Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Economic Policy (Week 3) Edited
Economic Policy (Week 3) Edited
(Week 3)
The problem with small state if you leave people in the market (looking for self interest) people
will be more motivated. (Bubbles; price above its worth) Which is pricing above the value,
which is misinformation. (info might not be shared accurately)
Governments can make mistakes, and so can we
Finance; they actually mean how you get money from the people who have money into
companies; if theirs a stock market money is going from my savings into companies, other
places would be bonds, depends on the ownership of companies (many shareholders; or cross
shareholdings, etc.) Important because company’s behavior changes, with companies owned by
local shareholders maybe they feel company will be less profitable. (So its not maximum
profits) If it’s a large shareholder (who owns) looks for DIVIDENDS. (different outcomes for
financing into companies)
Competitiveness (looking for the best price; aggressive within the supply chain)
Or Cooperativeness
International Bus. Interested in many countries; why talk about domestic policies. A big
debate to which policies can travel or not; would an economic system perform the same
way in another country (can it travel and be applied in other places) Whether certain
economic systems reflect on others. Ex. Swedish system (great).
‘Quality circles’ applied by Japan, people want to make better quality, and people want
to copy it, so the idea of whether a culture may be easy to travel or adapt to or not.
Rest of Lecture:
(Varieties of capitalism)
Washington Consensus: Don’t run big deficit (Anti Keynes), have state spend lots of money
(high taxes) here low spending, meaning low or no taxes.
Exchange rate:
Strong currency helps improve inflation which helps productivity.
If your principles aren’t perfect, you reform it. Or it will blow everything up, so capitalism
must evolve by accepting criticism.
(Japan)
Developmental Capitalism (means a country where state gets involved in ensuring economies
development) Japanese capitalism (feudal) isolated; till Americans warships in Tokyo, showing
they are behind in technology. So they wanted to start industrial development and that is from
the country. And the country catching up with others around the world. Japanese coordination
works as a whole for the country. After world war 2, US gave Japan certain individuals to work
in economic activities. Japanese thought as an entire economy. Under coordination of
economist, every time a company would invest in a new product they would help their
suppliers. Japan didn’t really have a free market, because money had to stay home
(government saying funding must be domestic). Have a private enterprise (will never get fired
from job) since if you’re a Japanese citizen is working for the whole of Japans economic
interest, means they never get fired. Japanese capitalism, if some company is doing bad,
government subsidies. In other countries, you just die.
(Germany)
In between the two
‘Social market capitalism’:
Social market economy, made my Germans, having a half way route between social and market
competition. German companies have to compete like free markets, but quiet a taxation at
personal level (high). USA (consumer is always right) In Japan and Germany (need economic
equilibrium). US always has a trade deficit; in Germany they are more focused on not having
deficits. So this is a national matter. (no one wants big deficits; government oversight) The
strength in Germany is the medium MNE’s. would specialized in narrow niches; supported by
state subsidies (schools). Funding comes from the big bank (control; national interest; talks with
the Politian’s; coordination’s). Germans hold their shareholders together. More capitalism here,
kind of a hybrid model. Liberal and coordinated (being under competition when global south
rise, they realized they didn’t get too expensive, so left wing proposes a deal be done where
workers keep their job but get a pay cut. Shows it is both liberal and coordinated mechanisms.
These guys, talk about global north, but in global south does both categories work. Global south
more coordinated; state is involved in decision making. (Hallinsas ask about this guy)