Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Artifact Orgl3311mrschristinawilson
Artifact Orgl3311mrschristinawilson
ORGL 3311
October 6, 2019
10/26/2020
Morales 2
Abstract:
It is a fact that the behavior or criteria of a leader towards his employees is the best judge of
his management success. As a result, we have gone from the supposition that leaders are
born, through to the possibility that we can measure your leadership potential (Great Man
Theory).
Your supervisor does not care what you're going through? Is he is only interested in
the organizations production? How comfortable do you feel at work? I have asked to
myself these questions several times. Life happens and when you are going through a rough
situation you want to be heard not ignored or feel used. Some leaders have a wrong concept
of what it takes to be a good leader. Today I am going to discuss about the four Behavior
Approaches to leadership styles that might be useful for supervisors who need to have
certain type of bond with their employees. Let us not forget that without these workers the
organization would not be successful. I strongly believe that real leaders should be able to
understand and comprehend that life happens and that the better an employee is treated and
There are four types of behavioral approach which are directive leaders who provide
specifically instructions to their employees and nothing more. There is also Supportive
Morales 3
Leaders who provide emotionally support to employees. Participative Leaders are the ones
that involve employees on decision making but do not allow them to decide on their own.
Last, Achievement Oriented Leader is that encourages their employees by setting goals.
I strongly believe that leaders should focus more on representing the Supportive
Leader and the Achievement –Oriented leader style to allow their employees to feel that
they are in a safe and nurturing working environment. For example, if the leader does not
have enough tact with his employees and his staff does not feel the confidence to speak
with him when a not so pleasant scenario is presented then this leader is lacking of
Supportive Leader Style. Imagine if an member that is going through a difficult situation
which interferes with the way he works, he should be able to speak with the supervisor and
if he does not put any effort in being able to give him some kind of help (when it is found
Also, there are researchers that believe that the Achievement-Oriented Leader Style
Machuki, Aosa, and Letting’ (2012), the problem of poor performance is strongly linked to
a leader’s style of doing things in a company which I completely agree with them. They
mention that even on high performance companies with years of experience it still
fundamental to have these leadership styles. Another study by Schriesheim, Castro, Zhou,
and DeChurch (2006) who specified that future research was based on that on the path-
goal theory and employee performance appear quite needed. Robbins theory (2014) of
degree of participation that employees have with their organization’s mission, values and
goals. These theories are well known by leaders and are of great help when you want to
Morales 4
accomplish long and short-term goals. Allowing staff to gain some rewards is always a way
to encourage them to work more efficiently. It is well known that even teachers use that
technique to motivate children to accomplish their goal in class. I strongly believe that true
leaders have to have confidence in their workers, and they must motivate and reward them
path-goal theory and he defined it as a leadership style that focuses on concerns for the
needs and well-being of followers and the facilitation of a desirable climate for
communication. Since 1977 House deliberated that the Supportive Leadership style focused
on preoccupations and needs as well to simplify a better environment for interaction. Also,
Supportive Leadership Style emphases more on social and emotional connections which
show behavior like taking care of, liking, and listening. Also, Newton, Cameron J. and
Maierhofer, Naomi I. (2005) have proposed along the investigation that the behavior of the
supportive leadership style has a positive effect on employees and staff. The style alone has
been very well documented through investigation. The researchers have considered several
behaviors of this leadership style to be very beneficial to any company if not every
organization. House and Mitchell (1974) emphasized that this leadership style allows a
friendly and psychologically supportive working environment by providing a path for the
reduction of stress and frustration that may be experienced by employees in high stress
jobs.
Just like (Kuchinke, 1998, Chiok, 2001, Walumbwa et al., 2005, Elloy, 2005; Abass
& Yaqoob, 2009; Braun, Peus, Weisweiler & Frey, 2013) made several studies to observe
Morales 5
the relationship between leadership styles and job satisfaction among employees in
organizations and the results show that leadership coming from any organization has an
positive and important impact on workers and they also mention that it is one of the main
reasons for their efficiency. Therefore, the supervisors should adopt leadership behaviors
that motivate their staff and not disappoint them. Employee’s well-being means their
relaxed state of mind and body, therefore is an employee is psychological stable at work he
On the other, I relate the way the teacher use Achieved Orientation Leadership with
their students. Instructors set goals for their students and help themselves by motivating
scholars. They stimulate them by giving them desire rewards if they meet their goal. This is
very much alike organizations. Supervisors need to motivate their staff to allow them to
make a greater effort in accomplish certain goal. The path goal theory of leadership by
Robert J. House states that workers whose duties are not repetitive may have different
personalities from those that do the same job over and over again. Achievement oriented
leader may have a greater impact on those who do not have a repetitive position on an
organization than those who do. Another justification is that Achievement oriented only
results in ambiguous scenarios because there is more flexibility and autonocty in such
duties.
I strongly believe that a good supervisor or leaders should have more qualities than
just give instructions. Qualities such as Supportive Leadership by being able to talk and
listen to their employees and Achievement oriented skills by being able to motivate
workers and staff to accomplish a goal successfully. As I mentioned before I have been in
situations where the leaders don’t relate to the rest of the staff and this only confirms my
Morales 6
hypothesis in which I believe that leaders should be able to speaks and understand their
workers. Many of us really need to get support at work and sometimes leaders just think
that because they hold an important position in the organization they have the right to
ignore the problem or simply decide not supply any type of help causing the productivity
to slow down.
Morales 7
References:
https://study.com/academy/lesson/the-path-goal-theory-and-leadership-styles.html
Leadership Central
https://www.leadership-central.com/behavioral-theories.html
Vol. 3, Issue 2, pp: (118-125), Month: May - August 2016, Available at:
www.noveltyjournals.com
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/290201875_A_Multilevel_Study_Of_Supportive
_Leadership_And_Individual_Work_Outcomes_The_Mediating_Roles_Of_Team_Coopera
tion_Job_Satisfaction_And_Team_Commitment
The influence of supportive leadership and job characteristics on work alienation: A six-
country investigation
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S109095160700044
https://eprints.qut.edu.au/5291/1/5291_1.pdf
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2314721017300798Relationships
between teachers’ perceived leadership style, students’ learning style, and academic
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01443410701417945