Professional Documents
Culture Documents
0139ee
0139ee
000443-0139
To what extent is physical activity an effective treatment for mental illnesses when employed as
000443-0139
Table of Contents
● Abstract……………………………………………………………... P. 3
● Anxiety Disorders………………………………………………….. P. 5
● Affective Disorders……………………………………………….... P. 7
● Conclusion………………………………………………….............. P. 13
● References………………………………………………………….. P.15
3
000443-0139
Abstract
The aim of this research paper is to evaluate the effectiveness of physical activity as a
treatment for various mental illnesses when employed as a treatment method either in
addition to traditional therapy methods or as the sole interventional treatment. The objective
of the paper will be to answer the question, does the intervention of physical activity help reduce
the symptoms associated with mental disorders? This paper will attempt to support the
hypothesis that the intervention will have a positive impact and reduce the symptoms. The paper
will begin by giving a general outline of the effects of a physical activity intervention on a variety
Universitätsmedizin Berlin clinic. Once the effects have been outlined, the search criteria set forth
by Charité will be evaluated, determining whether their criteria yielded research trials that would
provide credible data. Once the credibility of the reviews has been established, there will be a focus
on major depressive disorder (MDD) and the effectiveness of physical activity and the impact of
its absence. The effect on MDD will be determined using a meta-analysis conducted by Cochrane
that researched the effects of exercise on depression. The meta-analysis includes thirty-nine trials
which add up to a total of 2326 participants, but the trials will be criticized regarding their approach
to the research question in groups of similar rather than individually. Based on the analysis of the
trials set forth by the Cochrane review, I reached the conclusion that exercise has shown a moderate
effect on the treatment of depression, however because of the risk of bias seen by the majority of
the trials, it is probable that the effect is much less significant. It is also supported that exercise is
just as effective as traditional psychological treatment programs, however the evidence is limited.
4
000443-0139
The purpose of the research review published by Charité is to summarize several studies
conducted to determine the impact of exercise interventions in patients with a variety of mental
illnesses (Zschucke, 2013). To yield clinical studies relevant to their research questions, the
Charité team used the search engines PubMed, Medline, and Web of Science to generate a list of
reviews (Gaudlitz, 2013). The search engines used by the team are well-respected databases that
contain biomedical literature that is curated by professional peers to guarantee their scientific
accuracy. One of the primary research methods, PubMed, is an access portal that connects users
seeking medical journals, articles, and reviews to the MEDLINE data hub which is maintained by
the United States National Library of Medicine (NLM, 2018). The credibility of the search engine
gives me reassurance that the reviews and studies cited by the Charité review have been properly
vetted and therefore will not skew the results of the data analysis. An issue found with their
selection of trials was that they thought they did a comprehensive search, part of their criteria was
to find trials between the years of 1970 and 2012 (Gaudlitz, 2013). If it were possible to alter the
time period being searched, a time frame between the years 1995 and 2012 for trials would be
more reliable due to the recent significant growth that has taken place in the methodology of
conducting trials. As I will explore later in my paper when the analysis of the Cochrane review
begins, a major issue with the clinical trials is that a large majority failed to properly eliminate bias
(Lawlor, 2013). Based on the trials presented, it seems that the relatively younger trials have a
better understanding of being able to eliminate bias, thus requiring the alteration of the search
criteria regarding the age of the trials. The Charité team used only intervention studies using
physical activity as either a sole or combined treatment in addition to including only reviews
5
000443-0139
matching the same criteria. The authors of the review categorized the illnesses in groups of similar
nature rather randomly assort the mental disorders being studied and analyzed.
