PIC:

ODISHA [RSA REPORT]

(PART 1: ROAD INFORMATION)

State: Odisha
District/ Division: Sundargarh District/SundargarhDivision
Block: Hemgir
Road Number (Core Network): MRL-12

Number or DPR reference number: PKG NO.- OR 30-686

Road Name:
Telendihi to Rajbahal
Total Length in Km 12.960Km
RSA Stage: Pre-DPR stage
(PART 2: AUDIT INFORMATION)
Date of Audit: 02/09/2020
Inspection Team and Participants
From PIU: From PIC:
Er. LambodarNayak, AEE, PIU Er.UmakantaPani, PIC Road Safety Consultant
Er. DolagobindaBhoi, JE, PIU SatyanarayanRana,PIC Road Safety Associate
Background to Inspection:
The proposed road takes off from Telendihi and connects Rajbahal village. The road proposes to offer
round the year connectivity to 12708inhabitants including 6750 male and 5958 Female The alignment
is on the existing track. The entire road passes through plain terrain. Being a through route, the
movement of vehicles is moderate to medium. This calls for adequate measures to ensure road safety.
The road safety audit is carried out at Pre-DPR stage to identify vulnerable locations and action points
as per suggestions of the community.
Road Safety Audit (RSA) Process:

Executive Engineer, Rural Works Division, Sundargarh, was intimated one week in advance
about date of visit of RSA team from PIC. He was requested to instruct the concerned AEE
and JE to participate in the audit process with copies of DPRs. A pre audit meeting was held
to explain points of observation, spot verification, measurement and record review. The
formats part I, II and III along with issue based RSA Checklist prepared by PIC were shared
and the PIU was requested to complete the post audit compliances at the PIU end on part III
of the RSA format.

There was a thorough discussion on the scope of work related to Pre-DPR stage, Construction
Stage and Post-Construction Stage. PIU personnel were sensitized about the importance of
Road Safety issues and requested to be proactive in suggesting improvements. There was a
concern expressed on budget constraint for provisioning required number of road
appurtenances but it was clarified that there could be additional allocations on the ground of
genuine need. Date and time of audit was finalized in consultation with the PIU.

1
Life Academy of Vocational Studies
 PIC:
ODISHA [RSA REPORT]

(PART 3: ROAD SAFETY AUDIT FINDINGS)

Safety Issue No: 1

Location/ Chainage
0/000kmStarting point

Description of Road Safety Issue:The proposed road starts from Telendihi and has a T-
junction. The point which may cause accident during traffic volume increases.
Road Safety Risk:Scale: 1 - very low, 2- low, 3 – medium, 4 – high, 5 – very high
Exposure to Safety Risk: (Estimated as potential for traffic conflicts (e.g. braking,
swerving, etc.) caused by the issue) 4
Probability to Cause Accident: (Estimated as probability of traffic conflict resulting in
an accident) 4
Consequence of Accident: (Estimated likelihood of personal injury or death caused by
accident. Involvement of pedestrians/bicyclists versus vehicle would have severe
4
consequence. If trucks are involved, the consequence would be even more severe. High
speed of potential impact would have severe consequence)
Resulting Road Safety Risk: (Combined rating equals sum of exposure rating plus
probability rating plus consequence rating divided by 3. Higher the combined rating, 4
greater the urgency of attending to the road safety issue.)
Recommendations:

1 The junction should be design with bell mouth shape

2 Cautionary signage should be provided at all the three sides.

Safety Issue No: 2

Location/ Chainage
0/400 KMs

2
Life Academy of Vocational Studies
 PIC:
ODISHA [RSA REPORT]

Description of Road Safety Issue:The road has a turning at 0/400 KMs (LHS).. The point
which may cause accident during traffic volume increases.
Road Safety Risk:Scale: 1 - very low, 2- low, 3 – medium, 4 – high, 5 – very high

Exposure to Safety Risk: (Estimated as potential for traffic conflicts (e.g. braking,
swerving, etc.) caused by the issue) 3
Probability to Cause Accident: (Estimated as probability of traffic conflict resulting in
an accident) 3
Consequence of Accident: (Estimated likelihood of personal injury or death caused by
accident. Involvement of pedestrians/bicyclists versus vehicle would have severe
3
consequence. If trucks are involved, the consequence would be even more severe. High
speed of potential impact would have severe consequence)
Resulting Road Safety Risk: (Combined rating equals sum of exposure rating plus
probability rating plus consequence rating divided by 3. Higher the combined rating, 3
greater the urgency of attending to the road safety issue.)
Recommendations:
1 The curve should be design properly with cautionary signage at both end points..

