Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 13 views

    Flow Rates - Arithmetic Average, AC - 2, VC - 5 Flow Rates - Geometric Average, AC - 2, VC - 5

    Uploaded by

    Prakhar Sarkar
    The document contains computational results from simulations of fluid flow rates using different coarsening and upscaling methods. Fine scale simulations took over 292 seconds while low resolution upscaling methods like arithmetic, geometric and harmonic averaging took less than 1 second. Flow rates decreased with increasing coarsening but harmonic averaging produced the lowest rates.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Flow Rates - Arithmetic Average, AC - 2, VC - 5 Flow Rates - Geometric Average, AC - 2, VC - 5

    Uploaded by

    Prakhar Sarkar
    13 views3 pages
    The document contains computational results from simulations of fluid flow rates using different coarsening and upscaling methods. Fine scale simulations took over 292 seconds while low resolution upscaling methods like arithmetic, geometric and harmonic averaging took less than 1 second. Flow rates decreased with increasing coarsening but harmonic averaging produced the lowest rates.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    TOF_result compilation

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document contains computational results from simulations of fluid flow rates using different coarsening and upscaling methods. Fine scale simulations took over 292 seconds while low resolution upscaling methods like arithmetic, geometric and harmonic averaging took less than 1 second. Flow rates decreased with increasing coarsening but harmonic averaging produced the lowest rates.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    13 views3 pages

    Flow Rates - Arithmetic Average, AC - 2, VC - 5 Flow Rates - Geometric Average, AC - 2, VC - 5

    Uploaded by

    Prakhar Sarkar
    The document contains computational results from simulations of fluid flow rates using different coarsening and upscaling methods. Fine scale simulations took over 292 seconds while low resolution upscaling methods like arithmetic, geometric and harmonic averaging took less than 1 second. Flow rates decreased with increasing coarsening but harmonic averaging produced the lowest rates.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    of 3

    Flow rate

    Fine Scale
    Computational time Q1 Q2 Q3
    292.841206 seconds 3.24E+04 1.02E+05 5.46E+04
    Low Resolution Upscaling
    Areal Coarsening - 2 Vertical Coarsening - 5
    Type of upscaling used Computational time Q1 Q2 Q3
    Arithmetic averaging 0.369591 seconds 1.08E+05 2.50E+05 1.37E+05
    Geometric averaging 0.390285 seconds 1.46E+04 4.26E+04 2.63E+04
    Harmonic averaging 0.36383 seconds 2.46E+03 7.12E+03 4.28E+03

    Areal Coarsening - 1 Vertical Coarsening - 1


    Type of upscaling used Computational time Q1 Q2 Q3
    Arithmetic averaging 296.237092 seconds 1.69E+04 2.77E+05 8.57E+04
    Geometric averaging 55.500479 seconds. 1.69E+04 2.77E+05 8.57E+04
    Harmonic averaging 58.465028 seconds 1.69E+04 2.77E+05 8.57E+04

    Flow rates - Arithmetic average, Flow rates


    AC - 2, VC - 5 AC - 2, VC -

    1
    17% 2 23
    24%
    3
    4

    21% 38% 24%


    Q4 Q total
    5.68E+04 2.46E+05

    Q4 Q total
    1.55E+05 6.51E+05
    2.54E+04 1.09E+05
    2.71E+03 1.66E+04

    Q4 Q total
    3.84E+04 4.18E+05
    3.84E+04 4.18E+05
    3.84E+04 4.18E+05

    Flow rates - Geometric average, Flow rates - Harmonic a


    AC - 2, VC - 5 AC - 2, VC - 5

    1
    13% 2 16% 15%
    23%
    3
    4

    26%
    24% 39%
    43%
    w rates - Harmonic average,
    2, VC - 5

    1
    16% 15% 2
    3
    4

    26%
    43%

    You might also like