Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Corporation and Its Stakeholders: Chapter Outline
The Corporation and Its Stakeholders: Chapter Outline
CHAPTER 1
THE CORPORATION AND ITS
STAKEHOLDERS
INTRODUCTION
PREVIEW CASES
Wal-Mart
CHAPTER OUTLINE
I. BUSINESS AND SOCIETY
A. A Systems Perspective
II. THE STAKEHOLDER THEORY OF THE FIRM
1-1
Chapter 01 - The Corporation and its Stakeholders
B. Stakeholder Coalitions
C. Stakeholder Engagement
1-2
Chapter 01 - The Corporation and its Stakeholders
1. Understanding the relationship between business and society, and the ways in
which they are part of an interactive system.
Business firms are organizations that are engaged in making a product or providing a
service for a profit. Society, in its broadest sense, refers to human beings and to the social
structures they collectively create. Business is part of society and engages in ongoing
exchanges with its external environment. Together, business and society together form an
interactive social system in which each profoundly influences the other.
According to the stakeholder theory of the firm, the purpose of the modern corporation is
to create value for all of its stakeholders. To survive, all companies must make a profit
for their owners. However, they also create many other kinds of value as well for their
employees, customers, communities, and others. For both practical and ethical reasons,
corporations must take all stakeholders’ interests into account.
3. Knowing what is a stakeholder, and who are a corporation’s market and non-
market stakeholders.
Every business firm has economic and social relationships with others in society. Some
are intended, some unintended; some are positive, others negative. Stakeholders are all
those who affect, or are affected by, the actions of the firm. Market stakeholders are those
that engage in economic transactions with the company; non-market stakeholders are
those who—although they do not have engage in direct economic exchange with the firm
—are nonetheless affected by its actions.
1-1
Chapter 01 - The Corporation and its Stakeholders
5. Analyzing the forces of change that continually reshape the business and society
relationship.
A number of broad forces shape the relationship between business and society. These
include changing societal and ethical expectations; a redefinition of the role of
government; a dynamic global economy; emerging ecological and natural resource
concerns; and the transformational role of technology. To deal effectively with these
changes, corporate strategy must address the expectations of all of the company’s
stakeholders.
KEY TERMS AND CONCEPTS USED IN THE CHAPTER
business, 4
market stakeholders, 8
nonmarket stakeholders, 9
society, 4
stakeholder analysis, 11
stakeholder coalitions, 13
1-1
Chapter 01 - The Corporation and its Stakeholders
stakeholder dialogue, 17
stakeholder engagement, 17
stakeholder interests, 11
stakeholder power, 12
INTERNET RESOURCES
DISCUSSION CASE
1-2
Chapter 01 - The Corporation and its Stakeholders
2. Who are the relevant market and nonmarket stakeholders in this situation?
The term stakeholder refers to persons and groups that affect, or are affected by,
an organization’s decisions, policies, and operations. Market stakeholders are those that
engage in economic transactions with the company. Nonmarket stakeholders, by
contrast, are people and groups who—although they do not engage in direct economic
exchange with the firm—are affected by or can affect its actions. The relevant market
stakeholders in this situation are Cisco employees. The relevant nonmarket stakeholders
are the city of San Jose, the communities south of San Jose, labor unions, environmental
activists, and local businesses (represented by the Chamber of Commerce).
à After listing these on the board, the instructor may wish to bring out two points:
Not all stakeholders of Cisco are relevant to this particular situation. For example,
customers and stockholders are both important market stakeholders, but where Cisco
locates its offices is probably of little significance to them so long as prices, and the
value of the stock, are not affected.
The classification “nonmarket” does not imply less important. In this situation,
nonmarket stakeholders are critical whether or not Cisco can meet its objectives.
Both environmentalists and community groups are able to block the company, at least
temporarily, by filing lawsuits.
3. What are their interests? Please indicate if each stakeholder is in favor of, or
opposed to, the Coyote Valley development project, and why.
Employees – to have adequate office space; to stay in the area; to have affordable
housing and social services. IN FAVOR.
Local businesses – to create opportunities for businesses that benefit from Cisco’s
presence in the community. IN FAVOR.
Labor unions – to create jobs in the construction of the office park. IN FAVOR.
City of San Jose – to increase employment, economic development, and tax revenue in
the city. IN FAVOR.
Communities to the south (Hollister, Watsonville, Salinas) – to avoid added demands on
social services (schools, police, fire, road construction) without compensation; to
maintain affordable housing and a good quality of life in their own jurisdictions.
OPPOSED.
Environmentalists – to preserve open space, wildlife habitat, and clean air; to promote
the use of mass transit instead of automobiles. OPPOSED.
1-1
Chapter 01 - The Corporation and its Stakeholders
5. What possible solutions to this dispute do you think might emerge from dialogue
between Cisco Systems and its stakeholders?
Students should be asked to brainstorm creative solutions to the issues posed in
this dispute. These might include:
Scaling back the office park to more modest proportions;
Including some affordable housing in the development, so employees would not have
to find housing elsewhere;
Additional provisions for preservation of open space at the site;
An agreement for the company to purchase open space elsewhere as an “offset” to its
development in the Coyote Valley, which could be set aside as habitat or for
recreational use;
An agreement to pay some subsidies to southern communities for road development
or provision of services;
A plan for Cisco to provide car-pooling incentives, shuttle bus service to mass transit
hubs, or other plans to reduce single-vehicle commuting to the Coyote Valley site.
1-1
Chapter 01 - The Corporation and its Stakeholders
After generating such a list, the instructor may wish to point out that students need
not select among these options; the take-away point is simply that a process of
dialogue can produce solutions that may be able simultaneously to meet multiple
stakeholder interests in creative ways.
Epilogue
In October 2001, a judge rejected the lawsuits that had sought to block Cisco’s plans to
build in the Coyote Valley, clearing a major obstacle to the development. However, a
sharp downturn in the market for Cisco’s products had in the meantime changed the
company’s strategic priorities. Instead of expanding, Cisco was in the process of
downsizing its work force, and it no longer needed a new campus. Just days after the
judge’s decision, Cisco announced that it had indefinitely suspended its plans to expand.
“We still believe Coyote Valley is a great location,” a company spokesperson said. “But
as the economy slowed, we re-evaluated our space needs and decided to make some
strategic adjustments.” As of 2006, the Coyote Valley property remains undeveloped,
and the fundamental dispute remains unresolved.
1-1