Safety Issue No: 3

Location/ Chainage
0/900 KMs (LHS)

Description of Road Safety Issue: The proposed road has a Y-junctionat Ch. 0/900 KMs.
(RHS). The point which may cause accident during traffic volume increases.
Road Safety Risk: Scale: 1 - very low, 2- low, 3 – medium, 4 – high, 5 – very high
Exposure to Safety Risk: (Estimated as potential for traffic conflicts (e.g. braking,
swerving, etc.) caused by the issue) 3
Probability to Cause Accident: (Estimated as probability of traffic conflict resulting in
an accident) 3
Consequence of Accident: (Estimated likelihood of personal injury or death caused by
accident. Involvement of pedestrians/bicyclists versus vehicle would have severe
3
consequence. If trucks are involved, the consequence would be even more severe. High
speed of potential impact would have severe consequence)
Resulting Road Safety Risk: (Combined rating equals sum of exposure rating plus
probability rating plus consequence rating divided by 3. Higher the combined rating, 3
greater the urgency of attending to the road safety issue.)
Recommendations:
1 Proper signage should be provided at both sides of the junction.
3
Life Academy of Vocational Studies
 PIC:
ODISHA [RSA REPORT]

Safety Issue No: 4

Location/ Chainage
1/580 KMs

Description of Road Safety Issue: The road has a U-curve (RHS). The point which may cause
accident during traffic volume increases.

Road Safety Risk: Scale: 1 – very low, 2- low, 3 – medium, 4 – high, 5 – very high
Exposure to Safety Risk: (Estimated as potential for traffic conflicts (e.g. braking,
swerving, etc.) caused by the issue) 2
Probability to Cause Accident: (Estimated as probability of traffic conflict resulting in
an accident) 2
Consequence of Accident: (Estimated likelihood of personal injury or death caused by
accident. Involvement of pedestrians/bicyclists versus vehicle would have severe
2
consequence. If trucks are involved, the consequence would be even more severe. High
speed of potential impact would have severe consequence)
Resulting Road Safety Risk: (Combined rating equals sum of exposure rating plus
probability rating plus consequence rating divided by 3. Higher the combined rating, 2
greater the urgency of attending to the road safety issue.)
Recommendations:
1 Proper signage should be provided at both sides.

4
Life Academy of Vocational Studies
 PIC:
ODISHA [RSA REPORT]

Safety Issue No: 5

Location/ Chainage
1/700 KMs

Description of Road Safety Issue: The road passes through a proposed bridge. The point which
may cause accident during traffic volume increases.
Road Safety Risk: Scale: 1 – very low, 2- low, 3 – medium, 4 – high, 5 – very high
Exposure to Safety Risk: (Estimated as potential for traffic conflicts (e.g. braking,
swerving, etc.) caused by the issue) 4
Probability to Cause Accident: (Estimated as probability of traffic conflict resulting in
an accident) 4
Consequence of Accident: (Estimated likelihood of personal injury or death caused by
accident. Involvement of pedestrians/bicyclists versus vehicle would have severe
4
consequence. If trucks are involved, the consequence would be even more severe. High
speed of potential impact would have severe consequence)
Resulting Road Safety Risk: (Combined rating equals sum of exposure rating plus
probability rating plus consequence rating divided by 3. Higher the combined rating, 4
greater the urgency of attending to the road safety issue.)
Recommendations:
1 Proper signage should be providedat both sides.
2 Speed breakers should be provided on three sides

Safety Issue No: 6

Location/ Chainage2/330 KMs

Description of Road Safety Issue: The road has a T-junction at Ch. 2/330 KMs. The point
which may cause accident during traffic volume increases.
5
Life Academy of Vocational Studies
 PIC:
ODISHA [RSA REPORT]

Road Safety Risk: Scale: 1 - very low, 2- low, 3 – medium, 4 – high, 5 – very high
Exposure to Safety Risk: (Estimated as potential for traffic conflicts (e.g. braking,
swerving, etc.) caused by the issue) 4
Probability to Cause Accident: (Estimated as probability of traffic conflict resulting in
an accident) 4
Consequence of Accident: (Estimated likelihood of personal injury or death caused by
accident. Involvement of pedestrians/bicyclists versus vehicle would have severe
4
consequence. If trucks are involved, the consequence would be even more severe. High
speed of potential impact would have severe consequence)
Resulting Road Safety Risk: (Combined rating equals sum of exposure rating plus
probability rating plus consequence rating divided by 3. Higher the combined rating, 4
greater the urgency of attending to the road safety issue.)
Recommendations:
1 The junction should be design bell mouth shape with cautionary signage and speed breaker.

Safety Issue No: 7

Location/ Chainage
3/320 KMs

Description of Road Safety Issue: The road has a T-junction at Ch. 3/320KMs. and passes
through a habitation area. The point which may cause accident during traffic volume
increases.
Road Safety Risk: Scale: 1 - very low, 2- low, 3 – medium, 4 – high, 5 – very high
Exposure to Safety Risk: (Estimated as potential for traffic conflicts (e.g. braking,
swerving, etc.) caused by the issue) 4
Probability to Cause Accident: (Estimated as probability of traffic conflict resulting in
an accident) 4
Consequence of Accident: (Estimated likelihood of personal injury or death caused by
accident. Involvement of pedestrians/bicyclists versus vehicle would have severe
4
consequence. If trucks are involved, the consequence would be even more severe. High
speed of potential impact would have severe consequence)
Resulting Road Safety Risk: (Combined rating equals sum of exposure rating plus
probability rating plus consequence rating divided by 3. Higher the combined rating, 4
greater the urgency of attending to the road safety issue.)
Recommendations:
The junction should be design bell mouth shape with cautionary signage should be provided at
1
both sides.

