Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Supplier Relationship Management (SRM) : Guidelines For NSWP Practitioners
Supplier Relationship Management (SRM) : Guidelines For NSWP Practitioners
Supplier Relationship Management (SRM) : Guidelines For NSWP Practitioners
(SRM)
Version 2.0
January 2017
Purpose of this document
• Provide a consistent methodology for segmenting and managing the NSWP supply base
• Provide example tools and templates to support supplier relationship management
activities
• Note: this document applies to ALL suppliers. Outputs developed as part of the Supplier
Development Management (SDM) program apply to strategic whole-of-NSW
Government suppliers only
2
Contents
Section Page
Introduction 4
Segmentation 6
Governance 12
SRM Process and Procedures 14
Supplier Performance Management and KPIs 19
Appendix 26
3
NSWP Supplier Relationship Management Guidelines
INTRODUCTION
4
Definition
SRM enables NSWP to leverage value beyond the contract.
Effective contract management is a pre-requisite for SRM
(3)
(3) Category Management and SRM
Leveraging value from the relationship.
Contract execution Creating value beyond the contract.
Potential value
(2)
Standard contract management Category Management & Supplier Relationship Management (SRM)
▪ Contracts stipulate the agreed minimum levels of performance ▪ SRM delivers value over and above the agreed minimum levels of
performance laid out in the contract
▪ Contract management should be a low touch but comprehensive
process allowing more focus on value added activity ▪ SRM focuses attention on the whole value stream
▪ Contract management should establish a clear route for issue ▪ While the contract process relates to all suppliers, SRM focuses
resolution and escalation resource and activity on those relationships that are considered most
critical
SEGMENTATION
6
Why segment suppliers?
• Segmentation provides a consistent framework and terminology for identifying and classifying
different types of supplier relationships
• Not all suppliers require or benefit from the same degree of focus. Segmentation results therefore
determine the appropriate degree of supplier management effort and resource, based on the
nature of the relationship
• Based on the results of the segmentation, ownership of supplier management activities will be
assigned to different parts of the NSW Procurement organisation
• Segmentation results also determine the expectations for supplier management activities,
both for Procurement and business stakeholders
7
There are 3 main steps to supplier segmentation
• Data from spend cube & supplier reports • Validated spend from step 1 • Long list of suppliers from step 2
• Analyse spend data • Identify suppliers accounting for 80% of • Conduct detailed segmentation based on
spend for the category spend and criticality matrix
• Cleanse data and categorise where
necessary • Sense check initial segmentation results • Assign suppliers to tiers based on
to verify if any critical suppliers have segmentation
• Model future spend volumes where
been excluded based on spend criterion
appropriate (e.g. large new supply • Review and align segmentation results
agreements) • Review and align initial segmentation with stakeholders and agree final
results with stakeholders assignment of suppliers to tiers
• Identify stakeholders to include in
segmentation process • Assign supplier relationship lead and
associated governance for each supplier
• Validated spend by supplier • Long list of potential suppliers for • Completed segmentation, assigning
advanced SRM activities suppliers to Tiers 1 and 2 to inform SRM
activities
• Remainder of suppliers assigned to Tier
3 status • Additional Tier 3 suppliers if appropriate
• Identified supplier relationship leads and
governance structures
8
Basic supplier segmentation assesses suppliers based on
spend and risk
High
Strategic Security Strategic Critical
- Long term contracts - Medium term contract
- Indexation - Detailed contract
- Stockholding - Supplier Analysis
- Generate Alternatives - Supplier Development
- Volume conscious - Price management
Risk score
Medium
Spend volume
9
Supplier tiering can then be applied to group suppliers and
prioritise supplier management effort accordingly
Tier 1
Risk score
Supplier C
Medium
Tactical Acquisition Tactical Profit
Tier 2
Supplier E Supplier D
Low
Tier 3
Low Medium High
Spend volume
Dependencies 25% What is the linkage with NSW Government's key processes? What formal Performance Management
in place and reported?
Are any other suppliers/services dependent on this supplier?
Please assess historic performance of
Stakeholder 30% What is the impact on the end customer if this supplier fails to this supplier
Impact perform?
Value Add 20% Please assess the degree of
What is the impact on NSW Government staff if this supplier fails commoditisation of a product/service
to perform?