The mental disorders studied by the Charité team are categorized into the following groupings:
- Anxiety Disorders
- Affective Disorders
- Eating Disorders
- Substance Disorders
- Schizophrenia/Psychosis
Due to space constraints and for the sake of staying focused on my original research
question, I will be focusing on two of the seven listed groups to ensure a thorough analysis. The
research done by the Charité review regarding anxiety disorders and affective disorders will be
Anxiety Disorders
Patients diagnosed with anxiety disorders face relentless anxiety everyday leading
to social issues, difficulty accomplishing everyday tasks, and making life decisions seem more
serious than they are (NIH, 2018). The class of anxiety disorders is further classified into different
disorders based on the type of anxiety faced such as Generalized Anxiety Disorder vs Panic
Disorder (NIH, 2018). Certain risk factors are more significant than others, such as family history
of mental disorders, having recently experienced a traumatic life event such as a death, and
exposure to stressful situations as a child (NIH, 2018). The current consensus on treating or helping
6
000443-0139
reduce the symptoms of anxiety disorders is a treatment plan which employs a combination of
psychotherapy and medication (NIH, 2018). Psychotherapy is “talk therapy”, a method that is
found successful in the management of stress because it allows for clear communication of fears
and issues between the patient and therapist, allowing the therapist to target specific problems. In
addition to psychotherapy, stress management is an important tool to help patients suffering from
anxiety calm themselves down and be able to regain a balance in their life. Physical activity can
be a significant help because it provides a safe and healthy stress management solution. Often
when people have stress and feel overwhelmed they will go on a run to clear their mind
(Lewinsohn, 1994). For this reason, it is believed physical activity can provide a healthy outlet and
therefore make a difference in the anxiety that patients face. The Charité team identified a
mechanism of action in treating anxiety disorders as the reduction of anxiety sensitivity as a result
of the intervention of physical activity (Zschucke, 2013). It was found that subjects who had a
higher anxiety sensitivity level reported a lower level of physical activity compared to patients
with lower anxiety sensitivity (Gaudlitz, 2013). This correlation makes sense as physical activity
is a proven stress management method as well it allows for social interaction. The social interaction
aspect is supported as patients with low levels of physical activity reported a higher level of
perceived social barriers (Gaudlitz, 2013). It was unclear as to what was defined as physical
activity, and what the duration and intensity of the exercises were across the trials. Once I was able
to access the results clinical trials included in the Charité study, I found that the two types of
interventions studied were classified as acute and chronic treatments. It was not differentiated
between these two in the final conclusions because after analyzing the clinical and non-clinical
sample results it was found that both methods were successful in reducing state and trait anxiety
(Petruzzello, 1997). It was found that when the effect of both aerobic and anaerobic physical
7
000443-0139
activity were compared to the effect of cognitive therapy, they were just as effective as each other
(Wipfli, 2008). Because of the social interaction factor previously mentioned, it was seen that
across the trials patients with social phobia responded best to the exercise intervention and
demonstrated the greatest reductions in anxiety levels (Merom, 2008). This reduction was
measured in self-reported levels of social anxiety, levels of general depression, and follow-ups
conducted three months post-intervention (Jazaieri, 2012). Patients in the generalized anxiety
disorder (GAD) group also showed promising results when those compared in the wait list control
were compared against those performing resistance exercise and aerobic exercise (Herring,2011).
In the intervention groups there was a reduction in the worry symptoms typically associated with
GAD as well as a reduction in anxiety-tension levels (Herring, 2011). From the results of the
meta-analysis I can conclude that in the case of anxiety disorders, the intervention of physical
activity has beneficial effects, shown by the reduction in symptoms of anxiety associated with
Affective Disorders
Affective disorders, also referred to as mood disorders, are mental disorders that deal with
the emotional well-being of patients. The most prominent disorders classified under the DSM-5
grouping of affective disorders are major depression and bipolar disorder (NCBI). Though
depression is often associated with feeling sad or unmotivated, the issue is much larger than
unhappy feelings for a short period of time. For major depressive disorder (MDD) to be clinically
diagnosed, symptoms must persist for at least two continuous weeks to ensure the symptoms are
not merely feelings of unhappiness (NCBI). 40.5% of the disabilities caused by mental illnesses
in the world are accounted for by depressive disorders, and yet this proportion is underrepresented
as many people refuse to seek help and be clinically diagnosed (Whiteford, 2013). The symptoms
8
000443-0139
of depression include a general loss of interest and pleasure in once enjoyable activities, feelings
of constant guilt, and low motivation (Mental Health Foundation, 2018). Bipolar disorder is a
combination of both depressive and mania episodes, resulting in a dangerous mental condition if
not treated properly (Legg, 2017). While major depressive disorder has a set of tests such as self-
reported feelings and self-reporting questions, bipolar disorder is much harder to diagnosis. Like
all mental disorders, family medical history is evaluated to rule out other disorders or even show
a family link to bipolar disorder. Professionals turn to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of
Mental Disorders (DSM) to provide the most accurate diagnosis of bipolar disorder (Legg, 2017).
