Tabular Results

Finite Element Results Page 1 of 12
Tabular Results
Results were generated with the finite element program FE/Pipe®. Stress results are post-processed in accordance with the rules specified in ASME Section III and ASME Section
VIII, Division 2.
Analysis Time Stamp: Mon Nov 16 11:46:22 2020.
 Model Notes
 Load Case Report
 Solution Data
 ASME Code Stress Output Plots
 Stress Results - Notes
 ASME Overstressed Areas
 Highest Primary Stress Ratios
 Highest Secondary Stress Ratios
 Highest Fatigue Stress Ratios
 Highest Occasional Stress Ratios
 Stress Intensification Factors
 Allowable Loads
 Compressive Stress Summary
 Flexibilities
 Graphical Results
Model Notes
Model Notes
Input Echo:
Model Type : Cylindrical Shell
Parent Geometry
Parent Outside Diam. : 77579.000 mm.
Thickness : 37.900 mm.
Fillet Along Shell : 30.900 mm.
Parent Properties:
Cold Allowable : 174.4 MPa
Hot Allowable : 162.0 MPa
Material DB # 7005218.
Ultimate Tensile (Amb) : 482.6 MPa
Yield Strength (Amb) : 262.0 MPa
Yield Strength (Hot) : 242.7 MPa
Elastic Modulus (Amb) : 202720.0 MPa
Poissons Ratio : 0.300
Expansion Coefficient : 0.1197E-04 mm./mm./deg.
Weight Density : 0.0000E+00 N /cu.mm.(NOT USED)
Nozzle Geometry
Nozzle Outside Diam. : 1371.600 mm.
Thickness : 29.300 mm.
Length : 461.000 mm.
Nozzle Weld Length : 30.900 mm.
RePad Width : 695.000 mm.
RePad Thickness : 39.500 mm.
RePad Weld Leg : 39.500 mm.
Nozzle Tilt Angle : 0.000 deg.
Distance from Top : 20618.000 mm.
Distance from Bottom : 1382.000 mm.
Nozzle Properties
Cold Allowable : 160.7 MPa
Hot Allowable : 148.9 MPa
Material DB # 7002418.
Ultimate Tensile (Amb) : 413.7 MPa
Yield Strength (Amb) : 241.3 MPa
Yield Strength (Hot) : 224.1 MPa
Elastic Modulus (Amb) : 202720.0 MPa
Poissons Ratio : 0.300
Expansion Coefficient : 0.1197E-04 mm./mm./deg.
Weight Density : 0.0000E+00 N /cu.mm. (NOT USED)
Design Operating Cycles : 0.

Ambient Temperature (Deg.) : 21.10
file:///C:/Users/alimo11/Desktop/Projects/600097/SYS-004-008/Rev%20A/1-J60-D-0601... 11/16/2020
Uniform thermal expansion produces no stress in this geometry.

Any thermal loads will come through operating forces and
moments applied through the nozzle.
Nozzle Inside Temperature : 80.00 deg.

Nozzle Outside Temperature : 80.00 deg.
Vessel Inside Temperature : 80.00 deg.
Vessel Outside Temperature : 80.00 deg.
Nozzle Pressure : 0.173 MPa

Vessel Pressure : 0.173 MPa
User Defined Load Input Echo:

Loads are given at the Nozzle/Header Junction
Loads are defined in Global Coordinates
Forces( N ) Moments (N-m)
Load Case FX FY FZ MX MY MZ
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
WEIGHT: 244.0 -233630.0 -356.0 -169541.0 53.0 -227296.0
OPER: -53837.0 -175339.0 58924.0 244730.0 13367.0 150263.0
OCC: 45206.0 49.0 -983.0 303.0 5536.0 -882.0
FEA Model Loads:

These are the actual loads applied to the FEA model.
These are the User Defined Loads translated to the
end of the nozzle and reported in global coordinates.
Forces( N ) Moments (N-m)
Load Case FX FY FZ MX MY MZ
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
WEIGHT: 244.0 -233630.0 -356.0 -169541.0 -111.1 -119592.6
OPER: -53837.0 -175339.0 58924.0 244730.0 40531.0 231094.3
OCC: 45206.0 49.0 -983.0 303.0 5082.8 -904.6
The "top" or "positive" end of this model is "free" in

the axial and translational directions.
Stresses ARE nodally AVERAGED.
The cylinder length or nozzle/branch location was adjusted

so that a better mesh could be generated at each end of the
cylinder. The nozzle is now located 19367.51 mm.
down the length of the cylinder and the total cylinder length
is 22000.00 mm.
Vessel Centerline Vector : 0.000 1.000 0.000