6
Life Academy of Vocational Studies
 PIC:
ODISHA [RSA REPORT]

2 Speed breakers should be provided at all three sides

Safety Issue No: 8

Location/ Chainage
3/600 KMs (LHS)

Description of Road Safety Issue: School area at Ch.3/600Km. The point which may prone to
road accident during School hour.

/Road Safety Risk: Scale: 1 - very low, 2- low, 3 – medium, 4 – high, 5 – very high

Exposure to Safety Risk: (Estimated as potential for traffic conflicts (e.g. braking,
swerving, etc.) caused by the issue) 4
Probability to Cause Accident: (Estimated as probability of traffic conflict resulting in
an accident) 4
Consequence of Accident: (Estimated likelihood of personal injury or death caused by
accident. Involvement of pedestrians/bicyclists versus vehicle would have severe
4
consequence. If trucks are involved, the consequence would be even more severe. High
speed of potential impact would have severe consequence)
Resulting Road Safety Risk: (Combined rating equals sum of exposure rating plus
probability rating plus consequence rating divided by 3. Higher the combined rating, 4
greater the urgency of attending to the road safety issue.)
Recommendations:
PIB, cautionary signage, speed limit signage, no horn signage and speed breaker should be
1
provided .

Safety Issue No: 9

Location/ Chainage
4/300KMs (LHS)

7
Life Academy of Vocational Studies
 PIC:
ODISHA [RSA REPORT]

Description of Road Safety Issue: The road has a U-turn (LHS). The point which may cause
accident during traffic volume increases.

/Road Safety Risk: Scale: 1 - very low, 2- low, 3 – medium, 4 – high, 5 – very high
Exposure to Safety Risk: (Estimated as potential for traffic conflicts (e.g. braking,
swerving, etc.) caused by the issue) 2
Probability to Cause Accident: (Estimated as probability of traffic conflict resulting in
an accident) 2
Consequence of Accident: (Estimated likelihood of personal injury or death caused by
accident. Involvement of pedestrians/bicyclists versus vehicle would have severe
2
consequence. If trucks are involved, the consequence would be even more severe. High
speed of potential impact would have severe consequence)
Resulting Road Safety Risk: (Combined rating equals sum of exposure rating plus
probability rating plus consequence rating divided by 3. Higher the combined rating, 2
greater the urgency of attending to the road safety issue.)
Recommendations:
1 Curve should be design properly with cautionary signage at both end points

Safety Issue No: 10

Location/ Chainage
4/740 KMs

Description of Road Safety Issue: The road passes through a habitation area and has a U-turn.
The point which may cause accident during traffic volume increases.
Road Safety Risk: Scale: 1 - very low, 2- low, 3 – medium, 4 – high, 5 – very high
Exposure to Safety Risk: (Estimated as potential for traffic conflicts (e.g. braking,
swerving, etc.) caused by the issue) 3
Probability to Cause Accident: (Estimated as probability of traffic conflict resulting in
an accident) 3
Consequence of Accident: (Estimated likelihood of personal injury or death caused by
accident. Involvement of pedestrians/bicyclists versus vehicle would have severe
3
consequence. If trucks are involved, the consequence would be even more severe. High
speed of potential impact would have severe consequence)
8
Life Academy of Vocational Studies
 PIC:
ODISHA [RSA REPORT]

Resulting Road Safety Risk: (Combined rating equals sum of exposure rating plus
probability rating plus consequence rating divided by 3. Higher the combined rating, 3
greater the urgency of attending to the road safety issue.)
Recommendations:
PIB, cautionary signage, speed limit signage, no horn signage and speed breaker should be
1
provided

Safety Issue No: 11

Location/ Chainage
5/270 KMs

Description of Road Safety Issue: The road has a U-curve (RHS) at 5/270 KMs. and passes
through a habitation area.
Road Safety Risk: Scale: 1 - very low, 2- low, 3 – medium, 4 – high, 5 – very high
Exposure to Safety Risk: (Estimated as potential for traffic conflicts (e.g. braking,
swerving, etc.) caused by the issue) 3
Probability to Cause Accident: (Estimated as probability of traffic conflict resulting in
an accident) 3
Consequence of Accident: (Estimated likelihood of personal injury or death caused by
accident. Involvement of pedestrians/bicyclists versus vehicle would have severe
3
consequence. If trucks are involved, the consequence would be even more severe. High
speed of potential impact would have severe consequence)
Resulting Road Safety Risk: (Combined rating equals sum of exposure rating plus
probability rating plus consequence rating divided by 3. Higher the combined rating, 3
greater the urgency of attending to the road safety issue.)
Recommendations:
1 Cautionary signage should be provided at both sides as a blow horn signage.

Safety Issue No: 12

9
Life Academy of Vocational Studies
 PIC:
ODISHA [RSA REPORT]

Location/ Chainage
5/440 KMs (LHS)

Description of Road Safety Issue: The road has a U- curve at 5/440 KMs. The point which
may cause accident during traffic volume increases.

