Assessment of Changes in Alcohol and Marijuana Abstinence, Co-Use, and Use Disorders Among US Young Adults From 2002 To 2018

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 9

Research

JAMA Pediatrics | Original Investigation

Assessment of Changes in Alcohol and Marijuana Abstinence,


Co-Use, and Use Disorders Among US Young Adults
From 2002 to 2018
Sean Esteban McCabe, PhD; Brooke J. Arterberry, PhD; Kara Dickinson; Rebecca J. Evans-Polce, PhD;
Jason A. Ford, PhD; Jennie E. Ryan, PhD; Ty S. Schepis, PhD

Supplemental content
IMPORTANCE Recent information on the trends in past-year alcohol abstinence and marijuana
abstinence, co-use of alcohol and marijuana, alcohol use disorder, and marijuana use disorder
among US young adults is limited.

OBJECTIVES To assess national changes over time in past-year alcohol and marijuana
abstinence, co-use, alcohol use disorder, and marijuana use disorder among US young adults
as a function of college status (2002-2018) and identify the covariates associated with
abstinence, co-use, and marijuana use disorder in more recent cohorts (2015-2018).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This study examined cross-sectional survey data
collected in US households annually between 2002 and 2018 as part of the National Survey
on Drug Use and Health. The survey used an independent, multistage area probability sample
for all states to produce nationally representative estimates. The sample included 182 722
US young adults aged 18 to 22 years. The weighted screening and weighted full interview
response rates were consistently above 80% and 70%, respectively.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Measures included past-year abstinence, alcohol use,
marijuana use, co-use, alcohol use disorder, marijuana use disorder, prescription drug use,
prescription drug misuse, prescription drug use disorder, and other drug use disorders based
on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria.

RESULTS The weighted sample comprised 51.1% males. Between 2002 and 2018, there was
an annual increase in past-year alcohol abstinence among young adults (college students:
0.54%; 95% CI, 0.44%-0.64%; non–college students: 0.33%; 95% CI, 0.24%-0.43%).
There was an annual increase in marijuana use from 2002 to 2018 (college: 0.46%; 95% CI,
0.37%-0.55%; non-college: 0.49%; 95% CI, 0.40%-0.59%) without an increase in marijuana
use disorder for all young adults. Past-year alcohol use disorder decreased annually (college:
0.66%; 95% CI, 0.60%-0.74%; non-college: 0.61%; 95% CI, 0.55%-0.69%), while co-use
of alcohol and marijuana increased annually between 2002 and 2018 among all young adults
(college: 0.60%; 95% CI, 0.51%-0.68%; non-college: 0.56%; 95% CI, 0.48%-0.63%). Young
adults who reported co-use of alcohol and marijuana or met criteria for alcohol use disorder
and/or marijuana use disorder accounted for 82.9% of young adults with prescription drug
use disorder and 85.1% of those with illicit drug use disorder. More than three-fourths of
those with both alcohol use disorder and marijuana use disorder reported past-year
prescription drug use (78.2%) and illicit drug use (77.7%); 62.2% reported prescription
drug misuse.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The findings of this study suggest that US colleges and
communities should create and maintain supportive resources for young adults as the
substance use landscape changes, specifically as alcohol abstinence, marijuana use, and
co-use increase. Interventions for polysubstance use, alcohol use disorder, and marijuana
use disorder may provide valuable opportunities for clinicians to screen for prescription
Author Affiliations: Author
drug misuse.
affiliations are listed at the end of this
article.
Corresponding Author: Sean
Esteban McCabe, PhD, Center for the
Study of Drugs, Alcohol, Smoking and
Health, University of Michigan School
of Nursing, 400 North Ingalls
JAMA Pediatr. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.3352 Building, Ste 2241A, Ann Arbor, MI
Published online October 12, 2020. 48109 (plius@umich.edu).

(Reprinted) E1
© 2020 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ by a University College London User on 10/13/2020


Research Original Investigation Changes in Alcohol and Marijuana Abstinence, Co-Use, and Use Disorders Among US Young Adults

S
ubstance use disorders (SUDs) are most prevalent among
US young adults compared with other US age groups, Key Points
and 2 of the most common SUDs are alcohol use disor-
Question Have rates of alcohol abstinence and marijuana
der and marijuana use disorder.1-3 Recently, marijuana use has abstinence, co-use, and use disorders changed in US young adults
increased and alcohol use has decreased among US young from 2002 to 2018 as a function of college status?
adults, but trends in the co-use of these substances remain
Findings A nationally representative cross-sectional survey
largely unknown.3,4 Consequences associated with alcohol,
conducted annually of 182 722 US young adults found that alcohol
marijuana, and other drug use during young adulthood in- abstinence, marijuana use, and co-use of alcohol and marijuana all
clude injury, SUDs, depressive symptoms, overdose, and increased between 2002 and 2018. These findings were apparent
death.5-7 for both college students and non–college students.
The transition from adolescence to young adulthood is an
Meaning The findings of this study suggest that colleges and
important developmental period for studying substance use communities should create and maintain supportive resources in
behaviors because emerging adults often experience less response to the recent changes in the US young adult substance
parental monitoring and make increasingly independent use landscape, accounting for increases in alcohol abstinence,
decisions.8,9 Although the association between college atten- marijuana use, and co-use of alcohol and marijuana.
dance and substance use differs based on the substance used,
the college environment can also directly affect substance
use behavior, acting as either a protective influence or a risk der, and both alcohol use disorder and marijuana use disorder
factor.4,9 Research has shown that binge drinking, prescrip- (ie, disordered co-use) as a function of college status. The sec-
tion stimulant misuse, and alcohol use disorder are more preva- ond objective was to examine the prevalence of past-year
lent among college students than non–college students.4,10-12 prescription drug use, prescription drug misuse, illicit drug
In contrast, marijuana use, prescription opioid misuse, pre- use, and SUDs based on DSM-IV criteria as a function of alco-
scription sedative or tranquilizer misuse, and multiple SUDs hol and marijuana use among US young adults in recent
are more prevalent among non–college students.4,12-15 cohorts (2015-2018).
Earlier studies examining changes over time in substance
use behaviors among young adults focused largely on indi-
vidual substances used by US college students.16-18 One con-
cerning change between 1993 and 2001 was an increased risk
Methods
for developing alcohol use disorder as a result of increased fre- This study examined cross-sectional data collected annually
quency of binge drinking.16 There was also an increase in past- in household surveys between 2002 and 2018 as part of the
year alcohol abstinence over the same period, from 16.4% in 1993 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH). The NSDUH
to 19.3% in 2001, suggesting a polarization of drinking used an independent, multistage area probability sample for
behavior.17 The polarization of increased alcohol abstinence and all states to produce nationally representative data. Inter-
high-risk drinking over the same period among college views began with audio computer-assisted self-interviewing
students occurred alongside a decrease in low-risk drinking.17 questions on sensitive variables such as substance use. Audio
This change suggests a need for a more nuanced examination computer-assisted self-interviewing was used to ensure pri-
of long-term changes associated with alcohol involvement vacy and promote honest reporting and data completeness.
among US young adults. In addition, increases in marijuana use Response rates for the NSDUH were consistently above 80%
were found in US young adults between 1993 and 2017,4,18,19 es- for the weighted screening and above 70% for the weighted
pecially among non–college students, with daily marijuana use full interview. Details regarding NSDUH methods are avail-
reaching an all-time high of 13.2% in 2016.4 Although national able elsewhere.24,25 The present study was exempt from re-
data often focus on individual substances, it is useful to also ex- view and need for informed patient consent by the Texas State
amine changes in polysubstance use and multiple SUDs.20-22 University Institutional Review Board. This study followed
Polysubstance use and multiple SUDs have been shown to be the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies
more persistent in their course and challenging to treat.20-22 in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guideline for cross-
Despite the increased focus on substance use changes sectional studies.26
among US adolescents,21,23 there has been a dearth of re-
search examining trends in abstinence from substance use Measures
among US young adults, as well as little research differentiat- College status among respondents aged 18 to 22 years was cat-
ing these changes by educational status over the past 2 de- egorized as college student and non–college student. Respon-
cades. The aim of the present study was to use nationally rep- dents were classified as college students if they reported that
resentative data collected from 17 cohorts of US young adults they were in their first through fourth year at a college or uni-
aged 18 to 22 years, with 2 objectives. The first was to identify versity and were either full- or part-time students (ranging from
the long-term changes (2002-2018) in past-year abstinence, 44.5% to 51.0% between 2002 and 2018). Respondents were
nondisordered substance use (ie, substance use that does not classified as non–college students if their current enrollment
meet Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, status was known and they were not classified as a full- or part-
Fourth Edition [DSM-IV] criteria for SUD), and SUD based on time college student (ranging from 38.9% to 44.9% between
DSM-IV criteria of alcohol use disorder, marijuana use disor- 2002 and 2018). Respondents who were on breaks in the school