Please assess supplier's innovation
Supply Risk 20% Which statement best describes the supply market? track record
What are the switching costs/disruption if supplier was replaced Please assess the importance ‘Value-
or goods/services brought in house? adds’ associated with goods/service
provided by the supplier
Value Score Strategic 10% Please assess the importance of NSW
Area Weight Question Alignment Government as a customer to this
suppliers operations?
Current Spend 60% What is NSW Government spend with the supplier in the last FY?
Is there an evidence of any significant
Forecasted 20% Is the spend with this supplier forecasted to increase, decrease or barriers to SDM implementation with the
Spend remain constant in the next financial year? supplier?
Contracts 20% Please note the date of expiry of majority of contract(s) with this Is this supplier strategically aligned to
supplier NSW Government?
Template:
11
NSWP Supplier Relationship Management Guidelines
GOVERNANCE
12
Key stakeholders from both supplier and NSWP organisation should be
mapped at multiple levels to provide clear sponsorship and escalation
channels
13
NSWP Supplier Relationship Management Guidelines
14
Supplier management effort and activities vary by supplier tier. Tier 3
suppliers require basic management whilst Tier 1 suppliers require
advanced supplier management effort and activities
0 High
Tier 1
▪ Innovation ▪ Tier 1 contains NSWP strategic
▪ Continuous suppliers
improvement ▪ Activities focus on mutual cost
▪ Value creation savings/benefits across the entire value
Tier 1 chain
Tier 3
▪ Contract ▪ Tier 3 covers all remaining suppliers
management
Tier 3 ▪ Activities ensure compliance and enable
▪ Compliance savings/benefits tracking
All Low
Segmentation of suppliers is
the foundation of all SRM activity
15
SRM activities for Tier 3 suppliers focus on compliance
Tier 3 Suppliers
Tier 3 suppliers are typically transactional suppliers that provide no business critical commodity
Overview
products/services and viable alternatives exist
Relationship ▪ Short-term high-level business relationship involving procurement associates or end users (e.g.
building Category Analysts, Category Specialists and Category Managers)
▪ Supplier management effort concentrated during contract award and expiry, with ongoing
Minimum governance focused on basic monthly reporting and compliance
governance
▪ NSWP Service Centre and ProcurePoint leveraged for ad hoc queries and enquiries
16
SRM activities for Tier 2 suppliers add a focus on
performance and risk management
Tier 2 Suppliers
Tier 2 suppliers are typically suppliers that provide more tailored or specific products or services that
Overview
may be critical at a business unit level. Alternatives exist but switching is more difficult.
Relationship ▪ Mid-term business relationship involving procurement associates (e.g. Category Managers) and /or
building senior business stakeholders (e.g. Directors)
Minimum
▪ Monthly reporting and quarterly or annual performance reviews as appropriate
governance
17
SRM activities for Tier 1 suppliers add a focus on
improvement and innovation
Tier 1 Suppliers
Tier 1 suppliers are typically suppliers that provide highly customised or unique products/services that
Overview have a significant impact on the business, and provide a large source of competitive advantage.
Alternatives are scarce/nonexistent and switching costs are very high.
