The Democratic Rollback

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

TEXTO 4

Para el trabajo en grupo de mañana 8/10, ​SOLAMENTE​ deben completar el siguiente​ cuadro​ y hacer
las primeras cuatro actividades​ de lectocomprensión.

Título

Autor

Fuente

Fecha de publicación

Tipo de texto
THE DEMOCRATIC ROLLBACK​ - ​The Resurgence of the Predatory State

Author:​ ​Larry Diamond


Source:​ ​Foreign Affairs,​ ​March/April 2008

LARRY DIAMOND is a Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution and Co-Editor of the Journal of
Democracy. This essay is adapted from his book, The Spirit of Democracy: The Struggle to Build Free
Societies throughout the World (Times Books, 2008). Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace,
Stanford University (after President Herbert Hoover) is a public policy research center devoted to the
advanced study of politics, economics, political economy as well as international affairs.

1 Since 1974, more than 90 countries have made transitions to democracy, and by the turn
of the century approximately 60 percent of the world's independent states were democratic.
The democratization of Mexico and Indonesia in the late 1990s and the more recent "color
revolutions" in Georgia and Ukraine formed the crest of a tidal wave of democratic
5 transitions. Even in the Arab world, the trend is visible: in 2005, democratic forces in
Lebanon rose up to peacefully drive out Syrian troops and Iraqis voted in multiparty
parliamentary elections for the first time in nearly half a century.

But celebrations of democracy's triumph are premature. In a few short years, the
10 democratic wave has been slowed by a powerful authoritarian undertow, and the world has
slipped into a democratic recession. Democracy has recently been overthrown or gradually
stifled in a number of key states, including Nigeria, Russia, Thailand, Venezuela, and, most
recently, Bangladesh and the Philippines. In December 2007, electoral fraud in Kenya
delivered another abrupt and violent setback. At the same time, most newcomers to the
15 democratic club (and some long-standing members) have performed poorly. Even in many of
the countries seen as success stories, such as Chile, Ghana, Poland, and South Africa, there
are serious problems of governance and deep pockets of disaffection. In South Asia, where
democracy once predominated, India is now surrounded by politically unstable, undemocratic
states. And aspirations for democratic progress have been thwarted everywhere in the Arab
20 world (except Morocco), whether by terrorism and political and religious violence (as in Iraq),
externally manipulated societal divisions (as in Lebanon), or authoritarian regimes themselves
(as in Egypt, Jordan, and some of the Persian Gulf monarchies, such as Bahrain).

Before democracy can spread further, it must take deeper root where it has already
25 sprouted. It is a basic principle of any military or geopolitical campaign that at some point an
advancing force must consolidate its gains before it conquers more territory. Emerging
democracies must demonstrate that they can solve their governance problems and meet their
citizens' expectations for freedom, justice, a better life, and a fairer society. If democracies do
not more effectively contain crime and corruption, generate economic growth, relieve
30 economic inequality, and secure freedom and the rule of law, people will eventually lose faith
and turn to authoritarian alternatives. Struggling democracies must be consolidated so that all
levels of society become enduringly committed to democracy as the best form of government
and to their country's constitutional norms and constraints. Western policymakers can assist in
this process by demanding more than superficial electoral democracy. By holding
35 governments accountable and making foreign aid contingent on good governance, donors can
Países donantes
help reverse the democratic recession.

1- TRADUCIR ÚLTIMA ORACIÓN


2-RESUMEN DE CADA PÁRRAFO
3-HACER PUNTO 8
OBJETIVOS DE LECTO-COMPRENSIÓN:

● Tiempos verbales ​Simple​ ​Present, Present Perfect​ y​ Simple Past.


● Bloque nominal.
● Verbos modales ​can​ y ​must​.
● There is​ / ​There are​: HAY
● Condicional tipo I. Verbo modal ​will​.

ACTIVIDADES DE LECTO-COMPRENSIÓN:

01).- Lea el copete. Preste atención a las frases nominales. Subraye cuatro ejemplos e identifique los
núcleos y los modificadores.

02).- Los siguientes verbos fueron extraídos del texto. Colóquelos en la columna del tiempo verbal que
corresponda:

is / have made / were / formed / rose up / voted / are / has slipped / delivered
have performed / has sprouted / conquers

Simple Present Present Perfect Simple Past

03) Busque el significado de los verbos en el diccionario.

04).- ¿Qué situación se describe en el primer párrafo?


05).- En las líneas 16/17 se encuentra la expresión “there are”. ¿Cómo se traduce en español?
Hay/existen, en inglés varía la cantidad y aparece en cualquier tiempo,
06).- En el segundo párrafo, ¿por qué se afirma acompaña
que el verbo to
la celebración esbeprematura?
dependiendo del tiempo (habría, habrá, ha habido)

07).- En el último párrafo, varios verbos están precedidos por “must” o por “can”. ¿Qué idea denotan
cada una de estas palabras? Búsquelas en el diccionario.

08).- Traduzca la siguiente oración (línea 28): “If democracies do not more effectively contain crime and
corruption, generate economic growth, relieve economic inequality, and secure freedom and the rule of
law, people will eventually lose faith and turn to authoritarian alternatives”.
FINALMENTE ES
09).- ¿Qué desafío a futuro se describe en el último párrafo?

Completar el siguiente mapa de contenido.

TRANSICIÓN
A LA
DEMOCRACIA
A partir del año 1974
DEMOCRACIA
Alegría prematura

DEMOCRACIA
Desafío para el futuro

You might also like