E2 JAMA Pediatrics Published online October 12, 2020 (Reprinted) jamapediatrics.com

© 2020 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ by a University College London User on 10/13/2020


Changes in Alcohol and Marijuana Abstinence, Co-Use, and Use Disorders Among US Young Adults Original Investigation Research

year were considered enrolled if they intended to return to col- Analyses with subpopulations (eg, college students and non–
lege or university when the break ended. Respondents who college students) used the subpop option. For all analyses ex-
were in high school, graduated college, or had an unknown amining annual change and all regression analyses thereaf-
current college enrollment status were considered another ter, we adjusted for changing sociodemographic variables from
cohort and excluded from most analyses (ranging from 9.4% 2002 to 2018. Over these 17 years, the US population changed
to 11.5% between 2002 and 2018). in terms of race/ethnicity and college status (eTable 1 in the
Alcohol, marijuana, and other substance use included past- Supplement), making these annual adjustments necessary. We
year alcohol use, past-year marijuana use, past-year other illicit also adjusted analyses for income and population density.
drug use, and past-year prescription drug use/misuse. Past-year Based on the number of comparisons made in the present
alcohol use, past-year marijuana use, and past-year other illicit study, we focused on statistical significance for all analyses with
drug use, including heroin, cocaine, hallucinogens, inhalants, a 2-sided P value <.001.
and methamphetamine, were all assessed from 2002 to 2018. For alcohol use, marijuana use, and their co-use, weighted
Prescription drug use and misuse were assessed from 2015 to cross-tabulations estimated the prevalence of abstinence, non-
2018 by asking respondents a series of questions regarding the disordered use, and use disorders (separately for alcohol and
use and misuse of prescription opioids, stimulants, and sedatives/ marijuana). Prevalence estimates were computed separately
tranquilizers in the past 12 months. The time frame for prescrip- among those in college and those not in college, followed by
tion drug use and misuse differed from other substances owing multinomial regression analyses to evaluate the association
to wording changes in the NSDUH made in 2015. From 2015 to of year with alcohol and marijuana use status. The margins
2018, the NSDUH defined prescription drug misuse as “use with- command was used to evaluate annual change in models sig-
out a prescription of one's own; use in greater amounts, more nificantly associated with year, controlling for the variables
often, or longer than told to take a drug; or use in any other way noted above.
not directed by a doctor.”25 A third set of analyses used logistic regression to evaluate
Substance use disorders were assessed using past-year the association of alcohol and marijuana use status with any
DSM-IV alcohol use disorder and marijuana use disorder crite- past-year prescription drug use, prescription drug misuse, pre-
ria. Similar measures of other drug use disorders were as- scription drug use disorders, illicit drug use (cocaine, heroin,
sessed. Earlier studies reported that these measures have good hallucinogens, methamphetamine, or inhalants), or illicit drug
reliability and validity.27,28 Nondisordered alcohol use and non- use disorders. Analyses controlled for sex, race/ethnicity,
disordered marijuana use were defined as alcohol use and mari- family income, and population density, with past-year absti-
juana use that did not meet DSM-IV criteria for alcohol use nence from both alcohol and marijuana set as the reference
disorder or marijuana use disorder. For combined alcohol group for the co-use variable. These analyses used data from
and marijuana past-year use, a 7-level variable was created: the 2015-2018 NSDUH data sets only, as the prescription use/
(1) abstinence from both, (2) nondisordered alcohol use, (3) non- misuse assessment was changed between 2014 and 2015,
disordered marijuana use, (4) nondisordered co-use (ie, use of making comparisons of prescription use and misuse between
both alcohol and marijuana without meeting disorder crite- 2015-2018 and 2002-2014 data invalid.29
ria), (5) alcohol use disorder only, (6) marijuana use disorder only,
and (7) both alcohol use disorder and marijuana use disorder.
Sociodemographic variables and other controls included
sex, race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, income, population den-
Results
sity, religion, and physical health (self-reported health, body Between 2002 and 2018, a total of 182 772 US young adults aged
mass index, and hospitalizations). Mental health variables in- 18 to 22 years completed the NSDUH. The weighted sample,
cluded mental health treatment, major depression, psycho- as described in eTable 1 in the Supplement, was 51.1% male,
logical distress, disability, and suicidal ideation. 48.9% female, 58.3% White, 19.7% Hispanic/Latino, 14.2%
Black, 4.9% Asian, 1.9% multiracial, and 1.1% other. Relative
Statistical Analysis to White respondents aged 18 to 22 years, the prevalence of
All analyses used Stata, version 16.0 (StataCorp, LLC), using respondents who identified as Black, Asian, multiracial, or
svy commands to account for the NSDUH complex survey de- Hispanic/Latino increased over time. While White respon-
sign. The NSDUH data were weighted, clustered on primary dent prevalence decreased by 0.70% annually (95% CI, 0.61%-
sampling units, and stratified. The Taylor series approxima- 0.79%), the prevalence of Black (0.03%; 95% CI, −0.04% to
tion was used, with adjusted degrees of freedom, to create ro- 0.08%), Asian (0.14%; 95% CI, 0.10%-0.18%), multiracial
bust variance estimates. Initially, weighted cross-tabulations (0.11%; 95% CI, 0.09%-0.12%), and Hispanic/Latino respon-
estimated the annual prevalence of sex, race/ethnicity, and col- dents (0.43%; 95% CI, 0.35%-0.51%) increased. The propor-
lege enrollment status. Potential change over the study pe- tion of those in college increased and decreased over the study
riod was evaluated using binary logistic regression for sex and period; however, the proportion of those not in college de-
multinomial logistic regression for race/ethnicity and college creased by 0.16% annually (95% CI, 0.07%-0.24%) and re-
enrollment status, with estimates of linearized annual change spondents who selected the other racial category increased by
(via the Stata margins command, which calculates predicted 0.08% per year (95% CI, 0.04%-0.12%).
trend slope, adjusting for average covariate values over the As reported in Table 1,30 marginal estimates indicated
study period) for analyses significantly associated with year. that past-year alcohol abstinence increased for both college

