Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bilgiçli2007 - Bolachas Fibras
Bilgiçli2007 - Bolachas Fibras
www.elsevier.com/locate/jfoodeng
a
Department of Food Engineering, Agricultural College, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey
b
Department of Food Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Gaziantep University, 27310 Gaziantep, Turkey
Abstract
Cookie samples were prepared with 0–30% of the wheat flour substituted with fibres from apple, lemon, wheat and wheat bran. The
effects of increased levels of fibres from different sources on the nutritional properties of cookie samples were investigated (i.e. in vitro
protein digestibility, phytic acid content, total antioxidant capacity and total phenolic compounds). It was found that increasing fibre
from apple, lemon and wheat sources did not change the nutritional status of the samples to a great extent (p < 0.05). However, addition
of wheat bran significantly reduced the nutritional properties of the cookie samples.
2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
0260-8774/$ - see front matter 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.09.009
N. Bilgiçli et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 78 (2007) 86–89 87
dietary fibre and antioxidant properties, wheat bran is fibre was kindly supplied by Inallar Gı́da (Konya, Turkey).
widely used in cookies. However, it contains relatively lower Wheat bran used was obtained from a commercial wheat
dietary fibre, higher amount of crude fat and higher phytic flour company (Selva Gı́da, Konya, Turkey). The xylanase
acid content when compared to wheat fibre (Özavar, 2004). enzyme was a commercial mixture (endo-1,4 B–D xylanase,
Enzymes can be added to cereal products to increase the 10,000 Xyl u/ml) and obtained from Polen Gı́da (Istanbul,
water holding capacity and to improve the softness and Turkey). The SSL (sodium stearoyl lactylate) emulsifier
elasticity of the resulting doughs with an improved texture used was obtained from Trend Gı́da (Konya, Turkey).
and volume of the final product. Xylanase enzyme breaks The approximate chemical composition of the wheat four
down insoluble components of the cell walls (i.e. pentozans) and fibre sources used are given in Table 1.
resulted in solubilization of the component (Hilhorst, 1999).
The addition of various enzymes such as hemicellulase, 2.2. Methods
pentosanase, amylase, lipase, glucooxidase, cellulase and
xylanase on the chemical, physical and sensory properties 2.2.1. Cookie preparation
of bread has been studied extensively. Protein digestibility Wire-cut cookies were prepared according to the basic
is an important factor when assessing the protein quality formula given in Table 2 (AACC Method No: 10–54,
and nutritional status of a food product (Hsu, Vavak, 1990). The 15%, 20%, and 30% of the wheat flour used
Satterlee, & Miller, 1977). To the best of our knowledge, was replaced with different fibres. Xylanase enzyme was
there is limited research on the effect of fibre addition on added to the formulation at a level of 0.4%, based on the
the nutritional properties of xylanase enzyme added cook- total weight of the mixture. A control sample including
ies. The purpose of this study was to partially replace wheat no fibre and enzyme was also prepared (Table 2). The mix-
flour in the formulation of wire-cut cookies with different ture was kneaded using a laboratory type mixer for 10 min
sources of dietary fibre (i.e. lemon, apple, wheat fibres low speed. The resulting dough was manually shaped into
and wheat bran) on the levels of 15%, 20% and 30% (w/w, circular form (diameter: 50 mm, thickness: 5 mm). The
based on the wheat flour used) when used with 0.4% xylan- cookies were baked in an air oven at 180 C for 17 min.
ase enzyme and to measure the nutritional properties of The cookies were cooled down to room temperature prior
resulting cookies (i.e. in vitro protein digestibility, phytic to analysis (18–20 C).
acid content, total antioxidant capacity and total phenolic
compounds).
