Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Uganda Management Institute
Uganda Management Institute
MODULE: TAXATION
1
Digital Tax Stamps are physical paper stamp which are applied to goods or their packaging
which contain security features and codes to prevent counterfeiting, tamperproof features,
track and trace capabilities to enable consumers validate the stamp, traders and manufacturers
track the product movement and government to monitor compliance of the product and
stamp.it has a quick response code (QR code) that will allow distributors, retailers and
consumers to verify the authenticity of the products for online ordering and approval for
delivery of stamps. The Tax Procedures Code Act, 2014 provides for a code to regulate the
procedures for the administration of specified tax laws in Uganda; and to harmonize and
consolidate the tax procedures under the existing laws. The objectives of the act are to adopt
uniform procedures for the registration, assessment and collection of all domestic taxes;
promote efficiency in domestic tax administration by harmonizing, consolidating and
regulating tax procedures in a single law; and streamline and simplify the administration and
collection of taxes (URA, 2016).
Below are some of the pertinent issues that should be considered for successful
implementation of the Digital tax stamp by Uganda Revenue Authority:
2
Simplification of tax laws and policies
Efforts need to be made by some ‘tax experts’ to annually explain the implications of certain
tax proposals by government using a simplified language and approach. This calls for
concerted efforts to simplify all the tax laws and policies through translating them into local
languages. At local levels, CSOs can work with citizens’ groups (such as neighborhood
assemblies) and trader’s/ vendors’ associations to provide simplified information about
taxation.
3
Economic Efficiency
The tax authority has to consider that the new changes to be introduced shall not interfere
with allocation of resources and in consideration of any tax, it will be to an extent that does
not affect the economy or cause distortions in the economic decisions. For example, a good
tax system should have taxes that cause only minimal impact on resource allocation and
economic decisions to be undertaken.
Administrative Simplicity
Before implementation of a new tax it should be ensured that it will be simple and easy to
administer in terms of costs of administration to the tax authorities, staff training and
equipment to be used should not be too expensive. The compliance costs of the tax payer
regarding record keeping, use of consultants and adherence to other required procedures
should not be too high. However administrative simplicity may to some extent be determined
by the complexity of the tax code, the types of tax and the tax payer. the system should cater
for all stakeholders to help minimise costs.
Transparency
It means that the tax payers and leaders can easily find information about the tax system and
how tax payers’ money is used. With a transparent tax system, all tax payers know how
much they are paying and what is being done with the money. Transparency can help in
finding out who benefits from tax exemptions, deductions and credits, and with this, tax
payers are able to adjust to the new changes that are being introduced in the tax system.
4
Ensure Auditing as a legal pre-requisite.
Focus must be on improving the auditing processes and tools in this regard, the tax
administration has to prioritize more aggressive enforcement. Hence there is a need to audit
taxes with volatile collection rates. There were negative variations of 38% in 2013/14 and
6.4% in 2015/16 between actual and target collection for corporate tax. There is also a need
to audit the tax heads that are performing well to establish best practices that can be scaled up
in poor performing tax heads., it is evident that taxes on excise duty on soft drinks (5 % in
2013/14, 6.3 % in 2014/15 and 3% in 2015/16) performed well above the expected target.
5
REFERENCES
Alumina, M., Gerard, F., Hjort & Knebelmann, J. (2015). Fiscal Capacity and Tax Revenue
in Uganda. IGC working Paper.
Bird, Richard (2010) “Smart Tax Administration.” Economic Premise No 36. Washington
D.C.: World Bank
Bird, Richard (2013) “Foreign Advice and Tax Policy in Developing Countries.” Working
Paper 13-07 Atlanta: Georgia State University International Centre for Public Policy
GoU. (2017). Background to the Budget: Fiscal Year 2017/18. Industrialisation for Job
Creation and Shared Prosperity. Kampala: Ministry of Finance, Planning and
Economic Development.
IMF. (2016). Uganda Seventh Review under the Policy Support Instrument—Debt
Sustainability Analysis. Kampala: International Monetary Fund.
Kangave, J. (2005). Improving tax administration: a case study of the Uganda Revenue
Authority. Journal of African Law, Vol. 49, No. 2 (2005), pp. 145-176.
Kopanyi, Mihaly (2015) Local Revenue Reform - Kampala Capital City Authority. London:
International Growth Centre
Stiglitz, Joseph and Rosengard, Jay K. (2015) “The Five Desirable Characteristics of Any
Tax System.” In Stiglitz, Joseph and Rosengard, Jay K. Economics of the Public
Sector, 4th Edition London and New York: W. W. Norton and Company
URA. (2004). Taxation and Investment in Uganda: Structure and Trend. . Kampala Uganda:
Uganda Revenue Authority.