Nozzle Orientation Vector : 1.000 0.000 0.000
Table of Contents
Load Case Report

FEPipe Version 14.0 Jobname: NOZZLE $P
Released Nov 2019 11:45am NOV 16,2020
Load Case Report $X
Inner and outer element temperatures are the same

throughout the model. No thermal ratcheting
calculations will be performed.
THE 10 LOAD CASES ANALYZED ARE:
1 WEIGHT ONLY (Wgt Only)
Weight ONLY case run to get the stress range

between the installed and the operating states.
/-------- Loads in Case 1

Loads due to Weight
2 SUSTAINED (Wgt+Pr)
Sustained case run to satisfy local primary

membrane and bending stress limits.

Loads due to Weight
Pressure Case 1
3 OPERATING
Case run to compute the operating stresses used in

secondary, peak and range calculations as needed.

Pressure Case 1
Loads from (Operating)
4 RANGE (Fatigue Calc Performed)
Case run to get the RANGE of stresses.

as described in NB-3222.2, 5.5.3.2, 5.5.5.2 or 5.5.6.1.
/-------- Combinations in Range Case 4

Plus Stress Results from CASE 3
Minus Stress Results from CASE 1
5 OCCASIONAL
Occasional load case established per the

requirements of the Code.

Loads due to Weight
Pressure Case 1
Loads from (Occasional)
6 Program Generated -- Force Only
Case run to compute sif's and flexibilities.

Loads from (Axial)

Loads from (Inplane)

Loads from (Outplane)

Loads from (Torsion)

Pressure Case 1
Table of Contents
Solution Data
Solution Data
Maximum Solution Row Size = 834

Number of Nodes = 2444
Number of Elements = 800
Number of Solution Cases = 9
Summation of Loads per Case
Case # FX FY FZ
1 244. -234003. -356.

2 129832491. 118232179. -358.
3 129778447. 118291186. 58917.
4 129877701. 118232228. -1342.

5 17038000. 0. 0.
6 0. 119. 0.
7 0. 0. -97.
8 0. 0. 0.
9 129832247. 118466181. -2.
Table of Contents
ASME Code Stress Output Plots

ASME Code Stress Output Plots $X
1) Pl < SPL (SUS,Membrane) Case 2
2) Qb < SPS (SUS,Bending) Case 2
3) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (SUS,Inside) Case 2
4) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (SUS,Outside) Case 2
5) S1+S2+S3 < 4S (SUS,S1+S2+S3) Case 2
6) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (OPE,Inside) Case 3
7) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (OPE,Outside) Case 3
8) Membrane < User (OPE,Membrane) Case 3
9) Bending < User (OPE,Bending) Case 3
10) S1+S2+S3 < 4S (OPE,S1+S2+S3) Case 3
11) Pl+Pb+Q+F < Sa (SIF,Outside) Case 6
16) Pl < SPL (OCC,Membrane) Case 5
17) Qb < 3(Smh) (OCC,Bending) Case 5
18) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (OCC,Inside) Case 5
19) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (OCC,Outside) Case 5
20) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (EXP,Inside) Case 4
21) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (EXP,Outside) Case 4
22) Pl+Pb+Q+F < Sa (EXP,Inside) Case 4
23) Pl+Pb+Q+F < Sa (EXP,Outside) Case 4
Table of Contents
Stress Results - Notes

Stress Results - Notes
- Results in this analysis were generated using the finite

element solution method.
- Using 2013-2017 ASME Section VIII Division 2
- Use Polished Bar fatigue curve.
- Ratio between Operating and Design Pressure = 1.000000

Range cases use operating pressure. Primary cases
use design pressure.
- Assume free end displacements of attached pipe

(e.g. thermal loads) are secondary loads.
- Primary bending stresses at discontinuities

are treated like secondary stresses.
- Use Equivalent Stress (Von Mises).
- TRIAXIAL Stress Guidelines:

Include S1+S2+S3 evaluation for operating stress.
Include S1+S2+S3 evaluation in primary case evaluation.
Bending stress NOT included for all S1+S2+S3 calculations.
- Use local tensor values for averaged and not averaged stresses.
Table of Contents
ASME Overstressed Areas

ASME Overstressed Areas $X
*** NO OVERSTRESSED NODES IN THIS MODEL ***
Table of Contents
Highest Primary Stress Ratios