jamapediatrics.com (Reprinted) JAMA Pediatrics Published online October 12, 2020 E3

© 2020 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ by a University College London User on 10/13/2020


E4
Table 1. Trends in Abstinence, Substance Use Behaviors, and Disorders by College Statusa

Weighted %
Annualized change,
Variable 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 % (95% CI)
Unweighted sample size, No. 10 151 10 514 10 691 10 626 10 179 10 368 10 884 10 844 10 945 10 987 10 466 10 106 7250 7845 7325 7322 7456 NA
Alcohol: college students
Abstinence 20.0 18.6 20.2 20.0 18.1 19.9 21.7 19.5 20.6 23.9 23.8 24.2 26.3 27.4 26.9 28.7 28.0 0.54 (0.44 to 0.64)
Nondisordered alcohol use 60.3 62.6 60.3 60.5 62.1 60.8 60.2 63.7 62.1 60.6 61.1 63.0 60.7 61.7 62.5 62.3 62.2 0.13 (0.03 to 0.22)
Alcohol use disorder 19.7 18.8 19.5 19.5 19.8 19.3 18.2 16.8 17.3 15.5 15.1 12.8 13.0 10.9 10.6 8.9 10.0 −0.66 (−0.74 to −0.60)
Research Original Investigation

Alcohol: non–college students


Abstinence 23.6 24.2 23.3 25.5 25.6 24.8 24.2 23.1 24.1 26.3 24.3 25.5 24.7 26.8 29.9 28.2 29.9 0.33 (0.24 to 0.43)
Nondisordered alcohol use 57.2 59.1 58.1 56.9 57.4 57.8 59.1 60.0 59.6 59.6 61.2 61.5 62.8 62.6 59.4 61.9 60.8 0.28 (0.18 to 0.37)
Alcohol use disorder 19.2 16.7 18.7 17.6 17.0 17.4 16.8 16.9 16.2 14.1 14.6 13.0 12.5 10.6 10.7 9.9 9.3 −0.61 (−0.69 to −0.55)
Marijuana: college students
Abstinence 67.1 68.1 68.1 69.2 68.7 69.0 68.2 65.4 67.0 66.4 65.8 65.5 65.7 65.6 65.2 64.2 63.2 −0.41 (−0.51 to −0.31)
Nondisordered marijuana use 26.9 25.7 24.9 24.9 25.5 25.3 25.7 28.3 27.1 28.1 27.8 29.1 29.5 28.8 29.8 30.3 30.8 0.46 (0.37 to 0.55)
Marijuana use disorder 6.0 6.3 7.0 5.9 5.7 5.7 6.1 6.3 5.9 5.5 6.4 5.4 4.8 5.6 5.1 5.5 6.1 −0.05 (−0.10 to 0.01)
Marijuana: non–college students

JAMA Pediatrics Published online October 12, 2020 (Reprinted)


Abstinence 66.8 67.5 68.0 68.9 69.8 69.5 70.0 65.3 67.6 66.6 65.5 65.5 63.7 64.4 63.4 62.5 62.9 −0.41 (−0.51 to −0.31)
Nondisordered marijuana use 25.7 24.7 23.9 23.9 23.1 23.0 22.7 27.9 25.5 25.7 27.8 28.3 30.2 29.5 30.2 31.4 30.0 0.49 (0.40 to 0.59)
Marijuana use disorder 7.5 7.7 8.1 7.2 7.2 7.5 7.3 6.8 6.9 7.7 6.7 6.2 6.1 6.1 6.3 6.2 7.1 −0.09 (−0.14 to −0.04)
Marijuana and alcohol: college students
Abstinence of both 19.5 18.1 19.4 19.3 17.8 19.2 20.9 19.0 19.7 23.0 22.9 23.0 24.8 25.5 26.0 27.0 26.0 0.45 (0.35 to 0.55)
Nondisordered

Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ by a University College London User on 10/13/2020


Alcohol use 40.4 42.9 41.6 42.4 43.2 42.4 40.2 40.7 40.6 38.0 38.0 38.5 36.8 37.1 35.7 34.6 34.3 −0.52 (−0.61 to −0.44)
Marijuana use 0.5 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.2 0.6 0.8 0.5 0.7 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.3 1.8 0.8 1.5 1.8 0.08 (0.05 to 0.10)
Co-use 17.1 16.9 16.1 15.6 16.3 16.0 17.0 19.9 18.5 19.9 19.8 21.3 21.2 21.4 23.6 24.3 24.0 0.60 (0.51 to 0.68)
Alcohol use disorder 16.6 15.4 15.3 16.2 16.7 16.1 15.1 13.7 14.6 12.8 12.0 10.7 11.0 8.7 8.9 7.2 7.9 −0.55 (−0.62 to −0.48)
Marijuana use disorder 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.5 2.7 2.5 3.0 3.2 3.2 2.8 3.4 3.4 2.8 3.3 3.4 3.7 4.1 0.06 (0.03 to 0.10)
Disordered co-use 3.1 3.3 4.2 3.4 3.1 3.2 3.1 3.1 2.7 2.7 3.0 2.0 2.1 2.3 1.7 1.8 2.0 −0.11 (−0.14 to −0.09)

© 2020 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.


