According to Max Weber's theory, bureaucracy is the most technically efficient form of organization because it embodies a mechanical form that enables predictability and measurable outcomes through hierarchy, rules, and depersonalization. While bureaucracy ensures standards are preserved and all factors are treated equally, it is slow to react to change compared to project-based or autonomous organizations. Autonomous organizations in technology industries where innovation is key can respond quickly to environmental changes and provide more flexibility and freedom. However, bureaucracy reduces risks through standardized rules and controlled delegation, which is important for assuring an organization achieves its fundamental objectives.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
According to Max Weber's theory, bureaucracy is the most technically efficient form of organization because it embodies a mechanical form that enables predictability and measurable outcomes through hierarchy, rules, and depersonalization. While bureaucracy ensures standards are preserved and all factors are treated equally, it is slow to react to change compared to project-based or autonomous organizations. Autonomous organizations in technology industries where innovation is key can respond quickly to environmental changes and provide more flexibility and freedom. However, bureaucracy reduces risks through standardized rules and controlled delegation, which is important for assuring an organization achieves its fundamental objectives.
According to Max Weber's theory, bureaucracy is the most technically efficient form of organization because it embodies a mechanical form that enables predictability and measurable outcomes through hierarchy, rules, and depersonalization. While bureaucracy ensures standards are preserved and all factors are treated equally, it is slow to react to change compared to project-based or autonomous organizations. Autonomous organizations in technology industries where innovation is key can respond quickly to environmental changes and provide more flexibility and freedom. However, bureaucracy reduces risks through standardized rules and controlled delegation, which is important for assuring an organization achieves its fundamental objectives.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
According to Max Weber's theory, bureaucracy is the most technically efficient form of organization because it embodies a mechanical form that enables predictability and measurable outcomes through hierarchy, rules, and depersonalization. While bureaucracy ensures standards are preserved and all factors are treated equally, it is slow to react to change compared to project-based or autonomous organizations. Autonomous organizations in technology industries where innovation is key can respond quickly to environmental changes and provide more flexibility and freedom. However, bureaucracy reduces risks through standardized rules and controlled delegation, which is important for assuring an organization achieves its fundamental objectives.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
According to Max Weber’s theory of rationalisation, the bureaucratic organisation “is
technically the most efficient form of organization possible” [ CITATION Pug96 \p 7 \l 2057 ]. This belief is based on the mechanic form bureaucracy embodies, enabling predictability and measure of desired outcomes. Depersonalisation results from this as “control of the actions of the individuals in the organization is assured” through “the hierarchy of authority and the system of rules” [ CITATION Pug96 \p 8 \l 2057 ] put in place to achieve those outcomes. The civil service is a good example of a bureaucratic (rational-legal) establishment. In such organisations, “rules are written and power relationships clearly specified” [ CITATION Bro061 \p 220 \l 2057 ]. Some may view this as an advantage. However, it is mainly a disadvantage when compared to the level of flexibility and freedom the workforce in a project-based (or autonomous) organisation have. In project based organisations all staff are delegates. This empowers them to make more informed decisions appropriate to the situation and not based solely on following a set of rules. Although the rule setting model of bureaucracy ensures every factor is treated equally and standards are preserved, it is slow to react to change. Autonomous organisations differ in this respect as they are agile and able to respond quickly to changes in their environment. These organisations are prominent in the technology industry where innovation – a derivative of freedom to create, imagine and realise - is key to gaining competitive advantage and ultimately, success. Autonomy when practised also has its financial benefits for its user as it “leaves the superior free to do other things” [ CITATION Han93 \p 283 \l 2057 ] . In this sense it is cheap whereas bureaucracy is not because of its need to control, which costs money. However, this price is well justified when the fragile nature of entrustment is observed. Having standardised rules in place reduces the risk of infringement, abuse and improper use of trust given to subordinates. As a general rule of thumb it would be sensible for organisations to obtain the management structure of a bureaucracy, where individual responsibilities and delegation are based on proven expertise and are controlled to a certain degree by rules, regulations and procedures to better assure that the organisation achieves its fundamental objectives.