Highest Primary Stress Ratios $X
Pad/Header at Junction
Pl SPL Primary Membrane Load Case 2

164 243 Min Principle Stress = 0.( 0% Neg, 0% NegHi)
MPa MPa Plot Reference:
67%
Branch at Junction
Pl+Pb+Q SPS Primary+Secondary (Outer) Load Case 2

384 465 Min Principle Stress = -127.(53% Neg, 4% NegHi)
4) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (SUS,Outside) Case 2
82%
Branch Transition

32%
Pad Outer Edge Weld


74%
Header Outside Pad Area

66%
Table of Contents
Highest Secondary Stress Ratios

Highest Secondary Stress Ratios $X
Pl+Pb+Q SPS Primary+Secondary (Inner) Load Case 2

3) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (SUS,Inside) Case 2
46%
Branch at Junction

96%
Branch Transition

7) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (OPE,Outside) Case 3
27%
Pad Outer Edge Weld

48%

20) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (EXP,Inside) Case 4
35%
Table of Contents
Highest Fatigue Stress Ratios

Highest Fatigue Stress Ratios $X
Pl+Pb+Q+F Damage Ratio Primary+Secondary+Peak (Inner) Load Case 4

154 0.000 Life Stress Concentration Factor = 1.350
MPa 0.012 Stress Strain Concentration Factor = 1.000
Cycles Allowed for this Stress = 52,428.
Allowable "B31" Fatigue Stress Allowable = 420.5
12,423.1 Markl Fatigue Stress Allowable = 1689.2
MPa WRC 474 Mean Cycles to Failure = 110,240.
WRC 474 99% Probability Cycles = 25,610.
1% WRC 474 95% Probability Cycles = 35,556.
BS5500 Allowed Cycles(Curve F) = 22,578.
Membrane-to-Bending Ratio = 1.722
Bending-to-PL+PB+Q Ratio = 0.367
Plot Reference:
Branch at Junction
Pl+Pb+Q+F Damage Ratio Primary+Secondary+Peak (Outer) Load Case 4

Plot Reference:
Branch Transition

Cycles Allowed for this Stress = 4.3086E8
MPa WRC 474 Mean Cycles to Failure = 1,487,722.
Plot Reference:
Pad Outer Edge Weld

Plot Reference:
Pl+Pb+Q+F Damage Ratio Primary+Secondary+Peak (Inner) Load Case 4

Plot Reference:
Table of Contents
Highest Occasional Stress Ratios

Highest Occasional Stress Ratios $X

61%
Qb 3(Smh) Primary Bending Load Case 5

19%

41%

24%
Branch at Junction

50%

69%

69%

72%
Branch Transition

29%

14%


18%

24%
Pad Outer Edge Weld

68%

22%

34%

45%

59%

2%

28%

29%
Table of Contents
Stress Intensification Factors

Stress Intensification Factors $X
Branch/Nozzle Sif Summary
Peak Primary Secondary SSI

Axial : 31.107 23.043 46.085 2.205
Inplane : 11.944 8.848 17.695 2.284
Outplane: 14.628 10.836 21.671 1.854
Torsion : 0.616 0.897 0.913 0.785
Pressure: 1.459 1.080 2.161 1.091
The above stress intensification factors are to be used

in a beam-type analysis of the piping system. Inplane,
Outplane and Torsional sif's should be used with the
matching branch pipe whose diameter and thickness is given
below. The axial sif should be used to intensify the
axial stress in the branch pipe calculated by F/A. The
pressure sif should be used to intensify the nominal
pressure stress in the PARENT or HEADER, calculated
from PDo/2T. B31 calculations use mean diameters and
Section VIII calculations use outside diameters. SSIs are
based on peak stress factors and correlated test results.
Pipe OD : 1371.600 mm.