Marijuana and alcohol: non–college students
Abstinence of both 22.3 22.7 22.4 24.0 24.1 23.8 23.0 21.6 22.8 24.1 22.6 23.8 22.6 24.6 27.1 25.7 26.8 0.22 (0.14 to 0.31)
Nondisordered
Alcohol use 37.0 38.3 38.5 38.2 38.5 39.3 40.5 37.8 38.6 37.3 37.2 37.6 36.4 36.8 33.0 34.2 33.4 −0.31 (−0.41 to −0.22)
Marijuana use 1.2 1.1 0.8 1.1 1.1 0.7 1.0 1.2 1.0 1.7 1.3 1.4 1.7 1.9 2.3 2.1 2.7 0.10 (0.07 to 0.13)
Co-use 17.0 17.3 15.8 15.4 15.8 15.4 15.1 19.1 17.8 18.4 20.2 20.7 22.7 22.5 22.7 23.8 23.0 0.56 (0.48 to 0.63)
Alcohol use disorder 15.0 12.9 14.4 14.1 13.4 15.1 13.2 13.6 12.9 10.9 12.0 10.2 10.5 8.1 8.7 8.1 6.9 −0.47 (−0.53 to −0.41)
Marijuana use disorder 3.3 4.0 3.9 3.7 3.5 3.8 3.8 3.5 3.6 4.5 4.1 3.5 4.1 3.6 4.4 4.4 4.7 0.05 (0.01 to 0.09)
Disordered co-use 4.2 3.8 4.2 3.5 3.7 4.1 3.6 3.3 3.3 3.2 2.6 2.8 2.1 2.5 1.9 1.8 2.4 −0.14 (−0.18 to −0.11)

Abbreviation: NA, not applicable.


a
Data from the US Department of Health and Human Services.30

jamapediatrics.com
Changes in Alcohol and Marijuana Abstinence, Co-Use, and Use Disorders Among US Young Adults
Changes in Alcohol and Marijuana Abstinence, Co-Use, and Use Disorders Among US Young Adults Original Investigation Research

Figure 1. Prevalence of Alcohol and Marijuana Use Groups Figure 2. Prevalence of Alcohol and Marijuana Use Groups
in US College Students: 2002-2018 in US Non–College Students: 2002-2018

ND alcohol use Alcohol use disorder ND alcohol use Alcohol use disorder
ND marijuana use Marijuana use disorder ND marijuana use Marijuana use disorder
ND co-use Disordered co-use ND co-use Disordered co-use
50 Abstinence of both 50 Abstinence of both
Past-year prevalence of use, %

Past-year prevalence of use, %


40 40

30 30

20 20

10 10

0 0
2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
Year Year

ND indicates nondisordered. ND indicates nondisordered.

students and non–college students from 2002 to 2018. For ex- was higher among college students, while the prevalence of
ample, 20% of college students reported alcohol abstinence illicit drug use disorder was higher among non–college stu-
in 2002, compared with 28% in 2018. Similarly, 23.6% of non– dents. As presented in eTable 2 in the Supplement, young
college students reported alcohol abstinence in 2002 com- adults who reported co-use or met criteria for alcohol use
pared with 29.9% in 2018. Alcohol use disorder prevalence de- disorder and/or marijuana use disorder accounted for 82.9%
creased for both groups, with an annual decrease of 0.66% of young adults with prescription drug use disorders and
(95% CI, 0.60%-0.74%) for college students and 0.61% (95% 85.1% of young adults with illicit drug use disorders.
CI, 0.54%-0.69%) for non–college students. As reported in Table 3,30 the most consistent covariates
The past-year abstinence from marijuana use decreased across all of the outcomes were prescription drug misuse
for both college students (0.41%; 95% CI, 0.31%-0.51%) and and illicit drug use. For instance, young adults who had
non–college students (0.41%; 95% CI, 0.31%-0.51%) from 2002 engaged in prescription drug misuse had more than 2 times
to 2018. The past-year prevalence of nondisordered mari- greater odds of marijuana use disorder than young adults
juana use increased for both college students (0.46%; 95% CI, who had not engaged in prescription drug misuse (college:
0.37%-0.55%) and non–college students (0.49%; 95% CI, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.71-3.03; non-college: 2.04; 95% CI, 1.62-2.58).
0.40%-0.59%) from 2002 to 2018. Past-year marijuana use dis- Similarly, young adults who reported illicit drug use had
order held relatively steady for college students and non– over 4 times greater odds of marijuana use disorder than
college students from 2002 to 2018. young adults who did not report illicit drug use (college:
As shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2, college students and 5.09; 95% CI, 3.86-6.70; non-college: 4.41; 95% CI, 3.48-
non–college students both experienced increases in absti- 5.60). Prescription drug use was associated with lower odds
nence of marijuana and alcohol. Past-year nondisordered of abstinence (college: 0.60; 95% CI, 0.52-0.70; non-college:
co-use of alcohol and marijuana increased annually by simi- 0.65; 95% CI, 0.56-0.75) and increased odds of nondisor-
lar amounts in college students (0.60%; 95% CI, 0.51%- dered co-use (college: 1.41; 95% CI, 1.22-1.63; non-college:
0.68%) and non–college students (0.56%; 95% CI, 0.48%- 1.32; 95% CI, 1.14-1.52) and marijuana use disorder (college:
0.63%). 1.85; 95% CI, 1.42-2.41) among young adults, except mari-
Per Table 2,30 all alcohol and/or marijuana use groups juana use disorder for non–college students. In contrast, reli-
had higher rates of controlled prescription drug use, pre- giosity was related to higher odds of abstinence (college:
scription drug misuse, prescription drug use disorder, illicit 1.08; 95% CI, 1.06-1.10; non-college: 1.04; 95% CI, 1.03-1.06)
drug use, and illicit drug use disorder than abstinent (ie, and lower odds of nondisordered co-use (college: 0.92; 95%
alcohol and marijuana) respondents. For prescription drug CI, 0.90-0.93; non-college: 0.94; 95% CI, 0.92-0.95) and
use disorder and illicit drug use disorder, the nondisordered marijuana use disorder (college: 0.97; 95% CI, 0.94-0.99)
alcohol use and abstinent groups did not differ significantly. among young adults, except marijuana use disorder for non–
Most of those with both alcohol use disorder and marijuana college students. We found sex differences in marijuana use
use disorder reported past-year prescription drug misuse disorder for both college students (1.94; 95% CI, 1.57-2.41)
and past-year illicit drug use. Among young adults with both and non–college students (2.20; 95% CI, 1.80-2.71), with
alcohol use disorder and marijuana use disorder, the preva- men in each group having approximately 2 times higher
lence of all 3 prescription drug outcomes and illicit drug use odds of marijuana use disorder.

jamapediatrics.com (Reprinted) JAMA Pediatrics Published online October 12, 2020 E5

© 2020 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ by a University College London User on 10/13/2020


Research Original Investigation Changes in Alcohol and Marijuana Abstinence, Co-Use, and Use Disorders Among US Young Adults

Table 2. Prescription and Illicit Drug Use by Abstinence, Nondisordered Use, and Disordered Use, 2015-2018a,b