Table 1
Chemical and nutritional properties of wheat flour and fibre sources used in cookie production (mean ± SD, %, w/w, dry basis)*
Wheat flour Apple fibre Lemon fibre Wheat fibre Wheat bran
Moisture 14.21 ± 0.2 (a) 7.18 ± 0.1 (d) 8.20 ± 0.3 (c) 9.48 ± 0.4 (b) 7.21 ± 0.2 (d)
Crude protein (N · 5.7) 8.53 ± 0.5 (b) 0.93 ± 0.1 (c) 0.45 ± 0.1 (c) 0.40 ± 0.1 (c) 14.03 ± 0.3 (a)
Crude fat 1.55 ± 0.1 (c) 3.42 ± 0.1 (b) 0.54 ± 0.0 (d) 0.22 ± 0.0 (e) 5.63 ± 0.0 (a)
Crude ash 0.58 ± 0.1 (d) 1.47 ± 0.1 (b) 1.74 ± 0.1 (b) 1.03 ± 0.0 (c) 4.21 ± 0.1 (a)
Phytic acid (mg/100 g) 497.2 ± 3.11 (b) 41.5 ± 0.71 (d) 37.2 ± 1.71 (d) 57.1 ± 0.28 (c) 3348.8 ± 5.37 (a)
Total antioxidant capacity 24.06 ± 0.08 (a) 23.15 ± 0.89 (a) 24.24 ± 0.34 (a) 23.34 ± 0.72 (a) 19.82 ± 1.22 (c)
(mmol Trolox equiv/g dry sample)
Total phenolic compounds 1.218 ± 0.01 (b) 1.243 ± 0.02 (ab) 0.486 ± 0.11 (c) 0.340 ± 0.03 (c) 1.463 ± 0.05 (a)
(mM gallic acid/g dry sample)
In vitro protein digestibility 76.82 ± 2.57 (a) 66.03 ± 1.46 (b) 67.85 ± 0.21 (b) 65.18 ± 0.25 (bc) 62.36 ± 0.51 (c)
*
Figures in the same raw sharing a common letter in parentheses are not significantly different (p < 0.05).
88 N. Bilgiçli et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 78 (2007) 86–89
Table 3
Nutritional properties of cookies with added fibre (mean ± SD)*
Fibre source Fibre level (%) Phytic acid Total antioxidant activity Total phenolic compounds In vitro protein
(mg/100 g) (mmol Trolox equiv/g dry sample) (mM gallic acid/g dry sample) digestibility (%)
Apple 0 226. 2 ± 1.70 (a) 22.47 ± 0.10 (a) 1.21 ± 0.16 (b) 73.89 ± 0.13 (a)
15 207.4 ± 0.85 (b) 21.59 ± 0.13 (b) 1.25 ± 0.10 (ab) 70.92 ± 0.03 (b)
20 200.0 ± 1.41 (c) 21.44 ± 0.06 (b) 1.26 ± 0.08 (ab) 70.72 ± 0.10 (b)
30 183.3 ± 2.4 (d) 21.16 ± 0.08 (c) 1.30 ± 0.11 (a) 70.05 ± 0.07 (c)
Lemon 0 219.1 ± 5.8 (a) 22.21 ± 0.01 (b) 1.22 ± 0.03 (a) 71.95 ± 0.14 (a)
15 198.9 ± 2.69 (ab) 22.26 ± 0.08 (b) 1.20 ± 0.01 (ab) 71.35 ± 0.13 (b)
20 185.1 ± 7.21 (b) 22.51 ± 0.01 (a) 1.15 ± 0.03 (bc) 71.00 ± 0.00 (b)
30 162.8 ± 3.96 (c) 22.63 ± 0.04 (a) 1.12 ± 0.00 (c) 70.54 ± 0.16 (c)
Wheat 0 222.4 ± 3.68 (a) 22.27 ± 0.10 (a) 1.21 ± 0.01 (a) 71.81 ± 0.13 (a)
15 212.1 ± 8.34 (ab) 21.98 ± 0.11 (b) 1.20 ± 0.02 (a) 69.42 ± 0.11 (b)
20 203.5 ± 4.95 (b) 21.87 ± 0.10 (bc) 1.19 ± 0.07 (a) 69.50 ± 0.04 (b)
30 178.0 ± 1.41 (c) 21.71 ± 0.01 (c) 1.18 ± 0.01 (a) 68.89 ± 0.04 (c)
Wheat bran 0 223.7 ± 5.23 (d) 22.40 ± 0.03 (a) 1.22 ± 0.01 (b) 71.80 ± 0.14 (a)
15 475.5 ± 7.78 (c) 21.06 ± 0.08 (ab) 1.25 ± 0.01 (b) 68.03 ± 0.10 (b)
20 525.5 ± 7.78 (b) 20.56 ± 0.08 (b) 1.32 ± 0.28 (a) 66.45 ± 0.07 (c)
30 714.2 ± 6.79 (a) 20.36 ± 0.11 (b) 1.38 ± 0.07 (a) 65.04 ± 0.06 (d)
*
Figures in the same column sharing a common letter in parentheses are not significantly different (p < 0.05).