Pipe Thk: 29.300 mm.
Z approx: 41462576.000 cu.mm.
Z exact : 40596192.000 cu.mm.
(SSI = SIF^x) Axial Inpl Outpl Tors Pres

SIF/SSI Exponents: 0.913 0.879 0.888 0.225 0.205
SIF/SSI exponent based on relationship between primary and

peak stress factors from the finite element analysis.
B31.3 Branch Pressure i-factor = 130.340

Header Pressure i-factor = 2.919
The B31.3 pressure i-factors should be used with with

F/A, where F is the axial force due to pressure, and
A is the area of the pipe wall. This is equivalent to
finding the pressure stress from (ip)(PD/4T).
B31.3 (Branch)
Peak Stress Sif .... 0.000 Axial
26.527 Inplane
35.111 Outplane
1.000 Torsional
B31.1 (Branch)
35.111 Inplane
35.111 Outplane
35.111 Torsional
WRC 330 (Branch)
45.417 Inplane
35.111 Outplane
45.417 Torsional
Table of Contents
Allowable Loads
Allowable Loads $X
SECONDARY Maximum Conservative Realistic

Load Type (Range): Individual Simultaneous Simultaneous
Occuring Occuring Occuring
Axial Force ( N ) 1247766. 79191. 118787.
Inplane Moment (mm. N ) 1067708416. 47284332. 100305208.
Outplane Moment (mm. N ) 871818560. 38001364. 80613064.
Torsional Moment (mm. N )20701534208. 1248490752. 1872736128.
Pressure (MPa ) 0.21 0.17 0.17
PRIMARY Maximum Conservative Realistic

Load Type: Individual Simultaneous Simultaneous
Occuring Occuring Occuring
Axial Force ( N ) 1201651. 58627. 87940.
Inplane Moment (mm. N ) 1028248576. 35473336. 75250304.
Outplane Moment (mm. N ) 839598336. 28965130. 61444316.
Torsional Moment (mm. N )10146856960. 495051520. 742577280.
Pressure (MPa ) 0.20 0.17 0.17
NOTES:
1) Maximum Individual Occuring Loads are the maximum

allowed values of the respective loads if all other
load components are zero, i.e. the listed axial force
may be applied if the inplane, outplane and torsional
moments, and the pressure are zero.
2) The Conservative Allowable Simultaneous loads are

the maximum loads that can be applied simultaneously.
A conservative stress combination equation is used
that typically produces stresses within 50-70% of the
allowable stress.
3) The Realistic Allowable Simultaneous loads are the

maximum loads that can be applied simultaneously. A
more realistic stress combination equation is used
based on experience at Paulin Research. Stresses are
typically produced within 80-105% of the allowable.
4) Secondary allowable loads are limits for expansion

and operating piping loads.
5) Primary allowable loads are limits for weight,

primary and sustained type piping loads.
6) High D/T low pressure systems may be subject to

instability and should be checked when compressive
stresses are present.
Table of Contents
Compressive Stress Summary

Compressive Stress Summary (MPa) $X
Nomenclature:
Min Stress = Minimum princpal Code stress
Pts in Region = No. of stress pts in model region
Num Compression = Percent of stress pts in region that have
a negative principle stress < TOL. TOL= 5% Scrit
Hi Compression = Percent of compressive stress pts in region greater
than Scrit = MIN( Sy, kEt/R ), R=local radius
Min Pts Num Hi

# Load Type Case Stress in Region Compression Region
-- --------- ---- ------ ---------- ------------ ----------------
1 SUSTAINED 2 0. 696 0% 0% Pad/Header at Junction
2 OPERATING 3 0. 696 0% 0% Pad/Header at Junction
3 OCCASIONAL 5 0. 696 0% 0% Pad/Header at Junction
4 EXPANSION 4 0. 696 0% 0% Pad/Header at Junction
5 SUSTAINED 2 0. 1308 0% 0% Pad Outer Edge Weld
6 OPERATING 3 0. 1308 0% 0% Pad Outer Edge Weld

7 OCCASIONAL 5 0. 1308 0% 0% Pad Outer Edge Weld
8 EXPANSION 4 0. 1308 0% 0% Pad Outer Edge Weld
9 SUSTAINED 2 0. 90 0% 0% Header Outside Pad Area
10 OPERATING 3 0. 90 0% 0% Header Outside Pad Area
11 OCCASIONAL 5 0. 90 0% 0% Header Outside Pad Area

12 EXPANSION 4 0. 90 0% 0% Header Outside Pad Area
13 SUSTAINED 2 -127. 1344 53% 0% Branch at Junction
14 OPERATING 3 -138. 1344 54% 0% Branch at Junction
15 OPERATING 3 -138. 1344 55% 0% Branch at Junction
16 OCCASIONAL 5 -110. 1344 50% 0% Branch at Junction

17 EXPANSION 4 -144. 1344 55% 0% Branch at Junction
18 EXPANSION 4 -144. 1344 55% 11% Branch at Junction
19 SUSTAINED 2 -99. 384 50% 0% Branch Transition

23 OPERATING 3 -105. 384 47% 0% Branch Transition

28 OCCASIONAL 5 -87. 384 48% 0% Branch Transition
31 EXPANSION 4 -107. 384 47% 0% Branch Transition

Table of Contents
Flexibilities
Flexibilities $X
The following stiffnesses should be used in a piping,

"beam-type" analysis of the intersection. The stiff-
nesses should be inserted at the surface of the
branch/header or nozzle/vessel junction. The general
characteristics used for the branch pipe should be:
Outside Diameter = 1371.600 mm.