Road Safety Risk: Scale: 1 - very low, 2- low, 3 – medium, 4 – high, 5 – very high
Exposure to Safety Risk: (Estimated as potential for traffic conflicts (e.g. braking,
swerving, etc.) caused by the issue) 2
Probability to Cause Accident: (Estimated as probability of traffic conflict resulting in
an accident) 2
Consequence of Accident: (Estimated likelihood of personal injury or death caused by
accident. Involvement of pedestrians/bicyclists versus vehicle would have severe
2
consequence. If trucks are involved, the consequence would be even more severe. High
speed of potential impact would have severe consequence)
Resulting Road Safety Risk: (Combined rating equals sum of exposure rating plus
probability rating plus consequence rating divided by 3. Higher the combined rating, 2
greater the urgency of attending to the road safety issue.)
Recommendations:
1 Cautionary signage should be provided at both sides as a blow horn signage.

Safety Issue No: 13

Location/ Chainage
5/500 KMs

10
Life Academy of Vocational Studies
 PIC:
ODISHA [RSA REPORT]

Description of Road Safety Issue: The road has a T-junction at 5/500 KMs. The point which
may cause accident during traffic volume increases.
Road Safety Risk: Scale: 1 - very low, 2- low, 3 – medium, 4 – high, 5 – very high
Exposure to Safety Risk: (Estimated as potential for traffic conflicts (e.g. braking,
swerving, etc.) caused by the issue) 4
Probability to Cause Accident: (Estimated as probability of traffic conflict resulting in
an accident) 4
Consequence of Accident: (Estimated likelihood of personal injury or death caused by
accident. Involvement of pedestrians/bicyclists versus vehicle would have severe
4
consequence. If trucks are involved, the consequence would be even more severe. High
speed of potential impact would have severe consequence)
Resulting Road Safety Risk: (Combined rating equals sum of exposure rating plus
probability rating plus consequence rating divided by 3. Higher the combined rating, 4
greater the urgency of attending to the road safety issue.)
Recommendations:
1 The junction should be design bell moth shape with cautionary signage.
2 Speed beakers should be provide at all three sides of the junction

Safety Issue No: 14

Location/ Chainage
6/700 KMs

Description of Road Safety Issue: The road has a U- curve with a Y-junction at 6/700 KMs.
The point which may cause accident during traffic volume increases.

Road Safety Risk: Scale: 1 - very low, 2- low, 3 – medium, 4 – high, 5 – very high
Exposure to Safety Risk: (Estimated as potential for traffic conflicts (e.g. braking,
swerving, etc.) caused by the issue) 4
Probability to Cause Accident: (Estimated as probability of traffic conflict resulting in
an accident) 4
Consequence of Accident: (Estimated likelihood of personal injury or death caused by
accident. Involvement of pedestrians/bicyclists versus vehicle would have severe
4
consequence. If trucks are involved, the consequence would be even more severe. High
speed of potential impact would have severe consequence)
Resulting Road Safety Risk: (Combined rating equals sum of exposure rating plus
probability rating plus consequence rating divided by 3. Higher the combined rating, 4
greater the urgency of attending to the road safety issue.)

11
Life Academy of Vocational Studies
 PIC:
ODISHA [RSA REPORT]

Recommendations:
1 The Junction should be design properly with cautionary signage and speed breaker at all sides.

Safety Issue No: 15

Location/ Chainage
7/600 KMs

Description of Road Safety Issue: The road has a turning (RHS) at 7/600KMs. The point
which may cause accident during traffic volume increases.
Road Safety Risk: Scale: 1 - very low, 2- low, 3 – medium, 4 – high, 5 – very high
Exposure to Safety Risk: (Estimated as potential for traffic conflicts (e.g. braking,
swerving, etc.) caused by the issue) 2
Probability to Cause Accident: (Estimated as probability of traffic conflict resulting in
an accident) 2
Consequence of Accident: (Estimated likelihood of personal injury or death caused by
accident. Involvement of pedestrians/bicyclists versus vehicle would have severe
2
consequence. If trucks are involved, the consequence would be even more severe. High
speed of potential impact would have severe consequence)
Resulting Road Safety Risk: (Combined rating equals sum of exposure rating plus
probability rating plus consequence rating divided by 3. Higher the combined rating, 2
greater the urgency of attending to the road safety issue.)
Recommendations:
1 The curve should be design properly with cautionary signage at both end points.

Safety Issue No: 16

12
Life Academy of Vocational Studies
 PIC:
ODISHA [RSA REPORT]

Location/ Chainage 8/100 KMs

Description of Road Safety Issue: The road has a T-Junction on left hand side (RHS) at 8/100
KMs. The point which may cause accident during traffic volume increases.

Road Safety Risk: Scale: 1 - very low, 2- low, 3 – medium, 4 – high, 5 – very high
Exposure to Safety Risk: (Estimated as potential for traffic conflicts (e.g. braking,
swerving, etc.) caused by the issue) 3
Probability to Cause Accident: (Estimated as probability of traffic conflict resulting in
an accident) 3
Consequence of Accident: (Estimated likelihood of personal injury or death caused by
accident. Involvement of pedestrians/bicyclists versus vehicle would have severe
3
consequence. If trucks are involved, the consequence would be even more severe. High
speed of potential impact would have severe consequence)
Resulting Road Safety Risk: (Combined rating equals sum of exposure rating plus
probability rating plus consequence rating divided by 3. Higher the combined rating, 3
greater the urgency of attending to the road safety issue.)
Recommendations:
The junction should be design bell mouth shape with Proper signage should be provided at both
1
sides.
2 Speed breakers should be provided at all the three sides