Now that the class of affective disorders has been outlined, the Charité review will be used to
analyze the results for bipolar disorder and then use the Cochrane Review to do an in-depth
A 2007 clinical study aimed to research the link between bipolar illness and physical
endurance used a group of 24 adults to determine whether the presence of bipolar disorder lowered
cardiovascular health (Shah, 2007). Prior to this study, the link between cardiovascular diseases
and bipolar disease had been linked, as bipolar patients were 2-3 times were likely to have
cardiovascular issues than the rest of the population (Shah). Using two groups of patients being
exposed to treadmill running, Shah was able to conclude that the bipolar subjects had a
significantly reduced exercise tolerance than the control group however both displayed normal
cardiac function. The significance of this trial is that it shows an existing problem within the
bipolar community, which is that they are lacking physical endurance but have normal cardiac
functions. Therefore researchers have identified a characteristic of bipolar patients that may have
an effect on the bipolar disorder in patients. Studies following Shah’s trial found that physical
intervention methods did not place a strenuous demand on patients, but rather correlated to an
9
000443-0139
overall decrease in stress, depressive, and anxious symptoms, all of which are linked to bipolar
disorder (Edenfield, Dodd). These studies support the idea that bipolar patients are physically able
to exercise without negatively impacting cardiac function while also reducing their own bipolar
symptoms after exposure to physical activity interventions. Aside from the benefits, a potential
issue exists with the intervention of physical activity. Since bipolar disorder is characterized by
both episodes of depression and mania, it may be that the physical activity is only alleviating the
symptoms of the depressive episodes. Wright referred to the physical exercise intervention as a
“double-edged sword” for the same reason, as the sudden influx of exercise may inadvertently
intensify the manic symptoms of bipolar patients (Wright, 2012). Therefore because of this serious
issue, I feel that there more research must be done in the field of bipolar disorder before the
through medication. Though the intervention of exercise has shown the ability to manage the
mood fluctuations associated with the depressive side of bipolar disorder, that is only half of
the issue and we cannot ignore the risk of intensifying manic episodes.
that affects the emotional well-being and brain chemistry of those afflicted by the condition
(Belmaker, 2008). Depression often alters the way one thinks, behaves, and acts. Clinically
diagnosed depression is associated with feelings of hopelessness and general loss of interest in
activities, in many cases being accompanied by irrational thoughts of self-harm and/or suicide
(Kendler, 2000). The condition can lead to various emotional issues as well as physical problems
arising from the mental toll it takes. In serious cases, major depressive disorder can hinder
10
000443-0139
individuals from living their normal life because it disables them from working and interacting
with friends and family (Kendler, 2000). Depression is estimated to affect one in 15 adults (6.7%)
in any given year, however this estimate relies on the number of diagnosed major depressive
disorder cases (Kessler, 2003). Often those with depression fail to be diagnosed either out of social
pressure or denial. The most common symptoms of depression coincide with behavior associated
with sadness or grief, however symptoms must last a minimum of two weeks for a diagnosis of
depression. Symptoms include but are not limited to change in appetite, trouble sleeping or
excessive sleeping, feeling worthless, and loss of interest in previously enjoyed activities.
Depression can appear at any time, but on average, first appears during the late teens to mid-20s
(Kessler, 2003). Women are more likely than men to experience depression. Some studies show
that 33% of women will experience a major depressive episode in their lifetime (Kendler, 2000).
There are certain factors that cause an increased risk for depression in individuals, just like
any other medical condition. Biochemistry has a role in the onset of depression because it deals
with the chemistry of our brain (Fendrich, 1990). Depression can either be increased or hindered
by chemical signals in the brain. Depression can run and be prevalent in families, therefore genetics
play a role. The significance of genetics has been proven as it has been seen that an identical twin
with diagnosed depression correlates with the other twin of having a 70% of also experiencing
depression at one point in their lifetime. Related to brain chemistry, another factor for depression
is personality (Fendrich, 1990). A person’s disposition can make them more or less vulnerable to
the illness. For example, those with self-esteem issues and sensitive to stress are more likely to
experience depression as the symptoms are related to their general attitude. Another significant
factor is the environment to which the individual is constantly exposed to. Those who witness
11
000443-0139
more violence, neglect, or abuse tend to be more vulnerable to episodes of depression and a long
questions regarding the effectiveness of the intervention of physical activity in the treatment of
major depressive disorder. The Cochrane review utilities the same databases as the Charité review
to find their trials, therefore it is not necessary to re-evaluate the same sources and we can assume
the credibility of the data. Because of the large number of trials, there are variations in both
methodology and the reporting of results. For example, the approach to randomization varied
across the trials. Of the 39 trials, 14 of them properly concealed randomization in the trial, 15 of
them used intention-to-treat analyses, and 12 of them assessed the results blind (Cooney.2013).