Wall Thickness = 29.300 mm.
Axial Translational Stiffness = 29695. N /mm.

Inplane Rotational Stiffness = 1108912000. mm. N /deg
Outplane Rotational Stiffness = 632634944. mm. N /deg
Torsional Rotational Stiffness = 541654319104. mm. N /deg
Intersection Flexibility Factors for Branch/Nozzle :
Find axial stiffness: K = 3EI/(kd)^3 N /mm.

Find bending and torsional stiffnesses: K = EI/(kd) mm. N per radian.
The EI product is 0.56517E+16 N mm.^2
The value of (d) to use is:1342.300 mm..
The resulting bending stiffness is in units of force x length per radian.
Axial Flexibility Factor (k) = 6.180

Inplane Flexibility Factor (k) = 66.269
Outplane Flexibility Factor (k) = 116.159
Torsional Flexibility Factor (k) = 0.136
Table of Contents

Tabular Results

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Tabular Results

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Finite Element Results Page 1 of 12

Analysis Time Stamp: Mon Nov 16 11:46:22 2020.

Model Type : Cylindrical Shell

Design Operating Cycles : 0.

Uniform thermal expansion produces no stress in this geometry.

Nozzle Inside Temperature : 80.00 deg.

Nozzle Pressure : 0.173 MPa

User Defined Load Input Echo:

Forces( N ) Moments (N-m)

FEA Model Loads:

Forces( N ) Moments (N-m)

The "top" or "positive" end of this model is "free" in

Stresses ARE nodally AVERAGED.

The cylinder length or nozzle/branch location was adjusted

Vessel Centerline Vector : 0.000 1.000 0.000

Load Case Report

Load Case Report $X

Inner and outer element temperatures are the same

THE 10 LOAD CASES ANALYZED ARE:

1 WEIGHT ONLY (Wgt Only)

Weight ONLY case run to get the stress range

/-------- Loads in Case 1

Sustained case run to satisfy local primary

/-------- Loads in Case 2

Case run to compute the operating stresses used in

/-------- Loads in Case 3

4 RANGE (Fatigue Calc Performed)

Case run to get the RANGE of stresses.

/-------- Combinations in Range Case 4

Occasional load case established per the

/-------- Loads in Case 5

6 Program Generated -- Force Only

Case run to compute sif's and flexibilities.

7 Program Generated -- Force Only

Case run to compute sif's and flexibilities.

8 Program Generated -- Force Only

Case run to compute sif's and flexibilities.

9 Program Generated -- Force Only

Case run to compute sif's and flexibilities.

10 Program Generated -- Force Only

Case run to compute sif's and flexibilities.

Maximum Solution Row Size = 834

Summation of Loads per Case

1 244. -234003. -356.

4 129877701. 118232228. -1342.

ASME Code Stress Output Plots

ASME Code Stress Output Plots $X

1) Pl < SPL (SUS,Membrane) Case 2

2) Qb < SPS (SUS,Bending) Case 2

3) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (SUS,Inside) Case 2

4) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (SUS,Outside) Case 2

5) S1+S2+S3 < 4S (SUS,S1+S2+S3) Case 2

6) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (OPE,Inside) Case 3

7) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (OPE,Outside) Case 3

8) Membrane < User (OPE,Membrane) Case 3

9) Bending < User (OPE,Bending) Case 3

10) S1+S2+S3 < 4S (OPE,S1+S2+S3) Case 3

11) Pl+Pb+Q+F < Sa (SIF,Outside) Case 6

12) Pl+Pb+Q+F < Sa (SIF,Outside) Case 7

13) Pl+Pb+Q+F < Sa (SIF,Outside) Case 8

14) Pl+Pb+Q+F < Sa (SIF,Outside) Case 9

15) Pl+Pb+Q+F < Sa (SIF,Outside) Case 10

16) Pl < SPL (OCC,Membrane) Case 5

* NO OVERSTRESSED NODES IN THIS MODEL *