Past-year, weighted %
Prescription drug Other illicit drug
Unweighted
Variable sample size, No. Any use Any misuse Use disorder Use Use disorder
Alcohol and marijuana: college students
Abstinence of both 3739 23.6 2.1 0.3 2.8 0.3
Nondisordered
Alcohol use 5388 33.4 6.0 0.2 7.2 0.3
Marijuana use 209 42.8 10.9 0.4 16.0 1.3
Co-use 3378 52.3 25.5 1.1 35.1 1.9
Alcohol use disorder 1231 63.9 38.3 4.4 47.7 6.7
Marijuana use disorder 497 72.9 47.7 4.6 63.7 6.0
Disordered co-use 268 82.1 66.1 19.4 80.9 23.2
Alcohol and marijuana: non–college students
Abstinence of both 3988 25.7 3.0 0.5 3.9 0.6
Nondisordered
Alcohol use 5269 36.2 6.3 0.6 8.0 0.9
Marijuana use 375 36.6 16.1 3.6 22.2 4.8
Co-use 3397 51.6 25.0 2.3 36.4 4.6
Alcohol use disorder 1233 62.9 38.0 6.3 47.6 10.6
Marijuana use disorder 652 60.1 39.0 7.5 53.9 13.1
Disordered co-use 324 76.1 58.7 19.2 75.8 30.6
Alcohol and marijuana: overall
Abstinence of both 7727 24.6 2.5 0.5 3.3 0.5
Nondisordered
Alcohol use 10 657 34.3 6.0 0.4 7.5 0.6
Marijuana use 584 37.8 12.6 2.1 17.4 3.1
Co-use 6775 51.8 25.1 1.8 35.4 3.3
Alcohol use disorder 2464 63.5 38.2 5.5 47.7 8.8
Marijuana use disorder 1149 66.4 43.2 5.7 58.2 9.4
Disordered co-use 592 78.2 62.2 19.3 77.7 27.9
a
All comparisons are within column, with abstinence as the reference group. refers to heroin, cocaine, hallucinogens, inhalants, and methamphetamine.
Prescription drug refers to prescription opioids, prescription stimulants, b
Data from the US Department of Health and Human Services.30
and/or prescription sedatives/tranquilizers/anxiolytics. Other illicit drug use

geting US college students33,35-37 substantially addressed drink-


Discussion ing-related problems among this low- to moderate-risk group.
There was an increase in nondisordered marijuana use
Past-year abstinence from alcohol was more prevalent among from 2002 to 2018 without an increase in marijuana use
non–college students in the early 2000s relative to college stu- disorder among US young adults. This finding is consistent with
dents; however, this gap has closed in recent years. More than earlier changes reported in the US population, indicating an
1 in every 4 (28%) college students in the US were abstinent increase of 19% in the annual past-year prevalence of mari-
from alcohol use, or approximately 3 000 000 US college stu- juana use between 2002 and 2013 without an increase in
dents in 2018. We found that increases in alcohol abstinence marijuana use disorder.38 Nevertheless, the trends in mari-
were accompanied by decreases in alcohol use disorder among juana use and marijuana use disorder remain important to
college and non–college students. These changes may be in- monitor both cross-sectionally and prospectively given that
fluenced by increases in the number of US young adults liv- marijuana use among US young adults has reached its high-
ing with their parents,10,31,32 which could promote increased est level in several decades.39
alcohol abstinence and decreased alcohol use disorder as found Nondisordered co-use of alcohol and marijuana in-
in the present study. These changes may also be an example creased between 2002 and 2018 among US young adults. For
of the prevention paradox, where upstream interventions example, approximately 2.6 million college students co-used
aimed at low- to moderate-risk drinking populations more sub- alcohol and marijuana in 2018, as opposed to approximately
stantially address overall drinking-related problems in young 1.8 million college students in 2002. Those engaging in simul-
adults than interventions solely for high-risk groups.33,34 Per- taneous use of alcohol and marijuana (ie, use of both sub-
haps increased alcohol prevention and intervention efforts tar- stances on the same occasion) tend to use both substances

E6 JAMA Pediatrics Published online October 12, 2020 (Reprinted) jamapediatrics.com

© 2020 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ by a University College London User on 10/13/2020


Changes in Alcohol and Marijuana Abstinence, Co-Use, and Use Disorders Among US Young Adults Original Investigation Research

Table 3. Multivariable Results: Past-Year Abstinence, Co-Use, and Marijuana Use Disorder, 2015-2018a,b

AOR (95% CI)


Alcohol and marijuana abstinence Alcohol and marijuana co-use Marijuana use disorder
College Non–college College Non–college College Non–college
Variable students students students students students students
Unweighted sample size, No. 12 762 14 268 12 762 14 268 12 762 14 268
Sociodemographic covariates
Male 1.21 (1.11-1.33) 1.07 (0.95-1.21) 0.96 (0.87-1.06) 1.01 (0.88-1.15) 1.94 (1.57-2.41) 2.20 (1.80-2.71)
White 0.60 (0.54-0.67) 0.71 (0.63-0.80) 1.14 (0.99-1.30) 0.98 (0.87-1.10) 0.80 (0.62-1.03) 0.59 (0.48-0.72)
Poverty 0.79 (0.68-0.91) 1.55 (1.37-1.76) 1.22 (1.09-1.37) 0.97 (0.84-1.11) 1.06 (0.82-1.36) 0.98 (0.79-1.22)
CBSA >1 million 1.12 (0.99-1.25) 0.86 (0.77-0.97) 1.08 (0.98-1.20) 1.13 (1.04-1.24) 0.96 (0.77-1.18) 1.13 (0.91-1.39)
Religiosity 1.08 (1.06-1.10) 1.04 (1.03-1.06) 0.92 (0.90-0.93) 0.94 (0.92-0.95) 0.97 (0.94-0.99) 0.99 (0.96-1.02)
Lesbian/gay 1.21 (0.76-1.91) 0.58 (0.38-0.90) 1.42 (1.03-1.97) 1.41 (1.03-1.93) 0.87 (0.53-1.43) 0.82 (0.49-1.36)
Bisexual 1.03 (0.79-1.36) 0.82 (0.68-1.00) 1.17 (0.98-1.40) 1.44 (1.19-1.75) 1.02 (0.67-1.55) 1.17 (0.86-1.61)
Physical health covariates
Self-reported fair or 1.21 (0.90-1.64) 1.18 (0.94-1.49) 0.93 (0.68-1.25) 0.99 (0.82-1.20) 1.24 (0.73-2.12) 1.20 (0.94-1.53)
poor health
Overweight/obese BMI 0.93 (0.82-1.05) 1.07 (0.98-1.18) 0.93 (0.83-1.05) 0.88 (0.78-0.98) 1.03 (0.82-1.30) 0.78 (0.64-0.96)
Past-year hospitalization 1.44 (1.11-1.88) 1.58 (1.34-1.85) 0.87 (0.65-1.16) 0.69 (0.54-0.87) 1.01 (0.68-1.61) 1.01 (0.71-1.44)
Mental health covariates,
past year
Mental health treatment 1.19 (1.02-1.40) 1.10 (0.96-1.26) 0.98 (0.80-1.18) 0.97 (0.82-1.15) 1.33 (1.01-1.76) 1.13 (0.86-1.50)
Major depression 1.27 (1.01-1.61) 1.28 (1.03-1.60) 0.92 (0.75-1.14) 1.12 (0.89-1.40) 0.95 (0.70-1.29) 1.15 (0.83-1.60)
Psychological distress 0.79 (0.67-0.93) 1.06 (0.87-1.28) 0.98 (0.79-1.21) 0.81 (0.69-0.95) 1.46 (1.09-1.97) 1.50 (1.16-1.93)
WHO disability scale 1.02 (1.01-1.03) 0.99 (0.98-1.00) 0.98 (0.97-0.99) 1.00 (0.99-1.01) 1.05 (1.02-1.07) 1.04 (1.02-1.06)
Suicidal ideation 0.93 (0.76-1.12) 0.85 (0.68-1.07) 0.92 (0.75-1.12) 1.09 (0.86-1.38) 1.14 (0.86-1.51) 1.41 (1.07-1.86)
Substance use covariates,
past year
Prescription drug use 0.60 (0.52-0.70) 0.65 (0.56-0.75) 1.41 (1.22-1.63) 1.32 (1.14-1.52) 1.85 (1.42-2.41) 1.14 (0.91-1.43)
Prescription drug misuse 0.21 (0.15-0.31) 0.34 (0.25-0.47) 1.53 (1.27-1.83) 1.40 (1.18-1.65) 2.28 (1.71-3.03) 2.04 (1.62-2.58)
Other illicit drug use 0.08 (0.04-0.15) 0.11 (0.08-0.17) 1.86 (1.60-2.17) 2.14 (1.88-2.44) 5.09 (3.86-6.70) 4.41 (3.48-5.60)
Abbreviations: AOR, adjusted odds ratio; BMI, body mass index (calculated as and/or prescription sedatives/tranquilizers/anxiolytics. Other illicit drug use
weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared); CBSA, US Census refers to heroin, cocaine, hallucinogens, inhalants, and methamphetamine.
core-based statistical area; WHO, World Health Organization. b
Data from the US Department of Health and Human Services.30
a
Prescription drug refers to prescription opioids, prescription stimulants,