The issue with the trials using different outcome measurers is that once the data is pooled, it is
difficult to differentiate as to whether bias affected the data or not. Another issue is that the trials
used different conditions. While 35 of the trials compared the intervention of physical activity with
no treatment or another control intervention such as medication, the other four trials did not share
a similar control group. To analyze the data as a singular number rather than differentiate between
the different results reporting across the trials, the review authors calculated the respective results
of the trials as a standardized mean difference (SMD). This way, the results could all be reported
as a singular number that was comparable to the other trials. Also this allows the authors to group
similar trials and report a singular number to measure the effect of their methodology (Cooney,
2013). For example, the 35 trials previously mentioned (1356 participants) demonstrated the
positive impact of physical activity as a treatment method since their pooled standardized mean
difference at the end of treatment was -.62, a reduction in depression symptoms comparable to
moderate clinical effects. Seven of the trials decided to compare physical activity as the sole
12
000443-0139
treatment method, using psychological therapy as the control group. The issue with this method is
that the researchers are assuming that the psychological therapy is making a positive impact on the
patients, which invalidates the data if that is not true. However in these seven trials the reported
SMD was -0.003, an effect difference so small that it does not have any significance. Based on the
results of these trials it is inefficient to replace typical psychological therapy with physical activity
as the primary treatment method, however it supports the idea that exercise is just as effective
because of social interaction factor and the brain chemicals such as endorphins released. Some
researchers may argue that pharmacological treatments are the most effective solutions to clinical
depression, but four of the 39 trials provided disagree with this claim (Cooney, 2013). Four trials,
accounting for 300 patients of the population, compared the effectiveness of physical activity
versus pharmacological treatment (medication). The SMD of the pooled results was -0.11,
signifying a very small effect difference between the two treatments. Based on this SMD we can
conclude that medicating patients to treat major depressive disorder is not the most effective
method, and should be avoided because of the side effects. Psychiatrists should advocate for
physical activity for treatment instead of medication because the effect difference is not big enough
to have be significant. However because of the small population pool of 300 I believe more trials
Conclusion
Based on both the Cochrane meta-analysis and the Charité review, I was able to support
my hypothesis that the intervention of physical activity has a positive effect on patients diagnosed
13
000443-0139
with mental disorders. However, I believe that more research and trials must be conducted which
will increase the population pool of patients as well as try to eliminate confounding variables. I
think it is crucial to follow up results a couple months from the end of treatment, especially in the
case of bipolar disorder, to ensure the results were not mis-reported or short lived as part of a
maniac episode. The tricky part of measuring the degree of a mental illness is that the symptoms
are presented in different ways in patients, and there is no singular factor for researchers to measure
and compare. Regardless of this, I believe if researchers continue to experiment with varying
exercise plans, such as weekly running versus yoga sessions, they will be able to determine which
level of intensity is best suited for each mental disorder. As a result of this research paper I have
become much more sensitive to the nature of mental disorders in addition to learning about the
enormous benefits associated with exercising. As a year-round athlete I appreciate the time I have
for exercising much more because I realize that it is a major stress management method for me.
14
000443-0139
Works Cited
Cooney, G M, et al. “Exercise for Depression.” The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.,
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24026850.
Dinas PC, Koutedakis Y, Flouris AD. Effects of exercise and physical activity on depression. Ir J
Dodd S,The effects of physical activity in the acute treatment of bipolar disorder: a pilot study.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17182104/
Edenfield TM. Exercise and mood: exploring the role of exercise in regulating stress reactivity
Hoffman MD, Hoffman DR. Exercisers achieve greater acute exercise-induced mood
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18226663
Lewinsohn, P. M., Roberts, R. E., Seeley, J. R., Rohde, P., Gotlib, I. H., & Hops, H. (1994).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.103.2.302
Rimer J, Dwan K, Lawlor DA, Greig CA, McMurdo M, Morley W, et al. Exercise for
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22786489
000443-0139
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17442401/.
Shah A, Alshaher M, Dawn B, Siddiqui T, Longaker RA, Stoddard MF, et al. Exercise tolerance
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17442401
Wright, 'It's a double edged sword': a qualitative analysis of the experiences of exercise amongst
people with Bipolar Disorder. Wright K, Armstrong T, Taylor A, Dean S J Affect Disord.
Zschucke, Elisabeth, et al. “Exercise and Physical Activity in Mental Disorders: Clinical and
Experimental Evidence.” Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, The Korean
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3567313/#B47.
16
000443-0139