Safety Issue No: 17

Location/ Chainage
8/650KMs

Description of Road Safety Issue: The road a S-curve (RHS) at 8/650 KMs. The point which
may cause accident during traffic volume increases.
Road Safety Risk: Scale: 1 - very low, 2- low, 3 – medium, 4 – high, 5 – very high

13
Life Academy of Vocational Studies
 PIC:
ODISHA [RSA REPORT]

Exposure to Safety Risk: (Estimated as potential for traffic conflicts (e.g. braking,
swerving, etc.) caused by the issue) 4
Probability to Cause Accident: (Estimated as probability of traffic conflict resulting in
an accident) 4
Consequence of Accident: (Estimated likelihood of personal injury or death caused by
accident. Involvement of pedestrians/bicyclists versus vehicle would have severe
4
consequence. If trucks are involved, the consequence would be even more severe. High
speed of potential impact would have severe consequence)
Resulting Road Safety Risk: (Combined rating equals sum of exposure rating plus
probability rating plus consequence rating divided by 3. Higher the combined rating, 4
greater the urgency of attending to the road safety issue.)
Recommendations:
The curve should be design properly with cautionary signage and blow horn signage at both end
1
points.

Safety Issue No: 18

Location/ Chainage
8/950 KMs

Description of Road Safety Issue: The road passes through a habitation area from 8/950 KMs.
The point which may cause accident during traffic volume increases.
Road Safety Risk: Scale: 1 - very low, 2- low, 3 – medium, 4 – high, 5 – very high
Exposure to Safety Risk: (Estimated as potential for traffic conflicts (e.g. braking,
swerving, etc.) caused by the issue) 3
Probability to Cause Accident: (Estimated as probability of traffic conflict resulting in
an accident) 3
Consequence of Accident: (Estimated likelihood of personal injury or death caused by
accident. Involvement of pedestrians/bicyclists versus vehicle would have severe
3
consequence. If trucks are involved, the consequence would be even more severe. High
speed of potential impact would have severe consequence)
Resulting Road Safety Risk: (Combined rating equals sum of exposure rating plus
probability rating plus consequence rating divided by 3. Higher the combined rating, 3
greater the urgency of attending to the road safety issue.)
Recommendations:
1 PIB, cautionary signage and blow horn signage should be provided.
2 Speed breakers should be provided at mid village area

14
Life Academy of Vocational Studies
 PIC:
ODISHA [RSA REPORT]

Safety Issue No: 19

Location/ Chainage
9/100 KMs

Description of Road Safety Issue: The road has a U-curve at 9/100 KMs. The point which may
cause accident during traffic volume increases.

Road Safety Risk: Scale: 1 – very low, 2- low, 3 – medium, 4 – high, 5 – very high
Exposure to Safety Risk: (Estimated as potential for traffic conflicts (e.g. braking,
swerving, etc.) caused by the issue) 3
Probability to Cause Accident: (Estimated as probability of traffic conflict resulting in
an accident) 3
Consequence of Accident: (Estimated likelihood of personal injury or death caused by
accident. Involvement of pedestrians/bicyclists versus vehicle would have severe
3
consequence. If trucks are involved, the consequence would be even more severe. High
speed of potential impact would have severe consequence)
Resulting Road Safety Risk: (Combined rating equals sum of exposure rating plus
probability rating plus consequence rating divided by 3. Higher the combined rating, 3
greater the urgency of attending to the road safety issue.)
Recommendations:
The curve should be design properly with cautionary signage and blow horn signage at both end
1
points.

Safety Issue No: 20

Location/ Chainage
9/500 KMs

Description of Road Safety Issue: The road has a water body at 9/500 KMs. (LHS). The point
which may cause accident during traffic volume increases.

15
Life Academy of Vocational Studies
 PIC:
ODISHA [RSA REPORT]

Road Safety Risk: Scale: 1 – very low, 2- low, 3 – medium, 4 – high, 5 – very high
Exposure to Safety Risk: (Estimated as potential for traffic conflicts (e.g. braking,
swerving, etc.) caused by the issue) 3
Probability to Cause Accident: (Estimated as probability of traffic conflict resulting in
an accident) 3
Consequence of Accident: (Estimated likelihood of personal injury or death caused by
accident. Involvement of pedestrians/bicyclists versus vehicle would have severe
3
consequence. If trucks are involved, the consequence would be even more severe. High
speed of potential impact would have severe consequence)
Resulting Road Safety Risk: (Combined rating equals sum of exposure rating plus
probability rating plus consequence rating divided by 3. Higher the combined rating, 3
greater the urgency of attending to the road safety issue.)
Recommendations:
The curve should be design properly with cautionary signage and blow horn signage at both end
1
points.

