Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Evolution of Ad Tech by Samarth Sikka
Evolution of Ad Tech by Samarth Sikka
Evolution of Ad Tech by Samarth Sikka
ECOSYSTEM
06 NOVEMBER, 2020
Prepared by:
Samarth Sikka
WHAT WE’LL COVER
1. What is Ad Tech
2. Market Monopoly
3. Waterfall Era
4. Header bidding
5. Publishers control
6. Big Data
7. Programmatic for Mobiles
8. Cross Targeting (Online & Offline)
9. Rise of Tech players
10. GDPR
AD TECH DEFINED
Earlier in 2010, large companies such as Google bought up all elements of the
bid stream and ad technology, meaning that the majority of publisher
revenue and tech was Google. This began with Google buying Double Click
Google, with an intention to have a control over each impression, they made
ad serving low on cost to free on Google AdX. They started acquired majority
publishers, but, as it’s a saying, every free things has a cost to pay behind.
Google started taking control over publishers and they were restricted to
make changes on their own platform.
We will come on to how the monopoly was broken in further slides. Before
that, let us understand the bidding model which was followed during earlier
times and what was its impact on publishers.
WATERFALL ERA
Traditionally, i.e. in the Waterfall method, each ad networks submit their bid
if the previous ad network bid is rejected. The bids were taken from the
historical data, which is the average of previous bids. For example, there are
4 Networks, A, B, C, and D, with an average bid of $2, $1.75, $1.50, and $1
respectively. The network with the highest average bid will always be the
winner (Network A, $2 in this case) as it’s not real-time bidding.
The biding was not easy and publishers were loosing a lot of potential money.
The 2 major type of risks were,
2. Fill Risk: Publisher ad servers intends to fill all spots with highest average
rate, but sometimes it was unable fill. Then, the system used to call to
another server, and the whole process repeats again and take sits own time.
Hence, calling a partner who cant fill the space, makes publisher looses
revenue.
Ad Server teams had to login multiple accounts for accurate
reporting, de-duplicate passed impressions, and constantly update the
exchange partners average rate.
Hence, the due to domino effect, and so much effort, publisher suffers.
HEADER BIDDING
In 2014, the Header Bidding was introduced. The header bidding brought a turning
point in Ad tech industry. It is a programmatic auction, where a request for a bid, is
sent to multiple partners
In header bidding, the auction of all ad exchanges happen in real-time, all submit
their bids together at once, even before the page loads. So, when any user visits the
site, before the page loads, all ad exchanges submit their prices. This technology
brings the opportunity for publishers to maximize their revenues, as the bidding is in
real-time.
Now, from the previous example (waterfall), if Ad network C is willing to pay more
than Ad Network A in real-time, it will become the winner. Hence, we can optimize
an individual impression.
Effects on Ad Tech industry after the introduction of Header Bidding:
As discussed in in slide no 4, stating how Google monetised the Ad Technology space,
header bidding gave tough competition to Google. Hence, impressions go to header
bidding partners and Google servers simultaneously.
Header Bidding brought multiple other benefits for publishers,
Publishers got better control to select to whom to show the ad, the price, they were
free to try any kind of innovation on their platform.
Header bidding let publishers to connect with multiple demand side partners (DSPs),
hence getting more bid and revenue.
The system became pretty transparent. The publishers had access to check their
advertisers, from which network they are getting , at what exact cost etc.
As the header code is placed on the publishers site itself, hence the chances of data
discrepancy is very low. The auction and all transactions happens indie the platform,
hence chances of any discrepancy reduces drastically.
Advertisers are also keep to invest in header bidding due to its transparent
environment.
It competes Google AdX and works faster than it.
Post 2010 the importance of data started rising, the digital marketing for publishers
was used to be all about finding advertisers, showing ads and earing revenue.
- With evolution of Big Data the ads became more personalized, targeted, and
interactive. Every publishers started serving specific group of people and
specific target audience in very intelligent manner, depending on the behavior,
activities etc.
Between 2010 ad 2012, mobile technology grew like fire, so does Mobile
Advertisement.
The Programmatic Advertising gave rise to cross device and multi platform
targeting, which was a boon for publishers. Targeting based on statistics and
probabilities is an inevitable power
Prebid.js was released around 2010, and was opened sourced. It broke the
monopoly of Google, and changed the whole revenue strategy for Publishers.
Later, another platform was developed “Pub Food”. It is also an open source
bidding platform made for publishers, for publishers.
DECADE OF CHANGE
The General Data Protection Regulation
The GDPR law was officially declared on May 2018. The publishers cookie the
visitors, who are visiting their website. By cooking people, they were able to
collect behavioral data and other personal information and show them
personalized ads. Also, publishers used to share the data with platforms like
Facebook, Google for personalized advertisement without any user consent.
Now, with the roll of GDPR, on every website, the publisher has to take the
consent from the visitor, if he wants to share his/her data or not. The ads can
still be shown, without taking the consent, but they can not be personalized.
Reduction in revenue due to more generic ads and less targeted, especially
in Europe.
Once the user has given the consent, he/she can later delete the saved data
THANK YOU