Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ST James Elementary Lawsuit
ST James Elementary Lawsuit
YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED and required to answer the Complaint in this action, a copy
which is served upon you, and to serve a copy of your Answer of the Complaint on the Law
Office of William J. Luse, 917 Broadway Street, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, 29577, and on
the Horry County Clerk of Court at 1301 Second Avenue, Conway, SC 29526 within thirty (30)
days after service on you, exclusive of the date of such service; and if you fail to Answer this
Complaint within thirty (30) days, judgment by default will be rendered against you in Court for
the relief demanded in the Complaint.
Law Office of William J. Luse
S/William J. Luse________________
William J. Luse, Esquire
SC Bar No: 72790
Attorney for the Plaintiffs
917 Broadway Street
Myrtle Beach, SC 29577
Myrtle Beach, SC 843-839-4795, Fax: 843-839-4815
November 30, 2020 bill@getlusenow.com
1
ELECTRONICALLY FILED - 2020 Nov 30 4:15 PM - HORRY - COMMON PLEAS - CASE#2020CP2606920
State of South Carolina ) In the Court of Common Pleas
) for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit
County of Horry )
)
TAMRA BROACH (Guardian) )
JOHN DOE (Minor Child) )
) Case No. 20-CP-26-_____
)
Plaintiff(s), )
)
v. ) Complaint
) (Jury Trial Requested)
ST. JAMES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, )
HORRY COUNTY SCHOOLS, )
HORRY COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, )
& SCHOOL DISTRICT OF HORRY )
COUNTY, )
)
Defendants. )
)
The Plaintiffs, by and through their undersigned counsel do hereby make the following
JURISIDICTION
South Carolina. The claims giving rise to this action against the Defendants arose in
Horry County South Carolina. Plaintiff Tamra Broach is the guardian of Plaintiff John
2. Plaintiff John Doe is a minor child and is currently a resident of Georgetown County in
the State of South Carolina. The claims giving rise to this lawsuit against Defendants
arose while Plaintiff was a student at St. James Elementary School which is located in
3. Defendant St. James Elementary School is a public elementary school owned and
operated by the State of South Carolina. St. James Elementary School is located in Myrtle
2
ELECTRONICALLY FILED - 2020 Nov 30 4:15 PM - HORRY - COMMON PLEAS - CASE#2020CP2606920
Beach, South Carolina. St. James Elementary School is a governmental agency within the
meaning of the South Carolina Tort Claims Act, and it is organized and existing under the
4. Defendant Horry County Schools is a public school system owned and operated by the
State of South Carolina. Horry County Schools operates and controls St. James
governmental agency within the meaning of the South Carolina Tort Claims Act, and it is
organized and existing under the laws of the State of South Carolina.
5. Defendant Horry County School District is a public school system owned and operated
by the State of South Carolina. Horry County School District operates and controls St.
James Elementary School in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina. Horry County School District
is a governmental agency within the meaning of the South Carolina Tort Claims Act, and
it is organized and existing under the laws of the State of South Carolina.
6. Defendant School District of Horry County is a public school system owned and operated
by the State of South Carolina. School District of Horry County operates and controls St.
James Elementary School in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina. School District of Horry
County is a governmental agency within the meaning of the South Carolina Tort Claims
Act, and it is organized and existing under the laws of the State of South Carolina.
7. That all parties and subject matter herein mentioned are within the jurisdiction of this
Honorable Court.
FACTS
8. Plaintiff John Doe was a student at St. James Elementary School during the 2017- 2019
school years.
3
ELECTRONICALLY FILED - 2020 Nov 30 4:15 PM - HORRY - COMMON PLEAS - CASE#2020CP2606920
9. During Plaintiff John Doe’s time at St. James elementary School he continued to suffer
from headaches, sore throats, mouth sores, fatigue, depression, mood dysregulation and
general malaise.
10. John Doe did not suffer from headaches, sore throats, mouth sores, fatigue, depression,
mood dysregulation or general malaise prior to attending St. James Elementary School.
11. John Doe sought repeated medical treatment for his symptoms while attending St. James
Elementary School.
12. Eventually John Doe had blood work done as the result of his continued aliments. The
13. Further testing on John Doe revealed several infections which were all associated with
14. During John Doe’s enrollment at St. James Elementary School it was discovered that
several Horry County Schools including, but not limited to, St. James Elementary School
15. Upon information and belief Defendants had knowledge of water damage, water leaks
and mold issues for years within numerous Horry County Schools including, but not
16. Despite Defendants having knowledge of water damage, water leaks and mold issues for
years within Horry County Schools including, but not limited to, St. James Elementary
School the Defendants refused and or neglected to make necessary repairs and remove
toxic mold from numerous school buildings including, but not limited to, St. James
Elementary School.