▪ Infrequent sourcing events
▪ Customised purchasing activities
Example ▪ Innovation
procurement
activities ▪ Continuous improvement
▪ Risk sharing
▪ Gain sharing
Relationship ▪ Long-term strategic business relationship involving senior procurement staff and/or senior
building management (e.g. Directors and NSW Government CPO)
Minimum ▪ Annual business reviews, quarterly performance meetings and monthly reporting
governance ▪ Annual continuous improvement, innovation or supplier development workshops
18
NSWP Supplier Relationship Management Guidelines
SUPPLIER PERFORMANCE
MANAGEMENT AND KPIs
19
There are a number of pre-requisites for effective supplier
performance management
Prerequisite Benefit
Create category
Enables like-for-like comparison between suppliers
based scorecards
20
The effort of KPI management must be proportionate to the
benefits
21
There are 3 steps to effective supplier
performance management
1 Establish metrics 2 Measure, report 3 Manage performance
and baseline and review improvement
• Historical performance data • Metrics established in step 1 • Development areas and root causes
from step 2
• Business objectives • Actual performance data
• Draft list of relevant KPIs for supplier • Review performance against criteria • Establish improvement plan with
performance identified supplier
• Review KPIs with stakeholders to • Identify supplier strengths and • Monitor progress against improvement
ensure alignment development areas plan, with more frequent reviews as
appropriate
• Establish baselines against which to • Review performance with suppliers with
measure performance appropriate frequency • Refine KPIs as appropriate during
lifespan of relationship to ensure
• Identify sources of data for KPI • Identify root causes of supplier
relevance
reporting performance issues
• Build KPIs into contracts and SLAs
• Metrics, baseline and data sources • Understanding of areas of good and • Supplier improvement plans in place and
identified poor performance and root causes tracked
22
The AQSCIR framework provides a holistic grouping of key
KPIs
Assurance of Supply
Cost
24
Example strategic, operational & tactical meeting agendas
Strategic • Tier one (strategic) suppliers, senior executive staff • Focus on long-term strategic business
eg General Manager or equivalent relationship
• Strategic level meetings held with tier two suppliers • Collaboration and delivery of mutual
on an as needs basis benefits
• DFSI Strategic, senior management staff attend • Extensive information sharing
annual review & potentially quarterly review, with • Alignment of priorities
Category Manager (eg Directors & NSW Government • Risk review and shared mitigations
CPO) • Annual continuous improvement, innovation
• Secretary and/or Deputy Secretary may attend or supplier development workshops
meetings arranged for specific purposes or
relationship building, as required
Operational • Category Manager manages relationship • Manage, monitor and report the commercial
• Director attends annual and/or quarterly reviews as performance of the relationship
required • Identify opportunities to increase benefits
• Supplier Sales Director or equivalent attends annual • Mitigate risks and resolve issues
reviews and/or quarterly reviews as required • Manage issues by exception and escalate
• Tier two supplier activities are concentrated here to Strategic layer if required
Tactical • Category Analysts/ Specialist • Manage, monitor and report the tactical
• Procurement Associate performance of the relationship
• NSWP Service Centre • Order fulfilment, deliveries, invoice
• Supplier account representative or area accuracy, timeliness of payments, etc
representative • Manage by exception and escalate to
Operational layer if required
25
NSWP Supplier Relationship Management Guidelines
APPENDIX
26
Indicative Supplier KPIs – Assurance of Supply
Enables NSWP to understand the level of knowledge and experience a supplier has in predicting
Proactive issue identification serious faults and preventing them before they become too serious
and resolution This metric gives the customer and supplier a tool to track various issues and an ability to solve
supplier problems
Assurance Service reliability Measures the amount of downtime, or failure rate of the product or service
of Supply
Measures the financial stability through financial metrics and analysis
Supplier financial stability is important to capture at the beginning of a contract, however it is also
Supplier financial stability important to capture this info throughout the lifetime of the supplier relationship. Tracking this
metric can give foresight to if there is going to be future problems, and potentially need to look at
sourcing elsewhere
Supplier asset specificity (value Enables NSWP to understand the 'Financial' degree of investment the supplier has made in the
of assets dedicated to NSWP ) relationship
27
Indicative Supplier KPIs – Quality
Quality SLAs as per contract Ensures compliance to key 'Quality' SLAs as set out in the contract between NSWP and supplier
Measures overall customer satisfaction with the relationship to the supplier, normally established
Customer satisfaction
with a survey
Tracks the number of customer complaints in a reporting period, or tracking the number of
complaints as a % of # of transactions
Customer complaints Tracking the number of recorded complaints received by the customer can give an indication of
Quality the quality of service or the quality of product and can also help to spot problems early, to mitigate
long term issues.
