statement statement statement is clearly
generic and unclear clearly presented.
Introduction (10)

presented.

• Research • Research objectives

• Research objectives are
objectives are unclear and • Research objectives
• Research objectives clear and justified towards
• Objective irrelevant to partially relevant to are clear, however,
are clear and relevant answering the problem
and scope of the problem the problem partially relevant to
to problem statement statement
study statement. statement. problem statement.
• Scope of Study are • Scope of Study are x1
• Scope of • Scope of Study are • Scope of Study
relevant to research relevant to research
Study are partially relevant to partially relevant to
objectives and objective and clearly
irrelevant to research objectives research objectives,
sufficiently described described, highlighting the
research and poorly and fairly described
limitation of the study
objectives described

22
 Doc. Ref. No. Issue Version Date
UTP-ACA-PROG-FYP-01.14b 6.0 Sept 2019 APPENDIX 3-14

FORM 14

FYP II – DISSERTATION

Very Weak (1) Weak (2) Fair (3) Good (4) Very Good (5) Multiplier
Evaluation criteria Marks

Critical
Irrelevant literature
Literature Review (10)
Literature review is
Literature review provides
Literature review Literature review explains comprehensive, critically
good discussion on

analysis, explains previous study, previous study relevant to analyse previous work relevant
review previous study relevant to
relevancy and without connecting it to the current study, to current studies, with proper x1
the current study, and
recentness of the current study. Lack however, lack in critical cross referencing. Clearly
sufficiently highlight the
literature in critical analysis. analysis. established the importance of
problem statement.
the current work.
Insufficient Insufficient references, Sufficient references,
Quality of Adequate references,
references, none minimal number of almost all are relevant, Sufficient references, all are
references some are relevant, and
from published reference from and almost all are from relevant, and almost all from x1
(journals/confe from published journal /
journal / published journal / published journal / published journal / references
rences/etc.) conferences.
conferences conferences references

Methodology is relevant Methodology is relevant to

Insufficient and Methodology is Methodology is partially to achieve the objectives achieve the objectives and
Research
poorly described unsuitable to achieve relevant to achieve the and fairly described and comprehensively described, x1
methodology (5)
methodology the objectives objectives achievable within the time and highly achievable within
frame the time frame

23
 Doc. Ref. No. Issue Version Date
UTP-ACA-PROG-FYP-01.14c 6.0 Sept 2019 APPENDIX 3-14

FORM 14

FYP II – DISSERTATION

Evaluation criteria Very Weak (1) Weak (2) Fair (3) Good (4) Very Good (5) Multiplier Marks

Result and • All results do • Few results validate • Few, or most results • Results validate most of • Results validate most
discussion (40) not meet the some of the project validate some of the the research / project of the research / project
research / objectives project objectives objectives objectives
project • Analysis and • Analysis and • Analysis and presentation • Analysis and
objectives discussion of the discussion of the of results are correct, but presentation of results
results are poor or results are correct does not linked to theory are correct, critically
x8
inaccurate • Significance of results analysed and linked to
mentioned but deviation theory
from literature is not • Significance of results
properly discussed. and its deviation from
literature is sufficiently
discussed.
Conclusion & • Insufficient • Insufficient • Most conclusion is • Provide good conclusion • Provide excellent
recommendation conclusion and conclusion and relevant with relevant to the objective conclusion that is
(10) irrelevant with irrelevant with objective, but some • Future work recommended comprehensive
objective. objective. are not clearly is related to the research • Future work
• No future work • Insufficient future written. and briefly described. recommended is x2
recommended work related to the • Future work related to the research
research / project recommended is is well described.
recommended related to the research
and briefly outlined.

Total Score / 85

24

PART B
Evaluation criteria
Standard Guidelines and
formatting
ORGANISATION AND CLARITY
English usage and writing Very poor English
skills English usage and
writing skills (writing skills
(15)
refers to clear, coherent and
systematic writing of ideas)
Referencing and citations
Comments:
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Doc. Ref. No. Issue Version Date
UTP-ACA-PROG-FYP-01.14d 6.0 Sept 2019 APPENDIX 3-14
FORM 14
FYP II – DISSERTATION
Very Weak (1) Weak (2) Fair (3) Good (4) Very Good (5) Multiplier Marks
Report does not Report that has frequent Report that has frequent Report that has some Report that complies with
follow the standard major mistakes with the minor mistakes with the mistakes with the the standard guidelines
x1
guidelines and standard guidelines and standard guidelines and standard guidelines and format
formatting format format and format
Poor English and Fair English and writing Good English and Excellent English and
and writing skills. writing skills with many skills with noticeable writing skills with writing skills with no
spelling and grammar spelling and grammar minimal spelling or spelling or grammar x1
mistake mistake grammar mistake mistakes
Most references are Many references are Some references are Most references are All references are cited in
missing from missing from reference missing from reference cited in the reference the reference list, which
reference list and did list and did not follow list and / or most did not list, which follow the follow the style guide x1
not follow style style guide follow style guide style guide
guide
Total Score / 15
.…………………………………………..…
Supervisor’s / Examiner’s Signature
Name:
Date:
25
26