more frequently, use greater quantities, and experience more scription drug misuse is more prevalent among young adults
substance-related consequences.40 Although alcohol use than any other age group in the US.39,46,47 Young adults who
disorder is declining and alcohol abstinence is increasing in reported co-use of alcohol and marijuana or met criteria for al-
parallel, the legal landscape of marijuana is changing and the cohol use disorder and/or marijuana use disorder accounted
percentage of tetrahydrocannabinol in marijuana strains for 82.9% of young adults with prescription drug use disor-
has steadily increased in recent decades,41 with evidence of der and 85.1% of those with illicit drug use disorder. Current
an increase in risk related to development of symptomatic national studies and diagnostic instruments often focus on in-
marijuana use, 42 marijuana use disorder severity, 43 and dividual drug classes and can miss changes in co-use as sug-
psychosis.44,45 Therefore, clinicians and physicians have a com- gested by the present study. This assessment gap impacts pre-
plex task in developing effective programs to reduce the risk vention and intervention efforts because an individual may not
of negative consequences associated with the rising preva- be considered at risk based on any single substance; how-
lence of marijuana use and co-use of alcohol and marijuana. ever, the same individual could be at risk for dangerous drug
In addition, schools and employers may require additional re- interactions (eg, combining central nervous system depres-
sources to scale interventions to address both individuals with sants). Therefore, clinicians are encouraged to screen for a wide
and without a disorder, including brief interventions for non- range of substances and polysubstance use to detect risky use
disordered co-use of alcohol and marijuana. behaviors. Similarly, the high prevalence of prescription drug
More than three-fourths of young adults who met criteria use among young adults who report co-use of alcohol and mari-
for both alcohol use disorder and marijuana use disorder re- juana or met criteria for alcohol use disorder and/or marijuana
ported past-year prescription drug use (78.2%) and illicit drug use disorder reinforces the importance of carefully monitor-
use (77.7%); 62.2% reported prescription drug misuse. Pre- ing use of controlled substances among such individuals.

jamapediatrics.com (Reprinted) JAMA Pediatrics Published online October 12, 2020 E7

© 2020 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ by a University College London User on 10/13/2020


Research Original Investigation Changes in Alcohol and Marijuana Abstinence, Co-Use, and Use Disorders Among US Young Adults

Limitations in DSM-5-classified alcohol use disorder and marijuana use


The results of the present study should be considered within disorder among US young adults.
the context of its limitations. First, the cross-sectional design
of the NSDUH precludes any causal determinations regarding
the temporal associations between substance use and educa-
tional status. Second, all measures were self-reported and, al-
Conclusions
though all measures are considered reliable and valid, stud- The findings of this study suggest that greater attention is
ies suggest that misclassification and underreporting of needed to provide a diverse set of social support services and
sensitive behaviors such as substance use can occur.48,49 Also, resources to the growing number of US young adults in col-
we combined illicit drugs and additional research is needed that lege and not in college who are abstinent from alcohol, includ-
considers individual drugs to help detect emerging drug pat- ing those in recovery and those abstinent for other reasons.
terns (eg, methamphetamine and heroin), including co-use. In addition, screening for co-use of alcohol and marijuana, al-
While we adjusted for relevant sociodemographic character- cohol use disorder, and marijuana use disorder provide op-
istics associated with college enrollment and substance use, portunities for clinicians to detect illicit drug use, prescrip-
the secondary analyses were limited to the available vari- tion drug misuse, and other SUDs. Colleges and communities
ables, and other factors that may influence the associations in the US must find ways to address the changing landscape
could not be included (eg, social context and substance avail- of substance use behaviors by providing support to the in-
ability). In addition, the present study was constrained by the creasing number of young adults who are abstinent, while also
NSDUH measures, such as the DSM-IV criteria used to deter- creating interventions to address the increases in marijuana
mine SUD, and further work is needed to examine the trends use and co-use of alcohol and marijuana.