Safety Issue No: 21

Location/ Chainage
9/800 KMs

Description of Road Safety Issue: The road has a T junction at 9/800 KMs. The point which
may cause accident during traffic volume increases.
Road Safety Risk: Scale: 1 – very low, 2- low, 3 – medium, 4 – high, 5 – very high
Exposure to Safety Risk: (Estimated as potential for traffic conflicts (e.g. braking,
swerving, etc.) caused by the issue) 4
Probability to Cause Accident: (Estimated as probability of traffic conflict resulting in
an accident) 4
Consequence of Accident: (Estimated likelihood of personal injury or death caused by
accident. Involvement of pedestrians/bicyclists versus vehicle would have severe
4
consequence. If trucks are involved, the consequence would be even more severe. High
speed of potential impact would have severe consequence)
Resulting Road Safety Risk: (Combined rating equals sum of exposure rating plus
probability rating plus consequence rating divided by 3. Higher the combined rating, 4
greater the urgency of attending to the road safety issue.)
Recommendations:
The junction should be design bell mouth shaped with cautionary signage should be provided at
1
both sides.

16
Life Academy of Vocational Studies
 PIC:
ODISHA [RSA REPORT]

2 Speed breakers should be provided at all sides

Safety Issue No: 22

Location/ Chainage
11/230 KMs

Description of Road Safety Issue: The road has a right turning at 11/230 KMs. The point
which may cause accident during traffic volume increases.

Road Safety Risk: Scale: 1 – very low, 2- low, 3 – medium, 4 – high, 5 – very high
Exposure to Safety Risk: (Estimated as potential for traffic conflicts (e.g. braking,
swerving, etc.) caused by the issue) 2
Probability to Cause Accident: (Estimated as probability of traffic conflict resulting in
an accident) 2
Consequence of Accident: (Estimated likelihood of personal injury or death caused by
accident. Involvement of pedestrians/bicyclists versus vehicle would have severe
2
consequence. If trucks are involved, the consequence would be even more severe. High
speed of potential impact would have severe consequence)
Resulting Road Safety Risk: (Combined rating equals sum of exposure rating plus
probability rating plus consequence rating divided by 3. Higher the combined rating, 2
greater the urgency of attending to the road safety issue.)
Recommendations:

1 The curve should be design properly with cautionary signage at both end points

Safety Issue No: 23

Location/ Chainage
11/750to KMs

17
Life Academy of Vocational Studies
 PIC:
ODISHA [RSA REPORT]

Description of Road Safety Issue: The road has aS curve at 11/750KMs. The point which may
cause accident during traffic volume increases.

Road Safety Risk: Scale: 1 – very low, 2- low, 3 – medium, 4 – high, 5 – very high
Exposure to Safety Risk: (Estimated as potential for traffic conflicts (e.g. braking,
swerving, etc.) caused by the issue) 3
Probability to Cause Accident: (Estimated as probability of traffic conflict resulting in
an accident) 3
Consequence of Accident: (Estimated likelihood of personal injury or death caused by
accident. Involvement of pedestrians/bicyclists versus vehicle would have severe
3
consequence. If trucks are involved, the consequence would be even more severe. High
speed of potential impact would have severe consequence)
Resulting Road Safety Risk: (Combined rating equals sum of exposure rating plus
probability rating plus consequence rating divided by 3. Higher the combined rating, 3
greater the urgency of attending to the road safety issue.)
Recommendations:
1 The curve should be design properly with cautionary signage at both end points
2 Speed breakers should be at both ends of the village

Safety Issue No: 24

Location/ Chainage
12/000 KMs

Description of Road Safety Issue: The road has a U-curve at 12/000 KMs. (RHS) with less
visibility. The point which may cause accident during traffic volume increases.

Road Safety Risk: Scale: 1 – very low, 2- low, 3 – medium, 4 – high, 5 – very high
Exposure to Safety Risk: (Estimated as potential for traffic conflicts (e.g. braking,
swerving, etc.) caused by the issue) 3
Probability to Cause Accident: (Estimated as probability of traffic conflict resulting in
an accident) 3
Consequence of Accident: (Estimated likelihood of personal injury or death caused by
accident. Involvement of pedestrians/bicyclists versus vehicle would have severe
3
consequence. If trucks are involved, the consequence would be even more severe. High
speed of potential impact would have severe consequence)
Resulting Road Safety Risk: (Combined rating equals sum of exposure rating plus
probability rating plus consequence rating divided by 3. Higher the combined rating, 3
greater the urgency of attending to the road safety issue.)
18
Life Academy of Vocational Studies
 PIC:
ODISHA [RSA REPORT]

Recommendations:
1 The curve should be design properly with cautionary signage at both end points
2 Speed breakers should be at both ends of the turning

Safety Issue No: 25

Location/ Chainage
12/300 KMs

Description of Road Safety Issue: The road has a T-junction. The point which may cause
accident during traffic volume increases.

Road Safety Risk: Scale: 1 – very low, 2- low, 3 – medium, 4 – high, 5 – very high
Exposure to Safety Risk: (Estimated as potential for traffic conflicts (e.g. braking,
swerving, etc.) caused by the issue) 3
Probability to Cause Accident: (Estimated as probability of traffic conflict resulting in
an accident) 3
Consequence of Accident: (Estimated likelihood of personal injury or death caused by
accident. Involvement of pedestrians/bicyclists versus vehicle would have severe
3
consequence. If trucks are involved, the consequence would be even more severe. High
speed of potential impact would have severe consequence)
Resulting Road Safety Risk: (Combined rating equals sum of exposure rating plus
probability rating plus consequence rating divided by 3. Higher the combined rating, 3
greater the urgency of attending to the road safety issue.)
Recommendations:

19
Life Academy of Vocational Studies
 PIC:
ODISHA [RSA REPORT]

The junction should be design bell mouth shape with Proper signage should be provided at both
1
sides.
2 Speed breakers should be at all ends of the junction.

