Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lab 4 Report
Lab 4 Report
Jasper Fisher
Lab Section 4
The purpose of this experiment was to identify the unknown microorganism #100 using multiple
differential tests to indicate its physiological and biochemical properties. The tests performed on
the unknown include: the Gram Stain, differential and selective growth on Endo Agar, Eosin
Methylene Blue (EMB) Agar, and Phenylethyl Alcohol (PEA) Agar, the SIM Agar tube (which
incorporates tests for Indole, sulfur reduction, and motility), Kligler’s Iron Agar test (which
incorporates tests for lactose and glucose fermentation, gas production, and sulfur reduction), the
Methyl Red test for fermentation type, the Vogues-Proskauer test for acetoin production, the
Citrate test for alternative carbon source utilization, and the Gelatin Hydrolysis for the presence
of gelatinases in the unknown. Biochemical profiles for five known species were provided for
identification following the completion of the unknown’s profile; these species include
Escherichia coli, Enterobacter aerogenes, Citrobacter freundii, Proteus murabilis, and Serratia
marcescens. Additional completion of the RapID SS/u system for the unknown was completed to
include additional test results for cross-referencing and determining the identity of the unknown.
The unknown #100 was discovered to be a motile, Gram-negative, facultative anaerobic bacilli
that is a mixed-acid fermenter capable of fermenting glucose and citrate, as well as having the
capability to perform sulfur reduction. With this analysis and cross-referencing these
physiological and biochemical characteristics of the unknown to the biochemical profiles of the
known bacteria, it was concluded that the identity of the unknown was Citrobacter freundii.
Introduction
essential in multiple applications, notably in clinical laboratories and specimen collection for
health care. Identification tests in medical settings have varying degrees of specificity and
sensitivity to pathogens, with tests high in both of these criteria being able to identify a pathogen
with a high degree of reliability (Madigan et al., 2018). In addition to visual and microscopic
this report is the Gram-stain test, which directly examines the cell-wall composition of bacteria
through a staining procedure (Madigan et al., 2018; Leboffe & Pierce, 2011). Another method of
selective and differential media and observing their growth patterns; for example, the selective
media may permit the growth of Gram-negative bacteria while inhibiting the growth of Gram-
positive bacteria (Leboffe & Pierce, 2011). By combining the results of a wide variety of
biochemical and physiological tests, both indirect and direct methods, unknown organisms can
be determined with a relatively high degree of accuracy by cross-referencing the results of the
observations prove insufficient on their own for reliable identification is to assess various
mechanisms of cellular respiration that fall into one of 5 categories based on their oxygenic
and strict aerobes, oxygen acts as the final electron acceptor in the respiration process (Madigan
et al., 2018; Silverthorn, 2019). Conversely, anaerobic respiration, including aerotolerant and
strict anaerobes, is supported by final electron acceptors that are not oxygen, such as nitrite,
ferric iron, sulfate, and carbon dioxide (Madigan et al., 2018; Silverthorn, 2018). An important
final electron acceptor in anaerobic respiration for this study is inorganic sulfur compounds, such
oxygen; bacteria capable of sulfur-reduction reduce the compounds to H2S through either
assimilative or dissimilative reduction (Madigan et al., 2018). This reduction and the following
electron transport are what drive the proton motive force for ATP synthesis (Madigan et al.,
All of the bacteria assessed in this report are facultative anaerobes, indicating that
respiration can be performed in both anoxic and oxygen-rich environments. As such, all bacteria
examined are capable of performing cellular respiration with oxygen in addition to other
molecules as the final electron acceptor (Madigan et al., 2018). Determining the cellular
respiration pathways used in bacteria is an efficient method to identify and differentiate species,
which can be assessed by finding what specific final electron acceptor is used in cellular
respiration.
