This document is a reviewer form for a paper submitted to the IEEE Third International Conference on Sensing, Signal Processing and Security (ICSSS 2017). The paper is titled "Performance Analysis Of Vascaded Optical Fibers Using DP-16 QAM Modulation". The reviewer rated the quality of the paper as average and recommended it may be considered with major revisions after resubmission. The reviewer suggested the author compare the performance to some existing method.
This document is a reviewer form for a paper submitted to the IEEE Third International Conference on Sensing, Signal Processing and Security (ICSSS 2017). The paper is titled "Performance Analysis Of Vascaded Optical Fibers Using DP-16 QAM Modulation". The reviewer rated the quality of the paper as average and recommended it may be considered with major revisions after resubmission. The reviewer suggested the author compare the performance to some existing method.
This document is a reviewer form for a paper submitted to the IEEE Third International Conference on Sensing, Signal Processing and Security (ICSSS 2017). The paper is titled "Performance Analysis Of Vascaded Optical Fibers Using DP-16 QAM Modulation". The reviewer rated the quality of the paper as average and recommended it may be considered with major revisions after resubmission. The reviewer suggested the author compare the performance to some existing method.
(Approved by AICTE, New Delhi, affiliated to AU, Chennai, ISO 2008:9001 Certified) NAAC Accredited with ‘A’ Grade College Road, Avadi, Chennai-600054. Phone: 044-26558089, 26558091 Website:www.spcet.ac.in/icsss2017 E-mail: icsss2017@gmail.com
CSIR and ICMR SPONSORED
IEEE THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SENSING, SIGNAL PROCESSING AND SECURITY-ICSSS 2017 Reviewer Form ECE-ICSSS-2017-125 Paper id & Title Performance Analysis Of Vascaded Optical Fibers Using DP-16 QAM Modulation Reviewer Information The quality is average Reviewer Report S. Criteria Ratings 5 4 3 2 1 0 No. 1. Originality of the Paper √ 2. Technical Relevance to the Conference √ 3. Adequacy of Paper Title and Abstract √ 4. Quality of Technical Content √ 5. Appropriateness of Figures and Tables √ 6. Suitable Literature Citations √ 7. Adequacy of Experimental Analysis √ 8. Soundness of Conclusions and Interpretations √ 9. Adherence to the Instructions to Authors √ 10. Overall Structure of the Paper √
Paper Status: 2
1. Strongly Recommended
2. Recommended with minor Changes
3. May be considered with major revisions after resubmission
4. Not Recommended
Review Comments (if any): Author may compare the performance with some existing method.