Safety Issue No: 26

Location/ Chainage
12/600 KMs

Description of Road Safety Issue: The road has a U-curve at 12/600 KMs. and has a habitation
area.
Road Safety Risk: Scale: 1 – very low, 2- low, 3 – medium, 4 – high, 5 – very high
Exposure to Safety Risk: (Estimated as potential for traffic conflicts (e.g. braking,
swerving, etc.) caused by the issue) 4
Probability to Cause Accident: (Estimated as probability of traffic conflict resulting in
an accident) 4
Consequence of Accident: (Estimated likelihood of personal injury or death caused by
accident. Involvement of pedestrians/bicyclists versus vehicle would have severe
4
consequence. If trucks are involved, the consequence would be even more severe. High
speed of potential impact would have severe consequence)
Resulting Road Safety Risk: (Combined rating equals sum of exposure rating plus
probability rating plus consequence rating divided by 3. Higher the combined rating, 4
greater the urgency of attending to the road safety issue.)
Recommendations:
1 Proper signage should be provided at both sides.
2 Speed breakers should be at both ends of the turning

20
Life Academy of Vocational Studies
 PIC:
ODISHA [RSA REPORT]

Safety Issue No: 27

Location/ Chainage
12/670 KMs Curve

Description of Road Safety Issue: The road has a U-curve (LHS) and passes through a
habitation area. The point which may cause accident during traffic volume increases.

Road Safety Risk: Scale: 1 – very low, 2- low, 3 – medium, 4 – high, 5 – very high
Exposure to Safety Risk: (Estimated as potential for traffic conflicts (e.g. braking,
swerving, etc.) caused by the issue) 4
Probability to Cause Accident: (Estimated as probability of traffic conflict resulting in
an accident) 4
Consequence of Accident: (Estimated likelihood of personal injury or death caused by
accident. Involvement of pedestrians/bicyclists versus vehicle would have severe
4
consequence. If trucks are involved, the consequence would be even more severe. High
speed of potential impact would have severe consequence)
Resulting Road Safety Risk: (Combined rating equals sum of exposure rating plus
probability rating plus consequence rating divided by 3. Higher the combined rating, 4
greater the urgency of attending to the road safety issue.)
Recommendations:
1 The curve should be design properly with cautionary signage at both end points
2 Speed breakers should be at both ends of the turning

Safety Issue No: 28

Location/ Chainage
12/960 KMs C

21
Life Academy of Vocational Studies
 PIC:
ODISHA [RSA REPORT]

Description of Road Safety Issue: The road has a U-curve (RHS) at 12/960KMs. and passes
through habitation area. The point which may cause accident during traffic volume increases.
Road Safety Risk: Scale: 1 – very low, 2- low, 3 – medium, 4 – high, 5 – very high
Exposure to Safety Risk: (Estimated as potential for traffic conflicts (e.g. braking,
swerving, etc.) caused by the issue) 4
Probability to Cause Accident: (Estimated as probability of traffic conflict resulting in
an accident) 4
Consequence of Accident: (Estimated likelihood of personal injury or death caused by
accident. Involvement of pedestrians/bicyclists versus vehicle would have severe
4
consequence. If trucks are involved, the consequence would be even more severe. High
speed of potential impact would have severe consequence)
Resulting Road Safety Risk: (Combined rating equals sum of exposure rating plus
probability rating plus consequence rating divided by 3. Higher the combined rating, 4
greater the urgency of attending to the road safety issue.)
Recommendations:
1 The curve should be design properly with cautionary signage at both end points
2 Speed breakers should be at both ends of the turning

22
Life Academy of Vocational Studies
 PIC: ODISHA [RSA REPORT]

FORM A: EMPLOYER’s RESPONSE TO RSA FINDINGS

State: Odisha
District/Division: Sundargarh District/SundargarhDivision
Block: Hemgir
Road Number (Core Network): MRL-12

Construction Package Number or DPR reference number: PKG NO.- OR 30-686

Road Name: Telendihi to Rajbahal
Date of Audit: 02/09/2020
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sl. PIC PIU PIU PIC PIU PIU PIU
N Details of issue Agree? If RSA suggestion(s) To be If yes or partial: If no, describe an
o Yes/No disagree, implemente arrangements alternative
explain d yes, no, for action to be
partial implementation taken and
why
(elaborate) and timeline arrangements
for
implementation
1 The proposed road starts from The junction should be design with bell
Telendihi and has a T-junction. mouth shape
The point which may cause
accident during traffic volume Cautionary signage should be provided at
increases all the three sides
2 The curve should be design properly with
The road has a turning at 0/400 cautionary signage at both end points..
KMs (LHS).. The point which may
cause accident during traffic
volume increases.
3 The proposed road starts from Proper signage should be provided at
both sides of the junction.
23
Life Academy of Vocational Studies
 PIC: ODISHA [RSA REPORT]

Telendihi and has a T-junction.