ARTICLE INFORMATION consultant for Innovation Research and Training, 4. Schulenberg JE, Johnston LD, O’Malley PM,
a company dedicated to applying scientific findings Bachman JG, Miech RA, Patrick ME. Monitoring the
Accepted for Publication: June 17, 2020.
to real-world problems. future national survey results on drug use,
Published Online: October 12, 2020. 1975-2016: volume II, college students and adults
doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.3352 Funding/Support: This research was supported by
ages 19-55. Institute for Social Research: The
research grants R01DA031160, R01DA036541, and
Author Affiliations: Center for the Study of Drugs, University of Michigan; 2019. Accessed October 15,
R01DA043691 from the National Institute on Drug 2019. http://monitoringthefuture.org/pubs/
Alcohol, Smoking and Health, University of Abuse, National Institutes of Health, and grant monographs/mtf-vol2_2016.pdf
Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor (McCabe, NR016914 from the National Institute of Nursing
Arterberry, Dickinson, Evans-Polce, Ryan); Institute 5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Research.
for Research on Women and Gender, University of (CDC). Multiple causes of death 1999-2017 on CDC
Michigan, Ann Arbor (McCabe); Survey Research Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The National wide-ranging online data for epidemiologic
Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of research (CDC Wonder). CDC, National Center for
Michigan, Ann Arbor (McCabe); Center for Sexuality Health had no role in the design and conduct of the Health Statistics. Published 2018. Accessed
study; collection, management, analysis, and October 15, 2019. https://wonder.cdc.gov/wonder/
and Health Disparities, University of Michigan
interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or help/mcd.html
School of Nursing, Ann Arbor (McCabe); Institute
for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit 6. Hall WD, Patton G, Stockings E, et al. Why young
Michigan, Ann Arbor (McCabe); Department of the manuscript for publication. people’s substance use matters for global health.
Psychology, Iowa State University, Ames Additional Contributions: Kate Leary, BS Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3(3):265-279. doi:10.1016/
(Arterberry); Department of Sociology, University (Center for the Study of Drugs, Alcohol, Smoking S2215-0366(16)00013-4
of Central Florida, Orlando (Ford); Department of and Health research administrator), provided 7. McCabe SE, Veliz PT, Boyd CJ, Schepis TS,
Psychology, Texas State University, San Marcos editorial and formatting assistance with the McCabe VV, Schulenberg JE. A prospective study of
(Schepis). manuscript; no financial compensation was nonmedical use of prescription opioids during
provided. We thank the anonymous reviewers and adolescence and subsequent substance use
Author Contributions: Drs McCabe and Schepis
editorial team for their detailed review and helpful disorder symptoms in early midlife. Drug Alcohol
had full access to all of the data in the study and Depend. 2019;194:377-385. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.
take responsibility for the integrity of the data and suggestions to earlier versions of the manuscript.
2018.10.027
the accuracy of the data analysis.
REFERENCES 8. Arnett JJ. The developmental context of
Concept and design: McCabe, Arterberry, Dickinson,
substance use in emerging adulthood. J Drug
Ford, Ryan, Schepis. 1. Grant BF, Goldstein RB, Saha TD, et al.
Issues. 2005;35:235-254. doi:10.1177/
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Epidemiology of DSM-5 alcohol use disorder: results
002204260503500202
McCabe, Evans-Polce, Ford, Schepis. from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol
Drafting of the manuscript: McCabe, Dickinson. and Related Conditions III. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015; 9. Schulenberg JE, Maggs JL. A developmental
Critical revision of the manuscript for important 72(8):757-766. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015. perspective on alcohol use and heavy drinking
0584 during adolescence and the transition to young
intellectual content: All authors.
adulthood. J Stud Alcohol Suppl. 2002;(14):54-70.
Statistical analysis: McCabe, Schepis. 2. Grant BF, Saha TD, Ruan WJ, et al. Epidemiology
doi:10.15288/jsas.2002.s14.54
Obtained funding: McCabe, Schepis. of DSM-5 drug use disorder: results from the
Administrative, technical, or material support: National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and 10. Dawson DA, Grant BF, Stinson FS, Chou PS.
McCabe, Ryan. Related Conditions–III. JAMA Psychiatry. 2016;73(1): Another look at heavy episodic drinking and alcohol
Supervision: McCabe. 39-47. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.2132 use disorders among college and noncollege youth.
J Stud Alcohol. 2004;65(4):477-488. doi:10.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Arterberry is 3. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and
15288/jsa.2004.65.477
Quality. Results from the 2018 National Survey on
vice president of the Source Research Foundation,
Drug Use and Health: detailed tables. Substance 11. Grucza RA, Norberg KE, Bierut LJ. Binge
a nonprofit research and educational organization
Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. drinking among youths and young adults in the
that supports students who study the United States: 1979-2006. J Am Acad Child Adolesc
Published 2019. Accessed October 15, 2019. https://
epidemiology, phenomenology, and the www.samhsa.gov/data/report/2018-nsduh- Psychiatry. 2009;48(7):692-702. doi:10.1097/CHI.
environmental, cultural, and clinical contexts of detailed-tables 0b013e3181a2b32f
psychedelic use. Dr Arterberry is also a paid

E8 JAMA Pediatrics Published online October 12, 2020 (Reprinted) jamapediatrics.com

© 2020 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ by a University College London User on 10/13/2020


Changes in Alcohol and Marijuana Abstinence, Co-Use, and Use Disorders Among US Young Adults Original Investigation Research