4
ELECTRONICALLY FILED - 2020 Nov 30 4:15 PM - HORRY - COMMON PLEAS - CASE#2020CP2606920
17. Students of Horry County Schools including, John Doe, began to get and continued to
have health issues as a result of toxic mold levels within Horry County Schools
18. Upon information and belief, Defendants eventually ran at least two sets of mold test on
numerous Horry County Schools including, but not limited to, St. James Elementary
School.
19. Upon information and belief, toxic mold levels were found in numerous Horry County
Schools including, but not limited to, St. James Elementary School after mold test were
performed.
20. Defendants after years of neglect eventually hired a mold remediation company to
remove the toxic and unsafe mold from St. James Elementary School and/or other Horry
County Schools.
21. Defendants failed to hire a qualified mold remediation company after years of neglect
which then required a second mold remediation company to be hired to clean up the toxic
mold levels still left in the Horry County Schools including, but not limited to, St. James
Elementary School.
22. Upon information and belief, Defendants ran a toxic mold test after the first toxic mold
Elementary School and toxic mold levels continued to be found within St. James
23. Defendants then hired a second mold remediation company to perform mold remediation
services on St. James Elementary School and/or other Horry County Schools because of
5
ELECTRONICALLY FILED - 2020 Nov 30 4:15 PM - HORRY - COMMON PLEAS - CASE#2020CP2606920
24. Plaintiff, John Doe continued to receive medical treatment at various health care
25. John Doe’s family told Defendants about his on-going health issues and that his treating
physician had diagnosed him with being infected with toxic mold and mycotoxins during
26. John Doe and his family requested that he be transferred out of St. James Elementary
School based on his ongoing health issues and continued exposure to toxic molds while
27. Despite John Doe’s request to be transferred to a school which would not expose him to
unsafe toxic mold the Defendants refused to allow John Doe to transfer schools unless a
28. John Doe’s family did in fact pay the Defendants exorbitant $4,854.00 transfer fee so that
John Doe would not be forced to continually be exposed to unsafe, harmful and toxic
29. School boards and school districts serve in a in loco parentis position and as such are
required to fix unsafe conditions including those caused by mold so that students are not
30. Defendants knew, or should have known, of the toxic mold problems in John Doe’s
school when the Defendants were aware of repeated issues with water damages, water
leaks and mold within St. James Elementary School. Defendants failed to fix the water
and mold problems throughout John Doe’s enrollment at St. James Elementary School.
6
ELECTRONICALLY FILED - 2020 Nov 30 4:15 PM - HORRY - COMMON PLEAS - CASE#2020CP2606920
31. Defendants harmed the Plaintiffs by putting John Doe into an unsafe and uninhabitable
school which contained numerous toxic levels of mold and/or fungi and had severe
32. Plaintiffs have suffered damages as the result of the Defendants’ negligence in placing
and in keeping John Doe enrolled in a school with toxic mold levels and extremely high
moisture conditions.
33. Plaintiffs have suffered damages as the result of the Defendants’ failure to take proper
corrective actions to help mitigate the damages suffered by the Plaintiffs by either
removing the toxic mold and/or mold levels from John Doe’s school, stopping the water
and moisture problems from occurring or moving John Doe to a different school that did
34. The toxic mold levels and moisture were so severe at St. James Elementary School that
John Doe was forced to transfer to another school in order to avoid the toxic mold and
35. Defendants failed to provide John Doe and other students with a school that was safe
from hazardous and toxic conditions in blatant violation of their duties and obligations to
the well being and safety of students while serving in a in loco parentis position.
36. Upon information and belief, the Defendants were aware of the toxic mold and
contamination in John Doe’s school and intentionally and maliciously covered up the
mold in an effort to hide the toxic mold from the Plaintiffs or other prospective students
37. Upon information and belief, the Defendants were aware of the extremely moist
conditions at John Doe’s school and water problems causing the mold and intentionally
7
ELECTRONICALLY FILED - 2020 Nov 30 4:15 PM - HORRY - COMMON PLEAS - CASE#2020CP2606920
and maliciously covered up the water and mold issues in an effort to hide hazardous
conditions at St. James Elementary School and/or other Horry County Schools so that
John Doe and other students and their parents would continue to allow their children to
38. Upon information and belief, Defendants allowed teachers and other personnel who
worked at St. James Elementary School the option to transfer to other schools within the
district because of the toxic mold and unsafe working conditions found at St. James
Elementary School. Shockingly, despite the Defendants allowing district employees the
option to transfer to other district schools because of unsafe conditions at St. James
Elementary the Defendants continued to not disclose the unsafe conditions at St. James
Elementary School to the students and/or their parents. Defendants continued to allow
students to enroll at St. James Elementary School without warning them of the hazardous
conditions despite finding it necessary to warn their own employees about the hazardous
and unsafe conditions including, but not limited to, toxic mold found at St. James
Elementary School.
