The document discusses two assessment scenarios and determines their validity.
For the first scenario, a new shorter intelligence test was compared to a well-established intelligence test. The tests were given to students with only a few days between. The results from both tests revealed a high correlation. This assessment is valid because it demonstrates test-retest reliability, with the short interval resulting in a high correlation.
For the second scenario, graduating students took a simulated licensure examination a few months before the actual licensure exam. The results of the simulated exam did not correlate significantly with the actual licensure exam scores.
The document discusses two assessment scenarios and determines their validity.
For the first scenario, a new shorter intelligence test was compared to a well-established intelligence test. The tests were given to students with only a few days between. The results from both tests revealed a high correlation. This assessment is valid because it demonstrates test-retest reliability, with the short interval resulting in a high correlation.
For the second scenario, graduating students took a simulated licensure examination a few months before the actual licensure exam. The results of the simulated exam did not correlate significantly with the actual licensure exam scores.
The document discusses two assessment scenarios and determines their validity.
For the first scenario, a new shorter intelligence test was compared to a well-established intelligence test. The tests were given to students with only a few days between. The results from both tests revealed a high correlation. This assessment is valid because it demonstrates test-retest reliability, with the short interval resulting in a high correlation.
For the second scenario, graduating students took a simulated licensure examination a few months before the actual licensure exam. The results of the simulated exam did not correlate significantly with the actual licensure exam scores.
Assessment Scenarios I. For each of the following situations, determine whether the assessment is valid. Explain the answer in two or three sentences citing the type of validity. Scenario 1. Test constructor in elementary school designed a new measurement procedure to measure intellectual ability. Compared to a well-established measure of intellectual ability the new test is shorter to reduce the arduous effect of a long test on students. To determine its effectiveness, a sample of students accomplished two sets- a standardized intelligence test and the new test with only a few days interval. Results from both assessments revealed high correlation. The assessment is valid. To determine the assessment’s validity, they used Test-retest reliability. The interval of the two test is only few days which means it has high correlation. According to Test-retest reliability, the shorter the interval, the higher the correlation. And a higher correlation means the assessment is reliable or valid. Scenario 2. After the review sessions, a simulated examination was given to graduating students, a few months before the Licensure Examination for Teacher (LET). When the results of the LET came out the review coordinator found out that the result in the simulated (mock up) examination are not significantly coordinated with the LET scores.