PROJECT ASSESSMENT RUBRICS

ARRANGED BY :

GROUP III
ANAYOSI BR GINTING (4183322002)
LUNI KARLINA MANIK (4182121021)
MUHAMMAD AINAL (4181121004)
PATRICIA SINABUTAR (4182121014)

Class : Bilingual Physics 18

Course : Authentic Assessment
Lecture : Sabani, S.Pd, M.Si

DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS
FACULTY OF MATHEMATICS AND NATURAL SCIENCE
MEDAN STATE UNIVERSITY
2020
 1

LP. 1 Project Assessment Sheet

PROJECT ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS

Subjects :
Physics Class / Semester :
X / 2 Competence Basic :
Theory : Optics

Group : ………………………….
The project name : ……………………........

Score
No. Aspect
1 2 3 4 5
1 Planning: Title
Formulation topic
Project diagram

2 Implementation
Writing system
Accuracy of data sources / information.
Quantity of data sources
Data analysis
Draw conclusions
3 Project report
The list of references can be accounted for
Conclusions in accordance with the formulation of
the problem
Presentation and mastery
Total score
 2

Example of Assessment Guidelines

The components Criteria Score

are
rated
In accordance with the learning material, original, contextual 5
In accordance with the learning material, original, not contextual 4
Topics In accordance with the learning material, not original, contextual 3
In accordance with the learning material, not original, not contextual 2
Not according to the learning material, not original, not contextual 1
Reflecting relationships, there are opportunities for discovery 5
Reflecting relationships, there is no chance of discovery 4
Project Diagram Less reflective of relationships, there is a chance of discovery 3
Less reflective of relationships, there is a chance of discovery 2
Doesn't diagram 1
Complete, systematic, methodological 5
Complete, less systematic, methodological 4
Project process
Complete, systematic, less methodological 3
stages
Complete, less systematic, less methodological 2
Incomplete, less systematic, less methodological 1
According to the project stages, the schedule is clear, there is a 5
progress sheet
According to the project stage, the schedule is clear, there is no 4
Monitoring progress sheet
According to the project stage, the schedule is not clear, there is a 3
progress sheet
According to the project stage, the schedule is not clear, there is no 2
progress sheet
Not according to the project stage 1

Scoring Guidelines
Aspects measured : 11
Maximum score : 11 x 5 =55

final score = total score

𝑥100
maximum score
 3

LP. 3 Psychomotor Assessment Sheet

Assessment
Reference
No. Performance Task Details Score by
Score
Lecturer
1. Stringing Tools:
a. Skilled in assembling tools according 5
to the image including adjusting the
stative position 3
b. Don't know the correct arrangement of tools. 0
c. Does not do anything
2. Using Tools:
a. Deft but still careful to change weights 5
b. Not deft or careless in changing the
load 3
c. Doing nothing
0
3. Observe:
a. Read the number designation on the 5
measuring instrument in the correct
position 3
b. Read the numerical designation on the
measuring instrument in an incorrect 0
position
c. Doing nothing
4. Making conclusions:
a. Make correct conclusions and in easy 5
to understand language
b. Making conclusions that are not correct 3
c. Made nothing 0

Psychomotor value of students

Maximum score = 20

Value = ∑𝑠core 𝑥 100

20
 4

LP. 4 Affective Assessment Sheets (Social Skills Observation)

Name:
Date:
Class:
Instructions:

For each of the following social skills, rate () the student's social skills using the following
scale:

No. Social Skills Details 5 4 3 2 1 Information

1 Asking

2 Express opinions

3 Respond to opinions

4 Draw a conclusion

Information :

1. Asking.
(5). Polite, coherent with material, critical, and quality.

(4). Polite, coherent with the material, less critical, and of good quality.

(3). Polite, coherent with the material, critical, and lacking quality.

(2). Polite, coherent with the material, less critical, and lacking quality.

(1). Polite, incoherent with the material, uncritical, and unqualified.

2. Express opinions.
(5). Opinions are polite, logical, precise, and straightforward.

(4). Opinions are polite, logical, precise, and poorly understood.

(3). Opinions are polite, logical, precise, and correct but not quite right.

(2). Opinions are polite, logical, precise, and incorrect.

 5

(1). Opinions are polite, illogical, correct, and untrue.

3. Respond to opinions.
(5). Polite, argumentative, logical, precise, and straightforward.

(4). Polite, argumentative, logical, precise, and convoluted.

(3). Polite, argumentative, logical, and imprecise.

(2). Polite, argumentative, logical, precise, and imprecise.

(1). Polite, non-argumentative, illogical, and imprecise.

4. Draw conclusions.
(5). Nimble, decisive, content in logical decisions, and correct.

(4). Nimble, assertive, logical decision content, and incorrect.

(3). Nimble, decisive, content in logical decisions, and incorrect.

(2). Nimble, assertive, illogical and untrue.

(1). Not deft, indecisive, the content of the decision is illogical, and incorrect.

Affective Assessment

Rubric 1-7 = " Low"

8-14 = "Medium"
15-20 = "High"
 6

LA. 2 Cognitive assessment sheets (Competency Test)

EVALUATION PROBLEM

Amount of Score
Cognitive Value = Total Score 𝒙 𝟏𝟎𝟎%

Achievements of students:

90–100 understanding very well

70–89 understanding good
50–69 understanding enough
30–49 understanding less 0–29
understanding very less