39. That Defendants’ behavior in knowingly and intentionally enrolling John Doe and other
children in a school which contained toxic mold and which was hazardous to students
safety and wellbeing was grossly negligent and reckless and done with complete
disregard to the rights or the health of the Plaintiffs or other potential students and their
parents.
40. Plaintiffs have suffered damages as a result of the actions of the Defendants.
8
ELECTRONICALLY FILED - 2020 Nov 30 4:15 PM - HORRY - COMMON PLEAS - CASE#2020CP2606920
FOR A FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
Negligence/Gross Negligence
(South Carolina Tort Claims Act, S.C. Code Ann. § 15-78-10, et. seq.)
41. The allegations of the preceding paragraphs are hereby incorporated and alleged as if
42. At all times set forth herein, Defendants owed Plaintiff John Doe a student in its custody
and control, a responsibility to supervise, protect and ensure that students including John
Doe are safe from hazardous conditions including, but not limited to, toxic mold.
43. At all times set forth herein, Defendants owed Plaintiff Tamra Broach as a parent and/or
guardian a responsibility to supervise, protect and ensure that the students in the
Defendants care were safe and not exposed to hazardous conditions including, but not
44. At all times set forth herein, Defendants owed the Plaintiffs a duty of care to protect the
students enrolled in Horry County Schools from hazardous and unsafe conditions
45. At all times set forth herein, Defendants owed a duty of care to disclose any latent defects
including, but not limited to, disclosing toxic mold levels, extremely moist conditions or
continuous water leaks within Defendants’ school buildings to enrolled students and to
46. Defendants owed a duty of care to all enrolled students and their parents or guardians that
the Defendants’ school buildings would be habitable and will not harm the health and
47. Defendants owe a duty of care to the Plaintiffs and other enrolled students and their
parents or guardians to fix and/or correct problems with Defendants’ school buildings
9
ELECTRONICALLY FILED - 2020 Nov 30 4:15 PM - HORRY - COMMON PLEAS - CASE#2020CP2606920
within a reasonable amount of time after the Defendants become constructively or
actually aware of the problem, including, but not limited to, removing toxic mold levels
from the Defendants’ school buildings and resolving excessive moisture conditions
48. Defendants acted in a willful and wanton fashion with gross negligence and recklessness
and breached these duties to Plaintiffs by failing to exercise a slight degree of care in the
following particulars:
for students;
continued exposure to hazardous conditions including, but not limited to, toxic mold;
buildings so that hazardous and unsafe conditions could not occur in Defendants’
school buildings;
d) By failing to properly protect and keep safe the students enrolled within the
Defendants’ schools;
e) By failing to act in loco parentis manner and failing to act in the best interest of the
enrolled students.
f) In failing to implement or otherwise observe proper safety standards for the welfare
10
ELECTRONICALLY FILED - 2020 Nov 30 4:15 PM - HORRY - COMMON PLEAS - CASE#2020CP2606920
h) In failing to disclose to Plaintiffs and other students and parents or guardians of
students that the Defendants’ school buildings contained toxic mold levels and/or had
i) In failing to reduce or remove the toxic mold levels from Defendants’ school
j) In failing to stop water from coming into the Defendants’ school buildings once the
k) In failing to move Defendants’ enrolled students to another school within the district
l) In failing to move Defendants’ enrolled students to another school within the district
which did not have water problems, water leaks or extreme levels of moisture in the
building.
found within the Districts school buildings including, but not limited to, St. James
Elementary School even after the Defendants warned their own employees of the
unsafe conditions and allowed district employees to transfer to safe school buildings
49. Plaintiffs suffered damages as a direct and proximate result of the Defendants’ breach of
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray for damages against the Defendants in the amount of:
a) Actual damages;
b) Consequential damages;
11
ELECTRONICALLY FILED - 2020 Nov 30 4:15 PM - HORRY - COMMON PLEAS - CASE#2020CP2606920
c) Incidental damages;
d) Punitive damages;
e) Emotional Distress;
f) Any and all damages as provided under the South Carolina Tort Claims Act;
g) Other damages such as this Honorable Court deems appropriate and just.
S/William J. Luse_______________
William J. Luse, Esquire
SC Bar No: 72790
Attorney for the Plaintiffs
917 Broadway Street
Myrtle Beach, SC 29577
Myrtle Beach, SC Phone: 843-839-4795
Fax: 843-839-4815
November 30, 2020 bill@getlusenow.com
12