order to yield energy in the form of ATP, however some organisms are capable of fermenting
other compounds such as amino acids or aromatic compounds (Madigan, 2018). In typical sugar
fermentation, glucose enters the first stage, glycolysis, directly; glucose undergoes a redox
reaction to form two molecules of pyruvate, which then undergoes redox again to result in the
fermentation end-products (Madigan et al., 2018). An example of this is lactic acid fermentation,
in which pyruvate is transformed into lactic acid in addition to the production of 2 ATP
molecules (Madigan et al., 2018; Silverthorn, 2019). Another fermentation process relevant to
this report is Mixed-Acid fermentation, which is typically characterized by the fermentation end-
products of CO2, hydrogen ions, acetic acid, lactic acid, and succinic acid, however specific end-
products can vary between species (Madigan et al., 2018). A variant of Mixed-Acid fermentation
found in this report is Butanediol Mixed-Acid fermentation, which results in the eventual
bacterial species can be differentiated based on their fermentation pathways, biochemical tests to
identify fermentation mechanisms are essential for bacterial identification; in determining the
identity of the unknown organism #100, five tests that detect fermentation mechanisms are
performed: Aerotolerance (FTM tube), Sulfur reduction (SIM tube), Kliger’s Iron Agar test,
made for the species in question. Rather than performing multiple identification tests on an
unknown, multi-test systems such as the RapID SS/u are useful in creating a panel of tests that
identity with a high degree of accuracy (ThermoFisher Scientific, 2020). Catalogues such as this
document the biochemical and physiological profiles of many microorganisms for reference
when identifying an unknown. Taking into account the individual tests performed (see results in
Tables 2 & 3 in appendix) in parallel with the RapID SS/u identification system, it was
Procedures followed are as stated in the BIOL 2P98 Lab 4 Lab Manual (Carpenter-
Results
Examination of the physical characteristics of the unknown organism indicated that the
species is Gram negative (as indicated by a pink/red hue following the Gram stain procedure).
Individual cells are bacilli in shape and tend to be arranged singularly. When cultured, the
unknown has circular colonies with smooth margins and appears white, opaque, and moist.
Growth in the FTM tube is located throughout the colourless region with no pink at the surface,
indicating the unknown is a facultative anaerobe. Differential and Selective media indicated
growth on the EMB and Endo agars, with no growth occurring on the PEA agar.
Based on the black precipitate in the Sulfur reduction, the red slant/yellow butt of the
glucose fermentation in KIA media, and the blue colour in the citrate tests, the unknown
organism demonstrates that it is capable of using a wide variety of carbon sources for energy
The Indole test in the SIM Agar tube remains colourless at the surface following the
addition of Kovac’s reagent, indicating the species is incapable of producing indole. This tube
also reveals cultures that have grown away from the inoculating stab line, indicating motility.
The Kliger’s Iron Agar test resulted in a red slant portion with a yellow butt, suggesting the
bacteria is able to ferment glucose but not lactose within the 24-hour incubation period. There
are no cracks or lifting of the agar in this tube, indicating that the unknown does not produce gas
in this reaction. Two tests, the Kliger’s Iron Agar test and the H2S test indicate that the organism
is capable of reducing sulfur. The Methyl Red test in the MRVP tube reveals a red top, indicating
the unknown is capable of performing mixed-acid fermentation. The Vogues-Proskaur test in the
MRVP tube is yellow/brown in colour, indicating a negative result for acetoin production. The
Gelatin Hydrolysis test resulted in a solid nutrient gelatin medium, indicating the unknown does
Figure 1. Dichotomous key identification flow chart to identify the unknown organism #100
Citrobacter freundii
Enterobacter aerogenes Proteus mirabilis
Escherichia coli Serratia marcescens
Escherichia coli
Citrobacter freundii Serratia Proteus
marcescens mirabilis
Enterobacter
aerogenes
Indole Test
Citrobacter Escherichia
freundii coli
Performing the RapID SS/u tests revealed positive results in for only the GMS and A2
tests (see Figure 2 in Appendix). With only two positive tests in the RapID SS/u, the organism
had the potential to be all but one of the provided Gram-negative bacilli (Escherichia coli, which
was negative in the A2 test). By combining the results of the RapID SS/u tests, differential
staining, and biochemical tests performed, the identity of unknown organism #100 is likely
Citrobacter freundii.
Discussion
Based on the results of the biochemical, differential, and RapID SS/u tests performed, it
is probable that the identity of unknown organism #100 is Citrobacter freundii. The first step in
reaching this conclusion was to analyse the biochemical, physiological, and differential growth
aerogenes, Citrobacter freundii, Proteus mirabilis, and Serratia marcescens. The biochemical,
differential, and physiological characteristics were summarized into a table that included the
results that each of these organisms would present on each of the tests being performed, as well
as describing their physical and growth characteristics (see Table 2 in appendix; test results
gathered from Garrity et al., 2005, Madigan et al., 2018, and Leboffe & Pierce, 2011). An
additional table was produced to describe the characteristics of all tests to be performed,
including the indicators and media used, the purpose of the test, and the criteria that indicate a
positive or negative result (see Table 3 in appendix, test information gathered from Leboffe &
Pierce, 2011).