Ability to meet business needs Demonstrated by category-specific criteria and measures either through observation or surveys
28
Indicative Supplier KPIs – Service (1 of 3)
Enables NSWP to assess the utility of progress reports and keep an accurate track of in flight
Delays to progress reports
supplier projects
Delays to service delivery are Enables NSWP to identify promptness of supplier in delivering customer impacting service
reported in a prompt manner interruptions
Complaint escalation Ensures that escalations are handled with the appropriate level of importance and in a timely
compliance manner to prevent repeat issues
29
Indicative Supplier KPIs – Service (2 of 3)
Value of refunds received Enables NSWP to understand the financial extent of admin / order processing failures
Transaction volume Helps understand NSWP total transaction volume to assist with NSWP strategy formulation
Helps understand variation in volume against projections to enable investigation / better demand
Transaction volume variance
planning
30
Indicative Supplier KPIs – Service (3 of 3)
Helps NSWP track how responsive the supplier is to responding to requests, indicative of resource
allocated and importance placed on NSWP business
Timely response to requests
This KPI is important to ensure that customer inquiries are being handled in a timely manner. This
can be tracked either through survey, or monitoring issues.
Accuracy and completeness of Measures supplier responsiveness. While a supplier may respond on time, it may not be a quality
response response that enables NSWP to proceed so need to track time (above) and quality
31
Indicative Supplier KPIs – Cost
Demonstrates value for money, more openness should increase trust. Transparency of costs
Cost vs. industry or competitor
gives a good indication of trust in a relationship
Measures the number of cost reduction initiatives that are recommended by the supplier
Cost reduction initiatives
A good "value-add" metric to ensure the supplier is proactive and sharing cost saving ideas
Cost givebacks Measures the amount of year-on-year percentage givebacks over the lifetime of a project
Helps understand NSWP total spend to highlight relative relationship status and leverage
Spend by cost centre
opportunity
Helps understand NSWP total spend to highlight relative relationship status and leverage
Spend by NCC code
opportunity
Cost
Helps understand NSWP spend development with the supplier to flag changes to relationship
Spend
status
Average invoice value Helps NSWP to understand any movement which may require further investigation
Spend variance Helps understand variation in spend against projections to enable investigation
Enables NSWP to understand how willing the supplier is to tailor its pricing therefore shows
Flexibility with commercial
importance of NSWP as a customer . This metric is important to show how much influence NSWP
pricing options
can have over their suppliers
Openness and transparency of Demonstrates customer value for money, more openness should increase trust. Transparency of
actual costs costs gives a good indication of trust in a relationship
32
Indicative Supplier KPIs – Innovation (1 of 2)
Number of supplier-led
Helps to understand suppliers’ willingness to innovate and usefulness of these innovations
innovations delivered
Value of supplier-led Helps to understand level of innovation suppliers contribute and relative performance of strategic
innovations delivered suppliers
Helps understand progress made in building critical trust with strategic suppliers (measured by
Supplier trust in NSWP
survey)
Innovation Skills and knowledge Ensures the supplier has allocated the correct resources to a NSWP project
Helps NSWP understand which suppliers will continue to be strategic in the future, who to
Ability to add value to NSWP
strengthen relationships with
Willingness to work closely for Helps NSWP understand which suppliers will continue to be strategic in the future, who to
mutual benefit strengthen relationships with
Understanding of NSWP
immediate business drivers and Helps NSWP identify future strategic suppliers and strengthen relationships
requirements
Ability to recommend new ideas
and improvements to meet our Helps NSWP identify future strategic suppliers and strengthen relationships
business needs
33
Indicative Supplier KPIs – Innovation (2 of 2)
Knowledge of industry Helps NSWP identify future strategic suppliers and strengthen relationships
Knowledge of our organisation Helps NSWP identify future strategic suppliers and strengthen relationships
Measures the amount of continuous improvement projects performed by the supplier that adds
value to NSWP Tracking continuous improvement is a very important measure. It establishes
Total number of completed
accountability on the supplier's part, and also helps to identify long standing issues. By initiating a
continuous improvement
continuous improvement programme, NSWP can have control and oversee some of the issues
projects
that the supplier is working towards, and this helps to create an open communication and
collaboration between NSWP and the supplier to work towards a better future state.
Innovation
Continuous improvement
Measures the amount of savings attributed to the continuous improvement projects
savings
Continuous improvement
Measures the variance of savings from period to period
savings variance
Continuous improvement
Measures the impact of the continuous improvement programs on Revenue growth
revenue growth
Continuous Improvement
Measures the variance of revenue growth due to continuous improvement programs
revenue growth variance
34
Indicative Supplier KPIs – Regulation
Responsible procurement Ensures compliance to NSWP responsible procurement standards and policies
35