12. Schepis TS, Teter CJ, McCabe SE. Prescription Administration. Published September 2015. prevention. J Stud Alcohol Drugs Suppl. 2009;(16):
drug use, misuse and related substance use Accessed October 15, 2019. https://www.samhsa. 5-11. doi:10.15288/jsads.2009.s16.5
disorder symptoms vary by educational status and gov/data/sites/default/files/NSDUH- 37. Saltz RF. Environmental approaches to
attainment in US adolescents and young adults. MethodSummDefs2014/NSDUH- prevention in college settings. Alcohol Res Health.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018;189:172-177. doi:10. MethodSummDefs2014.htm 2011;34(2):204-209.
1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.05.017 25. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and 38. Grucza RA, Agrawal A, Krauss MJ,
13. Arterberry BJ, Boyd CJ, West BT, Schepis TS, Quality. 2017 National Survey on Drug Use and Cavazos-Rehg PA, Bierut LJ. Recent trends in the
McCabe SE. DSM-5 substance use disorders among Health: methodological summary and definitions. prevalence of marijuana use and associated
college-age young adults in the United States: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services disorders in the United States. JAMA Psychiatry.
prevalence, remission and treatment. J Am Coll Administration. Published September 2018. 2016;73(3):300-301. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.
Health. 2019;1-8. doi:10.1080/07448481.2019. Accessed October 15, 2019. https://www.samhsa. 2015.3111
1590368 gov/data/sites/default/files/cbhsq-reports/
NSDUHMethodSummDefs2017/ 39. Schulenberg JE, Johnston LD, O’Malley PM,
14. Ford JA, Pomykacz C. Non-medical use of Bachman JG, Miech RA, Patrick ME. Monitoring the
prescription stimulants: a comparison of college NSDUHMethodSummDefs2017.htm
future: national survey results on drug use,
students and their same-age peers who do not 26. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, 1975-2017: volume II, college students and adults
attend college. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2016;48(4): Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE Initiative. ages 19-55. Institute for Social Research, The
253-260. doi:10.1080/02791072.2016.1213471 The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational University of Michigan. Published July 2018.
15. Martins SS, Kim JH, Chen LY, et al. Nonmedical Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Accessed October 19, 2019. http://www.
prescription drug use among US young adults by guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann monitoringthefuture.org/pubs/monographs/mtf-
educational attainment. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Intern Med. 2007;147(8):573-577. doi:10.7326/ vol2_2017.pdf
Epidemiol. 2015;50(5):713-724. doi:10.1007/s00127- 0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010
40. Yurasek AM, Aston ER, Metrik J. Co-use of
014-0980-3 27. Jordan BK, Karg RS, Batts KR, Epstein JF, alcohol and cannabis: a review. Curr Addict Rep.
16. Knight JR, Wechsler H, Kuo M, Seibring M, Wiesen C. A clinical validation of the National 2017;4(2):184-193. doi:10.1007/s40429-017-
Weitzman ER, Schuckit MA. Alcohol abuse and Survey on Drug Use and Health assessment of 0149-8
dependence among US college students. J Stud substance use disorders. Addict Behav. 2008;33
(6):782-798. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.12.007 41. ElSohly MA, Mehmedic Z, Foster S, Gon C,
Alcohol. 2002;63(3):263-270. doi:10.15288/jsa.2002. Chandra S, Church JC. Changes in cannabis potency
63.263 28. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services over the last 2 decades (1995–2014): analysis of
17. Wechsler H, Lee JE, Kuo M, Seibring M, Administration. Reliability of key measures in the current data in the United States. Biol Psychiatry.
Nelson TF, Lee H. Trends in college binge drinking National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Office of 2016;79(7):613-619. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.01.
during Applied Studies, Methodology Series M-8, HHS 004
a period of increased prevention efforts: findings Publication No. SMA 09-4425. Published 2010.
Accessed October 15, 2019. https://www.samhsa. 42. Arterberry BJ, Treloar Padovano H, Foster KT,
from 4 Harvard School of Public Health College Zucker RA, Hicks BM. Higher average potency
Alcohol Study surveys: 1993-2001. J Am Coll Health. gov/data/sites/default/files/2k6ReliabilityP/
2k6ReliabilityP.pdf across the United States is associated with
2002;50(5):203-217. doi:10.1080/ progression to first cannabis use disorder symptom.
07448480209595713 29. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019;195:186-192. doi:10.
18. Mohler-Kuo M, Lee JE, Wechsler H. Trends in Quality. 2015 National Survey on Drug Use and 1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.11.012
marijuana and other illicit drug use among college Health: summary of the effects of the 2015 NSDUH
questionnaire redesign: implications for data users. 43. Freeman TP, Winstock AR. Examining the
students: results from 4 Harvard School of Public profile of high-potency cannabis and its association
Health College Alcohol Study surveys: 1993-2001. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services
Administration. Published June 2016. Accessed with severity of cannabis dependence. Psychol Med.
J Am Coll Health. 2003;52(1):17-24. doi:10.1080/ 2015;45(15):3181-3189. doi:10.1017/
07448480309595719 October 19, 2019. https://www.samhsa.gov/data/
sites/default/files/NSDUH-TrendBreak-2015.pdf S0033291715001178
19. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services 44. Di Forti M, Morgan C, Dazzan P, et al.
Administration. Key substance use and mental 30. US Department of Health and Human Services,
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services High-potency cannabis and the risk of psychosis.
health indicators in the United States: results from Br J Psychiatry. 2009;195(6):488-491. doi:10.1192/
the 2017 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Administration, Center for Behavioral Health
Statistics and Quality. 2019. National Survey on bjp.bp.109.064220
HHS Publication No. SMA 18-5068, NSDUH Series
H-53. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Drug Use and Health 2002-2018 (NSDUH-2002- 45. Di Forti M, Sallis H, Allegri F, et al. Daily use,
Quality, Substance abuse and Mental Health 2018-DS0001). Accessed January 6, 2020. https:// especially of high-potency cannabis, drives the
Services Administration. Published 2018. Accessed datafiles.samhsa.gov/ earlier onset of psychosis in cannabis users.
October 15, 2019. https://www.samhsa.gov/data/ 31. Vespa J. The Changing Economics and Schizophr Bull. 2014;40(6):1509-1517. doi:10.1093/
sites/default/files/cbhsq-reports/ Demographics of Young Adulthood: 1975–2016. schbul/sbt181
NSDUHFFR2017/NSDUHFFR2017.htm Current Population Reports, P20-579. US Census 46. Hughes A, Williams M, Lipari RN, Bose J,
20. Connor JP, Gullo MJ, White A, Kelly AB. Bureau; 2017. Copello EA, Kroutil LA. Prescription drug use and
Polysubstance use: diagnostic challenges, patterns 32. Gfroerer JC, Greenblatt JC, Wright DA. misuse in the United States: results from the 2015
of use and health. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2014;27(4): Substance use in the US college-age population: National Survey on Drug Use and Health. NSDUH
269-275. doi:10.1097/YCO.0000000000000069 differences according to educational status and Data Review. Published September 2016. Accessed
living arrangement. Am J Public Health. 1997;87(1): October 19, 2019. https://www.samhsa.gov/data/
21. Levy S, Campbell MD, Shea CL, DuPont R. sites/default/files/NSDUH-FFR2-2015/NSDUH-
Trends in abstaining from substance use in 62-65. doi:10.2105/AJPH.87.1.62
FFR2-2015.htm
adolescents: 1975-2014. Pediatrics. 2018;142(2): 33. Gruenewald PJ, Johnson FW, Light JM, Lipton
e20173498. doi:10.1542/peds.2017-3498 R, Saltz RF. Understanding college drinking: 47. McCabe SE, Wilens TE, Boyd CJ, Chua KP,
assessing dose response from survey self-reports. Voepel-Lewis T, Schepis TS. Age-specific risk of
22. Han B, Compton WM, Blanco C, DuPont RL. substance use disorders associated with controlled
National trends in substance use and use disorders J Stud Alcohol. 2003;64(4):500-514. doi:10.15288/
jsa.2003.64.500 medication use and misuse subtypes in the United
among youth. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. States. Addict Behav. 2019;90:285-293. doi:10.
2017;56(9):747-754.e3. doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2017. 34. Skog OJ. The prevention paradox revisited. 1016/j.addbeh.2018.11.010
06.011 Addiction. 1999;94(5):751-757. doi:10.1046/j.1360-
0443.1999.94575113.x 48. Morral AR, McCaffrey DF, Chien S.
23. Vaughn MG, Nelson EJ, Oh S, Salas-Wright CP, Measurement of adolescent drug use.
DeLisi M, Holzer KJ. Abstention from drug use and 35. Cronce JM, Toomey TL, Lenk K, Nelson TF, J Psychoactive Drugs. 2003;35(3):301-309. doi:10.
delinquency increasing among youth in the United Kilmer JR, Larimer ME. NIAAA’s college alcohol 1080/02791072.2003.10400013
States, 2002-2014. Subst Use Misuse. 2018;53(9): intervention matrix. Alcohol Res. 2018;39(1):43-47.
1468-1481. doi:10.1080/10826084.2017.1413392 49. Parra GR, O’Neill SE, Sher KJ. Reliability of
36. Dejong W, Larimer ME, Wood MD, Hartman R. self-reported age of substance involvement onset.
24. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and NIAAA’s rapid response to college drinking Psychol Addict Behav. 2003;17(3):211-218. doi:10.
Quality. 2014 National Survey on Drug Use and problems initiative: reinforcing the use of 1037/0893-164X.17.3.211
Health: methodological summary and definitions. evidence-based approaches in college alcohol
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services

jamapediatrics.com (Reprinted) JAMA Pediatrics Published online October 12, 2020 E9

© 2020 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ by a University College London User on 10/13/2020

You might also like