After having the base information required to identify the unknown via the tables
mentioned prior, the lab results for unknown organism #100 on each test, as well as its
physiological characteristics when grown on a basic medium, were assessed and catalogued in
Table 1. The test results were provided in the BIOL 2P98 Lab 4 Lab Manual (Carpenter-Cleland,
2020). With the biochemical and physiological data observed, the results of each test were
interpreted by referencing Table 3 to assess whether results were negative or positive and what
these results indicated. Interpretations and observations of the unknown were then cross-
referenced to the results for each of the five knowns in Table 2. Characteristics and test results
that were identical between the unknown and the known species were highlighted by a green cell
and results that were conflicting were marked with a red cell. This provided a clear and concise
Given all biochemical and physiological characteristics of the known and unknown
species had all been documented and cross-referenced, a clear pattern of similarities between the
unknown species and Citrobacter freundii was observed. Of the five known species, Citrobacter
freundii was the only species that did not have any conflicting biochemical test results. With all
tests indicating the same results, a conclusion was reached that the unknown species is likely
Citrobacter freundii.
Using the results in Tables 1 and 2, a dichotomous key identification flowchart was
created to differentiate between the five known species (Figure 1). This key includes the Gelatin
Hydrolysis Test, Methyl Red test, Sulfur Reduction (H2S) test, and the Indole test to
systematically identify the five known species based on their positive or negative results on each
test. Applying the unknown organism #100 to this identification key also leads to the conclusion
Lastly, the unknown was subject to the multi-biochemical test RadID SS/u, with results
provided in the BIOL 2P98 Lab 4 Lab Manual (Carpenter-Cleland, 2020). The results of this test
were much less specific in identifying a specific species as the unknown, as only two positive
results presented – the GMS and A2 tests (see Figure 2 in appendix). As the unknown only
presented two positive results, these criteria also applied to all but one of the provided Gram-
negative bacilli, Escherichia coli (see Figure 3 in appendix). Although a specific identity could
not be distinguished using only 2 positive test results, this test led to the conclusion that the
unknown could not be E. colii, given the conflicting result in the A2 test. As the unknown and E.
coli shared many characteristics on multiple tests, referring to the RapID SS/u system to rule out
Carpenter-Cleland, C. (2020) BIOL 2P98 2020FW Principles of Microbiology Lab Manual. St.
Leboffe MJ and Pierce BE (2011) A Photographic Atlas for the Microbiology Laboratory, 4th
Madigan MT, Bender KS, Buckley DH, Sattley WM, and Stahl DA (2018) Brock Biology of
Education, Inc.
https://www.thermofisher.com/order/catalog/product/R8311004?SID=srch-srp-
R8311004#/R8311004?SID=srch-srp-R8311004
Appendix
Table 2. Physiological and biochemical characteristics of different bacteria. Green cells indicate
shared characteristics with the unknown organism #100. Red cells indicate results that conflict
with the unknown.
Enterobacter
Escherichia
Citrobacter
marcescens
aerogenes
coli DH5
mirabilis
Serratia
freundii
Proteus
inactive
Risk Group 2 2 2 2 2
Cell length (m) 2-6 1.2-3.0 2.0-6.0 1.0-3.0 0.9-2.0
Gram Stain - - - - -
Cell shape & Straight Straight Straight Straight Bacillus/rod
arrangement bacillus/rod bacillus/rod, bacillus/rod: bacillus/rod:
s:singly or single single and swarm
pairs pairs
Colonial Smooth Mucoid and Smooth Uniform film Opaque or
characteristics convex flat, yellow or convex, moist, (swarm) iridescent; white,
(pigment colour) grey moist white colonies translucent or pink, or red
or rough opaque, grey
flat dry dull
wrinkled
Preferred 21-37 30-37 37 (mammal 37 10-36
Temperature intestine)
Range (oC)
Table 3. Summary of the biochemical and differential tests used in this report.
Motility Detect motility SIM Diffuse growth Radial growth Growth limited
of bacteria away from the outward from to the stab line
inoculation stab stab line
Indole Test Identify bacteria SIM Kovacs’ reagent Indole present: Indole not
that can produce (containing red colour at present: no red
indole via DMABA and surface colour
tryptophanase HCl)
hydrolyzing
pyruvate
Figure 3. RapID SS/U Differential Chart with positive tests of the unknown organism circled.