Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Artifact 2 Edu 210
Artifact 2 Edu 210
Artifact # 2
Court Cases
The administrators of a predominantly black high school are Freddie Watts the principle,
and Jimmy Brothers is the assistant principal. Both administrators are African-American. During
an intense conversation involving a white teacher and both administrators. The teacher Ann
Griffin had stated that she “hated all black folks.” The statement was leak and it caused a
negative reaction on her co-workers both white and black. As a result, the principle
recommended dismissal based on concerns of her ability of treating students fairly. As well as
Loeffelman v. Board of Education of the Crystal City School District (2004) is the first
case in favor of Freddie Watts. Jendra Loeffelman taught 8th grade English at Crystal City
Elementary School. A student asked her how she felt about interracial relationships, Loeffelman
responded that she opposed them and interracial couples should be “fixed” so the couple cannot
have children, who are “racially confused.” The school board concluded that it had the authority
to terminate her contract based on, that she willfully violated board policy by engaging in
discriminatory conduct and making disparaging racial comments. This case supports the side of
Freddie Watts because Jendra Loeffelman and Ann Griffin both made discrimination comments.
The only difference is that Ann Griffin made her statement towards the administrators of the
school. Loeffelman V. Board of Education of the Crystal County School District court case is
specially related to the current case because currently and in 2004 schools are meant to be
discrimination free. It is unacceptable for teachers to make children feel out of place when
Ammons V. Dade City, Fla., 594 F. Supp. 1274 (1984) is the second case in favor of
Freddie Watts. Black citizens maintained that they have been unlawfully denied their right to
equal municipals services and violation of their rights under the Thirteenth and Fourteenth
Artifact #2 3
Amendments to the United States Constitution. This case supports the current case because one
of the equal rights is free education and schools to be discrimination free. Ms. Griffin violated
that when she made her statement that she hated all black folks. This is specially related to Ms.
Griffin because she is part of the people that discriminate people outside of school, she might
Stroman V. Colleton County School Dist. Of Philadelphia (1958) is the first case in favor
of Ann Griffin. On May 29, 1987, John W. Stroman was discharged from his employment as a
public-school teacher in Colleton County, South Carolina. Stroman wrote and circulated a letter
to teachers complaining about a change of method of paying teaches. Stroman criticized the
school district for budgetary mismanagement, and encouraging his fellow teachers to engage in
absence during the week of finals exams. After his dismissal, Stroman filed a suit against the
Colleton County School District based on his dismissal was impermissibly based on his exercise
of free speech and violated the First Amendment. This case supports Ann Griffin. The
Administrators were there to speak with Ann Griffin based on the conversion at some point the
people involve caused the conversation to get out of control. The administrators took Ms.
Griffin’s right of the First Amendment by using her statement that was made under pleasure on
favor of the administrators to dismiss her from her job. This case specially relates to the other
side because the Colleton County and Freddie Watts employers were only exercising their right
free of speech.
Beilan V. Board of Education, School Dist. Of Philadelphia (1958) is the second case in
favor of Ann Griffin. A teacher of a public school in Philadelphia refused to answer questions
related to Communistic Affiliations and activities. The teacher was warned that the inquiry was
related to his fitness to be a teacher, and refusal to answer might lead to dismissal. It was
Artifact #2 4
confirmed that his political beliefs and activities was not an issue. Even though it was not an
issue, the Board of Education found that his refusal was “incompetency”, and discharged him.
This case is related to Ms. Griffin case because Beilan only mistake was that he did not answer
some questions, and caused him his job. He was fires because it was considered incompetent. In
the case of Ann Griffin that she did answer to the administrators found that she was unfit to teach
and would treat children unfairly. If Ms. Griffin would have stayed quit during the conversation
she could have been accused of incompetency too just like Beilan. This case is related to the
other side of the case because if Ms. Griffin would have chosen a different outcome like staying
Based on court cases. I have decided in favor of Freddie Watts the school principle. The
reason I choose this side of the case is because it’s unfair to co-workers and the students of the
school to have teachers that think of them differently just because of color. In Loeffelman v.
Board of Education of the Crystal City School District (2004), Loeffelman was speaking to
children saying that have a different effect on them then speaking with adults. Not only are
children affected by such behavior or point of view but co- workers and parents too. Ammons V.
Dade City, Fla., 594 F. Supp. 1274 (1984) case shows that the discrimination that is happening
outside of schools are being taught in schools too. When it shouldn’t be happening because
References
Ammons V. Dade City, Fla., 594 F. Supp. 1274 (1984). Retrieved on March 31, 2019/
https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/594/1274/1900209/
Beilan V. Board of Education, School Dist. Of Philadelphia, 375 U.S 399 (1958). Retrieved
Loeffelman v. Board of Education of the Crystal City School District (2004) 134 S.W.3d 637
appeals/2004/ed83337-2.html
Stroman V. Colleton County School District, 981 F.2d 152 (4th Cir. 1992). Retrieved March 30,
2019. https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/981/152/22184/
Underwood Julie, & Webb L. Dean. (2006). Teachers’ Rights. In School Law for Teachers.