The point which may cause
accident during traffic volume
increases

4 Proper signage should be provided at

The road has a U-curve (RHS). both sides.
The point which may cause
accident during traffic volume
increases.
5 Proper signage should be provided at
The road passes through a both sides.
proposed bridge. The point which
may cause accident during traffic Speed breakers should be provided on
volume increases three sides
6 The junction should be design bell mouth
The road has a T-junction at Ch. shape with cautionary signage and speed
2/330 KMs. The point which may breaker.
cause accident during traffic
volume increases
7 The junction should be design bell mouth
The road has a T-junction at Ch. shape with cautionary signage should be
3/320KMs. and passes through a provided at both sides.
habitation area. The point which Speed breakers should be provided at all
may cause accident during traffic three sides
volume increases.
8 School area at Ch.3/600Km. The Cautionary signage should be provided at
point which may prone to road both sides as a blow horn signage
accident during School hour.
9 Cautionary signage should be provided at
The road has a U-turn (LHS). The both sides as a blow horn signage
point which may cause accident

24
Life Academy of Vocational Studies
 PIC: ODISHA
during traffic volume increases
10
The road passes through a
habitation area and has a U-turn.
The point which may cause
accident during traffic volume
increases.
11 The road has a U-curve (RHS) at
5/270 KMs. and passes through a
habitation area.
12 The road has a T-junction at 5/500
KMs. The point which may cause
accident during traffic volume
increases.
13 The road has a T-junction at 5/500
KMs. The point which may cause
accident during traffic volume
increases.
14
The road has a U- curve with a Y-
junction at 6/700 KMs. The point
which may cause accident during
traffic volume increases.
15 The road has a turning (RHS) at
7/600KMs. The point which may
cause accident during traffic
volume increases
16 The road has a T-Junction on left
hand side (RHS) at 8/100 KMs.
The point which may cause
accident during traffic volume
[RSA REPORT]
Cautionary signage should be provided at
both sides as a blow horn signage
Cautionary signage should be provided at
both sides as a blow horn signage
Cautionary signage should be provided at
both sides as a blow horn signage
The junction should be design bell moth
shape with cautionary signage.
Speed beakers should be provide at all
three sides of the junction
The curve should be design properly with
cautionary signage at both end points
The junction should be design bell mouth
shape with Proper signage should be
provided at both sides.
Speed breakers should be provided at all
the three sides
The curve should be design properly with
cautionary signage at both end points
25
Life Academy of Vocational Studies
 PIC: ODISHA
increases.
17
The road a S-curve (RHS) at 8/650
KMs. The point which may cause
accident during traffic volume
increases.
18
The road passes through a
habitation area from 8/950 KMs.
The point which may cause
accident during traffic volume
increases.
19
The road has a U-curve at 9/100
KMs. The point which may cause
accident during traffic volume
increases.
20
The road has a water body at 9/500
KMs. (LHS). The point which may
cause accident during traffic
volume increases.
21 The road has a T junction at 9/800
KMs. The point which may cause
accident during traffic volume
increases.
22
The road has a right turning at
[RSA REPORT]
The curve should be design properly with
cautionary signage and blow horn signage
at both end points.
PIB, cautionary signage and blow horn
signage should be provided.
Speed breakers should be provided at mid
village area
The curve should be design properly with
cautionary signage and blow horn signage
at both end points.
The curve should be design properly with
cautionary signage and blow horn signage
at both end points.
The junction should be design bell mouth
shaped with cautionary signage should be
provided at both sides.
Speed breakers should be provided at all
sides
The curve should be design properly with
cautionary signage at both end points
26
Life Academy of Vocational Studies
 PIC: ODISHA
11/230 KMs. The point which may
cause accident during traffic
volume increases.
23 The road has a S curve at
11/750KMs. The point which may
cause accident during traffic
volume increases.
24
The road has a U-curve at 12/000
KMs. (RHS) with less visibility.
The point which may cause
accident during traffic volume
increases.
25 The road has a T-junction. The
point which may cause accident
during traffic volume increases
26 The road has a U-curve at 12/600
KMs. and has a habitation area.
27
The road has a U-curve (LHS) and
passes through a habitation area.
The point which may cause
accident during traffic volume
increases.
[RSA REPORT]
The curve should be design properly with
cautionary signage at both end points
Speed breakers should be at both ends of
the village
The curve should be design properly with
cautionary signage at both end points
Speed breakers should be at both ends of
the turning
The junction should be design bell mouth
shape with Proper signage should be
provided at both sides.
Speed breakers should be at all ends of
the junction.
Proper signage should be provided at
both sides
Speed breakers should be at both ends of
the turning
The curve should be design properly with
cautionary signage at both end points
Speed breakers should be at both ends of
the turning
27
Life Academy of Vocational Studies
 PIC: ODISHA [RSA REPORT]

28 The road has a U-curve (RHS) at The curve should be design properly with
12/960 KMs. and passes through cautionary signage at both end points
habitation area. The point which
Speed breakers should be at both ends of
may cause accident during traffic
the turning
volume increases

(ER.UmakantaPani) (NASHIR ALI)

Road Safety Expert Team Leader
PIC (LAVS)-Odisha PIC (LAVS)-Odisha

28
Life Academy of Vocational Studies